RESUMEN
The goal of training in orthopedic residency is to produce surgeons who are proficient in all aspects of the practice of orthopedic surgery; however, most residents receive either inadequate or no training in medical coding. The purpose of this study was to determine how well orthopedic residents code when compared with practicing surgeons and to identify whether coding education improves accuracy in medical coding. A mock coding survey was developed using commonly encountered orthopedic clinical scenarios. The survey was distributed to orthopedic trainees post-graduate years (PGY) 1 to 6 at 2 training programs and to attending surgeons. Results were analyzed in 3 groups: junior residents (PGY 1-3), senior residents (PGY 4-6), and attending surgeons. Overall and subcategory scores of (1) type of visit, (2) modifiers, (3) Evaluation and Management (E/M), and (4) Current Procedural Terminology code identification were recorded. Participants were also asked if they had ever received various forms of coding education. Sixty-seven total participants were enrolled, including 28 junior residents, 24 senior residents, and 15 attendings. Practicing surgeons performed significantly better than both senior (P<.027) and junior (P<.001) residents in all categories, with a mean overall correct response rate of 72.8%, 51.0%, and 47.4%, respectively. Any form of coding education was associated with a significantly improved overall score for residents (P=.013) and a nonsignificant increase for attending surgeons (P=.390). This study demonstrates that residents performed poorly when identifying proper billing codes for common procedures and encounters in orthopedic surgery. Further, those participants who received coding education did better than those who did not. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):380-383.].
Asunto(s)
Codificación Clínica , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/educación , Ortopedia/educación , Current Procedural Terminology , Humanos , Internado y ResidenciaRESUMEN
Returning to work after surgery is a primary concern of patients who are contemplating total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The ability to return to work has enormous influence on the patient's independence, financial well-being, and daily activities. The goal of this study was to determine the independent patient variables that predict return to work as well as to create a predictive model. From June 2017 to December 2017, a total of 391 patients who underwent primary TJA (243 hips, 148 knees) were prospectively enrolled in the study to obtain information on return to work after surgery. Patients were sent a series of questions in a biweekly survey. Information was collected on the physical demands of their occupation, the number of hours spent standing, the limitations to return to work, and the use of assistive devices. Bivariate analysis was performed, and a multiple linear regression model was created. Most (89.6%) patients returned to work within 12 weeks of surgery. Patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty returned to work earlier than those who underwent total knee arthroplasty (5.56 vs 7.79 weeks, respectively). Analysis showed the following independent predictors for faster return to work: self-employment, availability of light-duty work, male sex, and higher income. Predictors for slower return to work included a physically demanding occupation (at least 50% physical duties), knee arthroplasty, longer length of stay, and a job requiring more hours spent standing. This model reported an adjusted R2 of 0.332. The findings provide an objective predictive model of the patient- and procedure-specific characteristics that affect postoperative return to work. Surgeons should consider these factors when counseling patients on their postoperative expectations. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):e415-e420.].
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Empleo , Reinserción al Trabajo , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Factores Sexuales , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Controlling postoperative pain and reducing opioid requirements after total knee arthroplasty remain a challenge, particularly in an era stressing rapid recovery protocols and early discharge. A single-shot adductor canal blockade (ACB) has been shown to be effective in decreasing postoperative pain. The purpose of the present study is to compare the efficacy of an anesthesiologist administered ACB and a surgeon administered intraoperative ACB. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were prospectively randomized to receive either an anesthesiologist administered (group 1) or surgeon administered (group 2) ACB using 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.5%. Primary outcomes were pain visual analog scale, range of motion, and opioid consumption. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were randomized to group 1 and 29 to group 2. Opioid equivalents consumed were equal on postoperative day (POD) 0, 1, and 2. Patients in group 1 had statistically less pain on POD 0, but this did not reach clinical significance and there was no difference in pain on POD 1 or 2. Patients in group 1 had significantly increased active flexion POD 1, but there was no difference in active flexion on POD 0 or 6 weeks postop. There was no difference in patient satisfaction with pain control or short-term functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Surgeon administered ACB is not inferior to anesthesiologist administered ACB with respect to pain, opioid consumption, range of motion, patient satisfaction, or short-term functional outcomes. Surgeon administered ACB is an effective alternative to anesthesiologist administered ACB.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso , Cirujanos , Anestesiólogos , Anestésicos Locales , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many surgeons prefer to discharge patients home due to patient preferences, improved outcomes, and decreased costs. Despite an institutional protocol to send total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients home, some patients still required postacute care (PAC) facilities. This study aimed to create two predictive models based on preoperative and postoperative risk factors to identify which patients require PAC facilities. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2,372 patients undergoing primary unilateral THA at a single institution from 2012 to 2017 was done. An electronic query followed by manual review identified discharge disposition, demographic factors, comorbidities, and other patient factors. Of the 2,372 patients, 6.2% were discharged to skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation facilities and 93.8% discharged home. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to create two predictive models for patient discharge: preoperative visit and postoperative hospital course. RESULTS: Of 45 variables evaluated, 7 were found to be notable predictors for PAC facility discharge. In descending order, these included age 65 years or greater, non-Caucasian race, history of depression, female sex, and greater comorbidities. In addition to preoperative factors, in-hospital complications and surgical duration of 90 minutes or greater led to a higher likelihood of PAC facility discharge. Both models had excellent predictive assessments with area under curve values of 0.77 and 0.80 for the preoperative visit and postoperative models, respectively. DISCUSSION: This study identifies both preoperative and postoperative risk factors that predispose patients to nonroutine discharges after THA. Orthopaedic surgeons may use these models to better predict which patients are predisposed to discharge to PAC facilities.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Instituciones de Cuidados Intermedios/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Subaguda , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Depresión , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has solicited public comments for the 2019 Proposed Rule to remove total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient-only list. Concerns exist regarding the safety of discharging higher risk Medicare patients as an outpatient and whether hospitals may still be reimbursed for an inpatient procedure. The purpose of this study is to determine whether Medicare-aged patients undergoing outpatient THA have higher complication rates than patients who underwent inpatient THA. We also sought to identify characteristics of Medicare-aged patients that are associated with increased risk of complications or longer stay following short-stay THA. METHODS: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for patients over age 65 who underwent primary THA between 2015 and 2016. We compared demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day complication, reoperation, and readmission rates among outpatient, short-stay, and inpatient groups. A multivariate regression analysis identified patients who are at an increased risk for complications and a longer inpatient stay following short-stay THA. RESULTS: Of the 34,416 Medicare-aged patients who underwent THA, 310 (1%) were discharged on postoperative day 0, 5698 (16.5%) on postoperative day 1, and 28,408 (82.5%) were inpatients. The outpatient and short-stay patients had lower 30-day complication and readmission rates than the inpatient group. Independent risk factors for developing a complication or requiring an inpatient stay included general anesthesia, body mass index >35 kg/m2, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, malnutrition, female gender, age >75 years, minority ethnicity, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 4 (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: Outpatient and short-stay THA appears to be safe in a small subset of Medicare-aged patients. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should allow surgeons flexibility in determining admission status based on each patient's risk profile.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/mortalidad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Alta del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recently, self-directed physical therapy (SDPT) programs have gained popularity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the routine use of an SDPT program in a nonselect patient population. METHODS: This is a single-surgeon, retrospective study of 296 consecutive patients from August 2016 to October 2017 discharged home after primary, unilateral TKA and enrolled in a web-based SDPT program. Patients were seen 2 weeks after surgery and outpatient physical therapy (OPPT) was prescribed if flexion was less than 90°, upon patient request, or inability to use the web-based platform. RESULTS: Overall, 195 of 296 (65.9%) patients did not require OPPT (SDPT-only) while 101 of 296 were prescribed OPPT (34.1%, SDPT + OPPT). In SDPT + OPPT, 66.3% were for flexion <90°, 27.7% by patient request, 5.0% received a prescription but did not attend OPPT, and 1.0% due to inability to use the web-based platform. The rate of manipulation under anesthesia was 2.36% overall (SDPT + OPPT, 6.93%; SDPT-only, 0.0%). Multivariate analysis identified elevated Charlson comorbidity index, elevated body mass index, higher preoperative SF12 mental score, and loss of flexion at 2 weeks as independent predictors associated with the need for OPPT. CONCLUSION: Web-based SDPT is safe and effective for most patients eligible for home discharge after TKA. It is difficult to preoperatively predict those patients who will require OPPT; therefore, we recommend close follow-up. It is critical to preserve these services for patients who require them after TKA as up to a third of patients required OPPT.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/rehabilitación , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Alta del Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , AutocuidadoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One of the most effective prophylactic strategies against periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is administration of perioperative antibiotics. Many orthopedic surgeons are unaware of the weight-based dosing protocol for cefazolin. This study aimed at elucidating what proportion of patients receiving cefazolin prophylaxis are underdosed and whether this increases the risk of PJI. METHODS: A retrospective study of 17,393 primary total joint arthroplasties receiving cefazolin as perioperative prophylaxis from 2005 to 2017 was performed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (underdosed and adequately dosed) based on patient weight and antibiotic dosage. Patients who developed PJI within 1 year following index procedure were identified. A bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders and identify risk factors for PJI. RESULTS: The majority of patients weighing greater than 120 kg (95.9%, 944/984) were underdosed. Underdosed patients had a higher rate of PJI at 1 year compared with adequately dosed patients (1.51% vs 0.86%, P = .002). Patients weighing greater than 120 kg had higher 1-year PJI rate than patients weighing less than 120 kg (3.25% vs 0.83%, P < .001). Patients who were underdosed (odds ratio, 1.665; P = .006) with greater comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.259; P < .001) were more likely to develop PJI at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Cefazolin underdosing is common, especially for patients weighing more than 120 kg. Our study reports that underdosed patients were more likely to develop PJI. Orthopedic surgeons should pay attention to the weight-based dosing of antibiotics in the perioperative period to avoid increasing risk of PJI.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Artritis Infecciosa/prevención & control , Cefazolina/administración & dosificación , Obesidad/complicaciones , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Artritis Infecciosa/etiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) represent a significant portion of post-operative expenses of bundled payments for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although many surgeons no longer routinely send patients to IRFs or SNFs, some patients are unable to be discharged directly home. This study identified patient factors for discharge to post-acute care facilities with an institutional protocol of discharging TKA patients home. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA at a single institution from 2012 to 2017 was performed. All surgeons discharged patients home as a routine protocol. An electronic query followed by manual review identified discharge disposition, demographic factors, co-morbidities, and other patient factors. In total, 2281 patients were identified, with 9.6% discharged to SNFs or IRFs and 90.4% discharged home. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to create 2 predictive models for patient discharge: pre-operative visit and hospital course. RESULTS: Among 43 variables studied, 6 were found to be significant pre-operative risk factors for a discharge disposition other than home. In descending order, age 75 or greater, female, non-Caucasian race, Medicare status, history of depression, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were predictors for patients going to IRFs. In addition, any in-hospital complications led to a higher likelihood of being discharged to IRFs and SNFs. Both models had excellent predictive assessments with area under curve values of 0.79 and 0.80 for pre-operative visit and hospital course. CONCLUSION: This study identifies pre-operative and in-hospital factors that predispose patients to non-routine discharges, which allow surgeons to better predict patient post-operative disposition.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/rehabilitación , Pacientes Internos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Subaguda/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Alta del Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently require total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The outcomes of TJA in patients with MS, who are frequently on immunomodulatory medications and physically deconditioned, remain largely unknown. The aim of this study is to elucidate the survivorship and reasons for failure in this patient population. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of 108 TJAs (46 knees and 62 hips) was performed from 2000 to 2016. An electronic chart query based on MS medications and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes was used to identify this population followed by a manual review to confirm the diagnosis. Outcomes were then assessed using revision for any reason as the primary end point. Functional outcomes were assessed using Short Form 12 scores. Survivorship curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 6.2 years, 19.4% (21/108) of patients required a revision surgery. Instability (5.6%, P = .0278) and periprosthetic joint infection (4.6%, P = .0757) were among the most common reasons for revision. The overall survivorship of TJA at years 2, 5, and 7, respectively, was 96.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.6-100), 86.3% (95% CI, 77.7-94.5), and 75.3% (95% CI, 63.5-87.0). Functional score improvement was less in MS cohort than patients without MS. CONCLUSION: Patients with MS are at increased risk of complications, particularly instability and periprosthetic joint infection. Despite this increased risk of complications, patients with MS can demonstrate improved functional outcomes, but not as much as patients without MS. Patients with MS should be counseled appropriately before undergoing TJA.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/cirugía , Osteoartritis/complicaciones , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Supervivencia , Adulto , Anciano , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gait instability and muscle rigidity are known characteristics of Parkinson's disease (PD), putting PD patients at risk for complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The outcomes of Parkinson's patients undergoing TJA are largely unknown. This study evaluated the outcomes of TJA in this population. METHODS: A single institution retrospective cohort of 123 TJAs (52 hips, 71 knees) from 2000 to 2016 was reviewed. An electronic chart query was performed using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision codes to identify this population. A manual chart review was performed to confirm the diagnosis of PD, survivorship, and reason for failure. A control cohort was matched 2:1 based on age, body mass index, joint, and comorbidities. Outcomes were assessed using revision for any reason as the primary endpoint. Functional outcomes were assessed using Short-Form 12 scores. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 5.3 years, 23.6% of patients required revision surgery. The most common reasons for revision for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were periprosthetic infection and for total hip arthroplasty (THA) were periprosthetic fracture and dislocation. Overall survivorship of TJA at years 2, 5, and 10 respectively were 94.9%, 87.9%, and 72.3%. The survivorship of TKA was 95.2%, 89.8%, and 66.2%. THA implant survivorship was 94.3%, 85.3%, and 78.7%. Functional score improvement was less in PD cohort than the control. CONCLUSION: Patients with PD are at increased risk for complications, particularly periprosthetic infection following TKA and periprosthetic fracture and dislocation following THA. Despite this increased risk of complications, patients with PD can demonstrate improved functional outcomes but not as high as patients without PD. Patients with PD should be counseled appropriately prior to undergoing TJA.