RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Firearm injuries (FIs) are the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients. In this study, we aim to define evolving trends and avenues for prevention. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, medical records of patients presenting to our two State-Designated Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Centers for treatment of FIs from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data was analyzed with Chi-Squared and Student's t-test; P-value <0.05 was significant. RESULTS: 1037 FI encounters from 1005 unique patients aged 0-21 y were included. 70.4% (n = 730) were determined to be assaults, 26.1% (n = 271) unintentional, and 1.7% (n = 18) self-inflicted injuries. Overall mortality was 4.5% (n = 45). FI victims were most commonly African American (n = 836, 80.6%), male (n = 869, 83.8%), aged 13-17 (n = 753, 72.6%), and from single-parent families (n = 647, 62.4%). The incidence of FIs increased significantly over the last 5 y of the study (2010-2014, 6.8 FIs/month), compared to 2015-2019 (averaging 10.6 FIs/month, P < 0.0001). Concurrently, FI related fatality increased from an average of 2.6 deaths/year (2010-2014) to 6.4 deaths/year (2015-2019, P = 0.064). Results were subanalyzed for pediatric patients aged 0-14 y. For the entire cohort, 12.1% (n = 116) recidivists were identified. Geographic patterns of injury were identified, with 75% of all FIs clustered in a single urban region. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of pediatric FIs is increasing in recent years, with high mortality rates. Violence and recidivism are geographically concentrated, offering an opportunity for targeted interventions.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) for the treatment of appendicitis has been documented. Typically, SILA requires the use of specialized ports, instruments, and materials. The SILA technique at our institution utilizes the same instrumentation as the conventional laparoscopic approach (CLA), thus obviating the need for these specialized products. This study aims to further demonstrate the noninferiority of our SILA technique for the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis. Materials and Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent SILA from 2011 to 2020 to treat uncomplicated appendicitis. Outcomes including demographics, operative time, length of stay (LOS), and common postsurgical complications were evaluated. These SILA cases were matched with up to 3 CLA controls based on age, gender, and weight utilizing the Greedy match method. Patients with an operative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis were excluded. Results: A total of 137 patients underwent SILA at a single institution. A total of 128 patients were in the final cohort after excluding perforated appendicitis. Mean age was 11.9 years. Case-control matching was conducted with 349 controls included. Between cases and controls, SILA had shorter operative time (27.2 minutes versus 43.7 minutes, P < .001) with no difference in mean LOS (42.4 hours versus 42.4 hours, P = .88). There was no difference in complication rate (5.4% versus 8.5%, P = .06). There was no difference in readmission rate (0.8% versus 3.4%, P = .108). Conclusion: These data suggest that for appropriately selected patients, our SILA technique is noninferior to CLA with shortened operative time.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Herida Quirúrgica , Niño , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Tempo Operativo , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Purpose: Outcomes between primary gastrostomy tubes and buttons (G-tube and G-button) have not been established in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that primary G-tube have decreased complications when compared to G-button. Methods: A retrospective review of surgically placed gastrostomy devices from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Data collected included demographics, outcomes and 90-day complications. We divided the patients into primary G-tube and primary G-button. Results: Of 265 patients, 142 (53.6%) were male. Median age and weight at the time of surgery were 7 months (interquartile range [IQR], 2-44 months) and 6.70 kg (IQR, 3.98-14.15 kg), respectively. Among the groups, G-tube had 80 patients (30.2%) while G-button 185 patients (69.8%). There were 153 patients with at least one overall complication within 90 days postoperative. There was no significant difference in overall complications between groups (G-tube 63.8% vs. G-button 55.7%, p=0.192). More importantly, there were no significant differences in major complications among the groups, G-tube vs. G-button (5% vs. 4%; p=0.455). Conclusion: Primary G-tube offers no significant advantage in overall, minor or major complications when compared to primary G-button.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate a complicated appendicitis clinical practice guideline at our institution. METHODS: Records were compared before and after protocol implementation. We standardized an ED consult pathway, antibiotic use and need for early appendectomy (EA) versus interval appendectomy (IA). We evaluated demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare patients with small abscess treated with IA pre-protocol versus similar patients treated by EA post-protocol. RESULTS: In total 246 patients were reviewed (Pre-protocol = 152, Post-protocol = 94). Pre-protocol early appendectomy rate was 51% versus 82% on post-protocol patients. There were no differences in demographics. Post-protocol the use of preoperative imaging significantly decreased (Pre 92% vs. 56%, p = 0.0001), as well as the use of discharge antibiotics (Pre 93% vs. Post 27%, p = 0.0001) with no change in abscess rate. Overall, post-protocol patients had fewer total CT scans performed (Pre 40% vs. Post 28%, p = 0.03) and decreased total length of stay (Pre 7.7 vs. Post 6.5 days, p = 0.049). On subgroup analysis, post-protocol EA with no or small abscess had lower median number of admissions, decreased total LOS (Pre IA 9 days vs. Post EA 5 days, p = 0.00001) and fewer complications (Pre IA 42% vs. EA 22%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The establishment of a standardized pediatric complicated appendicitis protocol may lead to improved outcomes and resource utilization. Patients presenting with no or small abscess may be the least likely to benefit from interval appendectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Absceso/complicaciones , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aim to evaluate recurrence rates of gallstone pancreatitis in children undergoing early vs interval cholecystectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, retrospective review of pediatric patients admitted with gallstone pancreatitis from 2010 through 2017 was performed. Children were evaluated based on timing of cholecystectomy. Early cholecystectomy was defined as surgery during the index admission, whereas the delayed group was defined as no surgery or surgery after discharge. Outcomes, recurrence rates, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 246 patients from 6 centers with gallstone pancreatitis, 178 (72%) were female, with mean age 13.5 ± 3.2 years and a mean body mass index of 28.9 ± 15.2. Most (90%) patients were admitted with mild pancreatitis (Atlanta Classification). Early cholecystectomy was performed in 167 (68%) patients with no difference in early cholecystectomy rates across institutions. Delayed group patients weighed less (61 kg vs. 72 kg, p = 0.003) and were younger (12 vs. 14 years, p = 0.001) than those who underwent early cholecystectomy. However, there were no differences in clinical, radiological, or laboratory characteristics between groups. There were 4 (2%) episodes of postoperative recurrent pancreatitis in the early group compared with 22% in the delayed group. More importantly, when cholecystectomy was delayed more than 6 weeks from index discharge, recurrence approached 60%. There were no biliary complications in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Cholecystectomy during the index admission for children with gallstone pancreatitis reduces recurrent pancreatitis. Recurrence proportionally increases with time when patients are treated with a delayed approach.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Biliares , Pancreatitis , Adolescente , Niño , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Cálculos Biliares/complicaciones , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Recurrencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
We describe a case of congenital giant megaureter in a 16-year-old female. She presented with a 5-day history of abdominal distention, right flank pain and tenderness. Right pyelonephritis was suspected. Computerized tomography showed a large cystic abdominal mass with no appreciably functioning left kidney causing secondary compression of the contralateral right ureter. A left upper nephroureterectomy was performed, draining over 3.5 L of fluid. Our experience suggests that congenital giant megaureter should be considered in the differential for pediatric patients presenting with a cystic abdominal mass.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Ureterales/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adolescente , Dilatación Patológica/complicaciones , Dilatación Patológica/congénito , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Ureterales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Ureterales/congénito , Enfermedades Ureterales/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although literature is sparse, there are guidelines regarding optimal placement technique for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters in the pediatric population. Through this study, we sought to identify commonly used techniques among pediatric surgeons and identify areas for future work. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 16-question anonymous survey was emailed to American Pediatric Surgery Association members in September 2018 regarding routine practices for PD catheter placement. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis. RESULTS: In all, there were 221 respondents, 6.8% of whom did not place PD catheters in their practice. Of the remaining 206, the majority have been in practice >15 y. PD catheter placement during fellowship training varied widely, with 6.5% reporting no fellowship experience to 6% reporting >25 placed during fellowship. Almost half (48%) reported placing catheters via laparoscopic approach (versus open or combined approach). Most (62%) respondents reported an annual practice volume of 1-5 catheters, with only 11% placing >10 per year. Exit-site sutures were placed "always" by 33% of participants and "never" by 49% of participants. There was no association between years in practice or fellowship experience and exit-site suture placement. However, there was a trend for "never" placement (72%) with more recent graduates. Omentectomy was performed by 91% of respondents, whereas 8.3% reported never performing omentectomy/omentopexy. Similarly, there was no association between practice and fellowship experience and omentectomy. In the setting of abdominal stoma, 96% reported placing the exit site on the opposite side of the abdomen. Fibrin glue was used along the tunnel by 21% of participants, ranging from "always" to "sometimes", whereas 79% "never" used it. CONCLUSIONS: Fellowship, posttraining experience, and techniques in PD catheter placement vary widely among American Pediatric Surgery Association member respondents. Despite guidelines, practices differ among providers without an association between the number of cases performed in fellowship and postfellowship volume.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Cateterismo/normas , Catéteres de Permanencia , Niño , Preescolar , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Epiplón/cirugía , Diálisis Peritoneal/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Cirujanos/educación , Cirujanos/normas , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Screening blood work after minor injuries is common in pediatric trauma. The risk of missed injuries versus diagnostic necessity in an asymptomatic patient remains an ongoing debate. We evaluated the clinical utility of screening blood work in carefully selected asymptomatic children after minor trauma. METHODS: Patients seen at a level 1 pediatric center with "minor trauma" for blunt trauma between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria were age <4 of >18 years, a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <15, penetrating trauma, nonaccidental trauma, hemodynamic instability, abdominal findings (pain, distension, bruising, tenderness), hematuria, pelvic/femur fracture, multiple fractures, and operative intervention. Data abstraction included demographics, blood work, interventions, and disposition. RESULT: A total of 1308 patients were treated during the study period. Four hundred thirty-three (33%) met inclusion criteria. Mean ± SD age was 12.7 ± 4 years (range, 4-18 years), and 59% were male. Seventy-eight percent were discharged home from the emergency department. All patients had blood work. Twenty-eight percent had at least one abnormal laboratory value. The most common abnormal blood work was leukocytosis (16%). Thirty percent had an intervention, and none prompted by abnormal blood work. One patient had an intra-abdominal finding (psoas hematoma). CONCLUSION: When appropriately selected, screening laboratory testing in asymptomatic minor pediatric blunt trauma patients leads to unnecessary needle sticks without significant advantage.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja , Heridas no Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trisomy 18 is associated with a wide range of potentially fatal congenital conditions. Historically, clinical attitudes on treatment have been ambiguous, with palliative care as the standard of care. The aim of our study was to provide a descriptive analysis of surgical outcomes in patients with trisomy 18. STUDY DESIGN: We identified patients with trisomy 18 aged 0-18 years using the NSQIP-Pediatric database from 2012 to 2017 and analyzed demographics, surgery types, and perioperative characteristics of patients with trisomy 18 patients undergoing surgical intervention. Additionally, a case-match analysis was performed to assess surgical outcome differences. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients with trisomy 18 were identified. Thirty-one percent were >5 years of age and 73% were female. The most common surgical types were general surgery procedures (57.4%), followed by orthopedics (18.1%) and ENT (10.3%). Operations performed increased from 8% (2012) to 26% (2017), and only 23% of patients had previous cardiac surgery. Majority of patients had no prior history of malignancy (95%) and 5% had a tracheostomy placed. Discharge to home was achieved in 74% of patients, with a median total hospital length of stay of 5 days (IQR 17). Furthermore, 90% survived over 30 days from the operation. Thirty-two patients had readmissions and the most common reasons were dehydration, gastrostomy infection or malfunction. Surgical site infections occurred in <3% of patients. No differences in complications, length of stay, reoperations, and readmissions were identified by case-match analysis. CONCLUSION: In this data set, patients with trisomy 18 undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures experience excellent surgical outcomes with minimal morbidity and low mortality. Most patients more than a year of age will experience similar outcomes to patients without trisomy 18. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study (retrospective comparative study) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18 , Adolescente , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between open versus laparoscopic gastrostomies in children aged ≤1 y. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database was reviewed between 2012 and 2017. Chi-square analysis was performed on children aged ≤1 y to compare complication rates between open and laparoscopic procedures. RESULTS: A total of 7940 patients were aged ≤1 y. Of which, 20% underwent open gastrostomy (OGT), and 80% received laparoscopic gastrostomy (LGT). There were no differences in sex or race. However, OGT patients were younger (119 d versus 134 d; P = 0.0001), smaller at birth (1.84 kg versus 1.85 kg; P = 0.03), and were smaller at operation (4.6 kg versus 5 kg; P = 0.0001). Also, patients were more likely to be inpatient at the time of surgery and had more congenital malformations. Complications (OGT 6% versus LGT 4%; P = 0.001) and mortality were significantly higher in the open group (OGT 2.3% versus LGT 0.6%; P = 0.001). However, matched control analysis demonstrated OGT patients have more complications. CONCLUSIONS: OGT patients are smaller and with more significant comorbidities in this data set. In fact, even after matched control analysis, these patients experience more complications.
Asunto(s)
Gastrostomía/métodos , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gastrostomía/efectos adversos , Gastrostomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes of infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) treated with primary peritoneal drain versus primary laparotomy. METHODS: We performed a multi-institution retrospective review of infants with diagnosis of SIP from 2012 to 2016. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between infants treated with primary peritoneal drain vs infants treated with laparotomy. RESULTS: We identified 171 patients treated for SIP (drain nâ¯=â¯110 vs. laparotomy nâ¯=â¯61). There were no differences in maternal or prenatal characteristics. There were no clinically significant differences in vital signs, white blood cell or platelet measures, up to 48â¯h after intervention. Patients who were treated primarily with a drain were more premature (24.9 vs. 27.2â¯weeks, pâ¯<â¯0.001) and had lower median birth weight (710â¯g vs. 896â¯g, pâ¯<â¯0.001). No significant differences were found in complications, time to full feeds, length of stay (LOS) or mortality between the groups. Primary laparotomy group had more procedures (median number 1 vs. 2, pâ¯=â¯0.002). There were 32 (29%) primary drain failures whereby a laparotomy was ultimately needed. CONCLUSIONS: SIP treated with primary drain is successful in the majority of patients with no significant differences in outcomes when compared to laparotomy with stoma. THE LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Asunto(s)
Drenaje , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Laparotomía , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Masculino , Peritoneo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introduction: Although rare, major complications after gastrostomy tube placement are a significant source of morbidity in children. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of major complications in pediatric patients undergoing gastrostomy placement. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of surgically placed gastrostomy tubes from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Data collected included demographics, outcomes, and major complications. We divided the patients into no complications (Group 1) and major complications (Group 2). Excluded were minor complications and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedures. Results: Of 123 patients, 51.5% were males and 52% infants. Group 1 had 112 patients (91%), whereas Group 2 had 11 patients (9%). Of Group 2 patients, 3 required prolonged nil per os/total parenteral nutrition and 8 surgical reinterventions. Laparoscopy in 110 patients (89%), open surgery in 10 patients (8%), and 3 conversions to open. There were no significant differences in demographics or preoperative characteristics (albumin and comorbidities). We identified surgical approach (open: 6.3% versus 27.3%, P = .014), operative time (58 versus 85 minutes, P = .04), and use of preoperative antibiotics (63% versus 92%, P = .004) as predictors of outcomes. However, on multivariate analysis lack of preoperative antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 14.82 [confidence interval: 2.60-84.34], P = .002), and open procedure (aOR, 6.14 [1.01-37.24], P = .049) were independent predictors of major complications. Conclusion: Most patients with major complications after gastrostomy tube placement require surgical reintervention. Lack of preoperative antibiotics and open procedures are independent predictive factors for major complication in patients undergoing gastrostomy tube placement.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Gastrostomía , Intubación Gastrointestinal , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Intubación Gastrointestinal/métodos , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a known complication in patients with solid organ transplant. It can present as localized or disseminated tumor. The cornerstone of management consists of reduced immunosuppression (RI). In select cases, localized disease can potentially be curative with surgical excision. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Here we present a case of a 19-year-old female with orthotopic heart transplant with two episodes of recurrent PTLD. After the second episode she was found to have asymptomatic splenic lesions which were refractory to RI and chemotherapy. She subsequently underwent splenectomy that showed sterile necrotizing and non-necrotizing granulomas with no evidence of PTLD. DISCUSSION: Based on our literature search this is the first ever reported case of sterile granulomas in a patient with recurrent PTLD which could potentially be diagnosed with minimally invasive biopsy rather than diagnostic splenectomy. CONCLUSION: This report is an attempt to create awareness regarding potential for presence of sterile granulomas in patients with recurrent PTLD and discuss the use of percutaneous biopsy before splenectomy.
RESUMEN
Retinoic acid receptor beta (RARB) variants are heavily linked to pathologies of neural crest cell migration. The purpose of this report is to present a 23-month-old male with the previously described R387C RARB gain-of-function variant whose gastrointestinal issues and long-term constipation lead to the discovery of colonic hypoganglionosis. This case further delineates the pattern of malformation associated with RARB variants. The findings are also consistent with the known etiology of aganglionic colon due to failed neural crest cell migration.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Funcionales del Colon/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Funcionales del Colon/etiología , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Estreñimiento/etiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Variación Genética , Receptores de Ácido Retinoico/genética , Alelos , Exoma , Humanos , Lactante , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Mutación con Pérdida de Función , Masculino , Radiografía , Secuenciación del ExomaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To compare outcomes for complicated appendicitis treated with early versus interval appendectomy and to identify which patients would likely benefit from early appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of complicated appendicitis was performed from 2010 to 2015. Patients were divided into early (EA) versus interval appendectomy (IA) groups. We compared demographics, complications and outcomes. Pearson's Chi square analysis and Student's T test analysis were performed. RESULTS: We identified 316 patients (EA group 53% vs. IA group 47%). Interval appendectomy group had longer symptom duration [IA 3.8 vs. EA 2.3 days (p = 0.0001)], increased leukocytosis [IA 18.7 vs. EA 17.2 (p = 0.008)], more initial abscesses [IA 35% vs. EA 13% (p = 0.0001)], more complications [IA 30% vs. EA 19%, (p = 0.013) and prolonged total length of stay [(LOS), p = 0.009]. Subgroup analysis of all patients revealed 80% of patients presented with ≤3 cm abscess and duration of symptoms (DOS) ≤5 days. Interval appendectomy patients with DOS ≤5 days and or ≤3 cm abscess on admission had no differences in clinical presentation. However, these patients had prolonged total LOS (IA 7.7 vs. EA 6.3 days, p = 0.01) and increased complications (IA 29% vs. EA 19%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with complicated appendicitis in children present with small abscess (≤3 cm) and short symptom duration (≤5 days). This subset of patients might benefit from early appendectomy due to decreased LOS, resource utilization and reduced complications.
Asunto(s)
Absceso/cirugía , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Absceso/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso/patología , Algoritmos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No consensus exists regarding duration of antibiotic therapy for complicated appendicitis treated with interval appendectomy. We hypothesized that more than two weeks of antibiotic therapy does not decrease complication rates in asymptomatic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with complicated appendicitis treated with interval appendectomy from 2010-2015 was performed. We divided the patients in two groups (group 1, ≤2 weeks of antibiotics; group 2: >2 weeks of antibiotics). Demographics, antibiotic agents, and complications were collected. Pearson χ analysis and Student t-test analysis was performed with significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Total of 158 patients met inclusion criteria (group 1 [47.4%] vs. group 2 [52.5%]). Mean length of stay was 7.5 days. Abscess on admission was 26% (n = 41). The groups were demographically similar. Total complication rate was 39.2% (abscess development, n = 19; re-admissions, n = 16; interval appendectomy <28 days, n = 13; unplanned emergency department visits, n = 7; fistula, n = 4, wound infection/dehiscence, n = 3; and conversion to open surgery, n = 4). All fistulas and conversions occurred in the less than two-week group. Mean course of antibiotics was 4.1 weeks. There was no significant difference in the complication rates based on duration or type of antibiotics (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Treatment with more than two weeks of antibiotic therapy for complicated appendicitis does not confer any clinical benefit prior to interval appendectomy. Complications were not reduced by a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Adolescente , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Niño , Preescolar , Quimioterapia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Short bowel syndrome (SBS) results from extensive bowel resection. Patients with SBS require total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for survival. Understanding mechanisms contributing to TPN-associated liver injury and gut atrophy are critical in developing SBS therapies. Existing SBS models using tethered animals have significant limitations and are unlike ambulatory human SBS patients. We hypothesized that we could induce SBS in piglets and develop an ambulatory TPN-SBS model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen neonatal pigs received duodenal and jugular catheters. They were fitted with a jacket holding TPN and a miniaturized pump. Six piglets had 90% small bowel resection and catheter placement (SBS group). Non-SBS piglets were randomized into enteral nutrition (EN) or TPN. RESULTS: Bowel resection was successfully accomplished in SBS animals. Weight gain was similar in all groups. SBS animals had increased serum bilirubin compared to EN. Mean conjugated bilirubin ± SD was 0.045 ± 0.01 for EN, (P = 0.03 EN versus TPN and P = 0.03 SBS versus EN) and 1.09 ± 1.25 for TPN, (P = 0.62 TPN versus SBS). Gut density was reduced in the TPN group compared to EN and SBS groups. Mean gut density ± SD was 0.11 ± 0.04 for TPN (P = 0.0004 TPN versus SBS and P = 0.00007 TPN versus EN) and not statistically different for EN versus SBS (P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: We created a novel, ambulatory TPN-SBS model using piglets, mimicking long-term TPN delivery in human SBS patients. Our model demonstrated TPN-related conjugated hyperbilirubinemia and compensatory gut hypertrophy, as noted in humans with SBS. This model holds great potential for future research.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Síndrome del Intestino Corto , Animales , Animales Recién Nacidos , Hiperbilirrubinemia , Nutrición Parenteral Total , PorcinosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is the most common teratoma presenting at birth. Life-threatening bleeding is a major complication during tumor excision in children. In this study we demonstrate our technique for laparoscopic division of median sacral artery (MSA) during dissection of SCT in 2 pediatric patients as a safe technique to minimize risk of hemorrhage. METHODS: Two female infants diagnosed with types III and IV SCTs underwent preoperative evaluation in the postnatal period. The first patient was an 18-month-old girl who presented with metastatic type IV teratoma, resected after neoadjuvant therapy, and the second patient was a 6-day-old girl with prenatal diagnosis of cystic type III teratoma. Using laparoscopy in both patients, the presacral space was reached by opening the peritoneal reflection with blunt dissection and the MSA was identified. Then it was carefully isolated and divided with 3 or 5 mm sealing device. The pelvic components of the tumors were partially dissected using laparoscopy. The first patient's tumor resection was completed using a posterior sagittal approach and the second patient required a standard Chevron incision. Along with the description of our technique, a review of the current literature for the management of SCT and MSA was performed. RESULTS: Both patients underwent successful laparoscopic division of the MSA and resection of the SCTs without complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic MSA division before SCT excision offers a safe approach that can reduce the risk of hemorrhage during surgery.
Asunto(s)
Arterias/cirugía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Disección/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Teratoma/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Neoplasias Pélvicas/irrigación sanguínea , Región Sacrococcígea , Sacro/irrigación sanguínea , Teratoma/irrigación sanguíneaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Congenital lung malformations exist along a spectrum of pathogenesis and disease severity. Extrapulmonary sequestration (EPS), in which nonfunctional lung tissue develops without connection to the tracheobronchial tree, is one rare manifestation of this disease. Atypical vascular anatomy with a systemic feeding vessel characterizes these lesions. CASE PRESENTATION: A 3 day old, 37 week gestation infant underwent chest X-ray for confirmation of umbilical catheter placement and was found to have an elevated left hemidiaphragm consistent with eventration versus congenital diaphragmatic hernia. He remained asymptomatic and was evaluated as an outpatient at the age of 9 months, where CT angiogram demonstrated extrapulmonary versus intrapulmonary sequestration with a systemic feeding vessel from the left internal mammary artery. CONCLUSIONS: It is exceedingly rare for the feeding artery to arise from the internal mammary; two such cases have been reported to date, both in adult patients. Here we present a third case of EPS with arterial supply from the internal mammary successfully treated with video-assisted thoracoscopic resection in a 9 month old infant.
Asunto(s)
Secuestro Broncopulmonar/cirugía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Secuestro Broncopulmonar/diagnóstico , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pulmón/anomalías , Pulmón/cirugía , Masculino , Arterias Mamarias/anomalíasRESUMEN
Laparoscopy is increasingly utilized in neonatal surgery with safe and effective outcomes. Air embolism from insufflation for pneumoperitoneum is a rare but known risk of laparoscopy. Here we present a rare case of air embolism during insufflation for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.