RESUMEN
The island of Murano (Venice, Italy) is famous worldwide for its artistic glass production. Diarsenic trioxide was a main ingredient of the raw glass mixture until 2015, when the authorisation process of European REACH Regulation (Registration Evaluation Authorisation of Chemicals) entered into force, effectively forbidding the use of arsenic. A total of 3077 PM10 samples were collected across the Venice area in 2013-2017. This period included the REACH Sunset Date (May 2015). High arsenic concentrations were recorded in Murano before the Sunset Date (average 383 ng/m3), representing a serious concern for public health. Other sites in Venice complied with the EU target value. In 2013, concentrations were 36-folds higher than model estimation computed over the maximum-allowed emission scenario. Polar plot analysis indicated Murano as the major source of arsenic contamination. The concentration significantly dropped after the REACH implementation, thus meeting the European target values. However, high peaks of arsenic were still detected; inspections on raw and finished glass materials confirmed that some factories were still using arsenic. Results reported serious airborne arsenic pollution in Murano before the REACH implementation. This work represents an interesting case study on the effectiveness of the European REACH process.
RESUMEN
Accurate and reliable analytical measurements are essential when data are to be used to assist the Court in deciding whether or not a drug offence has been committed and therefore about either the innocence or guilt of the accused. The Italian law on drugs demands that compliance with specification limits be assessed on the basis of the actual content of controlled substance contained in seized materials. As a consequence, the role of measurement uncertainty, significant figures and rounding errors becomes critical. In order to assist analysts of forensic toxicology laboratories with illicit drug-related cases, a software tool named Drugs WorkBook (DWB) has been developed. The tool is useful for the quantification of illicit drugs in seized materials along with their measurement uncertainties, the assessment of compliance to specification limits, the printing of comprehensive laboratory reports and the organization of case archives. Other quality control topics, such as control charts, are included. The tool's databases can be edited by the user and maintained up to date. The tool is made freely available to the scientific community.
RESUMEN
The determination of illicit active ingredients in seized materials, in order to assess penal or administrative offences, is routinely carried out in many forensic toxicology laboratories. This paper presents main features of the protocol adopted in the Authors' laboratory for the above investigations. In particular, sampling and analysis are considered as the same measurement process quantifying their combined contribution to overall measurement uncertainty. Aspects concerning representative sampling in the case of single and multiple items are discussed. The effects of material heterogeneity are considered by analyzing separately distinct primary samples taken from different parts of the sampling target. Possible errors due to particles dimension that could arise when sub-sampling are also considered. Analytical precision, bias and other matrix effects are studied in order to quantify the component of the overall measurement uncertainty associated to the analysis of prepared test samples. Typical scenarios arising when measurement results are used to assess compliance with specification limits are also discussed revealing the crucial role of measurement uncertainty.
