High Symptom Burden in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Factors Associated with Being Offered an Intervention.

Patient report outcomes are commonly collected during oncology visits to elicit symptom burden and guide management. We aimed to determine the frequency of intervention for patients undergoing radiotherapy with high symptom complexity scores and identify which factors are associated with being offered an intervention. A retrospective chart audit was completed of adult patients with cancer who had at least one radiotherapy appointment and were assigned a high symptom complexity. A total of 200 patients were included; 150 (75.0%) patients were offered an intervention for the main symptom. The most offered intervention was medications. Multivariable logistic regression showed factors associated with being offered an intervention were the following: symptom score of 9 (OR = 9.56, 95% CI 1.64-62.8) and 10 (OR = 7.90, 95% CI 1.69-38.2); palliative intent radiation (OR 3.87, 96% CI 1.46-11.1); and last review appointment (OR 6.22, 95% CI 1.84-23.3). Symptoms associated with being offered an intervention included pain (OR 22.6, 95% CI 6.47-91.1), nausea (OR 15.7, 95% CI 1.51-412), shortness of breath (OR 7.97, 95% CI 1.20-63.7), and anxiety (OR 6.69, 95% CI 1.58-31.6). This knowledge will help guide clinical practice to understand symptom burden and how we can improve our management of patients' symptoms.

Single vs. multiple fraction non-inferiority trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligo-metastases/progression: SIMPLIFY-SABR-COMET.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy delivery regimens can vary between a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) given daily for up to several weeks depending on the location of the cancer or metastases. With limited evidence comparing fractionation regimens for oligometastases, there is support to explore toxicity levels to nearby organs at risk as a primary outcome while using SF and MF stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as well as explore differences in patient-reported quality of life and experience. METHODS: This study will randomize 598 patients in a 1:1 ratio between the standard arm (MF SABR) and the experimental arm (SF SABR). This trial is designed as two randomized controlled trials within one patient population for resource efficiency. The primary objective of the first randomization is to determine if SF SABR is non-inferior to MF SABR, with respect to healthcare provider (HCP)-reported grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) that are related to SABR. Primary endpoint is toxicity while secondary endpoints include lesional control rate (LCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The second randomization (BC Cancer sites only) will allocate participants to either complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires only; or QoL questionnaires and a symptom-specific survey with symptom-guided HCP intervention. The primary objective of the second randomization is to determine if radiation-related symptom questionnaire-guided HCP intervention results in improved reported QoL as measured by the EuroQoL-5-dimensions-5levels (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. The primary endpoint is patient-reported QoL and secondary endpoints include: persistence/resolution of symptom reporting, QoL, intervention cost effectiveness, resource utilization, and overall survival. DISCUSSION: This study will compare SF and MF SABR in the treatment of oligometastases and oligoprogression to determine if there is non-inferior toxicity for SF SABR in selected participants with 1-5 oligometastatic lesions. This study will also compare patient-reported QoL between participants who receive radiation-related symptom-guided HCP intervention and those who complete questionnaires alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05784428. Date of Registration: 23 March 2023.

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using 5 Daily Fractions: A Prospective, Phase 2, Multicenter Trial of Cosmetic Outcomes and Toxicity-ACCEL Final Results.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the cosmetic degradation and toxicity for an accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) prescription delivered in 5 fractions over 1 week and compared the outcomes with those of whole breast irradiation (WBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The trial was a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 prospective cohort study. Eligible women 50 years of age or older with estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery received 27 Gy in 5 daily fractions of APBI. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of 2-year cosmesis using the RAPID trial's WBI arm as the control arm. A global consensus cosmetic score using a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer rating scale score of excellent, good, fair, or poor for each patient at baseline and 2 years was generated by a panel of 5 radiation oncologists using photographs of treated and untreated breasts. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, 298 eligible women were enrolled. By the 2-year follow-up, 76 patients had been lost or withdrawn and 3 had died, resulting in 219 patients available for complete, 2-year photographic cosmetic evaluation. The median follow-up for all participants was 4.7 years (IQR, 3.8-5.5 years). No patient had a fair or poor cosmetic score at the 2-year evaluation. Cosmesis was better or unchanged for 97% of patients and worse for 3% (excellent to good), and no cosmetic failures occurred. The confidence intervals were 0.88 (0.86-0.90) and 1.00 (0.99-1.00) for the RAPID and ACCEL trials, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cosmetic degradation with 5 daily treatments of the ACCEL trial's APBI intervention is noninferior to the WBI arm of the RAPID trial.

Microwave imaging for monitoring breast cancer treatment: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Microwave imaging has been proposed for medical applications, creating maps related to water content of tissues. Breast imaging has emerged as a key application because the signals can be coupled directly into the breast and experience limited attenuation in fatty tissues. While the literature contains reports of tumor detection with microwave approaches, there is limited exploration of treatment monitoring. PURPOSE: This study aims to detect treatment-related changes in breast tissue with a low-resolution microwave scanner. METHODS: Microwave scans of 15 patients undergoing treatment for early-stage breast cancer are collected at up to 4 time points: after surgery (baseline), 6 weeks after accelerated partial breast radiation, as well as 1 and 2 years post-treatment. Both the treated and untreated breast are scanned at each time point. The microwave scanner consists of planar transmit and receive arrays and uses signals from 0.1 to 10 GHz. The average microwave frequency properties (permittivity) are calculated for each scan to enable quantitative comparison. Baseline and 6-week results are analyzed with a two-way ANOVA with blocking. RESULTS: Consistent properties are observed for the untreated breast over time, similar to a previous study. Comparison of the scans of the treated and untreated breast suggests increased properties related to treatment, particularly at baseline and 6-weeks following radiotherapy. Analysis of the average properties of the scans with ANOVA indicates statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05 $p < 0.05$ ) in the treated and untreated breast at these time points. CONCLUSIONS: Microwave imaging has the potential to track treatment-related changes in breast tissues.

Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing Site-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Head and Neck Cancer Clinics: A Prospective Institutional Study.

Purpose: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck (MDASI-HN) module in cancer clinics and its effect on patient-reported experience. Methods: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal study at a tertiary cancer institution between September 2020 and August 2021. Patients with newly diagnosed head and neck (HN) cancer who were evaluated to receive radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy and could communicate in English were approached to participate. The primary outcome was feasibility and acceptability of the MDASI-HN implementation in the radiation oncology department assessed by patient and provider exit surveys. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported experience as recorded by a shortened Your Voice Matters survey (YVM) in 2 cohorts pre- and post-MDASI-HN implementation and symptom scores. Descriptive statistics were used for exit surveys and symptom scores. Mann-Whitney tests were used to assess differences in positive responses between pre- and postimplementation for each YVM question. Cochrane-Armitage tests were used to examine changes in patient-reported experience over time. Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the postimplementation cohort and 29 (60%) responded to the exit survey. Eighty-nine percent of patients reported that MDASI-HN made it easier to remember symptoms, and 86% recommend its use in routine care. Four of the 5 radiation oncology HN providers (80%) responded to exit surveys; 75% felt the MDASI-HN provided clinically relevant information, improved communication with patients, and did not increase clinic time. The overall patient-reported experience was not affected by the implementation (P = .82). The probability of positive responses over time was significant (P = .025) in the clinic coordination domain for the postimplementation cohort. Conclusions: Implementation of MDASI-HN was feasible and acceptable by patients and providers. Although the overall patient-reported experience was not affected by implementation, some aspects improved as treatment progressed.

Assessment of tissue toxicity risk in breast radiotherapy using Bayesian networks.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis is to predict worsening post-treatment normal tissue toxicity in patients undergoing accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) therapy and to quantitatively identify which diagnostic, anatomical, and dosimetric features are contributing to these outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study of APBI treatments was performed using 32 features pertaining to various stages of the patient's treatment journey. These features were used to inform and construct a Bayesian network (BN) based on both statistical analysis of feature distributions and relative clinical importance. The target feature for prediction was defined as a measurable worsening of telangiectasia, subcutaneous tissue induration, or fibrosis when compared against the observed baseline. Parameter learning for the network was performed using data from the 299 patients included in the ACCEL trial and predictive performance was measured. Feature importance for the BN was quantified using a novel information-theoretic approach. RESULTS: Cross-validated performance of the BN for predicting toxicity was consistently higher when compared against conventional machine learning (ML) techniques. The measured BN receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was 0.960 ± $\,{\pm}\,$ 0.013 against the best ML result of 0.942 ± $\,{\pm}\,$ 0.021 using five-fold cross-validation with separate test data across 100 trials. The volume of the clinical target volume, gross target volume, and baseline toxicity measurements were found to have the highest feature importance and mutual dependence with normal tissue toxicity in the network, representing the strongest contribution to patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The BN outperformed conventional ML techniques in predicting tissue toxicity outcomes and provided deeper insight into which features are contributing to these outcomes.

An updated approach for deriving PTV margins using image guidance and deformable dose accumulation.

Objective.To demonstrate an updated approach for deriving planning target volume (PTV) margins for a patient population treated with volumetric image-guided radiotherapy.Approach.The approach uses a semi-automated workflow within commercial radiotherapy applications that combines dose accumulation with the bidirectional local distance (BLD) metric. The patient cohort is divided into derivation and validation datasets. For each patient in the derivation dataset, a treatment plan is generated with a 0 mm PTV margin (the idealized treatment scenario without the influence of the standard margin). Deformable image registration enabled dose accumulation of these zero-margin plans. PTV margins are derived by using the BLD to calculate the geometric extent of underdosed regions of the clinical target volume (CTV). The PTV margin is validated by ensuring the specified CTV coverage criterion is met when the margin is applied to the validation dataset.Main results.The methodology was applied to two cohorts: 40 oropharyngeal cancer patients and 50 early-stage breast cancer patients. Ten patients from each cohort were used for validation. PTV margins derived for the oropharyngeal and early-stage breast cancer patient cohorts were 3 and 5 mm, respectively, and ensure that 95% of the prescription dose is delivered to 98% of the CTV for 90% of patients. Dose accumulation showed that the CTV coverage criterion was achieved for at least 90% of patients when the margins were applied.Significance.This methodology can be used to derive appropriate PTV margins for realistic treatment scenarios and any disease site, which will improve our understanding of patient outcomes.

Diagnostic timelines and self-reported symptoms of patients with lung and gastrointestinal cancers undergoing radiation therapy. Retrospective case control study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that patients with lung cancer report worse patient experience compared to other tumour groups. Reasons that may negatively impact patient experience include delays in diagnosis as well as inadequate symptom management. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic timelines and symptom reports of patients with lung and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. METHODS: This study included patients diagnosed with lung or GI cancers who attended a radiation oncology (RO) consultation and/or received radiation treatment between May and August 2019 at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Data collected included demographics, dates of diagnostic time points, and self-reported symptom scores across 3 time points. A descriptive analysis was completed, and the median number of days between time points was compared between tumour groups. RESULTS: Patients with lung cancer had longer diagnostic timelines compared to GI patients. The median number of days between the first investigative test and biopsy was 21 days longer for patients with lung cancer (p < 0.05). From RO consultation to the first treatment review appointment, 25% and 4% of lung and GI patients, respectively, reported worsening of symptoms. A greater proportion of lung patients reported worse symptom scores during treatment compared to GI patients. This varied by specific symptom. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lung cancer experienced delays in receiving a diagnosis and worse symptom burden during radiation therapy in this study. We identified potential targets to improve patient experience.

Auto-delineation framework for the focal liver reaction observed in post Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Primovist MRI scans.

Development of a novel auto-delineation methodology for observed hypointensity from focal liver reaction in hepatobiliary-specific contrast (Primovist) enhanced MRI acquired post Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Additionally, the methodology for the quantification of the threshold dose associated with the observed focal liver reaction was also established. An auto-delineation algorithm was created based on the correlation between intensity and radiation dose information. The error associated with the auto-delineation was quantified using virtual FLRs, as well as clinical patient scans. Patients underwent liver SBRT with a total dose prescription of 50 Gy in 5 fractions. An inherent correlation was established between the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on MRI scans and expected performance of the algorithm using centre-of-mass (COM). Threshold dose associated with focal liver reaction was quantified for all ten patients and verified with associated most conformal isodose line. Based on the CNR vs COM error relationship, the expected median (range) auto-delineation COM error for ten patients was 0.5 (0 to 3.2) mm. The median threshold dose for ten clinical cases was 21.3 Gy based on the auto-delineation framework. This threshold dose was compared to the most conformal isodose line with the hypointensity; there was no significant difference observed (p = 0.6). We developed a framework for post-SBRT Primovist observed focal liver reaction localization. Furthermore, this study established an automated approach for the determination of the threshold dose associated with the hypointense region.

Competency-Based Medical Education in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning.

PURPOSE: To develop a technology-enhanced education methodology with competency-based evaluation for radiation therapy treatment planning. The education program is designed for integration in the existing framework of Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs (CAMPEP) accredited medical physics residency programs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This education program pairs an accessible, multi-institutional infrastructure with established medical education evaluation tools to modernize treatment planning education. This program includes 3 evaluation components: (1) competency-based evaluation, (2) inter- and intramodality comparison, and (3) learner feedback. For this study, synchronous bilateral breast cancer was selected to demonstrate a complex treatment site and nonstandardized technique. Additionally, an online study was made available to a public cohort of worldwide participants of certified Medical Dosimetrists and Medical Physicists to benchmark performance. Before evaluation, learners were given a disease site-specific education session on potential clinical treatment strategies. During the assessment, learners generated treatment plans in their institutional planning system under the direct observation of an expert evaluator. Qualitative proficiency was evaluated for all learners on a 5-point scale of graduated task independence. Quantitative dosimetry was compared between the learner cohort and public cohort. A feedback session provided learners context of multi-institutional experience through multimodality and technique comparison. After study completion, learners were provided a survey that was used to gauge their perception of the education program. RESULTS: In the public study, 34 participants submitted treatment plans. Across 3 CAMPEP-accredited residency programs, 6 learners participated in the education and evaluation program. All learners successfully completed treatment plans that met the dosimetric constraints described in the case study. All learners favorably reviewed the study either comprehensively or in specified domains. CONCLUSIONS: The competency-based education and evaluation program developed in this work has been incorporated in CAMPEP-accredited residency programs and is adaptable to other residency programs with minimal resource commitment.

Performance of a knowledge-based planning model for optimizing intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for partial breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a knowledge-based (KB) planning model for RapidPlan, generated using a five-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) class solution beam strategy and rigorous dosimetric constraints for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RapidPlan model was configured using 64 APBI treatment plans and validated for 120 APBI patients who were not included in the training dataset. KB plan dosimetry was compared to clinical plan dosimetry, the clinical planning constraints, and the constraints used in phase III APBI trials. Dosimetric differences between clinical and KB plans were evaluated using paired two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: KB planning was able to produce IMRT-based APBI plans in a single optimization without manual intervention that are comparable or better than the conventionally optimized, clinical plans. Comparing KB plans to clinical plans, differences in PTV, heart, contralateral breast, and ipsilateral lung dose-volume metrics were not clinically significant. The ipsilateral breast volume receiving at least 50% of the prescription dose was statistically and clinically significantly lower in the KB plans. CONCLUSION: KB planning for IMRT-based APBI provides equivalent or better dosimetry compared to conventional inverse planning. This model may be reliably applied in clinical practice and could be used to transfer planning expertise to ensure consistency in APBI plan quality.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Experience of Patients Receiving Radiotherapy Measured by Two Validated Surveys.

Patient-reported experience is associated with improved patient safety and clinical outcomes. Quality improvement programs rely on validated patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to design projects. This descriptive study compares the experience of cancer patients treated with radiation as recorded through the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS) or as recorded through Your Voice Matters (YVM) between February and August 2019. Six questions were compared ("overall experience with care", "discussion of worries", "involvement in decisions", "trusting providers with confidential information", "providing family with information", and "knowing who to contact"). Positive experience scores were calculated by cohort and by tumor groups. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated factors associated with positive experience. Two cohorts (220 and 200 patients) met the eligibility criteria for the AOPSS and YVM, respectively. Positive experience was reported similarly between the two PREMs for "overall experience with care", "discussion of worries", and "trusting providers with confidential information" with a score difference of 1-4% at the cohort level. Positive experience score difference ranged from 5% to 44% across questions at the tumor group level. Different experience gaps were identified with the two measures, mainly at the tumor group level. Programs interested in using these PREMS might consider this when designing projects.

Has Radiotherapy Been Successfully Implemented in Alberta's Small Cities? A Review of Alberta's Regional Cancer Centre Network from 2010-2020.

The expansion of cancer services closer to home has become a major focus of publicly funded healthcare, with cancer organizations attempting to invest in smaller centers by integrating radiotherapy into these facilities. In Canada this has resulted in Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta investing in 12 expanded regional centers over the past 20 years. Quebec, Manitoba and Nova Scotia have made similar investments. Alberta's three new centers opened in 2010, 2013 and 2021 (projected). This study examined improvements in wait times and patient throughput between 2010 and 2020, and highlighted strategies that will support the sustainability and growth of clinical activity through to 2030. Significant improvement in ready to treat wait times for radiotherapy have resulted from opening two centers, and the provincial throughput for patients requiring systemic or radiotherapy has gone up by 16%. A patient satisfaction survey demonstrated that rural patients are happy with their care and desire the provision of more of their cancer treatment closer to home. An expert panel provided recommendations on what needs to be done to stabilize recruitment and retention.

A retrospective analysis to demonstrate achievable dosimetry for the left anterior descending artery in left-sided breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate achievable dose for the left anterior descending artery (LAD) for left-sided breast cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all left-sided breast cancer patients receiving whole breast or post-mastectomy chest wall irradiation between 2013 and 2018. All patients in this study were treated with tangent-based techniques with the LAD prospectively contoured as routine clinical care. This large patient cohort was used to benchmark achievable mean doses to the LAD in the context of heart dose. The primary cohort of study were patients undergoing treatment with deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), stratified by internal mammary nodes (IMN) inclusion. In all cases, the median (25th-75th percentile) is reported. RESULTS: A total of 1221 left-sided breast cancer patients were included in this study with 1045 in the DIBH cohort. The median heart mean dose for this cohort is 1.0 Gy (0.8-1.1). For patients treated in DIBH with IMNs included (n = 422), the median of the mean LAD dose is 3.6 Gy (2.9-4.4) and, for patients treated in DIBH with IMNs excluded (n = 623), the median of the mean LAD dose is 3.2 Gy (2.5-3.8). CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate respiratory management can be utilized to achieve low dose to the LAD for the majority of patients without compromising target coverage.

Results of the ACCEL trial: Dosimetry in accelerated partial breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: To report the achieved dosimetry in the ACCEL trial and compare the results to reported dosimetry from the major accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) phase III trials. METHODS: The ACCEL trial was a single arm, phase II, prospective cohort study. A five-field, inverse-planned, IMRT strategy was employed using a class solution technique to increase planning consistency including high dose conformity and low normal tissue dose to the ipsilateral breast. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2019, 283 patients were treated with 27 Gy in five fractions in consecutive days. The average PTV conformity index was 1.1. For the ipsilateral breast, the median (range) volume receiving 95% and 50% of the prescription dose was 9.7% (3.2-22.4) and 30.3% (11.1-54.6), respectively. Compared to major APBI phase III trial constraints, this reduction in irradiated volume at the 95% and 50% isodose levels represents a reduction of 209 cm3 and 265 cm3, respectively. CONCLUSION: The IMRT planning strategy employed in the ACCEL trial demonstrated consistent and superior dosimetry by comparison to conventionally used 3D CRT techniques. Future APBI trials should update dosimetric constraints.

Volumetric changes in pharyngeal structures following head and neck cancer chemoradiation therapy.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the volumetric changes in pharyngeal structures in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Patients treated with CRT for esophageal carcinoma (EC), where pharyngeal structures were not part of the radiation treatment fields, were controlled for dysphagia-associated weight loss. We hypothesize that tissue volume alteration is a contributing factor of post-CRT dysphagia. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: This study measured pre- and 1-year posttreatment volumes of the base of tongue (BOT), parapharyngeal spaces, posterior pharyngeal constrictors (PCs), and retropharyngeal space (RPS) in patients undergoing CRT for HNSCC or EC treated January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2015. All HNSCC patients were treated to doses of 66 to 70 Gy in 30 to 33 fractions using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. RESULTS: Our cohort included 49 HNSCC and 11 EC patients. Within the HNSCC cohort, the PCs volume increased 1.55 cm3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77 to 2.34 cm3 , P = .0002), RPS increased 1.22 cm3 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.77 cm3 , P < .0001), and BOT decreased 2.29 cm3 (95% CI: -0.20 to 4.79 cm3 , P = .070). The EC cohort showed no significant volumetric changes for any anatomic space, with combined PCs and RPS volume changes statistically less than the HNSCC cohort (P = .031). There was no difference in mean body mass index reduction between groups (P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric changes following CRT may play a role in posttreatment dysphagia. Our findings support loss of physiologic function from posterior pharynx tissue thickening combined with reduced pharyngeal constriction capacity, and BOT atrophy secondary to radiation effects contribute to dysphagia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:597-602, 2020.

Structure guided deformable image registration for treatment planning CT and post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Primovist® (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MRI.

The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of structure-guided deformable image registration (SG-DIR) relative to rigid registration and DIR using TG-132 recommendations. This assessment was performed for image registration of treatment planning computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with Primovist® contrast agent acquired post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT treatment planning CT scans and posttreatment Primovist® MRI scans were obtained for 14 patients. The liver was delineated on both sets of images and matching anatomical landmarks were chosen by a radiation oncologist. Rigid registration, DIR, and two types of SG-DIR (using liver contours only; and using liver structures along with anatomical landmarks) were performed for each set of scans. TG-132 recommended metrics were estimated which included Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Mean Distance to Agreement (MDA), Target Registration Error (TRE), and Jacobian determinant. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. The median (range) DSC for rigid registration was 0.88 (0.77-0.89), 0.89 (0.81-0.93) for DIR, and 0.90 (0.86-0.94) for both types of SG-DIR tested in this study. The median MDA was 4.8 mm (3.7-6.8 mm) for rigid registration, 3.4 mm (2.4-8.7 mm) for DIR, 3.2 mm (2.0-5.2 mm) for SG-DIR where liver structures were used to guide the registration, and 2.8 mm (2.1-4.2 mm) for the SG-DIR where liver structures and anatomical landmarks were used to guide the registration. The median TRE for rigid registration was 7.2 mm (0.5-23 mm), 6.8 mm (0.7-30.7 mm) for DIR, 6.1 mm (1.1-20.5 mm) for the SG-DIR guided by only the liver structures, and 4.1 mm (0.8-19.7 mm) for SG-DIR guided by liver contours and anatomical landmarks. The SG-DIR shows higher liver conformality as per TG-132 metrics and lowest TRE compared to rigid registration and DIR in Velocity AI software for the purpose of registering treatment planning CT and post-SBRT MRI for the liver region. It was found that TRE decreases when liver contours and corresponding anatomical landmarks guide SG-DIR.

Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of abdominal compression on adjacent gastro-intestinal critical structures for patients treated with upper and mid-abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the dosimetric and radiobiological impact of abdominal compression (AC) on nearby gastrointestinal critical structures (GI-CS) and reported toxicities of patients treated with non-hepatic abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: Two sets of CT scans, planning scans with AC and pre-treatment diagnostic scans without AC (non-AC) were compared for patients treated with a prescription dose to planning target volume (PTV) ≥25 Gy/5-fractions at a single institution. Target volumes were delineated on both sets of scans and PTV was expanded isotropically by 2 cm (PTV+2) and 4 cm (PTV+4). All GI-CS were summated to create a composite CS (GI-lumen). Rigid registration of AC and non-AC scans was done using Velocity AI (Varian Medical Systems) to obtain dose distribution information. Lymann-Probit and logit models were used for radiobiological calculations. Toxicity scores were obtained from prospectively collected clinical data. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients were included. Mean PTV volumes were 190.3cc and 196.4cc with AC and non-AC (p=0.95). Significant improvement in V30 of GI-lumen was seen with AC (0.11cc vs. 4.97cc, p=0.04). There were no differences in the normal tissue complication probabilities of the individual GI-CS or the summary indices except a notable trend towards better NTCP for small bowel late effects with AC (0.21% vs. 2.45%; p=0.055). Three patients had acute grade-1 anorexia, one patient had acute grade-2 gastritis. There was no grade ≥3 GI toxicity. At a median follow-up of 2.6 years, total of 8/12 (66.7%) patients developed local recurrence of whom 4 (33.3%) had isolated local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Use of AC did not result in any dosimetric or radiobiological inferiority for GI-CS. The current cohort completed their treatment with minimal toxicity.

A Framework for Clinical Validation of Automatic Contour Propagation: Standardizing Geometric and Dosimetric Evaluation.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to outline and demonstrate a standardized framework for evaluating automatically propagated contour quality against expert contours. A 2-pronged approach is used to evaluate contour quality: a geometric evaluation to identify geometric and spatial discrepancies between propagated and expert contours, and a comprehensive dosimetric comparison to provide clinical context for the results. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The standardized framework requires a primary image, with reference contours and a radiation therapy treatment plan, and a secondary image. Reference contours are automatically propagated onto the secondary image anatomy and compared with expert contours obtained in an interobserver study. The standardized framework outlines geometric and dosimetric evaluation methodologies for determining indistinguishability between propagated and expert contours in a cohort analysis. Propagated contours are geometrically compared with expert contours in terms of the Dice similarity coefficient and the mean distance to agreement. Statistical analysis is performed on the central tendency and variability of Dice similarity coefficient and mean distance to agreement values over the patient cohort. Dosimetric evaluation involves computing the mean and 95% confidence intervals for the differences in cumulative dose-volume histograms for propagated and expert contours. A case study in accelerated partial breast irradiation was shown to demonstrate the framework. RESULTS: The standardized framework was applied to a case study of 24 patient data sets with 3 radiation oncologists providing the expert contours. Cohort analysis indicated that propagated contours were geometrically indistinguishable and dosimetrically distinguishable from expert contours. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended framework standardizes the comparison of geometric and dosimetric parameters to demonstrate indistinguishability of propagated contours from expert contours. Adoption of this framework is vital for consistent and comprehensive validation of automatic contour propagation for use in large-scale cohort analyses.