Effect of time of day on outcomes in elective surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The timing of elective surgery could affect clinical outcome because of diurnal rhythms of patient physiology as well as surgical team performance. Waiting times for elective surgery are increasing in many countries, leading to increasing interest in undertaking elective surgery in the evening or at night. We aimed to systematically review the literature on the effect of the timing of elective (but not urgent or emergency) surgery on mortality, morbidity and other clinical outcomes. METHODS: We searched databases for relevant studies combining the terms 'circadian rhythm' and 'anaesthesia/surgery'. Additional relevant articles were found by hand-searching the references. All studies were screened for bias. Included studies examined daytime vs. evening/night-time surgery, morning vs. afternoon surgery, multiple timeslots or used time as a continuous variable. RESULTS: Nineteen retrospective cohort studies, one prospective cohort study and one randomised controlled trial were included (n = 798,914). Evening/night-time elective surgery was associated with a higher risk of mortality when compared with daytime procedures in three studies (n = 611,230), with odds ratios (95%CI) for mortality ranging from 1.35 (1.16-1.56) to 3.98 (1.54-10.30), while no differences were found in three other studies (n = 142,355). No differences were found for morning vs. afternoon surgery (four studies, n = 3277). However, most studies had a low quality of evidence due to their retrospective nature and because not all studies corrected for patient characteristics. Moreover, the studies were heterogeneous in terms of the reported time slots and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found that evening/night-time elective surgery is associated with a higher risk of mortality compared with daytime surgery. However, the quality of evidence was graded as low, and thus, future prospective research should publish individual patient data and standardise outcome measures to allow firm conclusions and facilitate interventions.

Cerebral Glucose Metabolism following TBI: Changes in Plasma Glucose, Glucose Transport and Alternative Pathways of Glycolysis-A Translational Narrative Review.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health concern with significant consequences across various domains. Following the primary event, secondary injuries compound the outcome after TBI, with disrupted glucose metabolism emerging as a relevant factor. This narrative review summarises the existing literature on post-TBI alterations in glucose metabolism. After TBI, the brain undergoes dynamic changes in brain glucose transport, including alterations in glucose transporters and kinetics, and disruptions in the blood-brain barrier (BBB). In addition, cerebral glucose metabolism transitions from a phase of hyperglycolysis to hypometabolism, with upregulation of alternative pathways of glycolysis. Future research should further explore optimal, and possibly personalised, glycaemic control targets in TBI patients, with GLP-1 analogues as promising therapeutic candidates. Furthermore, a more fundamental understanding of alterations in the activation of various pathways, such as the polyol and lactate pathway, could hold the key to improving outcomes following TBI.

The role of intraoperative hypotension on the development of postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether intraoperative hypotension contributes to the development of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. DESIGN: A systematic review of prospective studies reporting on intraoperative hypotension and postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elective, non-cognitive impaired, adult surgical patients. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to the 1st of January 2021. SETTING: Studies had to use a clear definition of hypotension, although differing definitions were accepted. Neurocognitive tests to determine postoperative cognitive dysfunction had to be done pre- and postoperatively, with a minimum follow-up of seven days postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS: Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 941 studies screened, five randomized controlled trials and four cohort studies were included for qualitative analysis. Extensive methodological differences between studies were present hindering proper quantitive analysis. No studies reported statistically significant differences in incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in hypo- compared to normotensive patients. Five studies reported exact incidences of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed no conclusive association between intraoperative hypotension and the development of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Given the vast methodological differences of the included studies, the role of intraoperative hypotension in the development of postoperative cognitive dysfunction remains uncertain. Future research into the association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative cognitive dysfunction should be conducted in a standardized manner.