Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 119(1S): S2-S6, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153219
2.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(3): 978-988, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33748913

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proved to be a highly effective treatment for recurrent CDI, its efficacy in severe or fulminant CDI remains uncertain. AIMS: To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis evaluating clinical outcomes and safety of FMT in severe and fulminant CDI. METHODS: A systemic review with meta-analysis was performed through comprehensive search of Embase, Medline (Ovid), trial registers, and conference abstracts through January 2020. Studies on FMT in severe and fulminant CDI were included. Meta-analysis was done with random effects models given heterogeneity to estimate rates of cure, mortality, and colectomy. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. RESULTS: Sixteen studies comprised of one randomized controlled trial, four cohort studies, and eleven case series were analyzed. In total, 676 patients underwent FMT for severe or fulminant CDI. The overall rate of clinical cure after single FMT was 61.3% (95% CI 43.2-78.0%) with 10.9% (95% CI 0.2-30.2%) of patients experiencing major adverse events. The overall pooled colectomy rate after FMT was 8.2% (95% CI 0.1-23.7%) with a pooled all-cause mortality rate after FMT of 15.6% (95% CI 7.8-25.0%). CONCLUSION: Low-quality data support the use of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with severe and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Clostridioides , Infecciones por Clostridium/etiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/efectos adversos , Humanos , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol ; 14: 17562848211016248, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34093740

RESUMEN

Clostridioides difficile infection is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections with significant morbidity and mortality. For the past decade, the bulk of infection prevention and epidemiologic surveillance efforts have been directed toward mitigating hospital-acquired C. difficile. However, the incidence of community-associated infection is on the rise. Patients with community-associated C. difficile tend to be younger and have lower mortality rate. Rates of recurrent C. difficile infection overall have decreased in the United States, but future research and public health endeavors are needed to standardize and improve disease detection, stratify risk factors in large-scale population studies, and to identify regional and local variations in strain types, reservoirs and transmission routes to help characterize and combat the changing epidemiology of C. difficile.

5.
Gastroenterology ; 160(1): 183-192.e3, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33011173

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is used commonly for treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs), although prospective safety data are limited and real-world FMT practice and outcomes are not well described. The FMT National Registry was designed to assess FMT methods and both safety and effectiveness outcomes from North American FMT providers. METHODS: Patients undergoing FMT in clinical practices across North America were eligible. Participating investigators enter de-identified data into an online platform, including FMT protocol, baseline patient characteristics, CDI cure and recurrence, and short and long-term safety outcomes. RESULTS: Of the first 259 participants enrolled at 20 sites, 222 had completed short-term follow-up at 1 month and 123 had follow-up to 6 months; 171 (66%) were female. All FMTs were done for CDI and 249 (96%) used an unknown donor (eg, stool bank). One-month cure occurred in 200 patients (90%); of these, 197 (98%) received only 1 FMT. Among 112 patients with initial cure who were followed to 6 months, 4 (4%) had CDI recurrence. Severe symptoms reported within 1-month of FMT included diarrhea (n = 5 [2%]) and abdominal pain (n = 4 [2%]); 3 patients (1%) had hospitalizations possibly related to FMT. At 6 months, new diagnoses of irritable bowel syndrome were made in 2 patients (1%) and inflammatory bowel disease in 2 patients (1%). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective real-world study demonstrated high effectiveness of FMT for CDI with a good safety profile. Assessment of new conditions at long-term follow-up is planned as this registry grows and will be important for determining the full safety profile of FMT.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/terapia , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Clostridioides difficile , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
6.
Dig Dis Sci ; 65(12): 3647-3651, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32078714

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is highly effective for treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). CDI disproportionately affects the elderly; however, there is a paucity of data on FMT effectiveness in older adults, especially subpopulations at highest risk for CDI-related morbidity and mortality. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of FMT for CDI in older adults. METHODS: A retrospective, long-term follow-up study was performed. The high-risk subpopulation included patients who were immunocompromised, patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and patients presenting with severe or fulminant colitis. Outcome measures included primary cure rates, early (< 12 weeks) and late (> 12 weeks) recurrence rates, adverse events, and subgroup analysis of higher-risk populations. RESULTS: Our cohort included 75 patients (72% female) with a mean age of 76.4 and Charlson comorbidity index score of 5.4. There were 34 patients in our higher-risk subpopulation as defined above with an adjusted recurrence rate of 32.1%. FMT was performed for severe or fulminant disease in 30.6% of patients with a 3-month survival rate of 73.9%. Overall, the adjusted primary cure rate was 67.2% and the adjusted CDI recurrence was 29.9% in our cohort (90% of recurrences occurred early). Most adverse events in our study were rehospitalizations for recurrent CDI. CONCLUSION: Compared with previous studies of FMT efficacy, our cohort had a lower primary cure rate and higher CDI recurrence rate than previously reported, likely driven by our higher-risk subpopulations. Nevertheless, FMT should be considered early to prevent progression of CDI severity and recurrence, especially in patients who present with severe and fulminant disease.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Anciano , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Masculino , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
7.
Dig Dis Sci ; 65(4): 1125-1133, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31493042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) occur frequently and pose a substantial economic burden on the US healthcare system. The landscape for the treatment of CDI is evolving. AIM: To elucidate the most cost-effective strategy for managing recurrent CDI. METHODS: A decision tree analysis was created from a modified third-party payer's perspective to compare the cost-effectiveness of five strategies for patients experiencing their first CDI recurrence: oral vancomycin, fidaxomicin, fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) via colonoscopy, FMT via oral capsules, and a one-time infusion of bezlotoxumab with vancomycin. Effectiveness measures were quality-adjusted life years (QALY). A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 per QALY was set. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Base-case analysis showed that FMT via colonoscopy was associated with the lowest cost at $5250 and that FMT via capsules was also a cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $31205/QALY. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that FMT delivered by oral capsules and colonoscopy was comparable cost-effective modalities. At its current cost and effectiveness, bezlotoxumab was not a cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSIONS: FMT via oral capsules and colonoscopy is both cost-effective strategies to treat the first recurrence of CDI. Further real-world economic studies are needed to understand the cost-effectiveness of all available strategies.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium/economía , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Colonoscopía/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/economía , Administración Oral , Anciano , Cápsulas , Colonoscopía/métodos , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Económicos , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 50(10): 1094-1099, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31612528

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection is associated with high mortality rates. While faecal microbiota transplant has been shown to be effective for recurrent C difficile infection, there is little data on the utility of faecal microbiota transplant in severe or fulminant C difficile infection. AIM: To compare the outcomes of antibiotics and faecal microbiota transplantation vs antibiotics alone (standard of care) in critically ill patients with severe or fulminant C difficile infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective, matched cohort study in one urban tertiary academic care centre including 48 patients hospitalised with severe or fulminant C difficile infection who required care in intensive care unit. RESULTS: Patients who received faecal microbiota transplantation (n = 16) had a 77% decrease in odds for mortality (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.97) with a number needed to treat of 3 to prevent one death. CONCLUSIONS: Faecal microbiota transplantation provides mortality benefit over standard of care for severe and fulminant C difficile infection and should be considered in critically ill patients.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium/mortalidad , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/mortalidad , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...