RESUMEN
Our study aimed to evaluate the social deprivation score in families with a child with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and analyze its impact on the occurrence of obesity in the affected child. We included 147 children with PWS followed in our reference center with Evaluation of the Deprivation and Inequalities of Health in Healthcare Centres by the EPICES score. Deprivation (EPICES ≥ 30) was found in 25.9% of the population. Compared with the non-obese children, children with obesity had more deprived families, 50.0 vs. 18.0% (p = 0.0001); were older, with a median of 10.1 vs. 6.0 years (p = 0.0006); were less frequently treated with growth hormone (GH), 80.6 vs. 91.9% (p = 0.07). The mothers of obese children were more frequently obese, 46.9 vs. 13.3% (p < 0.0001), and achieved high study levels less frequently (≥Bac+2), 40.9 vs. 70.1% (p = 0.012). The multivariate logistic regression indicated that age, living in a deprived family, and having a mother with overweight/obesity were significantly associated with an increased risk of obesity (respectively, OR = 3.31 (1.26−8.73) and OR = 6.76 (2.36−19.37)). The same risk factors of obesity observed in the general population were found in children with PWS. Families at risk, including social deprivation, will require early identification and a reinforced approach to prevent obesity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In France, when someone presents with chest pain, it is recommended to call a health emergency number. The patient talks with an emergency doctor at a medical dispatch centre, who decides whether (or not) to send a Mobile Intensive Care Unit (MICU). Patients with an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) should have an MICU as their first medical contact, to speed up confirmation of diagnosis and enable them to benefit from reperfusion therapy as quickly as possible. AIM: To evaluate the proportion of patients with STEMI benefiting from an optimal care pathway, and to identify the key factors leading to this pathway. METHODS: RESCAMIP was a multicentre registry conducted between May 2015 and May 2017 in Midi-Pyrénées. All patients treated for STEMI within 12hours of symptoms onset, without initially going into cardiac arrest, were included. RESULTS: Data from 1371 patients with STEMI were analysed; 60% had an MICU as their first medical contact. In-hospital mortality was 4%. Factors associated with calling the medical dispatch centre when presenting chest pain were: age>65 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.83), personal history of cardiovascular disease (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.22-2.96) and having cardiovascular risk factors (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.35-2.5). Factors associated with sending an MICU as first medical contact were: male sex (OR 2.11, 955 CI 1.49-2.99) and personal history of cardiovascular disease (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07-2.65). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with STEMI going through non-optimal pathways was 40% in our area. We note that there are sex-based inequalities in accessing MICUs.
Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/normas , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Operador de Emergencias Médicas , Femenino , Francia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Transporte de Pacientes/normas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
To evaluate the safety profile of eight oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) available in France, using data reported through the French pharmacovigilance system. Data (from 2002 to 2006) were analysed for aceclofenac, diclofenac, ketoprofen, meloxicam, naproxen, nimesulide, piroxicam and tenoxicam, focusing on the reported rates of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the following system organ classes: gastrointestinal, hepatic, cutaneous, renal and cardiovascular. A total of 42 389 serious ADR reports were identified, and 38 506 were included in a case/noncase analysis. Ketoprofen was associated with the highest cumulative reported rate of serious ADRs (0.78 cases per million defined daily doses), followed by diclofenac (0.58), nimesulide (0.52), naproxen (0.50), piroxicam (0.47), tenoxicam (0.42), meloxicam (0.41) and aceclofenac (0.30). The most frequently reported serious ADRs were cutaneous, followed by gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal and rarely, cardiovascular events. In the case/noncase analysis, ketoprofen, piroxicam and naproxen were associated with the highest risk of serious gastrointestinal ADRs (odds ratios [ORs] of 6.87, 6.54 and 5.07, respectively). Nimesulide and aceclofenac were associated with the highest risk of liver ADRs (adjusted ORs of 4.53 and 3.67, respectively), as was meloxicam for cutaneous ADRs (adjusted OR of 3.15) and tenoxicam for renal ADRs (adjusted OR of 3.17). The most frequent serious ADRs reported with the selected oral NSAIDs are cutaneous, followed by gastrointestinal, hepatic and renal events. The highest risks for serious gastrointestinal, hepatic, cutaneous and renal adverse events were linked, respectively, with ketoprofen, nimesulide, meloxicam and tenoxicam compared with the other NSAIDs.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Francia , Humanos , FarmacovigilanciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guidelines emphasize the implementation of local networks with prehospital emergency medical systems to improve the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); they also define the choice of reperfusion strategies and adjunctive treatments. AIM: To assess the compliance of STEMI emergency care with current French guidelines in a large area of France and to identify predictors of compliance with guidelines. METHOD: The RESCA+31 registry was a 2-year, multicentre, prospective, multidisciplinary study, including 512 consecutive patients with STEMI evolving within 12 hours managed by emergency physicians in the prehospital system or emergency department. Data were recorded during the emergency phase and after admission to cardiology. RESULTS: First medical contact (FMC) was prehospital emergency care for 80% of patients; 97% received reperfusion treatment and 98% were admitted to a cardiology intensive care unit (CICU) with a catheterization laboratory. The mortality rate was 5%. Guidelines were complied with in 41% of patients for reperfusion strategies, in 47% for adjunctive treatments and in 23% for both. The only factor independently associated with guideline compliance was FMC by prehospital emergency system. In 52% of cases, emergency physicians underestimated the delay between FMC and admission to a CICU. CONCLUSION: Despite the implementation of a network, compliance with guidelines for reperfusion strategies and adjunctive treatments was insufficient in our area. However, very few patients did not receive reperfusion therapy and the mortality rate was low. Efforts should be made to improve the estimation of delay before primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Reperfusión Miocárdica/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/normas , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Femenino , Francia , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Reperfusión Miocárdica/efectos adversos , Reperfusión Miocárdica/mortalidad , Oportunidad Relativa , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Terapia Trombolítica/normas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) needs immediate management. Despite guidelines, adherence to management protocols is often poor, this contributing to poor outcome. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a management protocol in GCSE. METHODS: This is a prospective population-based study of consecutive adults with GCSE in Haute-Garonne district, France. Demographics and treatment procedures were documented. Factors associated with seizure termination and refractoriness were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen episodes in 111 adults (mean age 55 years) between October 2006 and February 2008 were included. SE was convulsive in 101 episodes. Incidence was 6.6 per 100,000 and case fatality was 9%. Adequate initial treatment according to protocol was observed in 38%; 64% were treated out-of-hospital, and SE was refractory in 27% [no response after two antiepileptic drugs (AED)]. Patients who received adequate first-line treatment were 6.8 times [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-16.9] more likely to have seizure termination, with 74% versus 29% efficacy rate (p < 0.0001). Inadequate initial management was 4.7 times (1.9-11.1) more likely to need several benzodiazepine doses (p = 0.0004) and 9.1 times (3.7-20) more likely to require a long-acting AED as next treatment (p < 0.0001). Seizure termination after initial treatment was associated with decreased intensive care unit stay [1 (1-2) versus 2 (1-5.5) days, p < 0.0001] and hospital stay [3 (2-11) versus 7 (3-18) days, p = 0.009]. DISCUSSION: GCSE termination and outcome seem clearly associated with adherence to treatment protocol. Results add to the debate on appropriate allocation of resources for out-of-hospital treatment, licensed drugs, and achievement of guideline implementation to improve SE outcome.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Estudios de Cohortes , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Francia/epidemiología , Adhesión a Directriz , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estado Epiléptico/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) frequently experienced pain. Nevertheless, there are no epidemiological data about frequency of pain in PD. We compare pain prevalence using analgesic prescription in PD patients, in the general population and in two samples of painful patients: diabetics and osteoarthritis patients in France. Data were obtained from the French System of Health Insurance for the year 2005. Medications (antiparkinsonian, antidiabetics drugs and osteoarthritis drugs) were used for identification of PD, diabetic and osteoarthritis patients. We estimated the prevalence of analgesic drugs prescription (at least one analgesic drug) and the prevalence of chronic analgesic drugs prescription (more than 90 DDD of analgesic drug). The study included 11,466 PD patients. PD patients significantly received more prescription of analgesics than the general population (82% versus 77%,) and fewer than patients with osteoarthritis (82% versus 90%). No significant difference was found between PD and diabetic patients. The chronic prescription of analgesic drugs was more prevalent in PD patients (33%) than in the general population (20%) and in diabetic patients (26%) and similar to that in osteoarthritis patients. PD patients were more exposed than the general population and diabetics to opiates, acetaminophen, and adjuvant analgesics chronic use.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoartritis/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Grupos de Población , Vigilancia de la PoblaciónRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of the French Pharmacovigilance Database to estimate characteristics of drug utilization in specific diseases. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We identified diabetic patients from the French Pharmacovigilance Database between 2002 and 2005. In this population, we studied demographic characteristics, and the patterns of drug use, particularly hypoglycemiant drug use and other drug exposure. In order to validate this approach, we compared our data to a population of patients with diabetes identified from the French Health Insurance System claims database in one French area. RESULTS: The estimation of prevalence of diabetes was very close in the sources: 2.7% in the French Pharmacovigilance Database and 3.2% in the French Health Insurance System claims database. We found similar results as well for demographic characteristics as for hypoglycemiant drug use and other drug exposure. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the French Pharmacovigilance Database may be used to investigate drug utilization patterns.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de Productos ComercializadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Homelessness is an increasing problem among subjects with severe mental illnesses and little is known about the characteristics of homeless subjects with psychosis using emergency psychiatric services. The aims of the present study were to assess the frequency of psychotic disorders among subjects attending a psychiatric emergency service and to explore the clinical and demographic characteristics of these subjects and the management proposed by the emergency staff. METHODS: All homeless patients (n=104) consecutively attending a psychiatric emergency service were included over a 6-month period. Patients were categorised according to ICD-10 diagnoses as presenting with psychotic disorder (schizophrenia and other non-affective psychotic disorders) versus other disorders. A random sample of matched non-homeless controls (n=71) was included over the same period. RESULTS: Nearly one out of three homeless subjects (32.7%) presented with a psychotic disorder, a higher proportion than that found in non-homeless subjects (15.7%). Compared to non-homeless subjects with psychosis, homeless subjects with psychosis were more likely to be male and to present with drug use disorder. The likelihood of being hospitalised after attending the psychiatric emergency services did not significantly differ between the two groups. Compared to homeless subjects with other psychiatric disorders, homeless subjects with psychosis were more likely to be single, to have a history of psychiatric hospitalisation and presented less frequently with anxiety or depressive symptoms motivating admission. CONCLUSION: Most homeless subjects with psychosis attending a psychiatric emergency service were already identified as suffering from a severe mental illness, suggesting that homelessness was a consequence of a break in contact with mental health services. Since homelessness is incompatible with the adequate management of psychosis, strategies have to be developed in mental health organisations in combination with outside partnerships, to drastically reduce the frequency of this condition in subjects with psychosis.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore general practitioners' (GPs) knowledge of the symptoms and epidemiology of schizophrenia, and the GPs' characteristics associated with level of knowledge. METHOD: Survey questionnaires exploring practice in patients with early psychosis were mailed to all GPs in South-Western France (N=3829). GPs were asked to fill out questions anonymously on the symptoms and epidemiology of schizophrenia. RESULTS: The response rate was 23.6%. GPs had a fair theoretical knowledge of schizophrenia symptoms, but underestimated the prevalence and the risk of suicide. Recent attendance at a continuing medical education (CME) course on schizophrenia was the main predictor of level of knowledge on epidemiological figures, although its impact was relatively modest. Regarding risk factors, the implication of genetic factors was considered as null or modest by more than half of the GPs, while a large proportion of them stated that mother-baby interactional disturbances were frequently implicated in the aetiology of the disorder. CONCLUSION: GPs' level of knowledge on the public health impact and risk factors for schizophrenia needs to be improved in order to promote the delivery of accurate and de-stigmatising information to primary care patients.
Asunto(s)
Recolección de Datos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Adulto , Anciano , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to explore how general practitioners (GPs) manage subjects with early psychosis and collaborate with psychiatrists in the care of such patients. METHODS: Survey questionnaires exploring practice in patients with early psychosis were mailed to all GPs in South-Western France (n=3,829). RESULTS: The response rate was 23.6%. Half of GPs responding to the survey had actually diagnosed a possible case of schizophrenia during the previous year. In such cases, the most frequent decision was to refer the patient to a psychiatrist, despite the difficulties of convincing the patient and obtaining a rapid referral. According to GPs' answers, the relationships between primary care and the mental health team were characterised by a lack of communication: less than one out of three GPs had regular contact with a mental health team, and a large majority reported that they never or rarely had information about the diagnosis and treatment of subjects referred for early schizophrenia. Having regular contacts with mental health services had a major impact on GPs' management of subjects with early schizophrenia, in particular on reducing delays to obtain a psychiatric consultation and on level of information on diagnosis and treatment after referral. CONCLUSION: Promotion of networking between primary care and mental health services is required to reduce delayed access to care in subjects with early schizophrenia.