RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) is the most common cause of Acute Viral Hepatitis (AVH) in children. It causes self-limiting illness and rarely acute liver failure. The shifting pattern in HAV endemicity is rendering adolescents and adults vulnerable to infection. METHODS: In this retrospective study, samples received from 14,807 patients with acute onset icteric illness from January 2014-December 2022 were analyzed. HAV infection was detected by anti-HAV IgM positivity. The cases were divided into 3 age groups, pediatric, adolescents and adults, and clinical presentations were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 7.72%(1144) were positive for anti-HAV IgM. Of these, 60%(690) were finally included in the study. The positive cases were divided into adults, ≥18 years (44%, 304); pediatric, <12 years (31%, 212) and adolescents (25%,174) age groups. Overall males were predominant [72.4%(500)], with a median age of 16 (IQR:9-21) years. Cases were characterised into AVH (68.1%, 470/690), Acute Liver Failure (ALF) (31.4%, 217/690) and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (0.43%, 3/690). AVH in the pediatric age group was 69%(146/212), adolescents was 67%(117/174), and adults was 68%(207/304). ALF cases among the 3 groups were 30%(65/212), 33%(57/174), and 31%(95/304) respectively. Overall mortality was seen in 6.52%(45/690), maximum in adolescents with ALF presentation [10.3%(18/174)]. On molecular characterization of infection, viremia was seen in 28.9%(200/690) and all the isolates were Genotype IIIA. CONCLUSIONS: The number of adults experiencing symptomatic HAV infection was seen to increase over the years in the present study. Infection in adolescents was associated with higher mortality and ALF as the clinical presentation.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis A , Humanos , Adolescente , India/epidemiología , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Hepatitis A/complicaciones , Hepatitis A/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Niño , Fallo Hepático Agudo/epidemiología , Fallo Hepático Agudo/mortalidad , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Virus de la Hepatitis A , Atención Terciaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticuerpos de Hepatitis A/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sepsis remains a global health burden associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Bacteria are known to be the predominant pathogens in sepsis; however, viral etiologies in sepsis are still under diagnosed. Respiratory viral pathogens have been previously linked to sepsis, but the knowledge of incidence, disease burden and mortality of viral-induced sepsis remains limited. This study aimed at understanding the role of respiratory viral infections in the causation of sepsis in liver disease patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the clinical records of liver disease patients with influenza-like illness, whose requests for respiratory viral testing were received from January 2019 to December 2022, were reviewed. Respiratory viruses were identified using FilmArray 2.0 respiratory panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Utah, USA). RESULTS: Of 1391 patients tested, a respiratory viral etiology was detected in 23%. The occurrence of sepsis was seen in 35%. Among these, isolated viral etiology with no other bacterial/fungal coinfection was found in 55% of patients. Rhinovirus/Enterovirus was found as the most common underlying viral etiology (23.4%). The sepsis prevalence was higher among patients with associated comorbidities (45%) and decompensated cirrhosis (84%). On multi-variable analysis, no factor was found independently associated with sepsis-related mortality. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the importance of isolated viral etiology in causation of sepsis among liver disease patients. Patients with comorbidities, older age and decompensated cirrhosis are at an increased risk of developing sepsis and are associated with poorer outcomes. Accurate and timely identification of the viral etiology in sepsis would prevent the misuse of antibiotics and improve overall patient care.
Asunto(s)
Hepatopatías , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Sepsis , Virosis , Humanos , Hepatopatías/complicaciones , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Comorbilidad , Virosis/complicaciones , Rhinovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Rhinovirus/fisiología , Enterovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Enterovirus/fisiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: The indigenously developed Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-NIV COVID Kavach IgG enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been recommended for seroprevalence among vulnerable populations in India, which provided essential services throughout the lockdown. The staff working in the High Court was one such group. We compared anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity among the staff of Jodhpur and Jaipur High Courts, Rajasthan, India. METHODS: Asymptomatic judiciary staff of Jodhpur and Jaipur benches of High Courts were enrolled after informed written consent. A questionnaire was filled and 3-5 ml venous blood was collected from participants. The ICMR-NIV COVID Kavach IgG ELISA and EUROIMMUN IgG ELISA were used for detection of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. RESULTS: A total of 63 samples (41 from Jodhpur and 22 from Jaipur) were collected between 28th July to 4th August 2020. The overall anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence was found to be 6.35%. Seropositivity was higher among the staff from Jaipur (13.64%) as compared to Jodhpur (2.44%). The Kavach ELISA results were in complete agreement with EUROIMMUN ELISA. The infection control measures were deemed effective. CONCLUSION: Seroprevalence among the staff of Jodhpur High Court was found to be lower than Jaipur, reflecting higher susceptibility to COVID-19 in the former. Many offices worldwide are closed till mid 2020 but need to come up with pre-emptive policies eventually. This study may help to anticipate the possible challenges when other government/private offices start functioning. The infection control practices of one workplace may help formulate guidelines for other offices.
RESUMEN
We studied the pattern and duration of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) shedding in 32 asymptomatic and 11 paucisymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 cases. Viral RNA shedding in exhaled breath progressively diminished and became negative after 6 days of a positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test. Therefore, the duration of isolation can be minimized to 6 days.
RESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an acute onset pneumonia caused by a novel Betacoronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in the Wuhan City of China in December 2019 and evolved into a global pandemic. To date, there are no proven drugs or vaccines against this virus. Hence, the situation demands an urgent need to explore all potential therapeutic strategies that can be made available to prevent the disease progression and improve patient outcomes. In absence of clinically proven treatment guidelines, several repurposed drugs and investigational agents are currently being evaluated in clinical trials for their probable benefits in the treatment of COVID-19. These include antivirals (remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, umifenovir, and favipiravir), interferon, antimalarials (chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine), antiparasitic drugs (ivermectin and nitazoxanide), biologics (monoclonal antibodies and interleukin receptor antagonist), cellular therapies (mesenchymal stem cells and natural killer cells), convalescent plasma, and cytokine adsorber. Though several observational studies have claimed many of these agents to be effective based on their in vitro activities and extrapolated evidence from SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemics, the currently available data remains inconclusive because of ill-defined patient selection criteria, small sample size, lack of concurrent controls, and use of intermediary outcomes instead of patient-relevant outcomes. Moreover, there is a need to clearly define the patient populations who warrant therapy and also the timing of initiation of treatment. Understanding the disease pathology responsible for the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 is imperative to identify the potential targets for drug development. This review explains the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and summarizes the potential treatment candidates, which can provide guidance in developing effective therapeutic strategies.