Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Trials ; 21(1): 136, 2020 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32014032

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The GABAA-α5 receptor antagonist S44819 is a promising candidate to enhance functional recovery after acute ischemic stroke (IS). S44819 is currently evaluated in this indication; RESTORE brain study started in Dec 2016 and was completed in March 2019. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a 3-month international, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled phase II multicentre study. Patients in 14 countries who suffered an IS leading to a moderate or severe deficit defined by NIHSS score ranging from 7 to 20 and are aged between 18 to 85 years are included between 3 and 8 days after the stroke onset. Approximately 580 patients are to be included. The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the superiority of at least one of the two doses of S44819 (150 or 300 mg bid) compared to placebo on top of usual care on functional recovery measured with the modified Rankin scale at 3 months. Comparisons between two doses of S44819 and placebo are assessed with ordinal logistic regression evaluating the odds of shifting from one category to the next in the direction of a better outcome at day 90. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of S44819 effects on neurological examination using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale total score, activities of daily living using the Barthel Index total score, and cognitive performance using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale total score and Trail Making Test times. Safety and tolerability of the two doses of S44819 will also be analyzed. DISCUSSION: The RESTORE BRAIN study might represent the first proof of concept study of an innovative therapeutic approach that is primarily based on enhancing functional recovery after IS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomized Efficacy and Safety Trial with Oral S 44819 after Recent ischemic cerebral Event, an international, multi-centre, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase II study. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02877615; Eudract 2016-001005-16. Registered 24 August 2016.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/administración & dosificación , Hemorragias Intracraneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Oxazoles/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Actividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Antagonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxazoles/efectos adversos , Recuperación de la Función/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 27(5): 526-537, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28298261

RESUMEN

Agomelatine is efficacious in reducing symptoms and preventing relapse in placebo-controlled trials in generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). Nevertheless, fixed dose studies of agomelatine in GAD have not been undertaken. To determine the minimally effective optimal dose of agomelatine in GAD, the efficacy of two doses of agomelatine (10 and 25mg/day) was investigated in a 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, international study in patients with a primary diagnosis of GAD. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A). The study was undertaken in 35 clinical centers in Finland, Russia, Poland, Slovakia and Ukraine from August 2013 to January 2015. 131 out-patients were included in the agomelatine 10mg group, 139 in the agomelatine 25mg group, and 142 in the placebo group. Both doses of agomelatine were associated with significant decreases in the HAM-A at week 12 (difference versus placebo of 7.16±1.00 at 10mg and 11.08±0.98 at 25mg, p<0.0001). Significant effects on all secondary measures were found for both doses at week 12; including psychic and somatic HAM-A subscales, response rate, remission on the HAM-A, and functional impairment. Findings were confirmed in subsets of more severely ill patients on all endpoints. The low placebo response rate observed in this study was consistent with an increase in the quality of data collected. Agomelatine was well-tolerated by patients, with minimal distinctions from placebo. There was a dose effect of agomelatine, with a greater placebo-agomelatine difference in the agomelatine 25mg group, compared to the agomelatine 10mg group.The present data support early work indicating the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine in the treatment of GAD.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Psychopharmacol ; 29(10): 1119-28, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26268533

RESUMEN

The present double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluates the effects of agomelatine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor escitalopram on sexual dysfunction in healthy men and women. METHODS: A total of 133 healthy volunteers (67 men, 66 women) were randomly assigned to agomelatine (25 or 50 mg) or escitalopram (20 mg) or placebo for nine weeks. Sexual acceptability was evaluated by using the psychotropic-related sexual dysfunction questionnaire 5-items total score and sexual dysfunction relative to each sub-score (in 110 volunteers with sexual activity). Sexual dysfunction was evaluated at baseline and after two, five and eight weeks of treatment and one week after drug discontinuation. RESULTS: The psychotropic-related sexual dysfunction questionnaire 5-items total score was significantly lower in both agomelatine groups versus escitalopram at all visits (p < 0.01 to p < 0.0001) with no difference between agomelatine and placebo nor between both agomelatine doses. Similar results were observed after drug discontinuation. The total score was significantly higher in the escitalopram group than in the placebo group at each post-baseline visit (p < 0.01 to p < 0.001). Similar results were observed regardless of volunteers' gender. Compared to placebo, only escitalopram significantly impaired dysfunction relative to "delayed orgasm or ejaculation" (p < 0.01) and "absence of orgasm or ejaculation" (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01). The percentage of participants with a sexual dysfunction was higher in the escitalopram group than in agomelatine groups (p < 0.01 to p < 0.05) and placebo (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study confirms the better sexual acceptability profile of agomelatine (25 or 50 mg) in healthy men and women, compared to escitalopram. TRIAL REGISTRATION NAME: Evaluation of the effect of agomelatine and escitalopram on emotions and motivation in healthy male and female volunteers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN75872983.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/administración & dosificación , Citalopram/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Emociones/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...