Combined in silico and in vitro approaches to identify P-glycoprotein-inhibiting pesticides.

The P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pump plays a major role in xenobiotic detoxification. The inhibition of its activity by environmental contaminants remains however rather little characterised. The present study was designed to develop a combination of different approaches to identify P-gp inhibitors among a large number of pesticides using in silico and in vitro models. First, the prediction performance of four web tools was evaluated alone or in combination using a set of recently marketed drugs. The best combination of web tools-AdmetSAR2.0/PgpRules/pkCSM-was next used to predict P-gp activity inhibition by 762 pesticides. Among the 187 pesticides predicted to be P-gp inhibitors, 11 were tested in vitro for their ability to inhibit the efflux of reference substrates (rhodamine 123 and Hoechst 33342) in P-gp overexpressing MCF7R cells and to inhibit the efflux of the reference substrate rhodamine 123 in the Caco-2 cell monolayer. In MCF7R cell assays, ivermectin B1a, emamectin B1 benzoate, spinosad, dimethomorph and tralkoxydim inhibited P-gp activity; ivermectin B1a, emamectin B1 benzoate and spinosad were determined to be stronger inhibitors (half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50 ] of 3 ± 1, 5 ± 1 and 7 ± 1 µM, respectively) than dimethomorph and tralkoxydim (IC50 of 102 ± 7 and 88 ± 7 µM, respectively). Ivermectin B1a, emamectin B1 benzoate, spinosad and dimethomorph also inhibited P-gp activity in Caco-2 cell monolayer assays, with dimethomorph being a weaker P-gp inhibitor. These combined approaches could be used to identify P-gp inhibitors among food contaminants, but need to be optimised and adapted for high-throughput screening.

Comparative in silico prediction of P-glycoprotein-mediated transport for 2010-2020 US FDA-approved drugs using six Web-tools.

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an efflux pump implicated in pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions. The identification of its substrates is consequently an important issue, notably for drugs under development. For such a purpose, various in silico methods have been developed, but their relevance remains to be fully established. The present study was designed to get insight about this point, through determining the performance values of six freely accessible Web-tools (ADMETlab, AdmetSAR2.0, PgpRules, pkCSM, SwissADME and vNN-ADMET), computationally predicting P-gp-mediated transport. Using an external test set of 231 marketed drugs, approved over the 2010-2020 period by the US Food and Drug Administration and fully in vitro characterized for their P-gp substrate status, various performance parameters (including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficient and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) were determined. They were found to rather poorly meet criteria commonly required for acceptable prediction, whatever the Web-tools were used alone or in combination. Predictions of being P-gp substrate or non-substrate by these online in silico methods may therefore be considered with caution.

Differential interactions of carbamate pesticides with drug transporters.

Pesticides are now recognised to interact with drug transporters, but only few data are available on this issue for carbamate pesticides, a widely used class of agrochemicals, to which humans are highly exposed. The present study was therefore designed to determine whether four representative carbamate pesticides, i.e. the insecticides aminocarb and carbofuran, the herbicide chlorpropham and the fungicide propamocarb, may impair activities of main drug transporters implicated in pharmacokinetics. The interactions of carbamates with solute carrier and ATP-binding cassette transporters were investigated using cultured transporter-overexpressing cells, reference substrates and spectrofluorimetry-, liquid chomatography/tandem mass spectrometry- or radioactivity-based methods. Aminocarb and carbofuran exerted no or minimal effects on transporter activities, whereas chlorpropham inhibited BCRP and OAT3 activities and propamocarb decreased those of OCT1 and OCT2, but cis-stimulated that of MATE2-K. Such alterations of transporters however required chlorpropham/propamocarb concentrations in the 5-50 µM range, likely not relevant to environmental exposure. Trans-stimulation assays and propamocarb accumulation experiments additionally suggested that propamocarb is not a substrate for OCT1, OCT2 and MATE2-K. These data indicate that some carbamate pesticides can interact in vitro with some drug transporters, but only when used at concentrations higher than those expected to occur in environmentally exposed humans.

Implication of human drug transporters to toxicokinetics and toxicity of pesticides.

Human membrane drug transporters are recognized as major actors of pharmacokinetics. Pesticides also interact with human drug transporters, which may have consequences for pesticide toxicokinetics and toxicity. The present review summarizes key findings about this topic. In vitro assays have demonstrated that some pesticides, belonging to various chemical classes, modulate drug transporter activity, regulate transporter expression and/or are substrates, thus bringing the proof of concept for pesticide-transporter relationships. The expected low human concentration of pesticides in response to environmental exposure constitutes a key-parameter to be kept in mind for judging the in vivo relevance of such pesticide-transporter interactions and their consequences for human health. Existing data about interactions of pesticides with drug transporters remain, however, rather sparse; more extensive and systematic characterization of pesticide-transporter relationships, through the use of high throughput in vitro assays and/or in silico methods, is, therefore, required. In addition, consideration of transporter polymorphisms, pesticide mixture effects and physiological and pathological factors governing drug transporter expression may help to better define the in vivo relevance of pesticide-transporter interactions in terms of toxicokinetics and toxicity for humans. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.