Role of plasma EBV-DNA load and EBER status on newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To explore the prognostic and therapeutic role of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) on peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). METHODS: Totally 262 newly diagnosed PTCL patients who were hospitalized from January 2014 to December 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Molecular analysis included 31 eligible patients. EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) presence in tumor tissue and EBV DNA levels in patients at baseline (DNA1) and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy (DNA4) were assessed. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that the EBER-positive cohort exhibited significant differences compared to counterparts in overall survival (OS, P = 0.047) and progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.009). Both DNA1 and DNA4 were significantly associated with inferior OS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that DNA4 independently affected PTCL prognosis for OS (hazard ratio = 5.1617; 95% confidence interval 1.1017-24.1831; P = 0.037). Treatment with the cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) plus azacytidine regimen showed a better OS compared to CHOP or CHOP plus etoposide for patients with partially positive EBER and EBER positive statuses (P = 0.192), although the improvement was not statistically significant. This study delineated the genetic paradigm of PTCL, comparing genetic differences by EBV status and found that EBER partially positive plus positive patients were more likely to have DNMT3A (P = 0.002), RHOAG17V (P = 0.023), and TET2 mutations (P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: EBER, DNA1, and DNA4 emerged as sensitive markers for prognosis. CHOP plus azacytidine might present a preferable option for PTCL patients with DNA methylation due to EBV infection.

Comparison of long-term outcomes between imatinib and dasatinib prophylaxis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although the prognosis of Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) has improved with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and stem cell transplantation, prevention of relapse after transplantation remains a concern. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of TKI prophylaxis with imatinib and dasatinib on long-term outcomes after transplantation. METHODS: Patients with Ph+ ALL who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at first complete remission (CR1) and received TKI prophylaxis after allo-HSCT were included in this retrospective analysis. Two cohorts were established based on the choice of TKI prophylaxis: the imatinib (Ima) and dasatinib (Das) cohorts. The survival and safety outcomes of these cohorts were compared. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients in the Ima cohort and 50 in the Das cohort were included. After a median follow-up of 50.6 months, the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality rate, and overall survival in the Ima and Das cohorts were 16.1% and 12.5%, 5.2% and 9.8%, and 86.5% and 77.6%, respectively, with no statistical differences. The cumulative incidence of mild chronic graft-versus-host disease was higher in the Das cohort. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (64.7% vs. 69.5%). The Das cohort had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (25.5% vs. 2.3%) and gastrointestinal reaction (48.9% vs. 31.4%) than the Ima cohort. The proportion of patients treated on schedule was significantly lower in the Das cohort than in the Ima cohort, and drug intolerance was the main reason for protocol violation. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with Ph+ ALL undergoing allo-HSCT in CR1, imatinib prophylaxis achieved long-term outcomes similar to those of dasatinib.

[Efficacy and Safety of Plerixafor Combined with G-CSF for Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Lymphoma Patients].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of plerixafor combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in mobilizing peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells in patients with lymphoma. METHODS: The clinical data of lymphoma patients who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization using plerixafor combined with G-CSF from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients received 3 kinds of mobilization regimens: front-line steady-state mobilization, preemptive intervention, and recuse mobilization. The acquisition success rate, excellent rate of collection, and incidence of treatment-related adverse reaction were counted. The influence of sex, age, disease remission status, bone marrow involvement at diagnosis, chemotherapy lines, number of chemotherapy, platelet count and number of CD34+ cells on the day before acquisition in peripheral blood on the collection results were analyzed to identify the risk factors associated with poor stem cell collection. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with lymphoma were enrolled, including 7 cases who received front-line steady-state mobilization, 19 cases who received preemptive intervention, and 17 cases who received recuse mobilization. The overall acquisition success rate was 58.1% (25/43) after use of plerixafor combined with G-CSF, and acquisition success rate of front-line steady-state mobilization, preemptive intervention, and recuse mobilization was 100%, 57.9%(11/19), and 41.2%(7/17), respectively. The excellent rate of collection was 18.6%(8/43). A total of 15 patients experienced mild to moderate treatment-related adverse reactions. The number of CD34+ cells < 5 cells/µl in peripheral blood on the day before collection was an independent risk factor affecting stem cell collection. CONCLUSIONS: Plerixafor combined with G-CSF is a safe and effective mobilization regimen for patients with lymphoma. The number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood on the day before collection is an predictable index for the evaluation of stem cell collection.

The Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Chinese Patients with Light-Chain Amyloidosis: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.

To retrospectively identify the critical characteristics and prognostic factors of light-chain amyloidosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected and compared from 91 patients who were diagnosed with light-chain amyloidosis at four hospitals between January 2010 and November 2018. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and performed an overall survival (OS) analysis. RESULTS: Patients (median age, 60 years) were diagnosed with organ involvement of the kidney (91.2%), heart (56%), liver (14.3%), soft tissue (18.7%), or gastrointestinal tract (15.4%), and 68.1% of patients had more than two organs involved. Patients were most treated with bortezomib-based regimens (56%), and only one patient had autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-ASCT). The median OS was 36.33 months and was influenced by the ECOG score, renal involvement, cardiac involvement, hepatic involvement, and persistence of positive immunofixation. Patients who received bortezomib-based treatment had a trend of favorable OS compared to those who received non-bortezomib-based treatments, but the difference was not statistically significant. Although the overall number of organs involved was not related to OS, the number of organs involved in the heart, liver and kidney was related. Multivariate analysis indicated that cardiac involvement and negative hematologic response with persistence of positive immunofixation were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION: Cardiac involvement and the hematologic response to treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS in light-chain amyloidosis patients.

Efficacy of Intermittent, Oral Famciclovir Prophylaxis for Bortezomib-Induced Herpes Zoster in Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of intermittent, oral famciclovir prophylaxis for bortezomib-induced herpes zoster in multiple myeloma patients. Method: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of bortezomib treatment-related varicella-zoster virus reactivation in 719 newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving intermittent oral famciclovir prophylaxis, continuous oral acyclovir prophylaxis or no prophylaxis. The definition of intermittent oral famciclovir prophylaxis was oral famciclovir at a dose of 250mg twice daily for 9 days after finishing the last dose of bortezomib therapy every cycle. Age, gender, stage per the International Staging System, type of M protein, baseline of absolute lymphocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, and absolute monocyte count were analyzed to find the potential factors that could predispose to herpes zoster infections. Results: Varicella-zoster virus infection occurred in 96 patients (13.4%) during bortezomib treatment. The incidence of herpes zoster was significantly higher in the non-prophylaxis group compared with the prophylaxis group (22.9% vs 8.2% P<0.001), while the rate was similar between the intermittent oral famciclovir group and the continuous oral acyclovir group (8.4% vs 7.9% P=0.835). Hepatic and renal toxicity were observed in 12% and 2.8% of the patient respectively in the intermittent famciclovir group, which was similar in the continuous acyclovir group (18.1% and 4.2%). The prophylactic use of antiviral agents is a predictive factor for varicella-zoster virus reactivation. Conclusion: Intermittent famciclovir prophylaxis is effective and safe in preventing herpes zoster development and can markedly reduce the duration of oral medicine treatment compared with continuous acyclovir prophylaxis.