Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
JAC Antimicrob Resist ; 4(2): dlac037, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35415609

RESUMEN

Background: The incidence of acquired rifampicin resistance (RIF-ADR; RR) during first-line treatment varies. Objectives: Compare clinically significant RIF-ADR versus primary and reinfection RR, between regimens (daily versus no rifampicin in the continuation phase; daily versus intermittent rifampicin in the continuation phase) and between rural Bangladesh and Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. Methods: From patients with treatment failure, relapse, or lost to follow-up, both the outcome and baseline sputum sample were prospectively collected for rpoB sequencing to determine whether RR was present in both samples (primary RR) or only at outcome (RIF-ADR or reinfection RR). Results: The most frequent cause of RR at outcome was primary RR (62.9%; 190/302). RIF-ADR was more frequent with the use of rifampicin throughout versus only in the intensive phase (difference: 3.1%; 95% CI: 0.2-6.0). The RIF-ADR rate was higher with intermittent versus daily rifampicin in the continuation phase (difference: 3.9%; 95% CI: 0.4-7.5). RIF-ADR after rifampicin-throughout treatment was higher when resistance to isoniazid was also found compared with isoniazid-susceptible TB. The estimated RIF-ADR rate was 0.5 per 1000 with daily rifampicin during the entire treatment. Reinfection RR was more frequent in Kinshasa than in Bangladesh (difference: 51.0%; 95% CI: 34.9-67.2). Conclusions: RR is less frequently created when rifampicin is used only during the intensive phase. Under control programme conditions, the RIF-ADR rate for the WHO 6 month rifampicin daily regimen was as low as in affluent settings. For RR-TB control, first-line regimens should be sturdy with optimal rifampicin protection. RIF-ADR prevention is most needed where isoniazid-polyresistance is high, (re)infection control where crowding is extreme.

4.
J Med Microbiol ; 70(3)2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33625351

RESUMEN

Introduction. Drug resistant tuberculosis remains a worldwide problem that requires prompt diagnosis.Hypothesis/Gap statement. The WHO recommended direct, rapid Xpert MTB/RIF is prohibitively costly, therefore, there is a need to validate a rapid, affordable DST for use in low- and middle-income settings.Aim. The technical performance and time to results of a simple, direct microscopy-based slide DST (SDST) assay for diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant TB was evaluated in Uganda.Methodology. Sputum samples from 122 smear-positive re-treatment TB patients presenting to the TB treatment centre at Uganda's National Referral Hospital, Mulago, Kampala, Uganda were examined. The sputum samples were tested by the direct SDST which was compared to the indirect Lowenstein Jensen Proportion Method (LJDST) method as the gold standard. The time to results was defined as the time from DST setting to results interpretation. The results were further analysed for sensitivity and specificity as well as agreement between LJDST and SDST for rifampicin resistance determination.Results. A total of 117 smear positive sputum samples with valid results for both tests were compared. The median time to results for SDST was 14 days with an interquartile range (IQR) of 10-14 days compared to 60 days with IQR of 60-75 days for LJDST. The number for rifampicin resistance by the gold standard LJDST was 26. The SDST had a sensitivity of 96 % (95 %; CI 81-99 %) and a specificity of 97.8 % (95 %; CI 93-100 %). The Positive Predictive and Negative Predictive values for SDST were 92.3 % (95 %; CI 76.8-99 %) and 98.9 % (95 %; CI 94-100 %), respectively. The kappa agreement between SDST and LJDST was 92.3 %.Conclusion. The SDST was found to be a rapid and accurate direct test for the detection of rifampicin resistance among retreatment TB cases in low-income settings.


Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antituberculosos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Rifampin/farmacología , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Microscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efectos de los fármacos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Esputo/microbiología , Factores de Tiempo , Uganda
5.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0238016, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866193

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since a meta-analysis showed little or no effect of second-line injectables on treatment success, and using injectables may induce ototoxicity, injectable-free rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) treatment regimens are recommended. However, acquired resistance preventing activity was overlooked. No previous study assessed the effect of shortening the duration of kanamycin administration to 2 months during the intensive phase of the RR-TB shorter treatment regimen (STR). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of the effect of using 2 months of kanamycin instead of the standard 4(+) months (extension if lack of smear conversion at 4 months) on recurrence (either treatment failure or relapse) and fluoroquinolone acquired drug resistance, in patients treated with a gatifloxacin-based STR in Damien Foundation supported clinics in Bangladesh. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations. RESULTS: Five of 52 (9.6%) treated with a STR containing two months of kanamycin had recurrence, compared to 21 of 738 (2.8%) patients treated with the standard STR containing 4(+) months of kanamycin (OR 3.7; 95%CI:1.5-10.3). In those with initially fluoroquinolone-susceptible TB, acquired resistance to fluoroquinolone was detected in none of 639 patients treated with 4(+) months of kanamycin and two (4.5%) of 44 treated with two months of kanamycin (OR 75.2; 95%CI:3.6-1592.1). CONCLUSION: Two months of kanamycin was insufficient to prevent recurrence with acquired resistance to gatifloxacin, the core drug of the most effective RR-TB STR. Injectable mediated resistance prevention is important to reach high effectiveness, to safeguard all treatment options after recurrence, and to prevent the spread of resistant TB. Studies on all-oral regimens should also assess the effect of regimen composition on resistance acquisition. Until evidence shows that other drugs can assure at least the same strong resistance preventing activity of the injectables, it seems wise to continue using this group of drugs, and adapt the regimen if any ototoxicity is detected.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Rifampin/farmacología , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones , Kanamicina/administración & dosificación , Kanamicina/farmacología , Kanamicina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Respir Med ; 161: 105844, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32056722

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Niger, the Shorter Treatment Regimen (STR) has been implemented nationwide for rifampicin resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB), since 2008. No previous publication has shown the results from countrywide programmatic implementation using few exclusion criteria, nor exhaustively assessed the effect of initial resistance to companion drugs on outcomes. METHODS: The National Tuberculosis Programme and the Damien Foundation conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the management of RR-TB from 2008 to 2016. Baseline resistance to drugs was assessed phenotypically, complemented by screening the inhA, katG and pncA genes. Cured patients were followed-up for a period of one year after cure. FINDINGS: Among 1044 patients tested for rifampicin resistance, mainly previously treated patients, 332 were diagnosed with pulmonary RR/TB, 288 were enrolled on treatment and 255 started on STR. Six patients received a modified STR. Among 249 patients on standardised STR, 207 (83·1%) were cured relapse-free, eight (3·2%) had failure, 23 (9·2%) died, seven (2·8%) were lost to follow-up and four (1·6%) relapsed. The risk of unfavourable outcome was higher in patients with initial resistance to fluoroquinolones (aOR 20·4, 95%CI:5·6-74·6) and very severely underweight (aOR 3·9, 95%CI:1·5-10·1). Successful outcome was not affected by initial resistance to companion drugs. Serious ototoxicity was reported in eight patients (3·2%). INTERPRETATION: A comprehensive nationwide approach to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis management using the STR was feasible and successful. Outcomes were not affected by initial resistance to companion drugs. Our study confirms the effectiveness and safety of the STR. FUNDING: Damien Foundation and Institute of Tropical Medicine-Antwerp.


Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos/administración & dosificación , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niger , Rifampin , Adulto Joven
7.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 11826, 2019 08 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413308

RESUMEN

We compared the ability of commercial and non-commercial, phenotypic and genotypic rapid drug susceptibility tests (DSTs) to detect rifampicin resistance (RR)-conferring 'disputed' mutations frequently missed by Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT), namely L430P, D435Y, L452P, and I491F. Strains with mutation S450L served as positive control while wild-types were used as negative control. Of the 38 mutant strains, 5.7% were classified as RR by MGIT, 16.2% by Trek Sensititre MYCOTB MIC plate, 19.4% by resazurin microtiter plate assay (REMA), 50.0% by nitrate reductase assay (NRA), and 62.2% by microscopic observation direct susceptibility testing (MODS). Reducing MGIT rifampicin concentration to 0.5 µg/ml, and/or increasing incubation time, enhanced detection of disputed mutations from 5.7% to at least 65.7%, particularly for mutation I491F (from 0.0 to 75.0%). Compared with MGIT at standard pre-set time with 0.25 µg/ml ECOFF as breakpoint, we found a statistically significant increase in the ability of MGIT to resolve disputed mutants and WT strains at extended incubation period of 15 and 21 days, with 0.5 µg/ml and 1 µg/ml ECOFF respectively. MODS detected 75.0% of the I491F strains and NRA 62.5%, while it was predictably missed by all molecular assays. Xpert MTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra, and GenoscholarTB-NTM + MDRTB detected all mutations within the 81 bp RR determining region. Only GenoType MTBDRplus version 2 missed mutation L430P in 2 of 11 strains. Phenotypic and genotypic DSTs varied greatly in detecting occult rifampicin resistance. None of these methods detected all disputed mutations without misclassifying wild-type strains.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , ARN Polimerasas Dirigidas por ADN/genética , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Mutación , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Rifampin/farmacología , Antituberculosos , Proteínas Bacterianas/efectos de los fármacos , ARN Polimerasas Dirigidas por ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Genes Bacterianos , Genotipo , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efectos de los fármacos
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(suppl_3): S274-S283, 2018 11 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30496459

RESUMEN

Background: Gatifloxacin is used for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The optimal dose is unknown. Methods: We performed a 28-day gatifloxacin hollow-fiber system model of tuberculosis (HFS-TB) study in order to identify the target exposures associated with optimal kill rates and resistance suppression. Monte Carlo experiments (MCE) were used to identify the dose that would achieve the target exposure in 10000 adult patients with meningeal or pulmonary MDR-TB. The optimal doses identified were validated using probit analyses of clinical data from 2 prospective clinical trials of patients with pulmonary and meningeal tuberculosis. Classification and regression-tree (CART) analyses were used to identify the gatifloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) below which patients failed or relapsed on combination therapy. Results: The target exposure associated with optimal microbial kill rates and resistance suppression in the HFS-TB was a 0-24 hour area under the concentration-time curve-to-MIC of 184. MCE identified an optimal gatifloxacin dose of 800 mg/day for pulmonary and 1200 mg/day for meningeal MDR-TB, and a clinical susceptibility breakpoint of MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L. In clinical trials, CART identified that 79% patients failed therapy if MIC was >2 mg/L, but 98% were cured if MIC was ≤0.5 mg/L. Probit analysis of clinical data demonstrated a >90% probability of a cure in patients if treated with 800 mg/day for pulmonary tuberculosis and 1200 mg/day for meningeal tuberculosis. Doses ≤400 mg/day were suboptimal. Conclusions: Gatifloxacin doses of 800 mg/day and 1200 mg/day are recommended for pulmonary and meningeal MDR-TB treatment, respectively. Gatifloxacin has a susceptible dose-dependent zone at MICs 0.5-2 mg/L.


Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos/farmacocinética , Gatifloxacina/farmacocinética , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efectos de los fármacos , Tuberculosis Meníngea/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Pulmón/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Método de Montecarlo , Estudios Prospectivos , Tuberculosis Meníngea/microbiología , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/microbiología , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/microbiología
9.
Int J Mycobacteriol ; 5 Suppl 1: S46-S47, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28043604

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an antibacterial used in the first-line regimen against tuberculosis (TB) for its action against dormant bacilli. PZA is also included in the new short regimen to treat multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). However, the prevalence and significance of PZA resistance is not known in Central and West Africa. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2016, we collected samples from MDR-TB patients recruited in an observational study implementing the new short MDR-TB regimen in six countries: Burundi (n=35), Cameroon (n=135), Niger (n=57), Central African Republic (n=35), Democratic Republic of the Congo (n=99), and Rwanda (n=16). Resistance to rifamipicine, isoniazide, injectables, and fluoroquinolones was tested by phenotypic (live strains) or genotypic methods (inactivated strains). Resistance to PZA was analyzed through sequencing of the pncA gene. Relevance of mutations was established based on recent literature. RESULTS: From 377 patients with MDR-TB, 354 (94%) samples were successfully sequenced. Among those, 53% (189) presented a mutation in pncA that confers a reported (121), potential (56), or unclear (12) resistance. Furthermore, six isolates presented a mutation associated with PZA sensitivity. The frequency of resistance per country was 26% in Central African Republic, 39% in Niger, 49% in Cameroon, 66% in Burundi, 68% in Democratic Republic of the Congo, and 87% in Rwanda. Isolates presented 109 different profiles of mutations, including 73 occurring only once. Codon 12 was most frequently affected (15 isolates), including 10 isolates with Asp12Ala. These 10 isolates came from three different countries, and presented different profiles of resistance to other drugs. The two next most frequent mutations, Met175Ile and Gln10Pro (8 isolates and 7 isolates, respectively), each suggest clusters of transmission, with similar geographical and resistance characteristics. Moreover, four isolates presented two simultaneous genetic variations, and 11 patients had a mix of sensitive and resistant bacilli. Preliminary data tend to indicate that patients carrying a PZA-resistant isolate had a higher failure rate on the new short MDR-TB treatment regimen (7% vs. 3%). All isolates resistant to injectables (4) and most (19/21) of those resistant to fluoroquinolones, including two extremely-resistant TB isolates, were also resistant to PZA. CONCLUSION: Similar to other regions in the world, the majority of MDR-TB strains from Sub-Saharan Africa countries are resistant to PZA, albeit with diverse rates between countries. We identified a diverse range of mutations in pncA, with 30% of them not previously reported. The impact of such resistance on the success of the short MDR-TB regimen will require more investigation.

10.
J Clin Microbiol ; 51(8): 2641-5, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23761146

RESUMEN

WHO-endorsed phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) methods for Mycobacterium tuberculosis are assumed to be the gold standard for identifying rifampin (RMP) resistance. However, previous results indicated that low-level, yet probably clinically relevant, RMP resistance linked to specific rpoB mutations is easily missed by some growth-based methods. We aimed to compare the level of resistance detected on Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium with resistance detected by the Bactec MGIT 960 automated DST (MGIT-DST) system for various rpoB mutants. Full agreement between LJ and MGIT-DST was observed for mutations located at codons 513 (Lys or Pro) and 531 (Leu, Trp), which were always resistant by both methods. For mutations 511Pro, 516Tyr, 533Pro, 572Phe, and several 526 mutations, LJ and MGIT results were highly discordant, with MGIT-DST failing to give a result or declaring the strains susceptible. Our data show that phenotypic RMP resistance testing of M. tuberculosis is not a binary phenomenon for some rpoB mutations and that the widely used automated MGIT 960 system is prone to miss some RMP resistance-conferring mutations, while careful DST on LJ missed hardly any. Given the association of these mutations with poor clinical outcome, our findings suggest that the gold standard for rifampin resistance should be reconsidered, in order to address the present confusion caused by discrepancies between phenotypic and genotypic results. The impacts of these mutations will depend on the frequency of their occurrence, which may vary from one setting to another.


Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Errores Diagnósticos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Mutación Missense , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Rifampin/farmacología , Automatización de Laboratorios/métodos , Medios de Cultivo/química , ARN Polimerasas Dirigidas por ADN , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA