Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e077428, 2024 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604633

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate all-cause mortality in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and determine whether antibiotic duration beyond 8 days is associated with reduction in all-cause mortality in patients admitted with VAP in the intensive care unit. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with VAP based on the National Healthcare Safety Network definition and clinical criteria. SETTING: Single tertiary care hospital in Southern India. PARTICIPANTS: 100 consecutive adult patients diagnosed with VAP were followed up for 28 days postdiagnosis or until discharge. OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of mortality at 28 days postdiagnosis was measured. Tests for association and predictors of mortality were determined using χ2 test and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included baseline clinical parameters such as age, underlying comorbidities as well as measuring total length of stay, number of ventilator-free days and antibiotic-free days. RESULTS: The overall case fatality rate due to VAP was 46%. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between those receiving shorter antibiotic duration (5-8 days) and those on longer therapy. Among those who survived until day 9, the observed risk difference was 15.1% between both groups, with an HR of 1.057 (95% CI 0.26 to 4.28). In 70.4% of isolates, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli were identified, of which the most common pathogen isolated was Acinetobacter baumannii (62%). CONCLUSION: In this hospital-based cohort study, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that prolonging antibiotic duration beyond 8 days in patients with VAP improves survival.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Adulto , Humanos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , India/epidemiología , Cuidados Críticos
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 1532, 2024 01 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38233417

RESUMEN

Climate is one of the major factors determining the prevalence and seasonality of vector borne diseases like scrub typhus (ST). We analyzed, the association of the meteorological factors like temperature, rainfall and humidity with scrub typhus using the 15 years scrub typhus data from a tertiary care hospital in Vellore, South India. Demographic data of permanent residents of Vellore, who had IgM ELISA results for scrub typhus for the time period of May 2005 to April 2020 were included. Meteorological data was correlated with the monthly scrub typhus cases; negative binomial regression model was used to predict the relation between scrub typhus occurrence and climate factors. Maximum number of ST cases were reported between the months August and February with October recording the highest number of cases. Elderly people, farmers, agricultural workers and housewives were at higher risk for scrub typhus. For an increase of 1 °C in mean temperature, the monthly ST cases reduced by 18.8% (95% CI - 24.1, - 13.2%). On the contrary, for 1 percent increase in mean relative humidity (RH), there is an increase of 7.6% (95% CI 5.4, 9.9%) of monthly ST cases. Similarly, an increase of 1 mm of rainfall contributed to 0.5 to 0.7% of monthly ST cases (after 2 months) depending on the variables included in the analysis. This study provides information that meteorological factors influence ST occurrence in Vellore. The rise of scrub typhus cases is maximal 2 months post rainfall. Whereas a rise in relative humidity, causes a rise in scrub typhus cases in same month, while rise in temperature has a negative impact on scrub typhus during the same month. These findings based on a retrospective analysis need validation by prospective studies.


Asunto(s)
Orientia tsutsugamushi , Tifus por Ácaros , Humanos , Anciano , Tifus por Ácaros/epidemiología , India/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 47: 100483, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37890413

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The immunodominant TSA 56 gene of Orientia tsutsugamushi, (scrub typhus agent) has four variable regions (VD-I to VD-IV) making it useful for genotyping. This study was undertaken to determine Orientia tsutsugamushi genotypes circulating in and around Vellore using complete and partial TSA 56 gene. METHODS: Of the 162 patients positive by 47 â€‹kDa qPCR, on 21 samples PCR to amplify the complete TSA 56 gene (≈1605 bp: Long protocol) and the partial gene sequence using the Horinouchi (≈650bp) and the Furuya (≈480 bp) protocol was performed. Sanger and Nanopore sequencing was performed to obtain sequence data for assigning genotype. For 13 amplicons partial and complete gene data was obtained. RESULTS: Phylogenetic analysis of the complete gene (Long protocol) which includes VD-I to VD-IV region and partial gene (Horinouchi) which amplifies the VD-I to VD-III regions showed identical genotypes. Twelve belonged to TA763 genotype and one belongs to Karp genotype. The Furuya sequence (in silico) correctly identified the Karp genotype and 10 of the TA763 genotypes. Two TA763 genotypes (identified by complete and 650 bp partial gene analysis) were misidentified by Furuya sequence analysis as Karp genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the 13 complete 56 â€‹kDa gene sequences suggests that TA763 is the commonest genotype in Vellore. Sanger sequencing of the 650 bp fragment gives similar results. However, these results need to be validated by larger prospective multi-centric studies.


Asunto(s)
Orientia tsutsugamushi , Tifus por Ácaros , Humanos , Orientia tsutsugamushi/genética , Genotipo , Filogenia , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , India
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(10): 1460-1467, 2023 11 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37405816

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few treatment options exist for patients with severe central nervous system (CNS) tuberculosis (TB) worsening due to inflammatory lesions, despite optimal antitubercular therapy (ATT) and steroids. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of infliximab in these patients are sparse. METHODS: We performed a matched retrospective cohort study based on Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores comparing 2 groups of adults with CNS TB. Cohort A received at least 1 dose of infliximab after optimal ATT and steroids between March 2019 and July 2022. Cohort B received only ATT and steroids. Disability-free survival (mRS score ≤2) at 6 months was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Baseline MRC grades and mRS scores were similar between the cohorts. Median duration before initiation of infliximab therapy from start of ATT and steroids was 6 (IQR: 3.7-13) months and for neurological deficits was 4 (IQR: 2-6.2) months. Indications for infliximab were symptomatic tuberculomas (20/30; 66.7%), spinal cord involvement with paraparesis (8/30; 26.7%), and optochiasmatic arachnoiditis (3/30; 10%), worsening despite adequate ATT and steroids. Severe disability (5/30 [16.7%] and 21/60 [35%]) and all-cause mortality (2/30 [6.7%] and 13/60 [21.7%]) at 6 months were lower in cohort A versus cohort B, respectively. In the combined study population, only exposure to infliximab was positively associated (aRR: 6.2; 95% CI: 2.18-17.83; P = .001) with disability-free survival at 6 months. There were no clear infliximab-related side effects noted. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab may be an effective and safe adjunctive strategy among severely disabled patients with CNS TB not improving despite optimal ATT and steroids. Adequately powered phase 3 clinical trials are required to confirm these early findings.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Infliximab , Tuberculosis del Sistema Nervioso Central , Adulto , Humanos , Antituberculosos/efectos adversos , Antituberculosos/farmacología , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Infliximab/farmacología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esteroides , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis del Sistema Nervioso Central/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Dialogues Health ; 2: 100139, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37317682

RESUMEN

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic had a tremendous impact that caused significant morbidity, mortality, and financial stress for families. Our study aimed to determine the Out-of-pocket expenses and economic impact of a Covid-19 illness for households where patients were admitted to a private hospital in India. Methodology: This was a cost-of-illness study from a tertiary care academic institute where adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from May 2020 to June 2021 were included. Patients with an admission of less than one day or who had any form of insurance were excluded. The clinical and financial details were obtained from the hospital information system and a cross-sectional survey. This was stratified across three clinical severity levels and two epidemiological waves. Results: The final analysis included 4445 patients, with 73 % admitted in Wave 1 and 99 patients interviewed. For patients with severity levels 1, 2 and 3, the median admission days were 7, 8 and 13 days respectively. The total cost of illness (general category) was $934 (₹69,010), $1507 (₹111,403) and $3611 (₹266,930) and the direct medical cost constituted 66%, 77% and 91% of the total cost for each level respectively. Factors associated with higher admission costs were higher age groups, male gender, oxygen use, ICU care, private admission, increased duration of hospital stay and Wave 2. The median annual household income was $3247 (₹240,000) and 36% of families had to rely on more than one financial coping strategies, loans with interest being the commonest one. The lockdown period affected employment and reduced income for a considerable proportion of households. Conclusion: A Covid admission of higher severity was a significant financial burden on families. The study reaffirms the need for collaborative and sustainable health financing systems to protect populations from hardships.$-US Dollar; ₹- Indian Rupees.

6.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 12(4): 672-678, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37312766

RESUMEN

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients presented to the emergency department (ED) with features of Influenza-like illnesses (ILI) and with other atypical presentations. This study was done to determine the etiology, co-infections, and clinical profile of patients with ILI. Methods: This prospective observational study included all patients presenting to the ED with fever and/or cough, breathing difficulty, sore throat, myalgia, gastrointestinal complaints (abdominal pain/vomiting/diarrhea), loss of taste and altered sensorium or asymptomatic patients who resided in or travelled from containment zones, or those who had contact with COVID-19 positive patients during the first wave of the pandemic between April and August 2020. Respiratory virus screening was done on a subset of COVID-19 patients to determine co-infection. Results: During the study period, we recruited 1462 patients with ILI and 857 patients with the non-ILI presentation of confirmed COVID-19 infection. The mean age group of our patient population was 51.4 (SD: 14.9) years with a male predominance (n-1593; 68.7%). The average duration of symptoms was 4.1 (SD: 2.9) days. A sub-analysis to determine an alternate viral etiology was done in 293 (16.4%) ILI patients, where 54 (19.4%) patients had COVID 19 and co-infection with other viruses, of which Adenovirus (n-39; 14.0%) was the most common. The most common symptoms in the ILI-COVID-19 positive group (other than fever and/or cough and/or breathing difficulty) were loss of taste (n-385; 26.3%) and diarrhea (n- 123; 8.4%). Respiratory rate (27.5 (SD: 8.1)/minute: p-value < 0.001) and oxygen saturation (92.1% (SD: 11.2) on room air; p-value < 0.001) in the ILI group were statistically significant. Age more than 60 years (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 4.826 (3.348-6.956); p-value: <0.001), sequential organ function assessment score more than or equal to four (adjusted OR: 5.619 (3.526-8.957); p-value: <0.001), and WHO critical severity score (Adjusted OR: 13.812 (9.656-19.756); p-value: <0.001) were independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion: COVID-19 patients were more likely to present with ILI than atypical features. Co-infection with Adenovirus was most common. Age more than 60 years, SOFA score more than or equal to four and WHO critical severity score were independent predictors of mortality.

7.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 17(3): 304-310, 2023 03 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37023432

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Remdesivir was the only antiviral used in the treatment of COVID-19 in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, following the adaptive COVID-19 treatment trial-1 interim analysis report. However, its use in moderate to critical hospitalized COVID-19 patients continues to be controversial. METHODOLOGY: In a cohort of 1,531 moderate to critical COVID-19 patients, we retrospectively performed a nested case-control study where 515 patients on Remdesivir were compared to 411 patients with no Remdesivir. Cases and controls were matched for age, sex and severity. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were duration of hospital stay, need for intensive care unit (ICU), progression to oxygen therapy, progression to non-invasive ventilation, progression to mechanical ventilation, and duration of ventilation. RESULTS: Mean age of the cohort was 57.05 + 13.5 years. 75.92% were males. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 22.46% (n = 208). There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality among cases and controls (20.78% vs. 24.57%, p = 0.17). Progression to non-invasive ventilation was lower in the Remdesivir group (13.6% vs 23.7%, p < 0.001), however progression to mechanical ventilation was higher in the Remdesivir group (11.3% vs 2.7%, p value < 0.001*). In a subgroup analysis of critically ill patients, the use of Remdesivir lowered mortality (OR 0.32 95% CI: 0.13 - 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir did not decrease the in-hospital mortality in moderate to severe COVID-19 but decreased progression to non-invasive ventilation. Its mortality benefit in critically ill patients needs further evaluation. Remdesivir may be useful if given early in the treatment of patients with moderate COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad Crítica , Pandemias , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Centros de Atención Terciaria
8.
N Engl J Med ; 388(9): 792-803, 2023 03 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36856615

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The appropriate antibiotic treatment for severe scrub typhus, a neglected but widespread reemerging zoonotic infection, is unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy of intravenous doxycycline, azithromycin, or a combination of both in treating severe scrub typhus. Patients who were 15 years of age or older with severe scrub typhus with at least one organ involvement were enrolled. The patients were assigned to receive a 7-day course of intravenous doxycycline, azithromycin, or both (combination therapy). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause at day 28, persistent complications at day 7, and persistent fever at day 5. RESULTS: Among 794 patients (median age, 48 years) who were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, complications included those that were respiratory (in 62%), hepatic (in 54%), cardiovascular (in 42%), renal (in 30%), and neurologic (in 20%). The use of combination therapy resulted in a lower incidence of the composite primary outcome than the use of doxycycline (33% and 47%, respectively), for a risk difference of -13.3 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -21.6 to -5.1; P = 0.002). The incidence with combination therapy was also lower than that with azithromycin (48%), for a risk difference of -14.8 percentage points (95% CI, -23.1 to -6.5; P<0.001). No significant difference was seen between the azithromycin and doxycycline groups (risk difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.0 to 10.0; P = 0.73). The results in the per-protocol analysis were similar to those in the primary analysis. Adverse events and 28-day mortality were similar in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with intravenous doxycycline and azithromycin was a better therapeutic option for the treatment of severe scrub typhus than monotherapy with either drug alone. (Funded by the India Alliance and Wellcome Trust; INTREST Clinical Trials Registry-India number, CTRI/2018/08/015159.).


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Azitromicina , Doxiciclina , Tifus por Ácaros , Animales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/administración & dosificación , Azitromicina/efectos adversos , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina/administración & dosificación , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Tifus por Ácaros/tratamiento farmacológico , Zoonosis , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Administración Intravenosa
9.
BMJ Open ; 12(11): e062724, 2022 11 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36410807

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical severity and outcome of hospitalised patients during the two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in India. SETTING: A tertiary care referral hospital in South India. PARTICIPANTS: Symptomatic SARS CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR positive patients presenting to the emergency department during the two waves were recruited. The first wave spanned between April and December 2020 and the second wave between April and May 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of interest was mortality. Secondary outcomes included illness severity at presentation, need for oxygen therapy, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and hospital or intensive care unit admission. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the 4971 hospitalised patients in the first wave was similar to the 2293 patients in the second wave (52.5±15.4 vs 52.1±15.1 years, p=0.37). When compared with the first wave, during the second wave, a higher proportion of patients presented with critical illness (11% vs 1.1%, p<0.001) and needed supplemental oxygen therapy (n=2092: 42.1% vs n=1459: 63.6%; p<0.001), NIV (n=643; 12.9% vs n=709; 30.9%; p<0.001) or inotropes/vasoactive drugs (n=108; 2.2% vs n=77: 3.4%; p=0.004). Mortality was higher during the second wave (19.2% vs 9.3%; p<0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, age >60 years (risk ratio, RR 2.80; 95% CI 2.12 to 3.70), D-dimer >1000 ng/mL (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.55), treatment with supplemental oxygen (RR 14.6; 95% CI 8.98 to 23.6) and presentation during the second wave (RR 1.40; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.62) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India appeared to be associated with more severe presentation and higher mortality when compared with the first wave. Increasing age, elevated D-dimer levels and treatment with supplemental oxygen were independent predictors of mortality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Oxígeno
11.
Med J Armed Forces India ; 78(Suppl 1): S139-S144, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36147429

RESUMEN

Background: Deliberate self-poisoning (DSP) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity, with rodenticides being common compounds used by many victims. However, comprehensive data regarding the spectrum and outcome of rodenticide poisoning is scant. Method: This retrospective study was conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) of a large tertiary care hospital in South India between January 2017 and December 2018. All patients with deliberate consumption of rodenticides were included in the analysis. Results: During the study period, 1802 patients presented with DSP, among which 145 (8%) consumed rodenticide compounds. The mean (SD) age was 27.9 (10.7) years. Young adults (16-30 years) comprised 73% (106/145) of the study population. The majority (87%) were triaged as priority 2, while 10% were triaged as priority 1. Common rodenticide compounds consumed were yellow phosphorous (57%: 82/145), coumarins (12%: 17/145), zinc phosphide (19%: 27/145), and aluminum phosphide (1%: 1/145). A significant proportion of patients (18.6%) were under the influence of alcohol. Among the 73 males, 25 (34.2%) gave a history of co-consumption of alcohol. There was a history of previous DSP attempts in 6%. The majority (68%) of the patients were discharged alive from the hospital, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 9%. Age >30 years (adjusted OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.00-5.05; p value: 0.04) was an independent predictor of poor outcome. Conclusion: Rodenticide compound consumption for DSP is prevalent in young adults and is associated with significant mortality, especially with yellow phosphorous poisoning. The current trend in our country of the increasing use of highly fatal phosphorous compounds over the innocuous coumarin derivatives is a cause of grave concern.

12.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 390, 2022 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35439957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role and performance of various serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by testing COVID-19 cases and controls. METHODS: Adult patients with fever for > 5 days, admitted to a tertiary-care teaching hospital in South India, were enrolled prospectively between June and December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed patients were classified as cases, and patients with febrile illness with laboratory-confirmed alternative diagnosis and healthy participants were controls. All participants were tested with SCoV-2 Detect™ IgM ELISA kit and SCoV-2 Detect™ IgG ELISA kit (InBios International, Seattle, USA) (Inbios), SARS-CoV-2 Total and SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, USA) (Siemens), Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) (Roche), Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott Diagnostics, IL, USA) (Abbott), and Liaison® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorinS.p.A., Saluggia, Italy) (Liaison). The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracies were compared. RESULTS: There were 303 participants: 153 cases and 150 controls. ELISA detecting anti-S protein antibody was more sensitive (88.9% for IgG and 86.3% for IgM) than the CLIAs (82.4% for total antibodies and 76.5-85.6% for IgG). Among CLIAs, Roche IgG was most sensitive (85.6%) followed by Abbott (83%) and Liaison (83%). Abbot had the best PPV (88.8%) and was more specific (89.3%) than Liaison (82%) and Roche (82%). Siemens IgG was less sensitive (76.5%) than Siemens Total (82.4%). The specificity of all the serological assays was modest (75-90%). Antibody test positivity increased with the duration of illness reaching 90% after 10 days of illness. When cases were compared against pre-pandemic controls, the IgG gave excellent specificity (98-100%). For seroprevalence studies, InBios IgG had the best accuracy (90.8%) with 88.9% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity. CONCLUSION: The serological assays are important adjuncts for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with persistent symptoms, especially in the second week of illness. The value of serological diagnostic tests is limited in the first week of illness and they provide additional value in seroprevalence studies. The diagnostic accuracy of the ELISA and CLIA platforms were comparable.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos
13.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 11(1): 233-239, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35309643

RESUMEN

Background: Deliberate self-poisoning and harm (DSPH) is an unabating problem with a wide variation in the methods used across the world. Hence, this study was conducted to understand the current spectrum of methods used for DSPH by patients in our geographic locality and catchment area with special emphasis on newer compounds and drugs used. Methods: This retrospective study included patients presenting with DSPH to the emergency department (ED) between January 2017 and December 2018. Results: This study included 1802 patients, with a mean age of 32 ± 12.7 years. Of the patients, 85% were in the young to middle age group (16-45 years). Agrochemicals (n = 604, 33.5%), drugs (n = 498, 27.6%), plant toxins (n = 150, 8.3%) and rodenticides (n = 145, 8%) were the predominantly used compounds. The major emergency resuscitation procedures required in the ED were intubation (n = 321, 18%), vasopressor support (n = 73, 4%) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 27, 1.4%). A quarter (23.2%) was discharged stable from the ED, whereas a further 56.5% were discharged stable after hospital admission. The in-hospital mortality rate was 3% (n = 47). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed rodenticides (odds ratio (OR): 22.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.05-61.88; P = 0.005) and plant poisons (OR: 23.92; 95% CI: 8.95-63.94; P = 0.005) to be the independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion: DSPH is prevalent in the highly productive young age group. Agrochemical ingestion and drug overdose are the most common methods used, whereas rodenticide and plant poisoning are associated with significant mortality.

14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e368-e379, 2022 08 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35323932

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In locations where few people have received coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, health systems remain vulnerable to surges in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. Tools to identify patients suitable for community-based management are urgently needed. METHODS: We prospectively recruited adults presenting to 2 hospitals in India with moderate symptoms of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 to develop and validate a clinical prediction model to rule out progression to supplemental oxygen requirement. The primary outcome was defined as any of the following: SpO2 < 94%; respiratory rate > 30 BPM; SpO2/FiO2 < 400; or death. We specified a priori that each model would contain three clinical parameters (age, sex, and SpO2) and 1 of 7 shortlisted biochemical biomarkers measurable using commercially available rapid tests (C-reactive protein [CRP], D-dimer, interleukin 6 [IL-6], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], procalcitonin [PCT], soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-1 [sTREM-1], or soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor [suPAR]), to ensure the models would be suitable for resource-limited settings. We evaluated discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the models in a held-out temporal external validation cohort. RESULTS: In total, 426 participants were recruited, of whom 89 (21.0%) met the primary outcome; 257 participants comprised the development cohort, and 166 comprised the validation cohort. The 3 models containing NLR, suPAR, or IL-6 demonstrated promising discrimination (c-statistics: 0.72-0.74) and calibration (calibration slopes: 1.01-1.05) in the validation cohort and provided greater utility than a model containing the clinical parameters alone. CONCLUSIONS: We present 3 clinical prediction models that could help clinicians identify patients with moderate COVID-19 suitable for community-based management. The models are readily implementable and of particular relevance for locations with limited resources.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Interleucina-6 , Modelos Estadísticos , Alta del Paciente , Seguridad del Paciente , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores del Activador de Plasminógeno Tipo Uroquinasa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Vaccine ; 40(13): 2107-2113, 2022 03 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35168837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccines were authorised for emergency use to mitigate the impact of the pandemic. This study evaluated the effect of prior vaccination with either Oxford Astra Zeneca's Covishield™ or Bharath Biotech's Covaxin® on mortality among symptomatic COVID-19 patients during the second wave of the pandemic in India. METHODOLOGY: In this cohort study comprising of RT-PCR confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 patients presenting during April and May 2021, the effect of prior vaccination on mortality (primary outcome), need for hospitalization, oxygen therapy, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were assessed and expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the cohort (n = 4183) was 46.3 (15.5) years; 17.9% (748/4183) had received at least one dose of Covishield™ and 4.8% (201/4183) had received Covaxin®. Mortality was 0.2% (95% CI: 0.2% - 0.7%), 3.5% (1.9-5.2%), 6.2% (0.3-12%) and 12.9% (11.8-14.1%) among fully vaccinated (>2 weeks after two doses), partially vaccinated (>2 weeks after one dose or <2 weeks after two doses), indeterminate (<2 weeks after one dose) and unvaccinated patients respectively. The difference in mortality among unvaccinated vs. fully vaccinated was 12.7% (95% CI: 11.4-13.9%), unvaccinated vs. partially vaccinated was 9.4% (7.4-11.4%) and unvaccinated vs. indeterminate vaccinated was 6.8% (0.8-12.7%). On adjusted analysis, as compared to unvaccinated patients, at least one dose of vaccine reduced the need for hospitalization (RR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.35-0.47), oxygen (0.33; 0.27-0.40), NIV (0.23; 0.17-0.32), ICU admission (0.18; 0.12-0.27) and mortality (0.18; 0.11-0.29). CONCLUSION: Among symptomatic COVID-19 patients, prior vaccination with Covishield ™ or Covaxin® impacted the severity of illness and reduced mortality during a period of widespread delta variant circulation. Full vaccination conferred greater protection than partial vaccination.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación
16.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 26(7): 836-838, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36864870

RESUMEN

Background: Deliberate self-harm (DSH) in developing nations has a significant impact on health and economic conditions of patients and families. Materials and methods: This retrospective study aims to study the cost of hospitalization and the factors affecting the cost of medical care. Adult patients with a diagnosis of DSH were included. Results: A total of 107 patients were included with the most common type of poison consumed being pesticides (35.5%) followed by a tablet overdose (31.8%). There was a male preponderance with a mean (SD) age of 30.04 (9.03) years. The median cost of admission was ₹13,690 (USD 195.57); DSH with pesticide increased the cost of care by 67% as compared to non-pesticides. Other factors which increased the cost were need for intensive care, ventilation, use of vasopressors, and development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Conclusions: Pesticide-based poisoning is the most frequent cause of DSH. Among different types of DSH, pesticide poisoning is associated with a higher direct cost of hospitalization. How to cite this article: Barnabas R, Yadav B, Jayakaran J, Gunasekaran K, Johnson J, Pichamuthu K, et al. Direct Costs of Healthcare among Patients with Deliberate Self-harm: A Pilot Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(7):836-838.

17.
J Glob Infect Dis ; 14(4): 162-164, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36636298

RESUMEN

Purpura fulminans (PF) is associated with acute infections such as meningococcal, staphylococcal, streptococcal, and rickettsial infections. However, there are only a few reports of association of PF with rickettsial fever from India. In this case series of seven adults with PF, four were definitive cases of spotted fever as the ompA real-time polymerase chain reaction was positive. The other three adults were probable cases of spotted fever, as they were positive by immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and their fever subsided within 72 h of rickettsia-specific therapy. Three of the seven patients had peripheral gangrene. These patients, despite presenting with severe spotted fever, had a favorable outcome. This is attributed to the high index of suspicion and early treatment supported by diagnostic assays.

18.
World J Nucl Med ; 20(3): 237-246, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34703391

RESUMEN

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) has been used as an imaging modality in workup of fever of unknown origin (FUO). The aim of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic utility of PET-CT in FUO workup in a resource-limited setting. We also looked at laboratory parameters as predictors of contributory PET-CT scans and propose an algorithm for evaluation of FUO in resource-limited tropical regions. This retrospective observational study included patients admitted for FUO workup under general medicine in a teaching hospital in South India from June 2013 to May 2016. PET-CT was done when the patient remained undiagnosed after a detailed clinical assessment and first- and second-tier investigations. Among 43 patients included in our study, a definite diagnosis was established in 74% (32). Noninfectious inflammatory diseases, infections, malignancies, and miscellaneous diseases were diagnosed in 37.2% (16/43), 23.3% (10/43), 9.3% (4/43), and 4.7% (2/43), respectively. Tuberculosis was the single most common disease seen in 20.9% (9/43). PET-CT scans were contributory toward establishment of final diagnosis in 90.7% (39/43). High C-reactive protein (CRP) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were associated with contributory PET-CT scans (P = 0.006 and 0.011, respectively). PET-CT delineating organ/tissue for diagnostic biopsy was associated with final diagnosis of infectious disease (P = 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of PET-CT scans were 76.9% (20/26), 33.3% (2/6), 83% (20/24), and 25% (2/8), respectively. High CRP and AST were predictors of contributory PET-CT scans. PET-CT scans have high sensitivity and positive predictive value when used in evaluation of FUO. Although it is a useful tool in FUO workup, especially in the diagnosis of tropical infections, PET-CT should be done after a comprehensive clinical assessment and basic investigations.

19.
Int J Mycobacteriol ; 10(3): 228-233, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34494560

RESUMEN

Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a global health problem with important complications such as acute infarcts secondary to vasculitis contributing to adverse outcomes. The objective of this study is to assess intracranial vasculitis in patients with TBM, either during their initial diagnosis or during follow-up while on standard antituberculous therapy. Methods: Ten patients with TBM underwent magnetic resonance (MR) based vessel wall imaging (VWI) to identify intracranial vasculitis (five patients during their initial presentation and the other five patients during their follow-up visit). Results: Vasculitis was seen in 60% of the patients wherein 70% of their intracranial vessels were affected. Acute and chronic infarcts were seen in four and two patients respectively, one of whom had both acute and chronic infarcts. Leptomeningeal enhancement and basal cisternal tuberculomas were frequently seen in patients with vasculitis. Vasculitis was also seen many days after the commencement of the antituberculous therapy thus explaining late-onset infarcts in this disease. Conclusion: Intracranial vasculitis is common in the patient with TBM. MR-based VWI technique has the potential for infarct risk assessment and to help guide the treatment for its possible prevention.


Asunto(s)
Tuberculosis Meníngea , Vasculitis , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Tuberculosis Meníngea/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Meníngea/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasculitis/diagnóstico por imagen
20.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 25(Suppl 2): S138-S143, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34345128

RESUMEN

Scrub typhus and other rickettsial infections contribute to 25 - 50% of acute undifferentiated febrile illnesses in endemic regions. Delayed recognition and therapy increase the morbidity and mortality. The constellation of fever with eschar or rash and multisystem involvement should facilitate the diagnosis and initiation of appropriate therapy. The pathological hallmark of rickettsial infections is endothelial infection and inflammation causing vasculitis. Endothelial inflammation results in microvascular dysfunction and increased vascular permeability. Immune and endothelial activation may worsen microvascular dysfunction, predisposing to multi-organ failure. Serology is the mainstay of diagnosis, although false negatives occur early in the disease. Point-of-care rapid diagnostic tests and molecular techniques, such as quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), can hasten diagnostic processes. Intravenous doxycycline with a loading dose is the most widely used antibiotic in critically ill patients, with azithromycin as a suitable alternative. Early appropriate treatment and organ support can decrease the duration of illness and be life-saving. How to cite this article: Gunasekaran K, Bal D, Varghese GM, et al. Scrub Typhus and Other Rickettsial Infections. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(Suppl 2):S138-S143.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA