Neural Interconnections of Extracranial Nerves in Headache Surgery: Anatomical Landmarks and Clinical Implications - A Review of Literature.

Headache disorders (HD) remain a nationwide challenge for the US healthcare system affecting nearly 60% of the US population. Surgical deactivation of the peripheral trigger site, also referred to as headache surgery, represents an effective treatment for patients with refractory HD pain or non-response to pharmacological regimes. Research stemming from other surgical specialties has underlined the clinical relevance of neural interconnections in refining diagnostic algorithms, adapting surgical techniques, and improving overall patient outcomes. While different HD trigger points have been identified, there is a paucity of studies discussing these mostly sensory neural interconnections between these trigger points in a comprehensive fashion. Herein, we aim to provide an overview of the specific nerves involved in HD and synthesize the current literature on HD nerve interconnections to, ultimately, deduce clinical implications. Overall, this line of research may help refine the perioperative workflow and enhance HD patient care.

An Algorithm for Control of Excessive Perioperative Bleeding and Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty Patients Based on 4 Decades of Experience.

BACKGROUND: Persistent intraoperative bleeding, excessive post-operative ecchymosis, epistaxis, or blood collection in the supratip area increases the complexity of rhinoplasty, causing suboptimal outcomes. We present an intraoperative bleeding management algorithm developed by the senior author (B.G.) based on 43 years of experience and assess its efficacy in achieving hemostatic control through 103 consecutive cases. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 103 consecutive patients who had undergone septorhinoplasty by a single surgeon. Patient demographics, coagulopathies, medications, diet, intraoperative use of tranexamic acid (TXA), desmopressin (DDAVP), Vitamin K, and post-operative complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-six (25.2%) patients did not receive intraoperative hemostatic agents. Twenty-six (25.2%) patients required TXA only, three (2.91%) patients were given DDAVP only, one (0.97%) patient received Vitamin K only, and forty-six (44.7%) patients required both TXA and DDAVP. One (0.97%) patient needed TXA, DDAVP, and vitamin K. Intraoperative bleeding was controlled in all patients. One patient with known factor 11 deficiency received both TXA and DDAVP intraoperatively but did not require fresh frozen plasma. Intraoperative bleeding was controlled by first administering 10 mg/kg of TXA intravenously, followed by DDAVP with a maximum dose of 0.3 mcg if needed, and 10 mg of Vitamin K if bleeding persisted. Patients with known type I or IIa Von Willebrand disease received DDAVP preoperatively. No patient experienced post-operative epistaxis, thromboembolism, or other associated complications. CONCLUSION: The algorithm of TXA, DDAVP, and Vitamin K is effective in controlling excessive intraoperative bleeding, post-operative ecchymosis, and epistaxis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Evidence-Based Dynamics in Rhinoplasty.

Rhinoplasty is a delicate surgical procedure that requires a thorough understanding of the dynamic interplay between the various structures of the nose. Any changes made to one part of the nose can have downstream effects on the overall harmony and appearance of the nose. For this reason, it is crucial for surgeons to be aware of these potential impacts in order to achieve predictable and aesthetically pleasing results. In this article, we aim to provide a summary of the current evidence-based conclusions on the dynamic influence of the radix, dorsum, tip, and ala during rhinoplasty. By understanding the complex relationships between these structures, surgeons can make informed decisions and achieve the best possible outcomes for their patients.

Comprehensive Criteria for Differential Diagnosis and a Surgical Management Algorithm for Occipital Neuralgia and Migraine Headaches.

The differential diagnoses and nuances of the surgical management of occipital migraine and occipital neuralgia have not been clearly discussed in the available literature. This study aims to highlight additional diagnostic features and offers an algorithm for the surgical treatment of occipital migraine and occipital neuralgia based on the vast experience of the senior author spanning over 23 years. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to review the number and distribution of patients who underwent surgical treatment for occipital migraine headaches and neuralgia and the signs and symptoms observed. Among the 660 patients who underwent surgical treatment for headaches within the territory of the greater occipital nerves, 86 patients underwent isolated deactivation of the greater occipital site (site IV) or combined greater and lesser occipital sites (site IV and site VI surgical). Within the isolated occipital headache group, 43 patients met the criteria for migraine headaches and 43 for occipital neuralgia. Our additional observation on the differences between the occipital neuralgia and migraine groups included that occipital neuralgia is more commonly unilateral, less commonly familial, and more commonly associated with a whiplash-type injury. In addition, the patient with occipital neuralgia can consistently identify the distinct point of pain using the index finger. An ultrasound Doppler signal can also be detected at the pain site and a pulse is often palpable in the site identified by the patient. Occipital neuralgia is also commonly continuous and unrelenting, with occasional spikes of shooting pain, and is less likely to respond to botulinum toxin-A injection. Patients with occipital neuralgia often have a single-site headache while patients with migraine headaches often suffer from headaches in multiple sites. Additional clinical criteria are offered for the differential diagnosis of occipital migraine headaches and occipital neuralgia based on the vast experience of the senior author and the developed surgical management algorithm.

Chin Dysmorphology in the Primary Rhinoplasty Population: Prevalence, Objective Analysis, and Implications.

BACKGROUND: Chin flaws are far more common than recognized. Denial of genioplasty by parents or adult patients can present a surgical planning enigma, especially in patients with microgenia and chin deviation. This study aims to investigate the frequency of chin imperfections on patients seeking rhinoplasty, review the conundrum they generate, and offer management suggestions based on over 40 years of the senior author's experience. METHODS: This review included 108 consecutive patients presenting for primary rhinoplasty. Demographics, soft tissue cephalometrics, and surgical details were obtained. Exclusion criteria included prior orthognathic or isolated chin surgery, mandiblular trauma, or congenital craniofacial deformities. RESULTS: Of the 108 patients, 92 (85.2%) were female. Mean age was 30.8 years (SD±13, range 14-72). Ninety-seven (89.8%) patients exhibited some degree of objective chin dysmorphology. Fifteen (13.9%) had Class I deformities (macrogenia), 63 (58.3%) Class II (microgenia), and 14 (12.9%) Class III (combined macro and microgenia in the horizontal or vertical vectors). Forty-one (38%) patients had Class IV deformities (asymmetry). While all patients were offered the opportunity to correct chin flaws, only 11 (10.1%) underwent such procedures. Five (4.6%) patients had simultaneous osseous genioplasty (mean advancement 7.8mm, range 5-9mm); 7 (6.5%) received fat grafting to the chin (mean volume 4.4cc, range 1-9cc). CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of primary rhinoplasty patients possess quantifiable chin dysmorphology on circumspect examination, high-resolution photographs and cephalometric analysis. Only a small number agree to surgical interventions that pursue full facial harmony. Potential reasons for these findings, patient aversion, and mitigation strategies will be discussed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Versatile Role of Fat Injection During Various Genioplasties.

BACKGROUND: Fat injection has become increasingly popular in aesthetic surgery, but there is a sparsity of literature regarding its role during genioplasty. In this study, we present the largest series of patients receiving fat injections to the chin for various indications. METHODS: Data were collected from January 2016 to December 2021 for patients who underwent chin fat injection for a variety of chin refinements. Patients with chin fat injection were divided into isolated genioplasty with fat injection (CF), combined facial and chin fat injection (CFC) and combined chin fat injection and osseous genioplasty (CFG). Complication rates and reoperations were compared using Fischer's exact test between each cohort. RESULTS: 181 patients were included in final analysis, with 14 patients in CF cohort, 130 patients in CFC cohort, 24 patients in CFG cohort, and 13 patients who underwent genioplasty alone. Repeat fat injections were required in 17 (9.4%) patients overall, which included 14 patients (10.8%) of CFC subcohort and three patients (12.5%) of CFG subcohort (p > 0.05). No patients who underwent genioplasty alone or CF required reoperation. There were no significant differences in complications between genioplasty alone group (0%) in comparison to CF (7.1%; p = 1.00), CFC (6.2%; p = .53), or CFG cohorts (7.7%; p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: Fat injection can safely correct minor chin deficiency or asymmetry, as either an isolated procedure or in combination with osteotomies. Additionally, fat injection enables advancement of the caudal segment to achieve superior outcomes by preventing unaesthetic deepening of labiomental groove which will not be advanced during sliding osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Common Dorsal Flaws Following Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systemic Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There has recently been a resurgence of interest in preservation rhinoplasty (PR) for dorsal hump elimination or dorsal projection reduction. However, no studies have scrutinized aesthetic outcomes to identify common pattern of flaws seen in published images to aid those with ardent enthusiasm for this technique to become aware of the frequency of these flaws and find ways to reduce imperfections. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using search terms ("preservation" OR "let down", "push down") AND "rhinoplasty" on PubMed, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases for studies between January 2000 and December 2022. Patient images from these studies were analyzed by three reviewers (MWW, IAC, and BG) for dorsal flaws. Raw interrater agreement percentage and Krippendorff's alpha were calculated to determine interrater reliability. A descriptive and comparative analysis with Fisher's exact test was performed for the aggregate data. RESULTS: There were 59 patient images with 464 views from 24 studies included for final analysis. Optimal dorsal aesthetic lines (DAL) were noted in 12 patients (20.3%), while optimal profile was observed in 15 patients (25.4%) (p = 0.66). Combined ideal front and profile view of dorsum was not observed on any patients. The most common flaws were DAL irregularities (n = 45; 78.0%), dorsal deviation (n = 32, 54.2%), and residual hump (n = 25, 42.4%). There was excellent interrater agreement. CONCLUSIONS: While PR may have some advantages, it has shortcomings in outcomes, particularly dorsal irregularities, dorsal deviation, and residual humps. Awareness of these imperfections may compel those performing this procedure to modify their techniques and improve their results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Logical Sequence of Primary Open Rhinoplasty Founded on the Principles of Rhinoplasty Dynamics.

Rhinoplasty is a perplexing procedure due to the variety of complex interplays between anatomical structures of the nose and the maneuvers used to accomplish the intended objective. Although every rhinoplasty is individualized, having a systematic order and an algorithm is crucial to achieve the designed aesthetic goals and a superior outcome, considering the interactions between maneuvers. Otherwise, the accumulated, unanticipated effects will result in displeasing outcomes due to over or under correction. In this report, we describe the sequential steps of rhinoplasty based on knowledge that the senior author has garnered over four decades of experience and having studied the rhinoplasty dynamics continually. Furthermore, we explain the detailed reasoning for each maneuver based on surgical indications and the resulting interplays.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266.

Exploring the Resurgence of the Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: The underlying principles of preservation rhinoplasty (PR) center around maintaining the soft tissue envelope, dorsum, and alar cartilage through surgical manipulations and tip suture techniques. In particular, the let-down (LD) and push-down (PD) techniques have been described, although reports of indications and outcomes in the literature are sparse. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using search terms "preservation" OR "let down" OR "push down" AND "rhinoplasty" on PubMed, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases. Patient demographic information, operative details, and surgical outcomes were recorded. Sub-cohorts for patients who underwent LD and PD techniques were analyzed utilizing Fischer's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Overall, there were 5967 PR patients in 30 studies in the final analysis, with 307 patients in the PD cohort and 529 patients in the LD cohort. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire showed a significant increase of patient satisfaction after PR compared to before PR (62.13 vs 91.14; p < 0.001). There was a significantly lower rate of residual dorsal hump or recurrence of 1.3% (n = 4) in the PD when compared to 4.6% (n = 23) in LD cohorts (p = 0.02). The revision rate of PD (0%, n = 0) was also significantly lower than that of LD (5.0%, n = 25) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on these published articles, it seems that preservation rhinoplasty is safe and efficacious procedure with improved dorsal aesthetic lines, reduced dorsal contour irregularities, and claimed excellent patient satisfaction. In particular, the PD technique has fewer reported complications and revisions than LD approach, although PD is often indicated in patients with smaller dorsal humps. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Nonpharmacologic Treatments for Chronic and Episodic Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques for treatment-resistant migraine have been developed on recent insights into the peripheral pathogenesis of migraines. Although there is a growing body of evidence supporting these techniques, no study has yet compared the effects of these treatments on headache frequency, severity, duration, and cost. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials that compared radiofrequency ablation, botulinum toxin type A (BT-A), nerve block, neurostimulation, or migraine surgery to placebo for preventive treatment. Data on changes from baseline to follow-up in headache frequency, severity, duration, and quality of life were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 30 randomized controlled trials and 2680 patients were included. Compared with placebo, there was a significant decrease in headache frequency in patients with nerve block ( P = 0.04) and surgery ( P < 0.001). Headache severity decreased in all treatments. Duration of headaches was significantly reduced in the BT-A ( P < 0.001) and surgery cohorts ( P = 0.01). Quality of life improved significantly in patients with BT-A, nerve stimulator, and migraine surgery. Migraine surgery had the longest lasting effects (11.5 months) compared with nerve ablation (6 months), BT-A (3.2 months), and nerve block (11.9 days). CONCLUSIONS: Migraine surgery is a cost-effective, long-term treatment to reduce headache frequency, severity, and duration without significant risk of complication. BT-A reduces headache severity and duration, but it is short-lasting and associated with greater adverse events and lifetime cost. Although efficacious, radiofrequency ablation and implanted nerve stimulators have high risks of adverse events and explantation, whereas benefits of nerve blocks are short in duration.

Frequency, Indications and Intraoperative Dynamics of Repositioning of the Lateral Crura of the Lower Lateral Cartilage: A 35-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Lower lateral cartilage repositioning (LLCR) is an effective technique that places the lateral crus in a newly created caudal pocket, and is utilized for a variety of indications including cephalic malposition, alar asymmetries and tip rotation/projection alteration. However, there is a relative sparsity in the literature regarding this procedure and the dynamic changes that it produces. In this study, we report our experience with LLCR in regard to its indications and related interplays. METHODS: Data from our institution were collected from the most recent 100 primary rhinoplasties, most recent 100 secondary rhinoplasties and all LLCRs performed. For each LLCR, patient demographics and concurrent surgical techniques were compiled. A descriptive analysis was performed for all cohorts, while Fischer's exact test was performed to compare the associations of categorical data for the respective sample sizes of the primary and secondary rhinoplasty cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 127 patients underwent LLCR, with eleven (11%) LLCRs in the primary rhinoplasty cohort and twelve (12%) LLCRs in the secondary rhinoplasty cohort. The most common indication for LLCR was cephalic malposition, followed by over-projection and asymmetry of the lower lateral cartilages. Intraoperative observation of dynamic changes included invariable cephalic rotation of the tip, ability to precisely control the tip projection, drastic narrowing of the domal arch often minimizing the need for the transdomal suture, alar repositioning caudally, correction of alar retraction and more elegant tip definition. However, the external valve lost its strength on majority of LLCR patients, which required almost routine use of Gunter lateral crus strut. CONCLUSION: LLCR is a powerful and versatile tool that can be utilized in either primary or secondary rhinoplasty. Its transposition results in cephalic rotation of the tip, narrowing of the domal arch, caudal reposition of the alar rim and superior tip definition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266.

The External Rhinoplasty Approach.

The nose is a complex three-dimensional structure with critical structural and functional roles; its relationship to surrounding structures is, in part, responsible for a harmonious, pleasing visage as a whole. There are many variables and dimensions that can be adjusted to alter the esthetic appearance, structural components, and functional role of the nose and many tools and maneuvers available to the rhinoplasty surgeon to adjust these numerous variables. Although every rhinoplasty operation should be individualized, a systematic order and algorithm may be helpful in operative planning as well as establishing a logical progression of steps and maintaining stability. While each adjustment may have a primary anticipated effect, it will invariably have a secondary impact.

The Evolution of Migraine Surgery: Two Decades of Continual Research. My Current Thoughts.

SUMMARY: A mere serendipitous finding has culminated in a life-changing development for patients and a colossally fulfilling field for many surgeons. The surgical treatment of migraine headaches has been embraced by many plastic surgeons after numerous investigations ensuring that the risks are minimal and the rewards inestimable. Seldom has a plastic surgery procedure been the subject of such scrutiny. Through retrospective, prospective pilot, prospective randomized, prospective randomized with sham surgery, and 5-year follow-up studies, the safety, efficacy, and longevity of the given operation have been confirmed. Although the first decade of this journey was focused on investigating effectiveness and risk profile, the second decade was largely devoted to improving results, reducing invasiveness, and shortening recovery. Multiple publications in peer-reviewed journals over the past 20 years, several independent studies from reputable surgeons at recognized centers, and over 40 studies from the author's center have established the surgical treatment of headaches as a standard practice.

Surgical Options for Migraine: An Overview.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this manuscript was to provide a comprehensive review of the surgical treatment for migraine headaches with a focus on trigger points and their clinical presentations, and to emphasize the importance of appropriate patient selection. BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent neurological disease with headache being a disabling component of it. Surgical treatment for migraine headache became available two decades ago, which is based on proper identification and the deactivation of the specific trigger sites in the head and neck area. DESIGN: This manuscript reviews the discovery and evolution of migraine surgery with changes in patients' selection throughout the years. CONCLUSION: Patients with migraine headaches who do not respond or cannot tolerate the medical treatment might benefit from trigger site deactivation surgery. The success of the surgery is closely related to proper identification of trigger point (s) and close collaboration with a neurologist or a headache specialist. This collaboration would enhance patients' positive outcomes and help to rule out other causes of the headache.

Delayed Septal Perforation as a Complication of COVID-19: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: There are increasing reports of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on olfactory function, with a significant number of patients reporting anosmia as a symptom. However, our knowledge and understanding of the virus's complete impact on the nose remains poor. This report describes a unique patient case to demonstrate how COVID-19 may be associated with rhinoplasty complications such as septal perforation. CASE REPORT: This is a case report of a previously healthy patient who underwent septorhinoplasty in 2018. She had frequent follow-up including intranasal examinations without evidence of the septal perforation for the 2 years following her operation. In March 2020, the patient was noted to have symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, but testing was not recommended by the pediatrician. Soon after her symptoms resolved, she experienced a sudden onset of whistling and physical examination revealed a perforation in the septum which rapidly enlarged over the ensuing weeks. She tested positive for the COVID-19 antibody. After confirming that she no longer had an active infection via antigen testing, she underwent repair of her septal perforation without complications. CONCLUSION: This case report illustrates a septorhinoplasty complication that may be associated with COVID-19. Further study into this virus's impact on vascularity and wound healing, specifically in the nose, is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The Prevalence of Blepharoptosis in Facial Rejuvenation Patient Population.

BACKGROUND: Facial rejuvenation results, commonly seen in publications or national presentations, are fraught with uncorrected eyelid ptosis. This study was conducted to investigate the frequency of blepharoptosis in the rejuvenation population and to help increase awareness in recognizing this under corrected condition. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients being evaluated for facial rejuvenation were included in the study. Patients who had previous eyelid or forehead surgery, congenital abnormalities, or post-traumatic deformities were excluded. Standard preoperative photographs were obtained. Each photograph was analyzed to determine blepharoptosis by measuring the distance between the upper eyelid margin and the upper limbus in each eye using Adobe Photoshop. Patient age, gender, and race were reported. Ptosis was defined as more than 1.0 mm overlap between the upper eyelid margin and the upper limbus. RESULTS: Mean age was 63.7. Among 59 patients, 34 patients (57.6%) had blepharoptosis and 25 patients did not. Patients with blepharoptosis were likely to be older and male. CONCLUSION: Blepharoptosis becomes more common as patients age due to involution of eyelid and orbital tissue. It is commonly missed due to patient compensation by recruiting the frontalis muscle to lift the eyelids. It is imperative for the patient and the plastic surgeon to be aware of existing blepharoptosis and discuss expectations and formulate a comprehensive surgical plan. Awareness of the high prevalence of ptosis in the facial rejuvenation population allows plastic surgeons to provide better outcomes and higher patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Economizing the Septal Cartilage for Grafts During Rhinoplasty, 40 Years' Experience.

BACKGROUND: During rhinoplasty, it is typically necessary to use cartilage to shape and support the final nasal construct to provide both form and function to the nose (Tanna et al. in Plast Reconstr Surg 141(1):137e-151e, 2018; Guyuron in Plast Reconstr Surg 105(6):2257-2259, 2000; Kim et al. in Ann Plast Surg 65(6):519-523, 2010). The septal cartilage is the ideal graft both for its ease of access and quality of cartilage. However, this graft is a limited resource, and economy of its use is important as to negate the need to harvest cartilage from the ear or rib. THE PURPOSE: 1. To share the senior author's 40 years' experience with the economy of septal cartilage. 2. To identify the areas of the septal cartilage most suitable for a particular graft. 3. To discuss the common grafts that are used in rhinoplasty. 4. To identify when other sources of cartilage are needed and where to best use those grafts. 5. To present option for preservation of the leftover septal cartilage. CONCLUSION: Overall consideration should focus on the size, thickness, and curvature of the graft contemplating the structural and functional needs of the rhinoplasty maneuvers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .