Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Med ; 12(17)2023 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37685594

RESUMEN

Parental presence during invasive pediatric procedures is controversial, and its benefits are under-researched. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of parental presence during invasive procedures on the parents themselves and the physician performing the procedure. This prospective study was conducted at a single tertiary center in Jerusalem, Israel. During 10 shifts, all physicians and the families of patients who underwent invasive procedures in the pediatric emergency department (PED) were asked to fill in questionnaires related to their experiences. A total of 98 parental questionnaires and 101 physician questionnaires were collected. The most commonly performed procedures were laceration repair (65%) and abscess drainage (18%). Sedation was required in 75% of cases. In total, 73% of the cited family members were present during these procedures. The main reason for refusing to allow family members access was the physicians' concern that the procedure would be hard for parents to watch. However, in more than 85% of cases, the physicians felt that the presence of a family member contributed to the success of the procedure, augmented the child's sense of safety and lessened the family members' feelings of anxiety. All parents who opted to be present during the procedure felt very satisfied, compared to 67% of parents who were not present (p < 0.0001). When asked if, in retrospect, they would have made the same decision, 100% of the parents who were present during the procedure indicated that they would have made the same decision, compared to only 68% of the parents who were not present (p < 0.001). Overall, these findings highlight the positive effects of parental presence during invasive procedures performed in the PED, even when procedures were performed under sedation. Encouraging parental attendance during invasive procedures may, thus, enhance family-centered practices in the PED.

2.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 25(8): 542-546, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37574892

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an endemic infection affecting the Mediterranean Basin, Arabian Peninsula, India, Mexico, and South America. Data on brucellosis infections in children are limited. OBJECTIVES: To review and characterize the clinical presentation of pediatric patients diagnosed with brucellosis in a tertiary medical center. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis was conducted on all pediatric patients from January 2010 to December 2020 admitted to the pediatric department with a diagnosis of brucellosis based on a positive serology test or growth of Brucella bacteria in blood culture. RESULTS: The study comprised 53 children aged 0-18 years. The mean age at presentation was 11.01 ± 4.91 years; 39 male (73.6%). Pre-infection exposure to unpasteurized milk or unvaccinated livestock was reported in 37 (69.8%). Fever was present in 64.6%, followed by arthralgia (49%), loss of appetite (42.3%), and weight loss (24.6%). Gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in 52.8% and included abdominal pain (34.6%), nausea (28.3%), vomiting (24.5%), and diarrhea (2.6%). Eight patients experienced pancytopenia (15.1%). The median length of intravenous antibiotic treatment was 7 days (range 3-14 days) and for oral antibiotic treatment 6 weeks (range 2-24 weeks). Most patients were initially treated with intravenous gentamycin (90.5%) and long-term oral antibiotics, most commonly doxycycline. Two (3.7%) required admission to the pediatric intensive care unit. No mortality was documented, and all cases of relapses were successfully treated. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric brucellosis is an acute febrile disease often associated with rheumatologic complaints. Patients 8-18 years of age also presented with headache, weight loss, and night sweats.


Asunto(s)
Brucelosis , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Brucelosis/diagnóstico , Brucelosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Brucelosis/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Fiebre/epidemiología , Fiebre/etiología
3.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(12): 929-933, 2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37039445

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There are scant data on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in infants younger than 90 days. This study was designed to characterize COVID-19 presentation and clinical course in this age group and evaluate the risk of serious bacterial infection. METHODS: Data on all SARS-CoV-2-polymerase chain reaction-positive infants presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED) were retrospectively collected, followed by a case-control study comparing those infants presenting with fever (COVID group) to febrile infants presenting to the PED and found to be SARS-CoV-2 negative (control group). RESULTS: Of the 96 PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 infants who met the inclusion criteria, the most common presenting symptom was fever (74/96, 77.1%) followed by upper respiratory tract infection symptoms (42/96, 43.8%). Four (4.2%) presented with symptoms consistent with brief resolved unexplained event (4.2%).Among the febrile infants, the presenting symptoms and vital signs were similar in the COVID and control groups, with the exception of irritability, which was more common in the control group (8% and 26%; P < 0.01). The SARS-CoV-2-positive infants had decreased inflammatory markers including: C-reactive protein (0.6 ± 1 mg/dL vs 2.1 ± 2.7 mg/dL; P < 0.0001), white blood cell count (9.3 ± 3.4 × 10 9 /L vs 11.8 ± 5.1 × 10 9 /L; P < 0.001), and absolute neutrophils count (3.4 ± 2.4 × 10 9 /L vs 5.1 ± 3.7 × 10 9 /L; P < 0.001). The rate of invasive bacterial infection was similar between groups (1.4% and 0%; P = 0.31). No mortality was recorded. Although not significantly different, urinary tract infections were less common in the COVID group (7% and 16%; P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants aged 0 to 90 days who present to the PED seems to be mostly mild and self-limiting, with no increased risk of serious bacterial infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , COVID-19 , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fiebre/etiología
4.
Eur J Pediatr ; 182(2): 609-614, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36401633

RESUMEN

Headache is a common complaint in children who present at the pediatric emergency department (PED). Serious conditions such as intracranial tumors and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) should be rapidly ruled out. Ophthalmoscopy for the presence of papilledema has long been considered critical to the assessment of headaches in children; however, the yield of this procedure is poorly validated. This retrospective study implemented a computerized search of the medical records of a single tertiary center to identify all children aged 2-18 years who presented at the PED complaining of headache between 2007 and 2017. The clinical, demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data were analyzed. Of the 948 children aged 2-18 years who presented at the PED complaining of headache, 536 had an ophthalmoscopy examination carried out by an ophthalmologist. Forty-one had papilledema, of whom 7 had an intracranial tumor, 15 had IIH, and 9 had optic nerve head drusen. Of the 495 children without papilledema, 3 had intracranial tumor, and 11 had IIH. The sensitivity and specificity of papilledema for the diagnosis of intracranial tumor were 70% and 93.5%, respectively, with an NPV and PPV of 99.4% and 17.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of papilledema for the diagnosis of intracranial pathology in general were 61.1% and 96.2%, respectively, with an NPV and PPV of 97.2% and 53.7%, respectively.  Conclusion: Assessment by ophthalmoscopy for papilledema in children presenting to the PED with headache had high sensitivity and high specificity, thus reinforcing the importance of ophthalmoscopy as a screening tool in these children. What is Known: • Headache is a common complaint in children. Serious intracranial pathologies need to be rapidly excluded. • Ophthalmoscopy for the presence of papilledema is commonly used as a screening tool for intracranial pathology, but this procedure is poorly validated. What is New: • Ophthalmoscopy for the assessment of papilledema in children who present with headache to the pediatric emergency department is shown to exhibit sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of intracranial pathology.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Papiledema , Seudotumor Cerebral , Humanos , Niño , Papiledema/diagnóstico , Papiledema/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Oftalmoscopía , Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...