Microbiome Profiling Demonstrates Concordance of Endotracheal Tube Aspirates With Direct Lower Airway Sampling in Intubated Patients.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) are widely used for microbiologic studies of the respiratory tract in intubated patients. However, they involve sampling through an established endotracheal tube using suction catheters, both of which can acquire biofilms that may confound results. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does standard clinical ETA in intubated patients accurately reflect the authentic lower airway bacterial microbiome? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Comprehensive quantitative bacterial profiling using 16S rRNA V1-V2 gene sequencing was applied to compare bacterial populations captured by standard clinical ETA vs contemporaneous gold standard samples acquired directly from the lower airways through a freshly placed sterile tracheostomy tube. The study included 13 patients undergoing percutaneous tracheostomy following prolonged (median, 15 days) intubation. Metrics of bacterial composition, diversity, and relative quantification were applied to samples. RESULTS: Pre-tracheostomy ETAs closely resembled the gold standard immediate post-tracheostomy airway microbiomes in bacterial composition and community features of diversity and quantification. Endotracheal tube and suction catheter biofilms also resembled cognate ETA and fresh tracheostomy communities. INTERPRETATION: Unbiased molecular profiling shows that standard clinical ETA sampling has good concordance with the authentic lower airway microbiome in intubated patients.

Diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound and virtual CT navigational bronchoscopy for biopsy of pulmonary nodules, mediastinal lymph nodes, and thoracic tumors in children.

OBJECTIVE: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy and needle aspiration (EBUS-TBB/EBUS-TBNA) are first line investigative modalities for lung and mediastinal pathology in adults. We aimed to characterize and assess the diagnostic yield of EBUS and virtual CT navigation guided biopsies in children. STUDY DESIGN: This single center, retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent radial or linear EBUS procedures (+/- CT navigation) for biopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes, tumors, and pulmonary nodules. Demographic, procedural, and outcome were collected. RESULTS: Sixty procedures were performed in 56 patients aged 2-22 years of age between January 2015 and May 2023. The most common indications for biopsy were pulmonary nodules (45%) and hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy (33%). For cases in which a final diagnosis was ascertained by any means, the diagnostic yield for linear EBUS (mediastinal pathology) was 76% and the diagnostic yield from radial EBUS (pulmonary nodules and lung masses) was 85%. The most common diagnoses were infection (45%), malignancy (17%), and sarcoidosis (11%). Among patients in whom infection was the final diagnosis, a total of 31 pathogens were identified. Eighteen were identified on bronchoalveolar lavage and an additional 14 pathogens identified on EBUS-TBB, representing an increase of 77% (p < .005). The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values for malignancy detection were 73%, 100%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBB/TBNA is a safe and effective way to diagnose lung and mediastinal pathology in children. Pediatric interventional pulmonology is a growing field offering minimally-invasive diagnostic opportunities for children in whom more invasive procedures were previously the only option.

Two cases of severe pulmonary toxicity from highly active mesothelin-directed CAR T cells.

Multiple clinical studies have treated mesothelin (MSLN)-positive solid tumors by administering MSLN-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Although these products are generally safe, efficacy is limited. Therefore, we generated and characterized a potent, fully human anti-MSLN CAR. In a phase 1 dose-escalation study of patients with solid tumors, we observed two cases of severe pulmonary toxicity following intravenous infusion of this product in the high-dose cohort (1-3 × 108 T cells per m2). Both patients demonstrated progressive hypoxemia within 48 h of infusion with clinical and laboratory findings consistent with cytokine release syndrome. One patient ultimately progressed to grade 5 respiratory failure. An autopsy revealed acute lung injury, extensive T cell infiltration, and accumulation of CAR T cells in the lungs. RNA and protein detection techniques confirmed low levels of MSLN expression by benign pulmonary epithelial cells in affected lung and lung samples obtained from other inflammatory or fibrotic conditions, indicating that pulmonary pneumocyte and not pleural expression of mesothelin may lead to dose-limiting toxicity. We suggest patient enrollment criteria and dosing regimens of MSLN-directed therapies consider the possibility of dynamic expression of mesothelin in benign lung with a special concern for patients with underlying inflammatory or fibrotic conditions.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Among Adults With Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Importance: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) represents a rare and clinically distinct entity among malignant mesotheliomas. Pembrolizumab has activity in diffuse pleural mesothelioma but limited data are available for DMPM; thus, DMPM-specific outcome data are needed. Objective: To evaluate outcomes after the initiation of pembrolizumab monotherapy in the treatment of adults with DMPM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2 tertiary care academic cancer centers (University of Pennsylvania Hospital Abramson Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center). All patients with DMPM treated between January 1, 2015, and September 1, 2019, were retrospectively identified and followed until January 1, 2021. Statistical analysis was performed between September 2021 and February 2022. Exposures: Pembrolizumab (200 mg or 2 mg/kg every 21 days). Main Outcomes and Measures: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The best overall response was determined using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria, version 1.1. The association of disease characteristics with partial response was evaluated using the Fisher exact test. Results: This study included 24 patients with DMPM who received pembrolizumab monotherapy. Patients had a median age of 62 years (IQR, 52.4-70.6 years); 14 (58.3%) were women, 18 (75.0%) had epithelioid histology, and most (19 [79.2%]) were White. A total of 23 patients (95.8%) received systemic chemotherapy prior to pembrolizumab, and the median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range, 0-6 lines). Of the 17 patients who underwent programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing, 6 (35.3%) had positive tumor PD-L1 expression (range, 1.0%-80.0%). Of the 19 evaluable patients, 4 (21.0%) had a partial response (overall response rate, 21.1% [95% CI, 6.1%-46.6%]), 10 (52.6%) had stable disease, and 5 (26.3%) had progressive disease (5 of 24 patients [20.8%] were lost to follow-up). There was no association between a partial response and the presence of a BAP1 alteration, PD-L1 positivity, or nonepithelioid histology. With a median follow-up of 29.2 (95% CI, 19.3 to not available [NA]) months, the median PFS was 4.9 (95% CI, 2.8-13.3) months and the median OS was 20.9 (95% CI, 10.0 to NA) months from pembrolizumab initiation. Three patients (12.5%) experienced PFS of more than 2 years. Among patients with nonepithelioid vs epithelioid histology, there was a numeric advantage in median PFS (11.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to NA] vs 4.0 [95% CI, 2.8-8.8] months) and median OS (31.8 [95% CI, 8.3 to NA] vs 17.5 [95% CI, 10.0 to NA] months); however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this retrospective dual-center cohort study of patients with DMPM suggest that pembrolizumab had clinical activity regardless of PD-L1 status or histology, although patients with nonepithelioid histology may have experienced additional clinical benefit. The partial response rate of 21.0% and median OS of 20.9 months in this cohort with 75.0% epithelioid histology warrants further investigation to identify those most likely to respond to immunotherapy.

The Performance of an Extended Next Generation Sequencing Panel Using Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Samples in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pragmatic Study.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Samples from endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are frequently used for next generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to look for genetic driver mutations. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the performance of extended NGS panels using EBUS-TBNA samples in a real-world setting and identify factors associated with the success of NGS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included all patients who underwent EBUS and were diagnosed with non-squamous NSCLC with mediastinal metastasis from 2016 to 2019 at the University of Pennsylvania. We reviewed demographic information, imaging studies, procedure reports, pathology and NGS reports. Logistic regression was used to analyze factors associated with the success of NGS panels. RESULTS: The success rates of NGS using EBUS-TBNA samples were 92.5%, and 91.5% for DNA and RNA NGS panels respectively. Samples from higher N stage (N2 and N3 lymph nodes) and with higher tumor cellularity (>25%) resulted in higher success rate for DNA NGS. The effect of tumor cellularity remained borderline significant after entering multivariable logistic regression. The short-axis diameter of the sampled lymph node on CT scan, FDG-avidity on PET CT and >3 EBUS passes per lymph node during the procedure were not associated with NGS success. CONCLUSION: Both DNA and RNA extended-panel NGS had high performance using EBUS-TBNA samples. Sampling more advanced nodal stations and obtaining samples with higher tumor cellularity were associated with higher success rate of DNA NGS. Other imaging or procedural factors did not affect NGS performance.

Diagnostic Yield of Cone-beam-Derived Augmented Fluoroscopy and Ultrathin Bronchoscopy Versus Conventional Navigational Bronchoscopy Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary nodules suspicious for lung cancer are frequently diagnosed. Evaluating and optimizing the diagnostic yield of lung nodule biopsy is critical as innovation in bronchoscopy continues to progress. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients undergoing guided bronchoscopy for suspicious pulmonary nodule(s) between February 2020 and July 2021 were included. The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)+ radial endobronchial ultrasound (r-EBUS) group had their procedure using CBCT-derived augmented fluoroscopy along with r-EBUS. The CBCT+ ultrathin bronchoscope (UTB)+r-EBUS group had the same procedure but with the use of an ultrathin bronchoscope. The r-EBUS group underwent r-EBUS guidance without CBCT or augmented fluoroscopy. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare diagnostic yield, adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included. The median pulmonary lesion diameter was 19.5 mm (interquartile range, 15.0 to 27.5 mm), and 91 (78.4%) were in the peripheral half of the lung. Thirty patients (25.9%) underwent CBCT+UTB, 27 (23.3%) CBCT, and 59 (50.9%) r-EBUS alone with unadjusted diagnostic yields of 86.7%, 70.4%, and 42.4%, respectively ( P <0.001). The adjusted diagnostic yields were 85.0% (95% CI, 68.6% to 100%), 68.3% (95% CI, 50.1% to 86.6%), and 44.5% (95% CI, 31.0% to 58.0%), respectively. There was significantly more virtual navigational bronchoscopy use in the r-EBUS group (45.8%) compared with the CBCT+UTB (13.3%) and CBCT (18.5%) groups, respectively. CBCT procedures required dose area product radiation doses of 7602.5 µGym 2 . CONCLUSION: Compared with the r-EBUS group, CBCT + UTB + r-EBUS was associated with higher navigational success, fewer nondiagnostic biopsy results, and a higher diagnostic yield. CBCT procedures are associated with a considerable radiation dose.

Plasma Genotyping at the Time of Diagnostic Tissue Biopsy Decreases Time-to-Treatment in Patients With Advanced NSCLC-Results From a Prospective Pilot Study.

Introduction: The availability of targeted therapies has transformed the management of advanced NSCLC; however, most patients do not undergo guideline-recommended tumor genotyping. The impact of plasma-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed simultaneously with diagnostic biopsy in suspected advanced NSCLC has largely been unexplored. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with suspected advanced lung cancer on the basis of cross-sectional imaging results. Blood from the time of biopsy was sequenced using a commercially available 74-gene panel. The primary outcome measure was time to first-line systemic treatment compared with a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC with reflex tissue NGS. Results: We analyzed the NGS results from 110 patients with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC: cohorts 1 and 2 included 55 patients each and were well balanced regarding baseline demographics. In cohort 1, plasma NGS identified therapeutically informative driver mutations in 32 patients (58%) (13 KRAS [five KRAS G12C], 13 EGFR, two ERRB2, two MET, one BRAF, one RET). The NGS results were available before the first oncology visit in 85% of cohort 1 versus 9% in cohort 2 (p < 0.0001), with more cohort 1 patients receiving a guideline-concordant treatment recommendation at this visit (74% versus 46%, p = 0.005). Time-to-treatment was significantly shorter in cohort 1 compared with cohort 2 (12 versus 20 d, p = 0.003), with a shorter time-to-treatment in patients with specific driver mutations (10 versus 19 d, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Plasma-based NGS performed at the time of diagnostic biopsy in patients with suspected advanced NSCLC is associated with decreased time-to-treatment compared with usual care.

Sedation and Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Tracheostomy in COVID-19, a Multi-Center Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with COVID-19 ARDS require significant amounts of sedation and analgesic medications which can lead to longer hospital/ICU length of stay, delirium, and has been associated with increased mortality. Tracheostomy has been shown to decrease the amount of sedative, anxiolytic and analgesic medications given to patients. The goal of this study was to assess whether tracheostomy decreased sedation and analgesic medication usage, improved markers of activity level and cognitive function, and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 ARDS. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective registry of patients with COVID-19 ARDS who underwent tracheostomy creation at the University of Pennsylvania Health System or the Johns Hopkins Hospital from 3/2020 to 12/2020. Patients were grouped into the early (≤14 days, n = 31) or late (15 + days, n = 97) tracheostomy groups and outcome data collected. RESULTS: 128 patients had tracheostomies performed at a mean of 19.4 days, with 66% performed percutaneously at bedside. Mean hourly dose of fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol were all significantly reduced 48-h after tracheostomy: fentanyl (48-h pre-tracheostomy: 94.0 mcg/h, 48-h post-tracheostomy: 64.9 mcg/h, P = .000), midazolam (1.9 mg/h pre vs. 1.2 mg/h post, P = .0012), and propofol (23.3 mcg/kg/h pre vs. 8.4 mcg/kg/h post, P = .0121). There was a significant improvement in mobility score and Glasgow Coma Scale in the 48-h pre- and post-tracheostomy. Comparing the early and late groups, the mean fentanyl dose in the 48-h pre-tracheostomy was significantly higher in the late group than the early group (116.1 mcg/h vs. 35.6 mcg/h, P = .03). ICU length of stay was also shorter in the early group (37.0 vs. 46.2 days, P = .012). INTERPRETATION: This data supports a reduction in sedative and analgesic medications administered and improvement in cognitive and physical activity in the 48-h period post-tracheostomy in COVID-19 ARDS. Further, early tracheostomy may lead to significant reductions in intravenous opiate medication administration, and ICU LOS.

Nontraumatic Chylothorax and Chylopericardium: Diagnosis and Treatment Using an Algorithmic Approach Based on Novel Lymphatic Imaging.

Rationale: Outcomes of interventional lymphangiographic treatment of nontraumatic chylous pleural effusions using traditional approaches have been highly variable. Recent advances in lymphatic imaging have revealed variations in underlying pathophysiology, enabling improved targeting of therapeutic interventions. Objectives: To assess outcomes of an algorithm for management of nontraumatic chylous pleural effusions based on advanced magnetic resonance (MR) identification of various abnormalities in the thoracoabdominal lymphatic network that give rise to chylothorax. Methods: Novel lymphatic MR imaging was performed in 52 patients aged 11-89 years. Three distinct pathophysiological patterns were found: 1) abnormal pulmonary lymphatic flow from the thoracic duct only; 2) abnormal pulmonary lymphatic flow from retroperitoneal lymphatic networks with or without involvement of the thoracic duct; and 3) chylous ascites presenting as chylous pleural effusion. Lymphatic interventions were individualized to the underlying pathophysiological patterns. Results: In 41/52 (79%) patients, imaging revealed abnormal pulmonary lymphatic flow from the thoracic duct and/or retroperitoneal lymphatic networks. Thoracic duct embolization and/or interstitial embolization of retroperitoneal lymphatic resulted in resolution of chylothorax in this group in 38/41 (93%) of those patients. Five patients experienced grade 1 or 2 complications. One patient succumbed to postoperative stress-induced cardiomyopathy and pulmonary embolism. Chylous ascites was the cause of chylothorax in 11/52 (21%) patients. Eight chose to undergo interventions for chylous ascites with clinical success in 6/8 (75%). Conclusions: Application of magnetic resonance imaging-guided intervention algorithm resulted in successful control of nontraumatic chylothorax in 93% patients with abnormal pulmonary lymphatic flow. Appropriate treatment of chylous ascites presenting as a pleural effusion requires systematic evaluation and diagnosis prior to potential treatments.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Uptake in Real-World Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

INTRODUCTION: Since the July 2017 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) guideline revision recommended second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), studies have suggested a greater response to ICI among patients with nonepithelioid MPM. Nevertheless, little is known regarding adoption of ICI in routine practice and if uptake differs by histologic subtype. Our objectives were to evaluate the real-world uptake of second-line ICI among patients with MPM and to reveal its association with histologic subtype. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of real-world patients with MPM receiving at least two lines of systemic therapy between 2011 and 2019. We found the uptake of second-line ICI over time and evaluated the association between histologic subtype and ICI use, adjusting for relevant patient demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: Among the 426 patients with MPM in our cohort, 310 had epithelioid and 116 nonepithelioid histologic subtype. The median age was 73 years (interquartile range: 67-78). Overall, 144 patients (33.8%) received second-line ICI and 282 (66.2%) traditional chemotherapy. ICI uptake began in early 2015 before the NCCN guideline revision and increased rapidly to 2019. After the 2017 NCCN guideline revision, patients with nonepithelioid MPM histologic subtypes had more than 3 times the odds of receiving second-line ICI (OR = 3.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.41-7.54). CONCLUSIONS: Among real-world patients with MPM, second-line ICI uptake began over two years before the 2017 NCCN guideline recommendations and was associated with nonepithelioid histologic subtype after contemporary studies suggested increased clinical benefit in this population, reflecting prompt integration of scientific discovery into clinical practice.

Serum soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP) and fibulin-3 levels correlate with baseline malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) tumor volumes but are not useful as biomarkers of response in an immunotherapy trial.

OBJECTIVES: Soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP) and fibulin-3 serum levels may serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Here, we evaluate these markers for correlation to tumor volume, prognosis and response assessment in a clinical trial of immunogene therapy in combination with chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial serum levels of SMRP and fibulin-3 were measured in adult patients with biopsy-proven MPM enrolled in two prospective clinical trials. Pre-therapy computed tomography (CT) measurements of tumor burden were calculated and correlated with pre-therapy serum SMRP and fibulin-3 levels in these two trials. Serological data were also correlated with radiological assessment of response using Modified RECIST criteria over the first 6 months of intrapleural delivery of adenovirus-IFN alpha (Ad.IFN-α) combined with chemotherapy. RESULTS: A cohort of 58 patients who enrolled in either a photodynamic therapy trial or immunotherapy clinical trial had available imaging and SMRP serological data for analysis of whom 45 patients had serological fibulin-3 data. The cohort mean total tumor volume was 387 cm3 (STD 561 cm3). Serum SMRP was detectable in 57 of 58 patients (mean 3.8 nM, STD 6.0). Serum fibulin-3 was detected in 44 of 45 patients (mean 23 ng/mL, STD 14). At pre-therapy baseline in these two trials, there was a strong correlation between tumor volume and serum SMRP levels (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), and a moderate correlation between tumor volume and serum fibulin-3 levels (r = 0.36, p = 0.014). Twenty-eight patients in the immunotherapy trial had longitudinal serologic and radiographic data. Fold-changes in SMRP and fibulin-3 did not show significant correlations with modified RECIST measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Although our data show correlations of SMRP and fibulin-3 with initial tumor volumes as measured by CT scanning, the use of SMRP and fibulin-3 as serological biomarkers in the immunotherapy trial were not useful in following tumor response longitudinally.

Delayed-Phase Enhancement for Evaluation of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma on Computed Tomography: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Radiologic assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) on computed tomography (CT) imaging can be limited by similar attenuations of MPM and adjacent tissues. This can result in inaccuracies in defining the presence and extent of pleural tumor burden. We hypothesized that increasing the time delay for pleural enhancement will optimize discrimination between MPM and noncancerous tissues on CT. Here we conduct a prospective observational study to determine the optimal time delay for imaging MPM on CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult MPM patients (n = 15) were enrolled in this prospective exploratory imaging trial. Patients with < 1 cm MPM thickness, prior pleurectomy, pleurodesis, pleural radiotherapy, or antiangiogenic therapy were excluded. All patients underwent a dynamically-enhanced CT with multiple time delays (0 - 10 minutes) after intravenous contrast administration. Tumor tissue attenuation was measured at each phase of enhancement. A qualitative assessment of tumor enhancement kinetics was also performed. The optimal phase of enhancement based on qualitative lesion conspicuity and quantitative tumor enhancement was then compared. RESULTS: MPM tumor enhancement was quantitatively and qualitatively increased at time delays beyond the conventional time delay for thoracic CT imaging (40-60 seconds). Patient tumor enhancement kinetics, displayed as the fraction of maximal tumor tissue attenuation as a function of time, revealed an optimal time delay of 230 to 300 seconds after intravenous contrast administration. There was an association between degree of tumor enhancement and subjective lesion conspicuity. CONCLUSION: Optimal MPM contrast enhancement occurs at a later phase than typically acquired with conventional thoracic CT imaging.

Neoadjuvant Gene-Mediated Cytotoxic Immunotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Safety and Immunologic Activity.

Gene-mediated cytotoxic immunotherapy (GMCI) is an immuno-oncology approach involving local delivery of a replication-deficient adenovirus expressing herpes simplex thymidine kinase (AdV-tk) followed by anti-herpetic prodrug activation that promotes immunogenic tumor cell death, antigen-presenting cell activation, and T cell stimulation. This phase I dose-escalation pilot trial assessed bronchoscopic delivery of AdV-tk in patients with suspected lung cancer who were candidates for surgery. A single intra-tumoral AdV-tk injection in three dose cohorts (maximum 1012 viral particles) was performed during diagnostic staging, followed by a 14-day course of the prodrug valacyclovir, and subsequent surgery 1 week later. Twelve patients participated after appropriate informed consent. Vector-related adverse events were minimal. Immune biomarkers were evaluated in tumor and blood before and after GMCI. Significantly increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells was found in resected tumors. Expression of activation, inhibitory, and proliferation markers, such as human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR, CD38, Ki67, PD-1, CD39, and CTLA-4, were significantly increased in both the tumor and peripheral CD8+ T cells. Thus, intratumoral AdV-tk injection into non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) proved safe and feasible, and it effectively induced CD8+ T cell activation. These data provide a foundation for additional clinical trials of GMCI for lung cancer patients with potential benefit if combined with other immune therapies.

Efficacy and safety of airway stenting to treat anastomotic complications after lung transplant: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Airway complications affect roughly 15-20% of lung transplant patients. Airway stents are an attractive therapeutic option; however, no experimental or controlled observational data exists to draw firm conclusions regarding airway stent efficacy and safety in this population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent airway stent placement for post-transplant anastomotic airway complications. The primary outcomes were improvements in FEV1 and reduction in bronchoscopies post-stent. RESULTS: We identified 36 patients who underwent airway stenting between October 2012 and October 2017. A total of 47 airways underwent stent placement. Improvement in FEV1 after stent placement was only observed in patients who ultimately were able to undergo stent removal. Patients who expired prior to stent removal had no immediate FEV1 improvement after stent placement. Among subjects who underwent stent removal, there was a statistically significant reduction in number of bronchoscopies per month after stent removal compared to pre-stent placement. Male gender was the only predictor of FEV1 improvement after stent placement while male gender and dehiscence prior to stent placement predicted increased number of bronchoscopies after stent placement. Mucous plugging and granulation tissue formation were the most common stent related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Only select patients benefit from stent placement for airways stenosis after lung transplant. Complications related to stent placement are common. Patients with airway complications treated with airway stents undergo a high volume of repeat procedures.

Outcomes After Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of patients undergoing tracheostomy for COVID-19 and of healthcare workers performing these procedures. BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy is often performed for prolonged endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients. However, in the context of COVID-19, tracheostomy placement pathways have been altered due to the poor prognosis of intubated patients and the risk of transmission to providers through this highly aerosolizing procedure. METHODS: A prospective single-system multi-center observational cohort study was performed on patients who underwent tracheostomy after acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. RESULTS: Of the 53 patients who underwent tracheostomy, the average time from endotracheal intubation to tracheostomy was 19.7 days ±â€Š6.9 days. The most common indication for tracheostomy was acute respiratory distress syndrome, followed by failure to wean ventilation and post-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation. Thirty patients (56.6%) were liberated from the ventilator, 16 (30.2%) have been discharged alive, 7 (13.2%) have been decannulated, and 6 (11.3%) died. The average time from tracheostomy to ventilator liberation was 11.8 days ±â€Š6.9 days (range 2-32 days). Both open surgical and percutaneous dilational tracheostomy techniques were performed utilizing methods to mitigate aerosols. No healthcare worker transmissions resulted from performing the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations to tracheostomy practices and processes were successfully instituted. Following these steps, tracheostomy in COVID-19 intubated patients seems safe for both patients and healthcare workers performing the procedure.

Management of Lung Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a devastating impact around the world. With high rates of transmission and no curative therapies or vaccine yet available, the current cornerstone of management focuses on prevention by social distancing. This includes decreased health care contact for patients. Patients with lung cancer are a particularly vulnerable population, where the risk of mortality from cancer must now be balanced by the potential risk of a life-threatening infection. In these unprecedented times, a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach is required to streamline but not compromise care. We have developed guidelines at our academic cancer center to standardize management of patients with lung cancer across our health care system and provide guidance to the larger oncology community. We recommend that general principles of lung cancer treatment continue to be followed in most cases where delays could result in rapid cancer progression. We recognize that our recommendations may change over time based on clinical resources and the evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. In principle, however, treatment paradigms must continue to be individualized, with careful consideration of risks and benefits of continuing or altering lung cancer-directed therapy.