Characteristics and outcomes of incidentally diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and implications for cancer screening.

Differences in characteristics and outcomes between incidental and symptomatic presentations of Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

DEK regulates B-cell proliferative capacity and is associated with aggressive disease in low-grade B-cell lymphomas.

This study sheds light on the pivotal role of the oncoprotein DEK in B-cell lymphoma. We reveal DEK expression correlates with increased tumor proliferation and inferior overall survival in cases diagnosed with low-grade B-cell lymphoma (LGBCL). We also found significant correlation between DEK expression and copy number alterations in LGBCL tumors, highlighting a novel mechanism of LGBCL pathogenesis that warrants additional exploration. To interrogate the mechanistic role of DEK in B-cell lymphoma, we generated a DEK knockout cell line model, which demonstrated DEK depletion caused reduced proliferation and altered expression of key cell cycle and apoptosis-related proteins, including Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and p53. Notably, DEK depleted cells showed increased sensitivity to apoptosis-inducing agents, including venetoclax and staurosporine, which underscores the therapeutic potential of targeting DEK in B-cell lymphomas. Overall, our study contributes to a better understanding of DEK's role as an oncoprotein in B-cell lymphomas, highlighting its potential as both a promising therapeutic target and a novel biomarker for aggressive LGBCL. Further research elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying DEK-mediated tumorigenesis could pave the way for improved treatment strategies and better clinical outcomes for patients with B-cell lymphoma.

CODOX-M/IVAC-R versus DA-EPOCH-R in double hit/triple hit lymphoma patients aged 60 years or under.

Intensified chemoimmunotherapy regimens are often used in young patients with double hit and triple hit lymphoma (DHL/THL) despite no survival benefit compared to R-CHOP. Favorable retrospective reports on the application of CODOX-M/IVAC-R are subject to selection bias as only young fit patients can tolerate this treatment. We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate outcome differences between CODOX-M/IVAC-R and DA-EPOCH-R in DHL/THL patients aged 60 years or younger. 113 patients were identified; CODOX-M/IVAC-R (N=49) and DA-EPOCH-R (N=64). 80% (39/49) achieved complete (CR) after completing CODOX-M/IVAC-R compared to 58% (37/64) with DA-EPOCH-R. The median follow-up was 5.3 years and 3.3 years for the CODOX-M/IVAC-R and DA-EPOCH-R group respectively. CODOX-M/IVAC-R demonstrated superior EFS on univariate (HR=0.54, 95%CI=0.31-0.97) and multivariable analysis adjusted for age, BCL translocation (BCL2 vs BCL6 vs both), IPI score and receipt of ASCT (aHR=0.52, 95%CI=0.29-0.93); however there was no significant influence on OS (aHR=0.92, 95%CI=0.46-1.84). The 1, 2 and 5 years EFS in the CODOX-M/IVAC-R group was 68.3%, 64.1% and 61.5% respectively compared to 52.4%, 48.9% and 39.5% respectively in the DA-EPOCH-R group. Primary refractory disease or relapse occurred in 33% (16/49) of CODOX-M/IVAC-R and 54% (35/64) of DA-EPOCH-R recipients, and produced median OS of 10.3 months and 33.7 months, respectively, indicating poor outcomes in the CODOX-M/IVAC-R subgroup with R/R disease. More patients were able to receive subsequent salvage therapies in the DA-EPOCH-R group. No patients died of regimen toxicity and the rates of CNS relapse and therapy related hematologic neoplasms were similar in both groups.

Neurologic Clinical, Electrophysiologic, and Pathologic Characteristics of Primary vs Secondary Neurolymphomatosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neurolymphomatosis (NL) is characterized by lymphomatous infiltration of the peripheral nervous system presenting as the initial manifestation of a lymphoma (primary NL [PNL]) or in relapse of a known lymphoma (secondary NL [SNL]). This report details and compares the neurologic clinicopathologic characteristics of these 2 groups. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed NL in nerve between January 1, 1992, and June 31, 2020. Patient clinical characteristics, neurologic examination, imaging studies, EMG, and nerve biopsy data were collected, analyzed, and compared between PNL and SNL. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were identified (34 PNL and 24 SNL). Time from neurologic symptom onset to diagnosis was longer in PNL at 18.5 months compared with 5.5 months in SNL (p = 0.01). Neurologic symptoms were similar in both patient groups and included primarily sensory loss (98%), severe pain (76%), and asymmetric weakness (76%). A wide spectrum of EMG-confirmed different neuropathy patterns were observed, but patients with SNL had increased numbers of mononeuropathies (n = 8) compared with PNL (n = 1, p = 0.01). MRI studies detected NL more frequently (86%) compared with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET CT imaging studies (60%) (p = 0.007). Nerve biopsies revealed B-cell lymphoma (PNL n = 32, SNL n = 22), followed by T-cell lymphoma (PNL n = 2, SNL n = 2), with increased demyelination in both groups and increased axonal degeneration (p = 0.01) and multifocal myelinated fiber loss (p = 0.04) significant in SNL vs PNL. Identifying SNL resulted in patient treatment modifications but a worse prognosis compared with PNL (p = 0.025). DISCUSSION: While PNL and SNL are both primarily painful and asymmetric neuropathies with axonal and demyelinating features on EMG and nerve biopsy, SNL presents somewhat differently than PNL with fulminant, asymmetric often mononeuropathies better detected on MRI than FDG-PET/CT. The focal pattern of SNL is likely a result of residual cancer cells that evaded initial chemotherapy, which does not cross the blood-nerve barrier, and these cells can later recur and result in fulminant disease. Although still resulting in a poorer prognosis, identifying SNL is important because this changed treatment and management in every SNL case.

Real-world impact of differences in the WHO and ICC classifications of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a LEO Cohort Study analysis.

Recent introduction of two different lymphoma classifications has raised concerns about consistency in diagnosis, management, and clinical trial enrollment. Data from a large cohort reflecting real-world clinical practice suggest that differences between the classifications will impact <1% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

Incidence of Central Nervous System Relapse in Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Implications for Central Nervous System Prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an uncommon type of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. PMBCL shares some clinical and biologic features with nodular sclerosis classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is exceedingly rare in cHL. Therefore, it may be expected that CNS relapse in PMBCL is also uncommon. Herein, we examined the incidence of CNS relapse in patients with PMBCL treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective single center analysis included 154 patients with newly diagnosed PMBCL seen at Mayo Clinic. The CNS relapse rate was calculated using a competing risk model, with death considered as a competing risk. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 39 months, 3 patients experienced CNS relapse, all associated with systemic relapse. The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse for the entire cohort was 1.43% (95% CI, 0.3%-4.6%) at 1 year and 2.21% (95% CI, 0.6%-5.8%) at both 2 and 5 years. For those who did not receive CNS prophylaxis (n = 131), the incidence was 0.85% (95% CI, 0.1%-4.2%) at 1 year and 1.80% (95% CI, 0.3%-5.8%) at both 2 and 5 years. All 3 patients who experienced CNS relapse had R-CHOP as frontline therapy; 2 patients did not receive any CNS prophylaxis, while 1 patient received intrathecal CNS prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: The risk of CNS relapse in PMBCL appears to be very low after treatment with standard chemoimmunotherapy, suggesting routine CNS prophylaxis is not necessary.

Transformation in Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Results from a Prospective Cohort and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) includes extranodal (EMZL), splenic (SMZL), and nodal (NMZL) subtypes. Histological transformation (HT) to large B-cell lymphomas is well documented but with a large variability in published cumulative incidence rates. We report results from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort for the cumulative incidence of HT (with death as competing risk) and associated risk factors and outcomes. We also conduct a meta-analysis of available studies on the cumulative incidence of HT. From 2002-2015, 529 patients with MZL were enrolled in the MER (69% EMZL, 16% SMZL, 15% NMZL). Ten-year overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 66%. HT occurred in 21 patients, with 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence of HT of 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.05) and 3.6% (95%CI 0.02-0.06), respectively. HT was associated with an increased risk of death (subdistribution hazard ratio (HR)=3.95; 95%CI 2.06-7.55). Predictors of HT were ≥2 extranodal sites and MALT-IPI score ≥2. OS was 79% at 5 and 55% at 10 years after HT. Age at HT≥70 years was the only predictor of OS after HT (HR=3.57; 95%CI 1.34-9.48). In meta-analysis of 12 studies (6,161 patients), the 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of HT across all subtypes were 5% (95%CI 0.05-0.06) and 8% (95%CI 0.07-0.09), respectively. Rates were lower in EMZL (3% and 5%) than in SMZL (7% and 13%) and NMZL (9% and 13%). While HT is relatively uncommon in the first decade after MZL diagnosis, it is associated with an inferior outcome and needs new approaches to prevention and management.

Transcriptomic classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies a high-risk activated B-cell-like subpopulation with targetable MYC dysregulation.

Immunochemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ndDLBCL) yet is inadequate for many patients. In this work, we perform unsupervised clustering on transcriptomic features from a large cohort of ndDLBCL patients and identify seven clusters, one called A7 with poor prognosis, and develop a classifier to identify these clusters in independent ndDLBCL cohorts. This high-risk cluster is enriched for activated B-cell cell-of-origin, low immune infiltration, high MYC expression, and copy number aberrations. We compare and contrast our methodology with recent DLBCL classifiers to contextualize our clusters and show improved prognostic utility. Finally, using pre-clinical models, we demonstrate a mechanistic rationale for IKZF1/3 degraders such as lenalidomide to overcome the low immune infiltration phenotype of A7 by inducing T-cell trafficking into tumors and upregulating MHC I and II on tumor cells, and demonstrate that TCF4 is an important regulator of MYC-related biology in A7.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Fit Patients With Late Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma That Responded to Salvage Chemotherapy.

The standard of care (SOC) for fit patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ≥12 months after completing frontline therapy is salvage chemotherapy (ST) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, this strategy may not be optimal for patients with certain clinical characteristics. We retrospectively studied 151 patients with DLBCL that relapsed ≥12 months after R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like frontline therapy who underwent ST and ASCT at Mayo Clinic between July 2000 and December 2017 or the University of Iowa between April 2003 and April 2020. Clinical characteristics, treatment information, and outcome data were abstracted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of ASCT were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median time from frontline therapy completion to 1st relapse was 26.9 months. The median line of ST was 1 (range 1-3), and 17 (11%) patients required >1 line of ST. Best response before ASCT was partial response (PR) in 60 (40%) and complete response (CR) in 91 (60%) patients. The median age at ASCT was 64 yr (range 19-78), and 36 (24%) patients were of ≥70 yr. The median follow-up after ASCT was 87.3 months. The median PFS and OS were 54.5 and 88.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS based on the age at ASCT (including patients aged ≥70-78 yr), sex, transplant era, time to relapse, LDH, extranodal site involvement, and central nervous system/nerve involvement at relapse. However, patients with advanced-stage relapse had inferior PFS than those with early-stage relapse (median 45.3 versus 124.7 months, P = .045). Patients who required > 1 line of ST, compared to those requiring 1 line, had significantly inferior PFS (median 6.1 versus 61.4 months, P < .0001) and OS (17.8 versus 111.7 months, P = .0004). There was no statistically significant difference in survival in patients who achieved PR versus CR, though numerically inferior in the former, with median PFS of 38.9 versus 59.3 months (P = .23) and median OS of 78.3 versus 111.7 months (P = .62). Patients achieving CR after 1 line of ST had excellent post-ASCT outcomes, with median PFS of 63.7 months. In conclusion, survival after ASCT was unfavorable in patients with late relapsed DLBCL (≥12 months) who required more than 1 line of ST to achieve PR or CR, and such patients should be treated with alternative therapies. Conversely, survival was favorable in patients who required only 1 line of ST, supporting the current clinical practice of ASCT consolidation in these patients. Moreover, outcomes were favorable in patients aged ≥70 to 78 yr at ASCT, similar to younger patients, highlighting the safety and feasibility of this approach in such patients.

Multiomic analysis identifies a high-risk signature that predicts early clinical failure in DLBCL.

Recent genetic and molecular classification of DLBCL has advanced our knowledge of disease biology, yet were not designed to predict early events and guide anticipatory selection of novel therapies. To address this unmet need, we used an integrative multiomic approach to identify a signature at diagnosis that will identify DLBCL at high risk of early clinical failure. Tumor biopsies from 444 newly diagnosed DLBCL were analyzed by WES and RNAseq. A combination of weighted gene correlation network analysis and differential gene expression analysis was used to identify a signature associated with high risk of early clinical failure independent of IPI and COO. Further analysis revealed the signature was associated with metabolic reprogramming and identified cases with a depleted immune microenvironment. Finally, WES data was integrated into the signature and we found that inclusion of ARID1A mutations resulted in identification of 45% of cases with an early clinical failure which was validated in external DLBCL cohorts. This novel and integrative approach is the first to identify a signature at diagnosis, in a real-world cohort of DLBCL, that identifies patients at high risk for early clinical failure and may have significant implications for design of therapeutic options.

Should All Patients With Stage IE Gastric Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma Receive Antibiotic Eradication Therapy for Helicobacter pylori?

PURPOSE: H. pylori eradication therapy (HPE) can lead to tumor regression in H. pylori-positive (HPP) gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. However, some patients do not have detectable H. pylori (HP) infection (H. pylori-negative [HPN]) and the guidelines differ in their initial approach to HPN patients. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends proceeding to radiation therapy, whereas European Society for Medical Oncology suggests HPE for every patient, even those who are HPN. To address this issue, we evaluated the effectiveness of HPE in limited-stage gastric MALT lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients newly diagnosed with stage IE gastric MALT lymphoma between January 2002 and December 2022. The primary outcome was the complete remission (CR) rate defined as no macroscopic findings of lymphoma and negative gastric biopsy at the follow-up gastric endoscopy. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were reviewed, and HP infection was detected in 19 (36.5%) patients-14 by immunostaining, three by serology, and one each by stool antigen and urea breath test. All 19 HPP and eight of the 33 HPN patients received HPE treatment. The CR rate was 63% (12/19) in HPP patients and 13% (1/8) in HPN patients (P = .033). After a median follow-up of 89.7 months, only two of the 12 HPP patients achieving CR have relapsed; the one HPN patient who received HPE remains in CR at 12+ months. CONCLUSION: For limited-stage HPP gastric MALT lymphoma, HPE is an effective and durable first-line treatment and should be used. For HPN patients, the CR rate with HPE is very low in our experience and is thus in support of the NCCN guideline.

Cancer Surveillance in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With a Pretransplant History of Malignancy: Multidisciplinary Collaborative Expert Opinion.

With improved medical treatments, the prognosis for many malignancies has improved, and more patients are presenting for transplant evaluation with a history of treated cancer. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with a prior malignancy are at higher risk of posttransplant recurrence or de novo malignancy, and they may require a cancer surveillance program that is individualized to their specific needs. There is a dearth of literature on optimal surveillance strategies specific to SOT recipients. A working group of transplant physicians and cancer-specific specialists met to provide expert opinion recommendations on optimal cancer surveillance after transplantation for patients with a history of malignancy. Surveillance strategies provided are mainly based on general population recurrence risk data, immunosuppression effects, and limited transplant-specific data and should be considered expert opinion based on current knowledge. Prospective studies of cancer-specific surveillance models in SOT recipients should be supported to inform posttransplant management of this high-risk population.

Marginal zone lymphoma international prognostic index: a unifying prognostic index for marginal zone lymphomas requiring systemic treatment.

Background: Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL), comprised of three unique but related subtypes, lack a unifying prognostic score applicable to all the patients in need for systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Methods: Patients from the prospective NF10 study (NCT02904577) with newly diagnosed MZL and receiving frontline systemic therapy at diagnosis or after observation were used to train a prognostic model. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment. The model was externally validated in a pooled analysis of two independent cohorts from the University of Iowa and Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource and the University of Miami. Findings: We identified 501 eligible patients. After multivariable modeling, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above upper normal limit, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, absolute lymphocyte count <1 × 109/L, platelets <100 × 109/L, and MZL subtype (nodal or disseminated) were independently associated with inferior PFS. The proposed MZL International Prognostic index (MZL-IPI) combined these 5 factors, and we defined low (LRG, 0 factors, 27%), intermediate (IRG, 1-2 factors, 57%) and high (HRG, 3+ factors, 16%) risk groups with 5-y PFS of 85%, 66%, and 37%, respectively (c-Harrell = 0.64). Compared to the LRG, the IRG (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.30, 95% CI 1.39-3.80) and HRG (HR = 5.41, 95% CI 3.12-9.38) had inferior PFS. Applying the MZL-IPI to the pooled US cohort (N = 353), 94 (27%), 192 (54%), and 67 (19%) patients were classified as LRG, IRG, and HRG, respectively, and the model was validated for PFS (log-rank test p = 0.0018; c-Harrell = 0.578, 95% CI 0.54-0.62). The MZL-IPI was also prognostic for OS in both the training and the external validation sets. Interpretation: MZL-IPI is a new prognostic score for use in all patients with MZL considered for systemic treatment. Funding: The MER was supported by P50 CA97274 and U01 CA195568.

Defining primary refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

ABSTRACT: Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) that fail to achieve a complete response (CR) or who relapse early after anthracycline-containing immunochemotherapy (IC) have a poor prognosis and are commonly considered to have "primary refractory disease." However, different definitions of primary refractory disease are used in the literature and clinical practice. In this study, we examined variation in the time to relapse used to define refractory status and association with survival outcomes in patients with primary refractory LBCL in a single-center prospective cohort with validation in an independent multicenter cohort. Patients with newly diagnosed LBCL were enrolled in the Molecular Epidemiological Resource cohort (MER; N = 949) or the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes cohort (LEO; N = 2755) from September 2002 to May 2021. Primary refractory LBCL was defined as no response (stable disease [SD]) or progressive disease (PD) during, or by the end of, frontline (1L) IC (primary PD; PPD); partial response at end of treatment (EOT PR); or relapse within 3 to 12 months after achieving CR at EOT to 1L IC (early relapse). In the MER cohort, patients with PPD had inferior overall survival (OS; 2-year OS rate: 15% MER, 31% LEO) when compared with other subgroups considered in defining primary refractory disease, EOT PR (2-year OS rate: 38% MER, 50% LEO) and early relapse (2-year OS rate: 44% MER, 58% LEO). Among patients receiving 1L IC with curative intent, we identified that patients with PPD are the key subgroup with poor outcomes. We propose a definition of primary refractory LBCL as SD or PD during, or by the end of, 1L treatment.

Targeted therapy in Burkitt lymphoma: Small molecule inhibitors under investigation.

Multiagent chemoimmunotherapy remains the standard of care treatment for Burkitt lymphoma leading to a cure in the majority of cases. However, frontline treatment regimens are associated with a significant risk of treatment related toxicity especially in elderly and immunocompromised patients. Additionally, prognosis remains dismal in refractory/relapsed Burkitt lymphoma. Thus, novel therapies are required to not only improve outcomes in relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma but also minimize frontline treatment related toxicities. Recurrent genomic changes and signalling pathway alterations that have been implicated in the Burkitt lymphomagenesis include cell cycle dysregulation, cell proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis, epigenetic dysregulation and tonic B-cell receptor-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (BCR-PI3K) signalling. Here, we will discuss novel targeted therapy approaches using small molecule inhibitors that could pave the way to the future treatment landscape based on the understanding of recurrent genomic changes and signalling pathway alterations in the lymphomagenesis of adult Burkitt lymphoma.

Follicular lymphoma B cells exhibit heterogeneous transcriptional states with associated somatic alterations and tumor microenvironments.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma of germinal center origin, which presents with significant biologic and clinical heterogeneity. Using RNA-seq on B cells sorted from 87 FL biopsies, combined with machine-learning approaches, we identify 3 transcriptional states that divide the biological ontology of FL B cells into inflamed, proliferative, and chromatin-modifying states, with relationship to prior GC B cell phenotypes. When integrated with whole-exome sequencing and immune profiling, we find that each state was associated with a combination of mutations in chromatin modifiers, copy-number alterations to TNFAIP3, and T follicular helper cells (Tfh) cell interactions, or primarily by a microenvironment rich in activated T cells. Altogether, these data define FL B cell transcriptional states across a large cohort of patients, contribute to our understanding of FL heterogeneity at the tumor cell level, and provide a foundation for guiding therapeutic intervention.

The Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes cohort study: Design, baseline characteristics, and early outcomes.

To address the current and long-term unmet health needs of the growing population of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients, we established the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) cohort study (NCT02736357; https://leocohort.org/). A total of 7735 newly diagnosed patients aged 18 years and older with NHL were prospectively enrolled from 7/1/2015 to 5/31/2020 at 8 academic centers in the United States. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range, 18-99). Participants came from 49 US states and included 538 Black/African-Americans (AA), 822 Hispanics (regardless of race), 3386 women, 716 age <40 years, and 1513 rural residents. At study baseline, we abstracted clinical, pathology, and treatment data; banked serum/plasma (N = 5883, 76.0%) and germline DNA (N = 5465, 70.7%); constructed tissue microarrays for four major NHL subtypes (N = 1189); and collected quality of life (N = 5281, 68.3%) and epidemiologic risk factor (N = 4489, 58.0%) data. Through August 2022, there were 1492 deaths. Compared to population-based SEER data (2015-2019), LEO participants had a similar distribution of gender, AA race, Hispanic ethnicity, and NHL subtype, while LEO was underrepresented for patients who were Asian and aged 80 years and above. Observed overall survival rates for LEO at 1 and 2 years were similar to population-based SEER rates for indolent B-cell (follicular and marginal zone) and T-cell lymphomas, but were 10%-15% higher than SEER rates for aggressive B-cell subtypes (diffuse large B-cell and mantle cell). The LEO cohort is a robust and comprehensive national resource to address the role of clinical, tumor, host genetic, epidemiologic, and other biologic factors in NHL prognosis and survivorship.

Autologous stem cell transplant in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that responded to salvage chemotherapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is the new standard of care in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there may still be a role for salvage chemotherapy (ST) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in certain circumstances (e.g., lack of resources for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, chemosensitive relapses). We retrospectively studied 230 patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL who underwent ST and ASCT. The median line of ST was one (range, 1-3). Best response before ASCT was complete response in 106 (46%) and partial response in 124 (54%) patients. The median follow-up after ASCT was 89.4 months. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.1 and 43.3 months, respectively. Patients relapsing between 6 to 12 months after frontline therapy had a numerically better median PFS (29.6 months) and OS (88.5 months). Patients who required one line of ST, compared to those requiring more than one line, had a better median PFS (37.9 vs. 3.9 months; P=0.0005) and OS (68.3 vs. 12.0 months; P=0.0005). Patients who achieved complete response had a better median PFS (71.1 vs. 6.3 months; P<0.0001) and OS (110.3 vs. 18.9 months; P<0.0001) than those in partial response. Patients who achieved complete response after one line of ST had the most favorable median PFS (88.5 months) and OS (117.2 months). Post-ASCT survival outcomes of patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL appeared reasonable and were particularly favorable in those who required only one line of ST to achieve complete response before ASCT, highlighting the role of this procedure in select patients with chemosensitive disease.