RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify factors influencing reoperations following minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and associated mortality and hospital costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2018, 125 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes included reoperations, mortality, and hospital costs. Multivariable logistic regression analyses determined factors associated with reoperations. RESULTS: In-hospital reoperations (n=10) were associated with in-hospital mortality (n=3, P<0.01), higher hospital costs (P<0.01), and longer hospital stay (P<0.01). Conversely, reoperations after discharge were not associated with mortality. By multivariable analysis, baseline cardiovascular (P=0.02) and chronic kidney disease (P=0.01) were associated with reoperations. However, anastomotic leaks were not associated with reoperations nor mortality. CONCLUSION: The majority of reoperations occur within 30 days often during index hospitalization. Reoperations were associated with increased in-hospital mortality and hospital costs. Notably, anastomotic leaks did not influence reoperations nor mortality. Efforts to optimize patient baseline comorbidities should be emphasized to minimize reoperations following minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Fuga Anastomótica , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the financial impact of clinical complications and outcomes after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MILE) at a safety-net hospital. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing MILE from 2013 to 2018. Postoperative complications were classified by Clavien-Dindo grade and associated total and direct recovered costs were assessed. Direct cost and LOS index were defined as the ratio of observed to expected values (>1 denotes above nationwide expectations). Annual outcomes were based on Medicare fiscal years. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients (99 males, mean age 65.7 ± 9.3) were surgically treated for esophageal malignancy (n = 118) and benign disease (n = 6) by MILE between 2014 and 2018. Mean ICU LOS (5.8 ± 6.6 versus 4.3 ± 6.3 days) and LOS index (1.16 versus 0.76) improved from 2014 to 2018. Both direct cost index (1.03 versus 0.99) and indirect costs (43.4% versus 41.4%) decreased over time. However, direct costs recovered (213.6 to 159.0%) and total costs recovered (119.1 to 92.5%) declined during this period. Clinical complications grade was not associated with total costs recovered (p = 0.69). Extent of recovered expenditure was significantly higher from commercial/private payers as compared to government-sponsored payers (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Improvement in clinical outcomes and efficiency of care are not reflected by annual recovered expenditure. Furthermore, clinical complications do not correlate with the ability to recover hospital spending. Financial recovery was primary payer dependent. Enhanced collaboration with hospital administration may be needed in an effort to maximize financial fidelity in the presence of good quality of care after highly complex procedures.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Anciano , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Small bowel obstructions (SBOs) are a known perioperative complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and common etiologies include internal hernia, port site hernia, jejunojejunostomy stricture, ileus and adhesions. Less commonly, SBO can be caused by superior mesenteric artery syndrome, intussusception and intraluminal blood clot. We present a case of SBO caused by intraluminal blood clot from jejunojejunostomy staple line bleeding in a patient with a normal coagulation profile. Computed tomography was used to elucidate the cause of perioperative SBO, and diagnostic laparoscopy was used to both diagnose and treat the complication. In this case, the intraluminal clot was evacuated laparoscopically by enterotomy, thrombectomy and primary closure without anastomotic revision since there was no evidence of continued bleeding. Administration of enoxaparin and Toradol post-operatively may have exacerbated mild intraluminal bleeding occurring at the stapled jejunojejunal anastomosis. Prompt recognition and treatment of perioperative SBO can prevent catastrophic consequences related to bowel perforation.