Dissociations between performance and visual fixations after subordinate- and basic-level training with novel objects.

Previous work suggests that subordinate-level object training improves exemplar-level perceptual discrimination over basic-level training. However, the extent to which visual fixation strategies and the use of visual features, such as color and spatial frequency (SF), change with improved discrimination was not previously known. In the current study, adults (n = 24) completed 6 days of training with 2 families of computer-generated novel objects. Participants were trained to identify one object family at the subordinate level and the other object family at the basic level. Before and after training, discrimination accuracy and visual fixations were measured for trained and untrained exemplars. To examine the impact of training on visual feature use, image color and SF were manipulated and tested before and after training. Discrimination accuracy increased for the object family trained at the subordinate-level, but not for the family trained at the basic level. This increase was seen for all image manipulations (color, SF) and generalized to untrained exemplars within the trained family. Both subordinate- and basic-level training increased average fixation duration and saccadic amplitude and decreased the number of total fixations. Collectively, these results suggest a dissociation between discrimination accuracy, indicative of recognition, and the associated pattern of changes present for visual fixations.

Neural and behavioral effects of subordinate-level training of novel objects across manipulations of color and spatial frequency.

Perceptual expertise is marked by subordinate-level recognition of objects in the expert domain. In this study, participants learned one family of full-color, artificial objects at the subordinate (species) level and another family at the basic (family) level. Discrimination of trained and untrained exemplars was tested before and after training across several image manipulations [full-color, grayscale, low spatial frequency (LSF) and high spatial frequency (HSF)] while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Regardless of image manipulation, discrimination (indexed by d') of trained and of untrained exemplars was enhanced after subordinate-level training, but not after basic-level training. Enhanced discrimination after subordinate-level training generalized to untrained exemplars and to grayscale images and images in which LSF or HSF information was removed. After training, the N170 and N250, recorded over occipital and occipitotemporal brain regions, were both more enhanced after subordinate-level training than after basic-level training. However, the topographic distribution of enhanced responses differed across components. The N170 latency predicted reaction time after both basic-level training and subordinate-level training, highlighting an association between behavioral and neural responses. These findings further elucidate the role of the N170 and N250 as ERP indices of subordinate-level expert object processing and demonstrate how low-level manipulations of color and spatial frequency impact behavior and the N170 and N250 components independent of training or expertise.

Differential neural responses to faces paired with labels versus faces paired with noise at 6- and at 9-months.

Labeling objects or faces in the first year of life shapes subsequent attention and perception. Three months of hearing individual-level, unique labels for previously unfamiliar faces promotes face differentiation and impacts neural processing during the first year of life. However, it is currently unclear whether verbal labeling influences visual processing of faces during label learning and whether these effects differ across the first year of life. The current study examined the impact of individual-level labels versus a non-speech noise on neural responses to monkey faces. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while infants viewed two species of monkey faces: one paired with labels and one paired with a non-speech noise. At 9 months, neural responses differentiated monkey faces paired with labels relative to those paired with noise during both the first and second halves of the experiment. Nine-month-olds exhibited a faster P1 latency, marginally greater N290 amplitude and reduced P400 amplitude to labeled faces relative to a non-speech noise. However, 6-month-olds' neural responses did not differentiate monkey faces paired with labels from those paired with a non-speech noise until the second half of trials and only showed this effect for P1 latency and N290 amplitude. The results of this study suggest that overall, infants differentiate faces labeled with individual-level labels from those paired with a non-speech noise, however, 6-month-olds require more exposure to the label-face pairings than 9-month-olds.

The developmental time course and topographic distribution of individual-level monkey face discrimination in the infant brain.

The ability to discriminate between faces from unfamiliar face groups has previously been found to decrease across the first year of life. Here, individual-level discrimination of faces within a previously unfamiliar group was investigated by measuring neural responses to monkey faces. Six- and 9-month-old infants (n = 42) completed a Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation (FPVS) task while steady state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) were recorded. Using an oddball task design (e.g., infrequent changes in face identity) faces were presented at a 6Hz (1 face approximately every 167ms) stimulation rate and every 1.2Hz different individual monkey faces were presented. Significant SNRs at 1.2Hz in both 6- and 9-month-old infants suggest that neural responses, recorded over posterior scalp regions, remain sensitive to individual-level differences within an unfamiliar face group despite previous behavioral evidence of decreased discrimination. However, the topographic distribution of the 1.2Hz response varied by age, suggesting that 6- and 9-month-old infants are using different neural populations to discriminate unfamiliar faces at the individual level.

Babies get it right.

Infants use a region on the right side of their brain to distinguish between human faces and objects.

The lasting effects of process-specific versus stimulus-specific learning during infancy.

The capacity to tell the difference between two faces within an infrequently experienced face group (e.g. other species, other race) declines from 6 to 9 months of age unless infants learn to match these faces with individual-level names. Similarly, the use of individual-level labels can also facilitate differentiation of a group of non-face objects (strollers). This early learning leads to increased neural specialization for previously unfamiliar face or object groups. The current investigation aimed to determine whether early conceptual learning between 6 and 9 months leads to sustained behavioral advantages and neural changes in these same children at 4-6 years of age. Results suggest that relative to a control group of children with no previous training and to children with infant category-level naming experience, children with early individual-level training exhibited faster response times to human faces. Further, individual-level training with a face group - but not an object group - led to more adult-like neural responses for human faces. These results suggest that early individual-level learning results in long-lasting process-specific effects, which benefit categories that continue to be perceived and recognized at the individual level (e.g. human faces).

A mechanistic approach to cross-domain perceptual narrowing in the first year of life.

Language and face processing develop in similar ways during the first year of life. Early in the first year of life, infants demonstrate broad abilities for discriminating among faces and speech. These discrimination abilities then become tuned to frequently experienced groups of people or languages. This process of perceptual development occurs between approximately 6 and 12 months of age and is largely shaped by experience. However, the mechanisms underlying perceptual development during this time, and whether they are shared across domains, remain largely unknown. Here, we highlight research findings across domains and propose a top-down/bottom-up processing approach as a guide for future research. It is hypothesized that perceptual narrowing and tuning in development is the result of a shift from primarily bottom-up processing to a combination of bottom-up and top-down influences. In addition, we propose word learning as an important top-down factor that shapes tuning in both the speech and face domains, leading to similar observed developmental trajectories across modalities. Importantly, we suggest that perceptual narrowing/tuning is the result of multiple interacting factors and not explained by the development of a single mechanism.