Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Spesolimab in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open-Label, Phase I Study.

INTRODUCTION: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and potentially life-threatening inflammatory skin disease. Interleukin (IL)-36 signalling may play a central role in GPP pathogenesis. Spesolimab is a humanized anti-IL-36 monoclonal antibody inhibiting the IL-36 signalling pathway. Here, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of spesolimab in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: In this Phase 1, single-dose, parallel-group, open-label study, healthy Chinese subjects aged 18-45 years received a single spesolimab dose by intravenous infusion (IV; 450 mg, 900 mg, or 1200 mg) or subcutaneous (SC) administration (300 mg or 600 mg). Primary endpoints were spesolimab exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration); secondary endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug-related adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Fifty subjects received IV (n = 30) or SC (n = 20) spesolimab (n = 10 per dose group); 60.0% were male, mean ± standard deviation age was 31.5 ± 6.6 and 31.0 ± 6.5 years in the IV and SC groups, respectively. Spesolimab exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner in both groups. TEAEs were reported in 83.3% and 80.0% of subjects in the IV and SC groups, the most common TEAE was upper respiratory tract infection (20.0% and 25.0%, respectively). One serious AE of hand fracture was reported in the 900 mg IV group that was not considered drug-related. Drug-related AEs were reported in 53.3% and 55.0% of subjects in the IV and SC groups. All laboratory-related AEs were mild and resolved. CONCLUSION: Spesolimab exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner after a single dose by IV and SC administration. Spesolimab was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT04390568.

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous spesolimab for the prevention of generalised pustular psoriasis flares (Effisayil 2): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Spesolimab is an anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody approved to treat generalised pustular psoriasis (GPP) flares. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of spesolimab for GPP flare prevention. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial was done at 60 hospitals and clinics in 20 countries. Eligible study participants were aged between 12 and 75 years with a documented history of GPP as per the European Rare and Severe Psoriasis Expert Network criteria, with a history of at least two past GPP flares, and a GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) score of 0 or 1 at screening and random assignment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous placebo, subcutaneous low-dose spesolimab (300 mg loading dose followed by 150 mg every 12 weeks), subcutaneous medium-dose spesolimab (600 mg loading dose followed by 300 mg every 12 weeks), or subcutaneous high-dose spesolimab (600 mg loading dose followed by 300 mg every 4 weeks) over 48 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate a non-flat dose-response curve on the primary endpoint, time to first GPP flare. FINDINGS: From June 8, 2020, to Nov 23, 2022, 157 patients were screened, of whom 123 were randomly assigned. 92 were assigned to receive spesolimab (30 high dose, 31 medium dose, and 31 low dose) and 31 to placebo. All patients were either Asian (79 [64%] of 123) or White (44 [36%]). Patient groups were similar in sex distribution (76 [62%] female and 47 [38%] male), age (mean 40·4 years, SD 15·8), and GPP Physician Global Assessment score. A non-flat dose-response relationship was established on the primary endpoint. By week 48, 35 patients had GPP flares; seven (23%) of 31 patients in the low-dose spesolimab group, nine (29%) of 31 patients in the medium-dose spesolimab group, three (10%) of 30 patients in the high-dose spesolimab group, and 16 (52%) of 31 patients in the placebo group. High-dose spesolimab was significantly superior versus placebo on the primary outcome of time to GPP flare (hazard ratio [HR]=0·16, 95% CI 0·05-0·54; p=0·0005) endpoint. HRs were 0·35 (95% CI 0·14-0·86, nominal p=0·0057) in the low-dose spesolimab group and 0·47 (0·21-1·06, p=0·027) in the medium-dose spesolimab group. We established a non-flat dose-response relationship for spesolimab compared with placebo, with statistically significant p values for each predefined model (linear p=0·0022, emax1 p=0·0024, emax2 p=0·0023, and exponential p=0·0034). Infection rates were similar across treatment arms; there were no deaths and no hypersensitivity reactions leading to discontinuation. INTERPRETATION: High-dose spesolimab was superior to placebo in GPP flare prevention, significantly reducing the risk of a GPP flare and flare occurrence over 48 weeks. Given the chronic nature of GPP, a treatment for flare prevention is a significant shift in the clinical approach, and could ultimately lead to improvements in patient morbidity and quality of life. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Spesolimab Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Palmoplantar Pustulosis: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase IIb, Dose-Finding Study.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the anti-interleukin-36 receptor antibody spesolimab in patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). METHODS: This phase IIb trial comprised a loading dose period to week (W) 4, then maintenance dosing to W52. Patients were randomised 2:1:1:1:2 to subcutaneous spesolimab 3000 mg to W4 then 600 mg every 4 weeks (q4w), spesolimab 3000 mg to W4 then 300 mg q4w, spesolimab 1500 mg to W4 then 600 mg q4w, spesolimab 1500 mg to W4, 300 mg q4w to W16 then 300 mg every 8 weeks (q8w), or placebo switching to spesolimab 600 mg q4w at W16. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in Palmoplantar Pustular Area and Severity Index (PPP ASI) at W16. Secondary endpoints included a Palmoplantar Pustular Physician's Global Assessment (PPP PGA) score of 0/1. Safety (including adverse events [AEs], local tolerability) was assessed. RESULTS: 152 patients were treated. The primary endpoint was not met; mean differences for spesolimab versus placebo ranged from - 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 31.5%, 2.2%) to - 5.3% (95% CI: - 19.1%, 8.6%); none reached significance. At W16, 23 (21.1%) and two (4.7%) patients in the combined spesolimab and placebo groups, respectively, achieved PPP PGA 0/1 (mean difference 16.4%; 95% CI: 3.8%, 25.7%), increasing to 59 (54.1%; combined spesolimab) and 12 (27.9%; placebo switch to spesolimab) patients at W52. Non-Asian patients had significant improvements in the primary endpoint (mean difference - 17.7%; nominal P = 0.0394) and PPP PGA 0/1 at W16 with spesolimab versus placebo. Rates of AEs and AE-related discontinuations were similar for spesolimab and placebo. Local tolerability events and injection-site reactions were more frequent with spesolimab than placebo. CONCLUSION: The primary objective to demonstrate a non-flat dose-response relationship and proof-of-concept was not achieved; improvements with spesolimab occurred in secondary endpoints and in non-Asian patients, indicating potential modest benefits. Spesolimab was generally well tolerated (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04015518).

A clinical trial of spesolimab for patients with palmoplantar pustulosis. Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a painful, difficult-to-treat skin disease that is found on patients' palms and the soles of their feet. In this clinical trial, we studied an injected medicine called spesolimab for treating patients with PPP. Patients were split into five groups; four groups received different doses of spesolimab and one received placebo (an injection without spesolimab). After 16 weeks, patients receiving placebo switched to spesolimab. We measured the body area affected by PPP and how severe PPP was at week 16. Patients' doctors also assessed skin affected by PPP. At 16 weeks of treatment, there was no significant difference between spesolimab and placebo in terms of the PPP-affected area and severity. However, more patients had clear or almost clear skin with spesolimab than placebo. Among non-Asian patients, more showed an improvement in their PPP with spesolimab than with placebo; this was not the case with Asian patients. Patients taking spesolimab or placebo reported side effects, of which the most common were colds, aches and headaches. More patients receiving spesolimab reported a reaction at the injection site compared with placebo. We monitored patients for up to 1 year, and results remained similar. We showed that spesolimab may have a modest effect on the body area affected by PPP, as well as the severity of PPP, and did not seem to cause more side effects than placebo, except for reactions at the injection site.

Safety and tolerability of spesolimab in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)-36 signaling has been shown to be increased in ulcerative colitis (UC). Spesolimab, a novel humanized monoclonal antibody, targets the IL-36 pathway. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We report safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy data of intravenous (IV) spesolimab in UC. Study 1: phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (300 mg single dose; 450 mg every 4 weeks [q4w]; or 1,200 mg q4w, three doses). Study 2: phase IIa, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (1,200 mg q4w). Study 3: phase IIa, open-label, single-arm trial (1,200 mg q4w). Studies lasted 12 weeks, with a 12-, 24-, and 16-week safety follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: Adver+se event (AE) rates were similar for spesolimab and placebo in Studies 1 (N = 98; 64.9%; 65.2%) and 2 (N = 22; 86.7%; 71.4%); all patients in Study 3 (N = 8) experienced AEs. The most frequent investigator-assessed drug-related (spesolimab; placebo) AEs were skin rash (5.4%; 0%) and nasopharyngitis (4.1%; 0%) in Study 1; acne (13.3%; 0%) in Study 2; one patient reported skin rash, nasopharyngitis, headache, and acne in Study 3. Efficacy endpoints were not met. CONCLUSIONS: Spesolimab was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns. The safety data are consistent with studies in other inflammatory diseases.

Assessment of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Spesolimab, a Humanised Anti-interleukin-36 Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, in Healthy Non-Japanese and Japanese Subjects: Results from Phase I Clinical Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The interleukin-36 signalling pathway is associated with pathogenesis of a number of inflammatory diseases. Spesolimab is a selective, humanised, IgG1 antibody that targets the interleukin-36 receptor. We aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of single and multiple doses of spesolimab in healthy non-Japanese and Japanese subjects. METHODS: Five phase I clinical studies (three placebo-controlled dose-escalation, two open-label) were conducted in healthy volunteers; single or multiple doses of spesolimab were administered by intravenous infusion or subcutaneous injection. Plasma samples were collected to investigate the pharmacokinetics of spesolimab and evaluate changes with respect to dose, frequency of dosing, formulation and injection site. Immunogenicity, safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Intravenous spesolimab exhibited target-mediated drug disposition at low doses (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) and linear kinetics at doses ≥ 0.3 mg/kg. Steady state was not attained after the fourth weekly dose because of the long half-life (3-5 weeks). Bioavailability of subcutaneous spesolimab increased with increasing dose over the range of 150-600 mg and was higher when administered to the thigh than to the abdomen. The pharmacokinetic profile was consistent between Japanese and non-Japanese subjects. Positive anti-drug antibody responses occurred during the terminal phase of the spesolimab concentration-time profile in 26.7-33.3% and 16.7-37.5% of subjects receiving intravenous and subcutaneous spesolimab, respectively. The impact of anti-drug antibodies on spesolimab pharmacokinetics was low in healthy volunteers, with the impact on spesolimab plasma concentrations only observed in a few subjects at higher titres (≥ 11,400). No serious adverse events were reported; intravenous doses up to 1200 mg were well tolerated in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic profile and safety data obtained from these phase I clinical studies have been used to guide spesolimab dosing in clinical studies of patients with interleukin-36-mediated diseases. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: For Studies 1-5, NCT02525679, NCT02852824, NCT03100903, NCT03123094, NCT03617835.

Nintedanib in Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data have suggested that nintedanib, an intracellular inhibitor of tyrosine kinases, inhibits processes involved in the progression of lung fibrosis. Although the efficacy of nintedanib has been shown in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, its efficacy across a broad range of fibrosing lung diseases is unknown. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted in 15 countries, we randomly assigned patients with fibrosing lung disease affecting more than 10% of lung volume on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) to receive nintedanib at a dose of 150 mg twice daily or placebo. All the patients met criteria for progression of interstitial lung disease in the past 24 months despite treatment and had a forced vital capacity (FVC) of at least 45% of the predicted value and a diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ranging from 30 to less than 80% of the predicted value. Randomization was stratified according to the fibrotic pattern (a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia [UIP] or other fibrotic patterns) on high-resolution CT. The primary end point was the annual rate of decline in the FVC, as assessed over a 52-week period. The two primary populations for analysis were the overall population and patients with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern. RESULTS: A total of 663 patients were treated. In the overall population, the adjusted rate of decline in the FVC was -80.8 ml per year with nintedanib and -187.8 ml per year with placebo, for a between-group difference of 107.0 ml per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4 to 148.5; P<0.001). In patients with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern, the adjusted rate of decline in the FVC was -82.9 ml per year with nintedanib and -211.1 ml per year with placebo, for a difference of 128.2 ml (95% CI, 70.8 to 185.6; P<0.001). Diarrhea was the most common adverse event, as reported in 66.9% and 23.9% of patients treated with nintedanib and placebo, respectively. Abnormalities on liver-function testing were more common in the nintedanib group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, the annual rate of decline in the FVC was significantly lower among patients who received nintedanib than among those who received placebo. Diarrhea was a common adverse event. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; INBUILD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02999178.).