RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: CDC reported that 45% of Hepatitis C (HCV) infected people denied known risk factors. Electronic health record RF-based, non-Birth Cohort (born outside of years 1945-1965) screening is challenging as risk factors are often input as nonsearchable data. Testing non-Birth Cohort patients solely based on risk factors has the potential to miss a substantial number of HCV infected patients. The aim was to determine the HCV antibody positive prevalence who would have been missed had providers only followed risk factor based screening recommendations. METHODS: A 1:3 case-control retrospective nested chart review was conducted. HCV risk factors and opioid prescriptions were manually abstracted from the Electronic Health Record; other variables were collected using Explorys. In July 2015 HCV screening data was collected on non-Birth Cohort patients who were HCV tested across MedStar Health, as a presumptive marker for high risk. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to determine HCV antibody positive predictors. RESULTS: Eighteen (23%) HCV antibody positive and 123 (49%) HCV antibody negative had no identified risk factors; 6 (33%) HCV antibody positive reported risk factors only after a positive test result. There was a significant interaction between age over 40 and opioid prescription use; these groups were 11× more likely to be HCV antibody positive (CI95 1.6-74.8). CONCLUSIONS: HCV testing solely based on presence of risk factors in non-Birth Cohort patients has the potential to miss a significant number of HCV antibody positive patients. Given patient- and provider-level barriers in elucidating risk factors, universal HCV antibody screening may be warranted.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Chromatographic purification of the extract of an endophytic fungal culture yielded depsitinuside (1), a new phenolic ester together with ergosterol (2) and (22E,24S)-24-methyl-5-α-cholesta-7,22-diene-3ß,5,6ß-triol (3). The structure of 1 was elucidated based on 1D, 2D NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry, whereas the known compounds (2 and 3) were identified by (1)H NMR, mass spectrometry, and in comparison with the literature values. Compound 1 was evaluated for its enzyme inhibitory potential against acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase and lipoxygenase, and was found inactive (10%-40% inhibition at a concentration of 2 mg/ml).
Asunto(s)
Ascomicetos/química , Depsidos/aislamiento & purificación , Galactósidos/aislamiento & purificación , Depsidos/química , Galactósidos/química , Estructura Molecular , Resonancia Magnética Nuclear Biomolecular , Pakistán , Viburnum/microbiologíaRESUMEN
Two new rotenoids, boerharotenoids A (1) and B (2), and four known compounds, boeravinone (3), 5,7,3'-trihydroxycoumaronochromone (4), boeravinone F (5), and eupalitin-3-O-beta-D-galactopyranoside (6), have been isolated from Boerhavia repens and their structures established by spectroscopic (1D and 2D NMR) and mass spectrometric comparison with literature values.