Understanding New Recommendations for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prevention in Pregnancy.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a significant cause of infant morbidity and mortality worldwide with peak hospitalization rates for RSV-mediated illnesses between 2 and 3 months of life. Until very recently, prevention strategies for RSV involved primarily passive immunization of neonates at high risk with monoclonal antibodies and promotion of breastfeeding. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices now recommends passive immunization of all neonates with monoclonal antibodies during RSV season, and the American Association of Pediatrics has endorsed this practice. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved a vaccination for RSV in pregnancy. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has recently recommended RSV vaccination for all pregnant patients between 32 and 36 weeks of gestation who are anticipated to deliver during RSV season if they are not planning nirsevimab for their infants. This recommendation has been endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. In this clinical perspective, we review the scientific evidence, potential concerns, challenges, and future considerations for RSV vaccination in pregnancy.

Pregnancy outcomes among patients with stage 1 chronic hypertension.

In recent years, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association have reduced the thresholds for a hypertension diagnosis among nonpregnant adults. This change has led to more individuals with reproductive potential to be labeled as being chronically hypertensive, and some were started on antihypertensive medications. When these individuals become pregnant, the obstetrical care provider will have to decide whether to manage them as individuals with chronic hypertensive when only a few years ago they would have been managed as normotensive individuals and when the evidence regarding treatment of these patients during pregnancy is limited. If implemented widely, the management of patients with stage 1 hypertension similar to the traditional chronic hypertension will likely lead to additional maternal and fetal testing, to an increase in hospital admissions, and potentially to unnecessary interventions, such as preterm birth. Our goal was to compile the existing evidence regarding the pregnancy outcomes among patients with stage 1 hypertension to assist providers in their diagnosis and management of this patient group.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancy.

Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Optimal glycemic control is associated with improved outcomes. Continuous glucose monitoring is a less invasive alternative to blood glucose measurements. Two types of continuous glucose monitoring are available in the market: real time and intermittently scanned. Continuous glucose monitoring is gaining popularity and is now recommended by some societies for glucose monitoring in pregnant women. In this review, we discuss the differences between the two types of continuous glucose monitoring, optimal treatment goals, and whether there is an improvement in maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Prophylactic ureteral stent placement for the prevention of genitourinary tract injury during hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic ureteral stent placement for the prevention of genitourinary tract injury at the time of cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum. The secondary objectives were to assess mean blood loss, operative time, number of packed red blood cells transfused, and rates of urinary tract infection among patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum with and without prophylactic ureteral stent placement. DATA SOURCES: The search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to February 2022 to December 2022. The protocol for this review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews before data collection (registration number: CRD42022372817). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All studies that examined differences in the rate of genitourinary tract injury among women undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for prenatally suspected placenta accreta spectrum with and without placement of prophylactic ureteral stents were included. Genitourinary injury was defined as cystotomy, ureteral injury, and/or bladder fistula. Cases of both intentional and unintentional genitourinary injuries were included in the analysis. METHODS: For all studies meeting the inclusion criteria, the following data were extracted: number of included patients, maternal demographic information, obstetrical history, type of invasive placentation, placement of stents (yes or no), type of stent placed, blood loss, operative time, genitourinary tract injury, and urinary tract infection. Pooled data analysis was completed using the Review Manager (version 5.3; Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). The summary measures were reported as summary relative risk or as summary mean difference. The quality and risk of biases of the included studies were assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Overall, 9 studies, including 848 patients, fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. Moreover, 523 patients (61.7%) had prophylactic ureteral stents placed, and 325 patients (38.3%) did not. Genitourinary injury occurred in 138 of 523 patients (26.4%) in the ureteral stent group vs 83 of 325 patients (25.5%) in the no ureteral stent group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.20). The mean number of packed red blood cells transfused did not differ between the 2 groups. The pooled analysis demonstrated decreased blood loss among patients who received prophylactic ureteral stents, with a mean difference of 392 mL (95% confidence interval, 52.74-738.13). CONCLUSION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in the rates of genitourinary tract injury with the use of prophylactic ureteral stent placement among cases of prenatally suspected placenta accreta spectrum undergoing cesarean hysterectomy.

The Association between Fetal Growth Restriction and Maternal Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare adverse maternal outcomes between pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR) and those without FGR. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor, which was conducted from 2002 to 2008 in 12 clinical centers with 19 hospitals across 9 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists districts. We included singleton pregnancies without any maternal comorbidities or placenta abnormalities. We compared the outcomes of individuals with FGR with individuals without FGR. Our primary outcome was severe maternal morbidity. Our secondary outcome included various adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), adjusting for confounders. Missing values for maternal age and body mass index were imputed. RESULTS: Of 199,611 individuals, 4,554 (2.3%) had FGR and 195,057 (97.7%) did not have FGR. Compared with the individuals without FGR, individuals with FGR had increased odds of severe maternal morbidity (0.6 vs. 1.3%; aOR: 1.97 [95% CI: 1.51-2.57]), cesarean delivery (27.7 vs. 41.2%; aOR: 2.31 [95% CI: 2.16-2.48]), pregnancy-associated hypertension (8.3 vs. 19.2%; aOR: 2.76 [95% CI: 2.55-2.99]), preeclampsia without severe features (3.2 vs. 4.7%; aOR: 1.45 [95% CI: 1.26-1.68]), preeclampsia with severe features (1.4 vs. 8.6%; aOR: 6.04 [95% CI: 5.39-6.76]), superimposed preeclampsia (18.3 vs. 30.2%; aOR: 1.99 [95% CI: 1.53-2.59]), neonatal intensive care unit admission (9.7 vs. 28.4%; aOR: 3.53 [95% CI: 3.28-3.8]), respiratory distress syndrome (2.2 vs. 7.7%; aOR: 3.57 [95% CI: 3.15-4.04]), transient tachypnea of the newborn (3.3 vs. 5.4%; aOR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.40-1.87]), and neonatal sepsis (2.1 vs. 5.5%; aOR: 2.43 [95% CI: 2.10-2.80]). CONCLUSION: FGR was associated with increased odds of severe maternal outcomes in addition to adverse neonatal outcomes. KEY POINTS: · FGR is associated with cesarean section.. · FGR is not associated with severe maternal morbidity.. · FGR is related to pregnancy-associated hypertension.. · FGR is associated with neonatal morbidity..

Low-dose aspirin therapy for the prevention of preeclampsia: time to reconsider our recommendations?

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends initiation of 81 mg of aspirin daily for women at risk of preeclampsia between 12 and 28 weeks' gestation, optimally before 16 weeks, with continuation until delivery. The World Health Organization recommends that 75 mg of aspirin should be initiated before 20 weeks of gestation for women at high risk of preeclampsia. Both the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence quality statement on "Antenatal Assessment of Pre-eclampsia Risk" request that healthcare providers prescribe low-dose aspirin to pregnant women at increased risk of preeclampsia daily from 12 weeks of gestation. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommends 150 mg of aspirin daily, and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines suggest risk stratification with a dosage of 75 mg for those at moderate risk of preeclampsia and 150 mg for those at high risk of preeclampsia. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics initiative on preeclampsia recommends 150 mg of aspirin to be initiated at 11 to 14+6 week's gestation and also proposes that 2 tablets of 81 mg is an acceptable alternative. Review of the available evidence suggests that both the dosage and timing of aspirin initiation is key to its effectiveness at reducing the risk of preeclampsia. Doses of >100 mg of aspirin daily initiated before 16 weeks' gestation seem to be most effective at reducing the risk of preeclampsia and thus dosages recommended by most major societies and organizations may not be effective. Randomized control trials examining 81 mg vs 162 mg of aspirin daily for the prevention of preeclampsia are required to assess the safety and efficacy of aspirin dosages available in the United States.