Effect of islet alone or islets after kidney transplantation on quality of life in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is efficacious in supressing severe hypoglycaemic episodes (SHE) and restoring glycaemic regulation, which are both pivotal in increasing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Therefore, a systematic assessment of reports detailing HRQoL outcomes is warranted to better understand the benefits of islet transplantation. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the impact of islet transplantation on HRQoL in individuals with T1DM, whether as a standalone procedure (ITA) or following renal transplantation (IAK). METHOD: All studies providing a quantitative assessment of HRQoL following ITA or IAK were included. Selected studies had to meet the following criteria: they had to (i) involve adult recipients of islet grafts for T1DM, (ii) use either generic or disease-specific QoL assessment tools, (iii) provide a comparative analysis of QoL metrics between the pre- and post-transplantation state or between the post-transplantation state and other pre-transplant patients or the general population. RESULTS: Seven studies that met the inclusion criteria provided data on 205 subjects. In the included studies, HRQoL was measured using both generic instruments, such as the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ) 2.0, and disease-specific instruments, such as the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), the Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey (HFS). These instruments cover physical, mental, social, or functional health dimensions. We found that pancreatic islet transplantation was associated with improvements in all HRQoL dimensions compared with the pre-transplant baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review demonstrates that islet transplantation significantly enhances quality of life in individuals with T1DM who are experiencing SHE. To our knowledge, this is the most extensive systematic review conducted to date, evaluating the impact of islet transplantation on HRQoL.

Pitfalls in Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Dose Adjustment Based on Renal Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Valganciclovir (VGC) is administered as prophylaxis to kidney transplant recipients (KTR) CMV donor (D)+/recipient (R)- and CMV R+ after thymoglobulin-induction (R+/TG). Although VGC dose adjustments based on renal function are recommended, there is paucity of real-life data on VGC dosing and associations with clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective Swiss Transplant Cohort Study-embedded observational study, including all adult D+/R- and R+/TG KTR between 2010 and 2020, who received prophylaxis with VGC. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of inappropriately (under- or over-) dosed VGC week-entries. Secondary objectives included breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) and potential associations between breakthrough-csCMVi and cytopenias with VGC dosing. Among 178 KTR, 131 (73.6%) patients had ≥2 week-entries for the longitudinal data of interest and were included in the outcome analysis, with 1,032 VGC dose week-entries. Overall, 460/1,032 (44.6%) were appropriately dosed, while 234/1,032 (22.7%) and 338/1,032 (32.8%) were under- and over-dosed, respectively. Nineteen (14.5%) patients had a breakthrough-csCMVi, without any associations identified with VCG dosing (p = 0.44). Unlike other cytopenias, a significant association between VGC overdosing and lymphopenia (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.71-16.22, p = 0.004) was shown. VGC prophylaxis in KTR is frequently inappropriately dosed, albeit without meaningful clinical associations, neither in terms of efficacy nor safety.

Frequency and impact on renal transplant outcomes of urinary tract infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species.

Background: Enterobacterales are often responsible for urinary tract infection (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients. Among these, Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) are emerging. However, there are only scarce data on frequency and impact of ESBL-UTI on transplant outcomes. Methods: We investigated frequency and impact of first-year UTI events with ESBL Escherichia coli and/or Klebsiella species in a prospective multicenter cohort consisting of 1,482 kidney transplants performed between 2012 and 2017, focusing only on 389 kidney transplants having at least one UTI with Escherichia coli and/or Klebsiella species. The cohort had a median follow-up of four years. Results: In total, 139/825 (17%) first-year UTI events in 69/389 (18%) transplant recipients were caused by ESBL-producing strains. Both UTI phenotypes and proportion among all UTI events over time were not different compared with UTI caused by non-ESBL-producing strains. However, hospitalizations in UTI with ESBL-producing strains were more often observed (39% versus 26%, p = 0.04). Transplant recipients with first-year UTI events with an ESBL-producing strain had more frequently recurrent UTI (33% versus 18%, p = 0.02) but there was no significant difference in one-year kidney function as well as longer-term graft and patient survival between patients with and without ESBL-UTI. Conclusion: First-year UTI events with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and/or Klebsiella species are associated with a higher need for hospitalization but do neither impact allograft function nor allograft and patient survival.

Do Infectious Diseases After Kidney Retransplantation Differ From Those After First Kidney Transplantation?

Background: Infectious diseases (IDs) are highly relevant after solid organ transplantation in terms of morbidity and mortality, being among the most common causes of death. Patients undergoing kidney retransplantation (re-K-Tx) have been already receiving immunosuppressive therapy over a prolonged period, potentially facilitating subsequent infections. Comparing ID events after re-K-Tx and first kidney transplantation (f-K-Tx) can delineate patterns and risks of ID events associated with prolonged immunosuppression. Methods: We included adult patients with records on f-K-Tx and re-K-Tx in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. We analyzed ID events after f-K-Tx and re-K-Tx within the same patients and compared infection rates, causative pathogens, and infection sites. Recurrent time-to-event analyses were performed for comparison of infection rates. Results: A total of 59 patients with a median age of 47 years (range, 18-73) were included. Overall, 312 ID events in 52 patients occurred. In multivariable recurrent event modeling, the rate of ID events was significantly lower after re-K-Tx (hazard ratio, 0.70; P = .02). More bacterial (68.9% vs 60.4%) and fungal (4.0% vs 1.1%) infections were observed after f-K-Tx but fewer viral infections (27.0% vs 38.5%) as compared with re-K-Tx (P = .11). After f-K-Tx, urinary and gastrointestinal tract infections were more frequent; after re-K-Tx, respiratory tract and surgical site infections were more frequent (P < .001). Conclusions: ID events were less frequent after re-K-Tx. Affected sites differed significantly after f-K-Tx vs re-K-Tx.

[Renal xenotransplantation : state of the art]. / Xénotransplantation rénale†: état actuel et perspectives.

Xenotransplantation could be an inexhaustible source of organs and change the life of end-stage kidney disease patients with reduction of morbidity and mortality. Through genetic engineering it is now possible to reduce the risk of hyperacute and acute graft rejection and improve the overall immune compatibility between two different species. Some experiments have already brought promising perspectives. Nevertheless, there are still difficulties to overcome. The risk of animal-related infectious diseases, ethnic limitations, safety, and applicability of large-scale xenotransplantation should be assessed. We still need to improve the technical aspects and define the purpose of these procedures: definitive replacement or temporary solution?

La xénotransplantation pourrait être une source inépuisable d'organes et changer la vie des patients atteints d'une maladie rénale terminale en diminuant la morbidité et la mortalité. Grâce au génie génétique, il est maintenant possible de réduire le risque de rejet hyperaigu et aigu et d'améliorer la compatibilité immunitaire globale entre deux espèces différentes. Certains travaux ont déjà apporté des perspectives prometteuses. Néanmoins, il reste de nombreuses difficultés à surmonter. Le risque de maladies infectieuses liées aux animaux, les considérations ethniques, la sécurité et l'applicabilité de la xénotransplantation à grande échelle devraient être évalués. Nous devons encore améliorer les aspects techniques et définir le but de ces procédures : remplacement définitif ou solution temporaire ?

[Diabetes and pancreas or islet transplantation: psychological issues]. / Diabète et transplantation du pancréas ou d'îlots de Langerhans : enjeux psychologiques.

Diabetes is a chronic and progressive disease that affects an increasing number of patients. The prevalence of associated psychological comorbidities is high and often requires the implementation of targeted psychological interventions. Pancreas or islet transplantation remains a therapeutic option to consider, for a part of patients with type 1 diabetes unstable disease or established complications. From the clinical indication to the waiting period for a transplantation, then to the postoperative and long-term care, the diabetic patient is found to experience perpetual changes that may test his adaptability. In this article, the psychological aspects of the pancreas or islet transplantation, as well as the role of a liaison psychiatrist in a transplantation unit will be discussed.

Le diabète est une maladie chronique et évolutive atteignant un nombre croissant de patients. La prévalence des comorbidités psychiques associées est élevée et nécessite souvent l'implémentation d'interventions psychologiques ciblées. La transplantation du pancréas ou d'îlots de Langerhans est une option thérapeutique à considérer pour certains patients avec un diabète de type 1 instable ou des complications installées. De l'indication clinique à la période d'attente pour une greffe, puis des suites postopératoires jusqu'à la vie d'après la greffe, le patient diabétique vit des transitions multiples le mettant à l'épreuve. Dans cet article, nous discutons les aspects psychologiques de ces transplantations ainsi que les interventions du psychiatre de liaison au sein d'un service de transplantation.

[Kidney disease in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome]. / Manifestations rénales du syndrome des anticorps antiphospholipides.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by recurrent arterial and venous thromboembolic events. Renal complications occur in 3 % of patients. Renal artery stenosis is the most common, and APS-related nephropathy is the predominant microvascular complication. APS nephropathy has heterogeneous manifestations ranging from hematuria and non-nephrotic range proteinuria to hypertension and multi-organ failure caused by catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Anticoagulation and thromboprophylaxis are key to management. Immunosuppression has been used with some success but lacks randomized controlled trial validation for their use.

Le syndrome des anticorps antiphospholipides (SAPL) est une maladie auto-immune rare caractérisée par des événements thromboemboliques artériels et veineux récurrents. Les complications rénales surviennent chez 3 % des patients. La sténose de l'artère rénale est la plus courante et la néphropathie liée au SAPL représente la complication microvasculaire principale. La maladie rénale liée au SAPL se traduit par des manifestations hétérogènes allant de l'hématurie et de la protéinurie non néphrotique à l'hypertension jusqu'à la défaillance multi-organique causée par le syndrome catastrophique des anticorps antiphospholipides (SCAPL). L'anticoagulation et la thromboprophylaxie sont clés dans la prise en charge. L'immunosuppression a été utilisée avec un certain succès, mais manque de validation par des essais contrôlés randomisés pour leur utilisation.

[Nephrology: what's new in 2023]. / Néphrologie: ce qui a changé en 2023.

Molecules such as sparsentan and budesonide look promising to treat proteinuric IGA nephropathy. SLGT2 inhibitors have a prominent place in nephroprotection and could be used in the treatment of acute kidney injury due to heart failure as well. High volume hemodiafiltration compared to hemodialysis improves survival in dialysis patients. Lessening dialysate temperature does not improve hemodynamic stability during the dialysis session. Sodium bicarbonate does not seem to protect renal function in renal transplant patients. SGLT2 inhibitors may have a beneficial effect in these patients in terms of nephroprotection.

Dans les formes protéinuriques de néphropathie à IgA, le sparsentan et le budésonide semblent être des molécules prometteuses. Les inhibiteurs du SGLT2 (iSGLT2) confirment leur place primordiale dans la néphroprotection et pourraient être utilisés dans le traitement de l'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) liée à l'insuffisance cardiaque. En hémodialyse, l'hémodiafiltration à haut-débit comparée à l'hémodialyse diminue la mortalité d'environ 22 %. Abaisser la température du dialysat n'améliore pas la stabilité cardiovasculaire durant la séance d'hémodialyse. Le bicarbonate de sodium ne semble pas avoir d'effet néphroprotecteur sur la fonction rénale des greffés rénaux alors que les iSGLT2 pourraient avoir un effet bénéfique.

Surgical site infections after kidney transplantation are independently associated with graft loss.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common health care-associated infections. SSIs after kidney transplantation (K-Tx) can endanger patient and allograft survival. Multicenter studies on this early posttransplant complication are scarce. We analyzed consecutive adult K-Tx recipients enrolled in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study who received a K-Tx between May 2008 and September 2020. All data were prospectively collected with the exception of the categorization of SSI which was performed retrospectively according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. A total of 58 out of 3059 (1.9%) K-Tx recipients were affected by SSIs. Deep incisional (15, 25.9%) and organ/space infections (34, 58.6%) predominated. In the majority of SSIs (52, 89.6%), bacteria were detected, most frequently Escherichia coli (15, 28.9%), Enterococcus spp. (14, 26.9%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (13, 25.0%). A BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (multivariable OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.07-4.34, P = .023) and delayed graft function (multivariable OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.56-5.34, P = .001) were independent risk factors for SSI. In Cox proportional hazard models, SSI was independently associated with graft loss (multivariable HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.35-10.38, P = .011). In conclusion, SSI was a rare complication after K-Tx. BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and delayed graft function were independent risk factors. SSIs were independently associated with graft loss.

Psychological care of patients during the pancreas transplantation process: issues and prospects.

Pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes is a therapeutic option when other treatments are not effective and physical complications occur. Psychological burden is prominent in patients, and non-adherence to treatment is often one manifestation of such difficulties. Time projection is an important factor affected by chronic disease. The prospect of transplantation has the potential to repair this disruption. It could re-establish a continuity in the patient's self and history, by connecting the future to a life that was only about past and present. Taking care of oneself, adhering to treatment, being part of a long-term therapeutic project and going through transplantation are all processes that need a good ability to self-project in time. This is specifically a domain of psychotherapeutic interventions. In this article, the psychological implications of pancreas transplantation for patients and caregivers alike will be discussed, as well as the role of the psychiatrist in the transplantation process.