Extensively Porous-Coated Stems Demonstrate Excellent Long-Term Survivorship in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Extensively porous-coated cylindrical stems have demonstrated excellent results in revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs). However, most studies are midterm follow-ups and of modest cohort size. This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of a large series of extensively porous-coated stems. METHODS: From 1992 to 2003, 925 extensively porous-coated stems were utilized in revision THAs at a single institution. The mean age was 65 years, and 57% of patients were males. Harris hip scores were calculated, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Radiographic assessment for stem fixation was categorized as either in-grown, fibrous stable, or loose according to Engh criteria. Risk analysis used Cox proportional hazard method. The mean follow-up was 13 years. RESULTS: Mean Harris hip scores improved from 56 to 80 at the last follow-up (P < .001). Fifty-three femoral stems (5%) were rerevised: 26 for aseptic loosening, 11 for stem fractures, 8 for infection, 5 for periprosthetic femoral fractures, and 3 for dislocation. Cumulative incidence of aseptic femoral loosening and femoral rerevision for any reason were 3% and 6.4% at 20 years, respectively. Nine of eleven stem fractures occurred with 10.5-13.5 mm diameters (mean 6 years). Radiographic review of unrevized stems demonstrated 94% bone-ingrown. Demographics, femoral bone loss, stem diameter, and length were not predictors of femoral rerevision. CONCLUSION: In this large series of revision THAs using a single extensively porous-coated stem design, the cumulative incidence of rerevision for aseptic femoral loosening was 3% at 20 years. These data confirm the durability of this stem in femoral revision, providing a long-term benchmark for newer uncemented revision stems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.

Measuring standing hindfoot alignment: reliability of goniometric and visual measurements.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability of a functional weight-bearing measure of hindfoot alignment, the standing tibiocalcaneal angle (STCA), and to compare the relative reliabilities of goniometrically and visually estimated STCAs. DESIGN: Prospective blinded comparison. SETTING: Sports medicine center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen asymptomatic volunteer subjects (10 men, 8 women; age range, 22-41y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two experienced examiners completed 2 blinded goniometric STCA and 2 blinded visual STCA measurements on each subject's right and left ankles in random order. RESULTS: Quantitative visual and goniometric STCAs were similar (visual mean range, 5.61 degrees -6.50 degrees valgus vs goniometric mean range, 5.50 degrees -6.94 degrees valgus), and both measurements exhibited good to excellent intrarater reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range, .80-.94; 95% prediction limits, 1.51 degrees -2.06 degrees ). Interrater ICCs were only fair for both measurement methods (.50-.75; 95% prediction limits, 2.2 degrees -4.1 degrees ). In terms of relative reliability, the visual STCA and goniometric STCA exhibited good to excellent agreement (ICC range, .64-.95). CONCLUSIONS: The STCA as described herein exhibited acceptable intrarater reliability for clinical use but may not be acceptably reliable between experienced examiners. The visual and goniometric STCA measurements were quantitatively similar and exhibited similar reliability. Using either method, changes of up to 2 degrees over time may be attributable to measurement error. Clinicians may consider using either STCA measurement in evaluating patients with lower-limb injuries or during screening of high-risk populations.