Transforming Growth Factor-ß1 C (+869) T Codon 10 Gene Polymorphism Significantly Associated with Rates of SARS-CoV-2 in Kidney Transplant Recipients in Kuwait.

OBJECTIVES: COVID-19, which began in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, has caused a large global pandemic and poses a serious threat to public health. As of March 20, 2023, over 13 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses had been administered worldwide, with the United States accounting for almost 672 million of total administered vaccine doses. Some COVID-19 patients experience sudden and rapid deterioration with onset of fatal cytokine storm syndrome, which increased interest in the mechanisms, diagnosis, and therapy of cytokine storm syndrome. Although the prototypic concept of cytokine storm syndrome was first proposed 116 years ago, we have only begun to study and understand it over the past 30 years. Clinical data suggest that Th1, Th2, and Th3 and macrophage origin cytokines have effects on cytokine storm syndrome. We aimed to study the effects of cytokine gene polymorphisms in cytokine storm syndrome mechanisms and progression of COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We screened 309 patients who had undergone kidney transplant at the Hamad Al Essa organ transplant center. From February 2020 through February 2022, 64 patients (20.7%) developed COVID-19 infection. Patient blood samples were screened for the key Th1, Th2, Th3, and macrophage cytokines gene polymorphisms. RESULTS: We observed that only transforming growth factor-ß C (+869) T codon 10, but not interferon-γ T (+874) A, interleukin 6 G (-174) C, and interleukin 4C (-490) T, was significantly associated with progression of COVID-19 and cytokine storm syndrome mechanisms (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding can be a profoundly important factor in the initiation of cytokine storm syndrome and progress of COVID-19.

Effect of Repeated Structured Diabetes Education on Lifestyle Knowledge and Self-Care Diabetes Management in Kidney Transplant Patients With Posttransplant Diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes knowledge among kidney transplant recipients with posttransplant diabetes has not been clearly assessed. We evaluated whether diabetes education in kidney transplant recipients with posttransplant diabetes affected self-care, metabolic control variables, and reversibility of early diabetic microangiopathies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, we enrolled 210 renal transplant recipients with posttransplant diabetes. Group 1 patients (n = 140) received structured diabetes education, and group 2 patients (n = 70) received conventional education. Patient data were collected through patient identification and metabolic control parameter forms and a diabetes self-care scale questionnaire (scores between 0 and 7). RESULTS: Diet knowledge improved and waist circumference was reduced with mild to moderate exercise in group 1 (P < .001), despite no differences between the 2 groups in mean body weight or body mass index. Patients in group 1 (structured diabetes education with repeated reinforcement) showed significant improvement in healthy lifestyle parameter scores versus group 2 (P < .05) and versus values before education (P < .05). At end of study, these achievements were translated into proper blood sugar monitoring, management of both hypoand hyperglycemia, improvements in logbook use and healthy sharp disposal, Ramadan fasting, sick day management, and knowledge on the importance of HbA1c (P < .05), which translated to decrease of HbA1c in group 1 by 1.35%. In group 1, proteinuria decreased significantly compared with before education and compared with group 2 values (P = .016). Diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy remained comparable between groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Structured diabetes education improved lifestyle knowledge, self-care diabetes management, and metabolic control variables among kidney transplant recipients with posttransplant diabetes. Structured diabetes education also resulted in partial reversibility of the present early diabetic nephropathy. We recommended such education to be delivered to all kidney transplant recipients with diabetes.

Impact of Pretransplant Dialysis Modality on Posttransplant Outcomes: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: It remains unclear whether posttransplant outcomes differ according to the pretransplant dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis). Our aim was to assess posttransplant outcomes in patients with different predialysis modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two thousand two hundred fifty-eight kidney recipients following up in Hamed Alessa Organ transplant center in Kuwait were included and divided into two groups according to pre-transplant dialysis modality: Group 1: those who received hemodialysis (HD) and group 2: those with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Demographics, pretransplant and posttransplant comorbidities, and patient and graft outcomes were studied. RESULTS: There were 1956 patients on hemodialysis, and 302 patients were on peritoneal dialysis. Most were male patients (1456 vs 802 female patients), with comparable mean age (P = .34). Chronic glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy represented the most common original kidney disease before transplant (27.6% and 21.4%, respectively), with higher prevalence of glomerulonephritis in group 1 and diabetic nephropathy in group 2 (P = .001). The 2 groups were comparable with regard to immunosuppression (induction and maintenance) (P > .05). Posttransplant diabetes and hypertension were significantly higher in the hemodialysis group (P = .004 and P = 003, respectively). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the graft outcome (P = .86). However, patient survival was significantly higher in the hemodialysis group (81.2% vs 64.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with peritoneal dialysis, pretransplant hemodialysis is associated with better posttransplant patient survival despite no difference in the graft outcome. Diabetes-related complications could be attributed to such outcomes.

Acute Kidney Injury Among COVID-19-Positive Patients Is Associated With Higher Mortality: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Renal complications of COVID-19 are not yet well studied. We aimed to evaluate acute kidney injury prevalence among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection and explore its effect on patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 586 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Of these patients, 267 (45.5%) developed acute kidney injury, as classified according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. We compared this group with 319 patients (54.5%) without acute kidney injury. RESULTS: Most patients in both study groups were men; mean age was 60.8 ± 14 versus 51.7 ± 16 years. Comorbid conditions that were substantially predominant among patients with acute kidney injury were diabetes mellitus (64% vs 42.9%), hypertension (72.6% vs 43.5%), and ischemic heart disease (25% vs 14.7%). Fever, cough, shortness of breath, and dehydration were the main presentations among patients with acute kidney injury, and patients in this group had greater prevalence of radiological findings concordant with COVID-19 (86.8% vs 59.8%). Sepsis, volume depletion, shock, arrhythmias, and acute respiratory distress syndrome were higher in patients with acute kidney injury. Anticoagulation (85% vs 59.2%), vasopressors, plasma infusions, antimicrobials, and steroids were more frequently used in patients with acute kidney injury. More patients with acute kidney injury had acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (62.3% vs 32.9%), with higher overall mortality rate (63.2% vs 31.1%). CONCLUSIONS: We found more frequent prevalence of acute kidney injury associated with severe COVID-19 than shown in reports from Chinese, European, and North American cohorts. Patients with COVID-19 who developed acute kidney injury had risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes, greater need for mechanical ventilation, were males, and were older age. Mortality was high in this population, especially among older patients and those who developed Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes stage 3 disease.

Inhibition of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin-9 After Kidney Transplant: Single-Center Experience Among Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk.

OBJECTIVES: The benefits of reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by evolocumab by nearly 60% has not been evaluated among kidney transplant recipients to our knowledge. We assessed the efficacy and safety of evolocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin-9 inhibitor, in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events among kidney transplant recipients in a randomized controlled study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2017 and June 2019, we enrolled 197 kidney transplant recipients with high cardiovascular risk score (>20). Patients who received evolocumab (140 mg/2 weeks) comprised group 1 (n = 98), and patients maintained on statin therapy comprised group 2 (n = 99). We followed patients clinically and with necessary laboratory investigations over 24 months. RESULTS: The 2 groups had comparable demographic characteristics (P > .05). Before enrollment in the study, smokers were significantly more prevalent in group 1, whereas posttransplant diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in group 2 (P = .033). Moreover, baseline serum creatinine was higher in group 1, whereas immunosuppression was equivalent in both groups (P > .05). We found no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning cardiovascular events, and both graft and patient outcomes were comparable (P > .05). The higher baseline cholesterol in group 1 (5.5 vs 4.7 mmol/L; P < .001) decreased significantly after 3 months and thereafter (P = .031) compared with levels in group 2 and baseline values (P < .001). We reported 2 cases of acute myocardial infarction and 1 atrial fibrillation in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin-9 inhibitors, as an added therapy to statins, are safe and effective in treating hypercholesterolemia after kidney transplant. Evolocumab can minimize cardiovascular events after kidney transplant in patients with high events at baseline. Longer-term trials with larger number of patients are needed to confirm its beneficial effects on cardiovascular complications and patient and graft survival.

Full Correction of Posttransplant Anemia Is Associated With Stabilized Cardiac Dimensions Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Posttransplant anemia might be associated with cardiovascular morbidity and increased mortality. To our knowledge, the debate on anemia correction has neither been revisited nor decided definitively. We aimed to assess the effects of full correction of posttransplant anemia on the cardiovascular system and quality of life among renal transplant recipients with stable graft function who were using erythropoietin-stimulating agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 247 kidney recipients with stable graft function to be assessed for anemia. Eligible patients were randomized to achieve targeted hemoglobin of 11 to 12 g/dL (group 1, n = 183) or of 13 to 15 g/dL (group 2, n = 64) with the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents. Patients underwent monthly clinical and laboratory evaluations of kidney graft function. Quality of life and echocardiography were assessed at study start and at 12 months. RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable regarding pretransplant characteristics. In group 2, we observed comparable posttransplant complications (P > .05) but better graft function at 6 months and better cardiac indexes at 1 year of the study (P < .05). At 12 months, quality of life had improved after full correction of posttransplant anemia in the renal transplant recipients who received erythropoietinstimulating agents. CONCLUSIONS: Full correction of posttransplant anemia in renal transplant recipients was associated with improved quality of life and cardiac indexes without an effect on cardiovascular comorbidity.

Contrast-induced Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients are scarce despite the distinct risk factors such as the use of immunosuppressive agents, sympathetic denervation, glomerular hyperfiltration, and high prevalence of the cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CIN in KT recipients who received low-osmolality iodine-based contrast material (CM) for radiological assessment. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, 79 of the 3180 KT recipients followed at Hamed Al-Essa organ transplant center received low-osmolality iodine-based contrast for radiological assessment for various indications. Preventive measures including holding metformin, intravenous hydration, sodium bicarbonate and N-acetylcysteine were given before contrast administration. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 25% from the baseline within 72 hours. RESULTS: The enrolled patients were divided into two groups: those who developed CIN (n = 7) and those with no increase in serum creatinine level (n = 72). The mean age of the patients was 52.1 ± 12.3 years; 44 of them were males, and the cause of end-stage kidney disease was mostly diabetic nephropathy. The pre-transplant demographics were comparable between the two groups. Fortyseven cases received contrast for coronary angiography, and 32 received it for a CT scan. The graft function deteriorated in group 1, but no significant difference was found between the two groups at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: CIN is not uncommon in KT recipients receiving CM, especially with ischemic heart disease. Risk stratification, optimizing hemodynamics, and avoiding potential nephrotoxins are essential before performing CM-enhanced studies in KT recipients.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7165.

Effect of Structured Diabetes Education on Diabetic Angiopathies Among Kidney Transplant Recipients With Posttransplant Diabetes: Kuwait Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes knowledge among kidney transplant recipients with posttransplant diabetes has not been exhaustively assessed. Here, we evaluated the effects of structured diabetes education on development of diabetic micro- and macroangiopathies in kidney transplant patients with posttransplant diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study categorized 210 renal transplant patients with posttransplant diabetes mellitus into 2:1 groups according to type of diabetes education. Group 1 (n = 140) received structured education, and group 2 (n = 70) received conventional education. Patient data were collected through patient identification and metabolic control parameter forms. RESULTS: Most patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, were Kuwaiti (60.7% vs 58.6%), men (57.9% vs 68.6%), and had high school-level education (43.6% vs 48.6%). Chronic glomerulonephritis was the original disease in 36.4% versus 35.4% of patients. Most patients (72.8% vs 78.6% in group 1 vs 2) received pretransplant hemodialysis. At study start, the rate of patients with diabetic neuropathy was comparable between groups (32.4% vs 27.9%). Moreover, after completion of 24 months of education, neurological evaluation by electromyograph and nerve conduction studies did not show any significant differences between the groups (P > .05). Similarly, the number of patients with fundus imaging showing retinopathy was comparable between groups at start and end of study (P > .05). Although macroangiopathic events were higher in group 1, this finding was not significant (P > .05). However, although the percentage of patients with nephropathy was comparable in both groups at start of study, the percentage decreased significantly in group 1 at 24 months after completion of education compared with group 2 and baseline value (P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: Structured diabetes education was associated with reduced diabetic nephropathy but had no significant effects on other micro- or macroangiopathies. However, we recommend education for all kidney transplant recipients with diabetes.

Cystinosis in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients: A Case-Control Study From Kuwait.

OBJECTIVES: Cystinosis is the most frequent cause of the inherited renal Fanconi syndrome and is also potentially treatable. In this study, we have reported our single-center experience of the longterm outcomes of kidney transplant in patients with cystinosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients with cystinosis (n = 17) were compared with a matched control group without cystinosis (n = 126). The 2 groups were compared with regard to demographic data, posttransplant complications, and graft and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Most patients with cystinosis were male teenagers (52.9%) with comparable mean age (12.4 ± 4.1 vs 14 ± 3.1 years) versus the group without cystinosis. The 2 study groups were comparable with regard to type of dialysis, type of donor, blood group, and pretransplant comorbidities (P > .05). Patients with cystinosis received significantly more potent induction therapy (P < 0.05), but both groups were maintained on comparable immunosuppressive regimens (mostly tacrolimus based) (P > .05). Most grafts in both groups displayed immediate graft function. The percentage of patients with cystinosis with primary graft function was significantly higher than the percentage of those patients without cystinosis who had primary graft function (P = .024); this was associated with a relatively lower baseline creatinine level, although this was not significant (P > .05). Posttransplant complications, especially posttransplant diabetes, cytomegalovirus viremia, or BK nephropathy, were comparable (P > .05). Moreover, patient and graft survival rates were similar in the 2 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Under standard immunosuppression, renal transplant and cysteamine therapy were safe with good long-term outcomes in patients with cystinosis. Studies that can include more patients and that have longer follow-up are needed to better understand the nature of this genetic disease and to discover the best treatment options.

Disseminated Rhinocladiella mackenziei infection in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report and literature review.

Rhinocladiella mackenziei is a rare fungal pathogen which belongs to a large group of pigmented fungi causing phaeohyphomycosis. R. mackenziei primarily infects the brain and leads to high fatality rates among both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. Among solid organ transplant recipients, the infection may disseminate to extra-neuronal sites, necessitating comprehensive radiologic imaging. Here we describe a new case of R. mackenziei infection in a renal transplant patient involving the brain and renal allograft. She received liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole but no surgical intervention. Ultimately, the patient died after two months of hospital stay. A review of all reported cases of transplant patients infected with R. mackenziei is also presented.

Better outcome of COVID-19 positive kidney transplant recipients during the unremitting stage with optimized anticoagulation and immunosuppression.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic with high morbidity and mortality and with a reported high risk of severe disease in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). AIM: We aimed to report the largest number of COVID-19-positive cases in KTR in a single center and to discuss their demographics, management, and evolution. METHODS: We enrolled all the two thousand KTR followed up in our center in Kuwait and collected the data of all COVID-19-positive KTR (104) from the start of the outbreak till the end of July 2020 and have reported the clinical features, management details, and both patient and graft outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the one hundred and four cases reported, most of them were males aged 49.3 ± 14.7 years. Eighty-two of them needed hospitalization, of which thirty-one were managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Main comorbidities among these patients were hypertension in 64.4%, diabetes in 51%, and ischemic heart disease in 20.2%. Management strategies included anticoagulation in 56.7%, withdrawal of antimetabolites in 54.8%, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal in 33.7%, the addition of antibiotics in 57.7%, Tocilizumab in 8.7%, and antivirals in 16.3%. During a follow-up of 30 days, the reported number of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 28.7%, respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy 46.2%, and overall mortality rate was 10.6% with hospital mortality of 13.4% including an ICU mortality rate of 35.5%. CONCLUSION: Better outcome of COVID-19-positive KTR in our cohort during this unremitting stage could be due to the younger age of patients and early optimized management of anticoagulation, modification of immunosuppression, and prompt treatment of secondary bacterial infections. Mild cases can successfully be managed at home without any change in immunosuppression.

Pretransplant donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies despite a negative complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch: Is it wise to desensitize before kidney transplant?

The significance of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) despite negative complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) would be useful for clinical decision-making. Hence, we aimed to determine the impact of pretransplant DSA despite negative crossmatch on the outcome of kidney transplantation. One hundred and eleven kidney recipients were prospectively enrolled in this study after being transplanted at Hamed Al-Essa Organ Transplant Center of Kuwait between January 2011 and December 2013. Of them, 50 recipients with positive DSA at the time of transplant were subjected to desensitization (Group 1). Three local protocols were utilized; first included plasma exchange, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and rituximab; second included immunoadsorption plus RTX, and the third included high-dose IVIG and rituximab. The second group included 61 recipients with negative DSA. All recipients had negative CDC-XM and flow cytometry crossmatch at the time of transplant. Panel-reactive antibody (±DSA) levels with mean fluorescence intensity and graft function were monitored along the first 24 months for all patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding early posttransplant graft function, patient and graft survivals. Pretransplant DSA with negative CXM carries a minimal clinical risk with optimized immunosuppression.

Immunogenetics of new onset diabetes after transplantation in Kuwait.

Introduction and aim: New onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious metabolic complication following kidney transplantation. Although beta-cell dysfunction is considered the main contributing factor in the development of this complication, its exact etiology is yet to be identified. We aimed to investigate NODAT among kidney transplant cohort in Kuwait with special stress on correlation between its risk factors and interferon gamma genotyping. Materials and methods: We surveyed 309 kidney transplant recipients from Hamed Al Essa Transplantation Centre, Kuwait. The participants were categorized into cohorts according to the development of NODAT diagnosed based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. We genotyped interferon gamma as the leading immunosignature for T lymphocyte. Results: No relationship between ethnicity and the development of NODAT was identified. However, there was a significant difference in age between cohorts. Younger patients demonstrated a lower rate of NODAT while, NODAT reached its maximum in 40-60-year age group. IFNG TT genotype was significantly associated with NODAT (p=0.005), while IFNG AA was considerably higher in the non-NODAT group. Conclusion: Beside the conventional contributing factors of NODAT, our results might represent a suitable platform for a larger cytokine and chemokine spectrum genotyping.

Screening for BK Viremia/Viruria and the Impact of Management of BK Virus Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of BK-induced nephritis in renal transplant recipients is estimated to be 1% to 10%; the rate of graft loss within 1 year is 30% to 65%. We conducted this study to evaluate screening of BK virus in blood and/or urine among renal transplant recipients and to assess the effects of different therapeutic modalities in renal transplant recipients with BK nephropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients were screened at the time of transplant and then at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months posttransplant. Fiftynine patients were diagnosed with BK virus viremia. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment: group 1 (n = 29) received an active treatment and group 2 (n = 30) received minimized immunosuppression. RESULTS: Most patients required graft biopsies to confirm diagnosis (86.2% in group 1 vs 50% in group 2; P = .03). Both groups were comparable regarding demographic data. Initial posttransplant graft function was significantly better in group 1 (P = .017); ultimately, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding graft survival (P= .51). Fifty percent of patients had biopsy-proven acute T-cell-mediated rejection before BK virus-associated nephropathy diagnosis (significantly higher in group 1). Serum creatinine levels were significantly better in group 2 at 3, 4, and 5 years after BK nephropathy (P = .001, .017, and .003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of BK nephropathy in our renal transplant recipients was 5.9% with a rate of graft loss ranging from 43% to 51%. Regular screening, less intensive immunosuppressive therapy, and early intervention by reduction of immunosuppressive medications are advisable to obtain early diagnosis and to have better outcomes of BK virus-associated nephropathy with antiviral agents.

Pregnancy After Renal Transplant: Single Center Experience From the Middle East in Patients Using Different Calcineurin Inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy after kidney transplant has a high risk for maternal and fetal complications; however, it can be successful if patients are properly selected. Here, we studied outcomes and complications of pregnancies in kidney transplant recipients who received calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case control study, we reviewed patients who became pregnant between 2004 and 2017. For this analysis, each pregnancy was considered an event. We divided pregnancies into 2 groups according to calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance immunosuppression: group 1 (49 pregnancies) received cyclosporine, and group 2 (33 pregnancies) received tacrolimus. Patients also received steroids and azathioprine. Patients had regular antenatal follow-up at the Hamed Alessa Organ Transplant Center (Kuwait) and in the maternity hospital (monthly until month 7 and then weekly until delivery). RESULTS: Of 750 female kidney transplant recipients within childbearing potential, there were 82 pregnancies (10.9%) in 49 recipients (6.5%). Seventy-eight pregnancies were planned, and 4 pregnancies occurred while women were using contraception. There was 1 triple pregnancy, 5 double, and 76 single pregnancies. Two women had preeclampsia as maternal complication, 2 had uncontrolled hypertension, and 7 developed graft dysfunction. Forty-seven women (57.3%) had caesarean section, and the remaining had vaginal deliveries. Of 89 babies, 86 were viable (1 intrauterine fetal death and 2 abortions). Eight babies were delivered prematurely with low birth weight, and 2 needed incubators. Mean serum creatinine levels were 97.9 ± 24, 109 ± 38, 100 ± 39, 120 ± 46, and 115 ± 57 µmol/L at baseline, first, second, and third trimesters, and postpartum, respectively. Twelve patients showed high panel reactive antibodies but without donor-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Posttransplant pregnancy can be successful in most renal allograft recipients, but the increased risk of fetal and maternal complications, including low birth weight, spontaneous abortus, and preeclampsia, should be considered.

Management of Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients: Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Data on the management of chronic antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation are limited. We aimed to assess the impact of treatment of biopsy-proven chronic active antibodymediated rejection with combined plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab treatment versus intravenous immunoglobulin alone or conservative management on the evolution of renal function in renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we compared patients diagnosed with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection who were treated with standard of care steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and rituximab (n = 40) at our center versus those who received intravenous immunoglobulin only or just intensified maintenance immunosuppression (n = 28). All patients were followed for 12 months clinically and by laboratory tests for graft and patient outcomes. RESULTS: The two groups were matched regarding mean recipient age (41.9 ± 15.4 vs 37.8 ± 15.5 y in patients with conservative versus combined treatment), recipient sex, mean body weight, and the cause of end-stage kidney disease. Most patients and their donors were males. Glomerulonephritis represented the most common cause of end-stage kidney disease in both groups followed by diabetic nephropathy. The type of induction and pretransplant comorbidities were not different between groups (P > .05) except for the significantly higher number of chronic hepatitis C infections in patients who received conservative treatment (P = .007). Mean serum creatinine values before and after treatment of chronic active antibodymediated rejection were comparable between groups (P > .05). Active treatment with heavier immunosuppression (rituximab and plasma exchange) was associated with posttreatment viral (cytomegalovirus and BK virus) and bacterial infections that necessitated more hospitalization (P > .05). However, graft and patient outcomes were significantly better in the active treatment group than in patients with conservative treatment (P = .002 and .028, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection with plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab can significantly improve outcomes after renal transplant.

Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients: Single-Center Experience in the Middle East.

OBJECTIVES: The number of renal transplants in elderly patients is increasing as age per se does not constitute a contraindication to transplant. We compared renal transplant outcomes in elderly recipients versus a group of middle-aged patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our retrospective casecontrolled study compared elderly transplant recipients (n = 252; > 60 y old) with a matched cohort of younger adult recipients (n = 710; between 40 and 60 years old) who underwent renal transplant at the Hamed Al-Essa Organ Transplant Center of Kuwait between 2000 and 2014. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, complications after transplant, and graft and patient outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: There were 252 elderly kidney transplant recipients (mean age of 65.5 ± 4.8 y; 59.52% males) and 710 younger adult patients (mean age of 49.3 ± 5.5 years; 61.4% males). Most donors were males in their thirties. Deceased donors predominated in the younger adult group, whereas living unrelated donors predominated in the elderly group (P < .05). Diabetes represented the most common cause of endstage kidney disease. Younger patients tended to receive heavier induction therapy but comparable maint enance immunosuppression. Posttransplant diabetes was higher in younger patients; however, there were more elderly patients with micro- and macroangiopathies (P < .05). No significant differences were shown between groups with regard to patient or graft survival (P > .05). This could be attributed to a significantly higher number of patients with cardiovascular risks, less rejection episodes, and higher number of malignancies in the elderly group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Due to relatively less potent immunosuppression, elderly patients experienced lower rejection rates and better graft survival; however, patient survival was lower due to higher cardiovascular risk factors. Older patients should not be discouraged from living-donor renal transplant. Targeted research studies on protocols for the elderly are needed.

Thymoglobulin-Resistant T-Cell-Mediated Acute Rejection in a Pregnant Renal Transplant Recipient: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

To avoid graft rejection during pregnancy, frequent monitoring of serum drug levels is recommended. Pregnancy induces hyperfiltration in transplanted kidneys, as in native kidneys; therefore, detection of rejection can be difficult when monitoring by serum creatinine. If rejection is suspected, ultrasonographguided graft biopsy can be done; once proven, it can be treated with pulse steroids, but data are scarce regarding other agents. Here, we present a 28-year-old pregnant female patient with resistant acute rejection but with successful pregnancy outcome. Our patient had end-stage kidney disease secondary to lupus nephropathy and underwent living-donor renal transplant in May 2013 after hemodialysis support for 1 year. She received thymoglobulin as induction therapy and was maintained on prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. She had normal renal graft function without proteinuria. After she received counseling, she became pregnant in February 2015. In June 2015, she presented with acute graft dysfunction with serum creatinine level of 365 µmol/L. Her abdominal ultrasonography showed mild hydronephrosis and viable fetus. She received empirical pulse steroids with partial response, and her graft biopsy showed acute T-cell-mediated rejection and negative C4d. Intravenous immunoglobulins and minipulse steroids were administered but without response. After gynecologic counseling and informed consent, she received 5 doses of thymoglobulin. She was dialysis dependent until premature vaginal labor, which resulted in birth of a viable 2-kg boy. We suggest that successful pregnancy outcomes could occur with close monitoring and daily dialysis in female kidney transplant patients with resistant rejection.

Role of Diabetes Education Program in Controlling Posttransplant Diabetes in a Recent Renal Transplant Bodybuilder: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Posttransplant diabetes is a common complication of solid-organ transplantation. We present the possible role of diabetes education in improvement of posttransplant diabetes in a 36-year-old bodybuilder who was a kidney transplant recipient. The patient had been abusing some medications to help in bodybuilding. He underwent living unrelated-donor renal transplant with thymoglobulin induction and was maintained on steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Posttransplant diabetes was confirmed by blood tests. His blood sugar was partially controlled by 3 oral agents. The patient participated in our structured diabetes education program. This program was created to cover different items related to diabetes control, including diet, proper exercise, blood sugar monitoring, sick day management, and pathophysiologic roles of diabetes medications. Within 4 months of participation in this program, the patient's blood sugar became well controlled and his diabetes medications started to be minimized. He presently has stable graft function with hemoglobin A1c level around 5.6% on only diet management. Bodybuilders are at risk of deterioration of their kidney function. A proper diabetes education program is recommended to help renal transplant recipients with early posttransplant diabetes mellitus to control their disease. Success requires close evaluation and a multidisciplinary approach.

Successful Management of Late-Onset Cytomegalovirus-Induced Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Kidney Transplant Recipient After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Hemophagocytic syndrome combines febrile hepatosplenomegaly, pancytopenia, hypofibrinemia, and hepatic dysfunction. It is characterized by bone marrow and organ infiltration of activated, nonmalignant macrophages that phagocytize blood cells. It is rare among renal transplant recipients. Here, we present the successful management of late-onset cytomegalovirusinduced hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in a kidney transplant recipient after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In 2012, our patient had end-stage kidney disease due to diabetic nephropathy and underwent related living-donor renal transplant. He was also hypertensive and hyperuricemic and had heart ischemia for which percutaneous coronary intervention for triple vessel disease was performed before transplant. In March 2017, he underwent successful aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft surgery; however, the patient had persistent thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was negative. His bone marrow showed hemophagocytosis possibly due to cytomegalovirus. Moreover, antiglycoprotein IIb/IIIA autoantibodies were positive. A positron emission tomography scan was negative for malignancy. He started treatment for cytomegalovirus with modifi cation of his immunosuppressive regimen (pulse steroid). Antiplatelet therapy was held and only resu med if platelet count exceeded 30000/L. Moreover, he received intravenous immunoglobulin and romiplostim treatment with partial response. Throughout treatment, he had stable kidney graft function with improving platelet count. A multi disciplinary approach is needed to treat patients with hemophagocytic syndrome, especially renal transplant recipients. Late-onset cytomegalovirus is an important cause for this syndrome.