Transforaminal Versus Lateral Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease in the Lumbar Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE: This study compared outcomes for patients managed with a lateral approach to interbody fusion [lateral (LLIF) or oblique (OLIF)] versus a posterior (PLIF) or transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) for treatment of adjacent segment disease (ASD) above or below a prior lumbar fusion construct. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No study has compared outcomes of lateral approaches to more traditional posterior approaches for the treatment of ASD. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent single-level lateral or posterior approaches for lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic ASD between January 2010 and December 2021. Exclusion criteria included skeletal immaturity (age below 18 y old) and surgery indication for malignancy or infection. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, postoperative complications, and revision surgery profiles were collected for all patients. Standard descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Comparative statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 28.0.1.0; Chicago, IL). RESULTS: A total of 152 patients (65±10 y) were included in the study with a mean duration of follow-up of 1.6±1.4 years. The cohort included 123 PLIF/TLIF (81%), 18 LLIF (12%), 11 OLIF (7%). TLIF/PLIF experienced greater mean operative time (210±62 min vs. 184±80 OLIF/105±64 LLIF, P<0.001) and estimated blood loss (414±254 mL vs. 49±29 OLIF/36±33 LLIF, P<0.001). No significant difference in rate of postoperative complications. Postoperative radicular pain was significantly greater in OLIF (7, 64%) and LLIF (7, 39%) compared with PLIF/TLIF (16, 13%), P<0.001. No statistically significant difference in health care utilization was noted between the groups. CONCLUSION: Lateral fusions to treat ASD demonstrated no significantly different risk of complication compared with posterior approaches. Our study demonstrated significantly increased operative time and estimated blood loss for the posterior approach and an increased risk of radicular pain from manipulation/retraction of psoas following lateral approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Demographics and Outcomes of Glenohumeral Dislocations in Individuals With Elevated Body Mass Index.

INTRODUCTION: No specific study has investigated the characteristics and outcomes of anterior shoulder dislocations in morbidly obese individuals. The purpose of this study was to describe shoulder dislocations in patients with body mass index (BMI) greater than 40. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients aged 18 years and older with a BMI ≥40 who presented with a shoulder dislocation in a single institution from 2000 to 2020. Dislocation patterns, associated injuries, treatment modalities, and associated complications were recorded. RESULTS: A significant increase was noted in the number of patients with BMI greater than 40 presenting per year (r2 = -0.831, P < 0.01) over the past 20 years. A significant increase was noted in the average BMI per year in this population (r2 = 0.504, P = 0.028). Fifteen patients (19.5%) experienced at least one recurrent dislocation episode. Ten patients had a Bankart lesion that was associated with an elevated BMI (P = 0.04). Nine patients (11.7%) sustained an associated neurologic injury (no association with BMI). CONCLUSIONS: Over time, there has been an increase in shoulder dislocations in morbidly obese individuals in the United States, alongside an overall increase in the average BMI of patients who present with shoulder dislocations.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in the Adolescent Population: Injury Demographics and Risk of Reinjury Among High School Athletes.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is increasing among the adolescent population with a peak occurring in the high school age range. PURPOSE: To characterize recent epidemiologic trends of ACL injuries, ACL reconstruction (ACLR), and retear rates in high school adolescents based on age, participating sport, and mechanism of injury. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A prospectively maintained institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients 18 or younger who underwent primary ACLR between 2015 and 2020. Odds ratios were calculated for baseline patient characteristics and their association with risk of retear. Multivariate regression analysis was also performed to identify the relationship between retear and specific categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 482 patients were included, with a mean follow-up time of 13.0 ± 11.8 months. Patients were an average age of 16.1 ± 1.3 years old (range: 13 to 18 y). Initial presentation of ACL injuries in high school athletes often occurred at 16 years old regardless of the sport played. Based on age, high school freshmen and seniors are found to have an increased risk of ACL retear. One hundred three patients (21.6%) completed at least 2 or more years of follow-up after ACLR. Of these patients, 38.8% received a bone-tendon-bone (BTB) autograft, 36.9% hamstring autograft, 14.6% quadriceps tendon autograft, and 3.9% received hamstring allograft or other graft (eg, tibialis anterior and BTB allograft), respectively. There were 25 ipsilateral ACL retears that occurred in the patient cohort (5.2%). Thirteen (52%) of retears were females. Football and soccer were the most common sports played by patients with a retear of the ipsilateral knee (31.8% and 27.3%, respectively). Patients who were 13 to 14 or 18 years old ( P = 0.009 and 0.035, respectively) or who received a tibialis anterior/BTB allograft ( P = 0.002) were found to have increased risk of ACL retear compared with other age groups. When evaluating by sex, female soccer players had a greater risk of retear compared with male soccer players ( P = 0.007). When adjusting for multiple variables, (including age, sex, body mass index, primary reconstruction graft choice, sport, and length of follow-up), the odds of ipsilateral retear in patients who received hamstring autograft ( P = 0.02), sustained a contralateral ACL tear ( P = 0 .04), or a contact injury ( P = 0.01) were increased. CONCLUSION: Initial presentation of ACL injuries in high school athletes often occurs at 16 years old regardless of the sport played. Based on age, high school freshmen and seniors are found to have an increased risk of ACL retear. However, the overall rate of ACL retear in high school athletes of all ages is low. Patients who underwent ACLR with hamstring tendon autograft had a greater risk of retear compared with other graft types. Female soccer players also had a greater risk of ACL retear. High school athletes must take caution when in the early high school years (underclassman) and more senior years (upperclassman), as susceptibility for ACL retears is elevated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

A prospective assessment of resilience in trauma patients using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale.

BACKGROUND: Resilience, or the ability to adapt to difficult or challenging life experiences, may be an important mediator in trauma recovery. The primary aim of this study was to describe resilience levels for trauma patients using the validated Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. METHODS: Adult trauma patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center (June 2022-August 2022) were surveyed at the time of admission and by phone between 2 weeks and 1 month after the original survey to obtain follow-up scores. We utilized the validated Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score, a 25-question survey with 5 subfactors (Tenacity, Positive Outlook, Social Support, Problem Solving, and Meaning and Purpose). Each question was scored from 0 to 4 (maximum score 100, representing the highest resilience). Patient factors were collected from the electronic medical record and trauma health registry. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and multivariable linear regression were used to understand associations with Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores. RESULTS: We enrolled 98 patients. The median age was 50 years (interquartile range 32-67), and 74% were male sex. The baseline median Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score on admission was 88 (interquartile range 81-94). Follow-up surveys (N = 64) showed a median score of 89.5 (80-90.5) (P = non-significant). No demographic variable was significantly associated with increasing baseline Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score. Increased length of stay (ß = 1.03), insurance (ß = -7.50), and unknown race (ß = 23.69) were correlated with follow-up Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores. The subfactor "Meaning and Purpose" decreased at follow-up but was not statistically significant (P = .05). CONCLUSION: Validated tools that can accurately distinguish variability in resilience scores are needed for the trauma patient population to understand its relationship with long-term patient health outcomes.

Development of Imaging Criteria for Geriatric Blunt Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Current decision tools to guide trauma computed tomography (CT) imaging were not validated for use in older patients. We hypothesized that specific clinical variables would be predictive of injury and could be used to guide imaging in this population to minimize risk of missed injury. METHODS: Blunt trauma patients aged 65 y and more admitted to a Level 1 trauma center intensive care unit from January 2018 to November 2020 were reviewed for histories, physical examination findings, and demographic information known at the time of presentation. Injuries were defined using the patient's final abbreviated injury score codes, obtained from the trauma registry. Abbreviated injury score codes were categorized by corresponding CT body region: Head, Face, Chest, C-Spine, Abdomen/Pelvis, or T/L-Spine. Variable groupings strongly predictive of injury were tested to identify models with high sensitivity and a negative predictive value. RESULTS: We included 608 patients. Median age was 77 y (interquartile range, 70-84.5) and 55% were male. Ground-level fall was the most common injury mechanism. The most commonly injured CT body regions were Head (52%) and Chest (42%). Variable groupings predictive of injury were identified in all body regions. We identified models with 97.8% sensitivity for Head and 98.8% for Face injuries. Sensitivities more than 90% were reached for all except C-Spine and Abdomen/Pelvis. CONCLUSIONS: Decision aids to guide imaging for older trauma patients are needed to improve consistency and quality of care. We have identified groupings of clinical variables that are predictive of injury to guide CT imaging after geriatric blunt trauma. Further study is needed to refine and validate these models.