Safety of Baricitinib 4 mg for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of baricitinib 4 mg at 24 weeks for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Multiple databases were searched from inception up to November 26, 2019 for randomized controlled trials comparing baricitinib 4 mg with placebo for the treatment of moderate to severe RA. The safety outcomes of interest were the incidence of serious adverse events, adverse events leading to study discontinuation, all infections, and serious infections. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for safety outcomes. The Cochrane tool was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: This analysis included four randomized controlled trials with 3106 patients. For serious adverse events, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.09 (0.76-1.57). For adverse events leading to study discontinuation, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.41 (0.94-2.11). For all reported infections, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.24 (1.10-1.40), For serious infections, pooled RR (95% CI) was 0.97 (0.51-2.57). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA taking 4 mg baricitinib daily did have an increased risk of infections; however, the incidence of serious adverse events, adverse events leading to study discontinuation, or serious infections were not significantly different in patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg compared with placebo.

Culture Negative Endocarditis Masquerading as Recurrent Supraventricular Tachycardia.

Supraventricular tachycardia are common dysrhythmias seen in hospitalized patients. Electrolyte derangements and cardiomyopathy are among the most common causes. Rarely, blood culture negative endocarditis can lead to unexplained recurrentsupraventricular tachycardia. Herein, we present a case of recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in a patient with no previous history of cardiovascular disease.

Choice of Intravenous Crystalloid Fluid and Mortality in Critically Ill Adult Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Intravenous balanced crystalloid fluid therapy may improve mortality and other outcomes in critically ill adult patients, but data are conflicting. We conducted a meta-analysis and literature review to evaluate the impact of intravenous balanced crystalloid, as compared with normal saline, fluid therapy on outcomes in critically ill adult patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials for relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of balanced intravenous crystalloids with normal saline on intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital mortality were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using a fixed effects model. Heterogeneity was calculated using the I2 statistic. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials with 20,171 patients (10,179 participants received balanced crystalloids and 9992 participants received normal saline) were included. For hospital mortality, the pooled RR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.92 (0.85-1.00). For ICU mortality, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 0.91 (0.82-1.00). For major adverse kidney events at 30 days, pooled RR (95% CI) was 0.95 (0.88-1.01). For stage ≥2 acute kidney injury, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 0.94 (0.86-1.02). For receipt of new renal replacement therapy, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 0.91 (0.77-1.07). None of these findings reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous balanced crystalloid use, compared with normal saline, does not result in a statistically significant reduction in hospital or ICU mortality, major adverse kidney events at 30 days, stage ≥2 acute kidney injury, or receipt of new renal replacement therapy in critically ill adult patients.