Cognitive outcomes following unilateral magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: findings from two cohorts.

Magnetic resonance-guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy is a neurosurgical treatment for refractory essential tremor. This study examined cognitive outcomes following unilateral magnetic resonance-guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy, targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus for essential tremor. The research was conducted at two sites: Sunnybrook Research Institute in Toronto, Canada, and West Virginia University School of Medicine Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute in West Virginia, USA. The study focused on cognitive changes at both the group and individual levels. Patients with refractory essential tremor completed cognitive testing before and after magnetic resonance-guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy at both sites. The cognitive testing assessed domains of attention, processing speed, working memory, executive function, language and learning/memory. Postoperative changes in cognition were examined using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, as appropriate. Reliable change indices were calculated to assess clinically significant changes at the individual level. A total of 33 patients from Toronto and 22 patients from West Virginia were included. Following magnetic resonance-guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy, there was a significant reduction in tremor severity in both cohorts. At the group level, there were no significant declines in postoperative cognitive performance in either cohort. The reliable change analyses revealed some variability at the individual level, with most patients maintaining stable performance or showing improvement. Taken together, the results from these two independent cohorts demonstrate that unilateral magnetic resonance-guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy significantly reduces tremor severity without negatively impacting cognition at both the group and individual levels, highlighting the cognitive safety of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor.

Effects and mechanisms of anterior thalamus nucleus deep brain stimulation for epilepsy: A scoping review of preclinical studies.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is a safe and effective intervention for the treatment of certain forms of epilepsy. In preclinical models, electrical stimulation of the ANT has antiepileptogenic effects but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this review, we searched multiple databases for studies that described the effects and mechanisms of ANT low or high frequency stimulation (LFS or HFS) in models of epilepsy. Out of 289 articles identified, 83 were pooled for analysis and 34 were included. Overall, ANT DBS was most commonly delivered at high frequency to rodents injected with kainic acid, pilocarpine, or pentylenetetrazole. In most studies, this therapy increased the latency to the first spontaneous seizure and reduced the frequency of seizures by 20%-80%. Electrophysiology data suggested that DBS reduces the severity of electrographic seizures, decreases the duration and increases the threshold of afterdischarges, reduces the power of low-frequency and increase the power high-frequency bands. Mechanistic studies revealed that ANT DBS leads to a series of short- and long-term changes at multiple levels. Some of its anticonvulsant effects were proposed to occur via the modulation of serotonergic and adenosinergic transmission. The latter seems to be derived from the downregulation of adenosine kinase (ADK). ANT DBS was also shown to increase hippocampal levels of lactate, alter the expression of genes involved in calcium signaling, synaptic glutamate, and the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway. When delivered during status epilepticus or following the injection of convulsant agents, DBS was found to reduce the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and apoptosis. When administered chronically, ANT DBS increased the expression of proteins involved in axonal guidance, changed functional connectivity in limbic circuits, and increased the number of hippocampal cells in epileptic animals, suggesting a neuroprotective effect.

Long-term safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound capsulotomy for obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) trials targeting the anterior limb of the internal capsule have shown promising results. We evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of MRgFUS capsulotomy in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: This phase I single center open label study recruited treatment-resistant OCD and MDD. Outcomes were measured 6mo, 12mo, and 18-24months (long-term) after MRgFUS capsulotomy. Neuropsychological testing and neuroimaging were conducted at baseline and 12mo postoperatively. The primary outcome was safety. The secondary outcome was clinical response, defined for OCD as ≥35% improvement in Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (YBOCS) scores, and for MDD as a ≥50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores, compared to baseline. RESULTS: No serious adverse effects were registered. In patients with OCD (n=15), baseline YBOCS scores (31.9±1.2) were significantly reduced by 23% (p=0.01) at 6mo and 35% (p<0.0001) at 12mo. In patients with MDD (n=12), a 26% and 25% non-significant reduction in HAMD-17 scores (baseline 24.3±1.2) was observed at 6mo and 12mo, respectively. Neuropsychological testing revealed no negative effects of capsulotomy. In the OCD and MDD cohorts we found a correlation between clinical outcome and lesion laterality, with more medial left (OCD, p=0.08) and more lateral right (MDD, p<0.05) placed lesions being respectively associated with a stronger response. In the MDD cohort, more ventral tracts appeared to be associated with a poorer response. CONCLUSIONS: MRgFUS capsulotomy is safe in patients with OCD and MDD and particularly effective in the former population.

Antidepressant class and concurrent rTMS outcomes in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is frequently used as an adjunctive treatment with antidepressants for depression. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of antidepressant classes when administered concurrently with rTMS for the management of major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 12th 2024 for terms relating to medication, depression, and rTMS and appraised by 2 independent screeners. All randomized clinical trials that prospectively evaluated a specific antidepressant adjunctively with sham rTMS as a control in MDD were included. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023418435). The primary outcome measure assessed symptomatic improvement measured by formal depression scales. We used a random-effects model with pooled Standardized Mean Differences (SMDs) and log odds ratios (OR). All studies were assessed for their methodological quality and bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool version 2 (RoB2). Findings: 14 articles from 5376 identified studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. There was only sufficient trial data to evaluate the effects of rTMS and combination therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Across studies, 848 participants (mean [SD] age:41.1 [18.7] years for SSRIs, 51.8 [3.8] years for SNRIs) prospectively examined the efficacy of antidepressant medication with rTMS. Combining rTMS with SSRIs led to significantly lower depression scores, (SMD [CI] of -0.65 [-0.98, -0.31], p = 0.0002, I2 = 66.1%), higher response (OR = 0.97 [0.50, 1.44], p < 0.0001, I2 = 25.33%) and remission rates (OR = 1.04 [0.55, 1.52], p < 0.0001, I2 = 0.00%) than medication with sham rTMS. No additive benefit was found for SNRIs with rTMS (SMD of 0.10 [-0.14, 0.34], p = 0.42, I2 = 0.00%; OR = 0.12 [-0.39, 0.62], p = 0.64, I2 = 0.00%; OR = -0.31 [-0.90, 0.28], p = 0.86, I2 = 39.9%). The overall risk of bias for the included studies ranged from low to high, with 1 study having a high risk of bias. Interpretation: The combination of rTMS with SSRIs, but not SNRIs, significantly reduced depression severity, increasing response and remission rates. Some analyses demonstrated high heterogeneity, which was influenced by an SSRI trial with a high effect size. Overall, these results suggest that not all antidepressant combination therapies are alike, and SSRIs should be considered when initiating rTMS. Funding: Donald T. Stuss Young Investigator Research Innovation Award from the Sandra Black Centre for Brain Resilience & Recovery and the Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation through the Sunnybrook Foundation.

Treatment expectations and clinical outcomes following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

BACKGROUND: Patient expectations, including both positive (placebo) and negative (nocebo) effects, influence treatment outcomes, yet their impact on acute repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is unclear. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective chart review, 208 TRD patients completed the Stanford Expectation of Treatment Scale (SETS) before starting open-label rTMS treatment. Patients were offered two excitatory rTMS protocols (deep TMS or intermittent theta-burst stimulation), which stimulated the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. A minimum of 20 once daily treatments were provided, delivered over 4-6 weeks. Primary outcomes were 1) remission, measured by a post-treatment score of <8 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), and 2) premature discontinuation. The change in HAMD-17 scores over time was used as a secondary outcome. Physicians were blinded to SETS scores. Logistic and linear regression, adjusting for covariates, assessed SETS and HAMD-17 relationships. RESULTS: Of 208 patients, 177 had baseline and covariate data available. The mean positivity bias score (positive expectancy minus negative expectancy subscale averages) was 0.48 ± 2.21, indicating the cohort was neutral regarding the expectations of their treatment on average. Higher positive expectancy scores were significantly associated with greater odds of remission (OR = 1.90, p = 0.003) and greater reduction in HAMD-17 scores (ß = 1.30, p = 0.005) at the end of acute treatment, after adjusting for covariates. Negative expectancy was not associated with decreased odds of remission (p = 0.2) or treatment discontinuation (p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Higher pre-treatment positive expectations were associated with greater remission rates with open-label rTMS in a naturalistic cohort of patients with TRD.

A Pragmatic Review on Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy for Parkinson's Disease Gait Related Disorders: Gaps and Controversies.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder that results in potentially debilitating mobility deficits. Recently, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been proposed as a novel therapy for PD gait disorders. The highest levels of evidence remain limited for SCS. OBJECTIVES: In this systematic review and narrative synthesis, the literature was searched using combinations of key phrases indicating spinal cord stimulation and PD. METHODS: We included pre-clinical studies and all published clinical trials, case reports, conference abstracts as well as protocols for ongoing clinical trials. Additionally, we included trials of SCS applied to atypical parkinsonism. RESULTS: A total of 45 human studies and trials met the inclusion criteria. Based on the narrative synthesis, a number of knowledge gaps and future avenues of potential research were identified. This review demonstrated that evidence for SCS is currently not sufficient to recommend it as an evidence-based therapy for PD related gait disorders. There remain challenges and significant barriers to widespread implementation, including issues regarding patient selection, effective outcome selection, stimulation location and mode, and in programming parameter optimization. Results of early randomized controlled trials are currently pending. SCS is prone to placebo, lessebo and nocebo as well as blinding effects which may impact interpretation of outcomes, particularly when studies are underpowered. CONCLUSION: Therapies such as SCS may build on current evidence and be shown to improve specific gait features in PD. Early negative trials should be interpreted with caution, as more evidence will be required to develop effective methodologies in order to drive clinical outcomes.

Current Progress in Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound to Facilitate Drug Delivery across the Blood-Brain Barrier.

This review discusses the current progress in the clinical use of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) and other ultrasound platforms to transiently permeabilize the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for drug delivery in neurological disorders and neuro-oncology. Safety trials in humans have followed on from extensive pre-clinical studies, demonstrating a reassuring safety profile and paving the way for numerous translational clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and primary and metastatic brain tumors. Future directions include improving ultrasound delivery devices, exploring alternative delivery approaches such as nanodroplets, and expanding the application to other neurological conditions.

Insertional effect following electrode implantation: an underreported but important phenomenon.

Deep brain stimulation has revolutionized the treatment of movement disorders and is gaining momentum in the treatment of several other neuropsychiatric disorders. In almost all applications of this therapy, the insertion of electrodes into the target has been shown to induce some degree of clinical improvement prior to stimulation onset. Disregarding this phenomenon, commonly referred to as 'insertional effect', can lead to biased results in clinical trials, as patients receiving sham stimulation may still experience some degree of symptom amelioration. Similar to the clinical scenario, an improvement in behavioural performance following electrode implantation has also been reported in preclinical models. From a neurohistopathologic perspective, the insertion of electrodes into the brain causes an initial trauma and inflammatory response, the activation of astrocytes, a focal release of gliotransmitters, the hyperexcitability of neurons in the vicinity of the implants, as well as neuroplastic and circuitry changes at a distance from the target. Taken together, it would appear that electrode insertion is not an inert process, but rather triggers a cascade of biological processes, and, as such, should be considered alongside the active delivery of stimulation as an active part of the deep brain stimulation therapy.

Fundamentals of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease in clinical practice: part 1.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is recognized as an established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) and other movement disorders in the light of the developments seen over the past three decades. Long-term efficacy is established for PD with documented improvement in the cardinal motor symptoms of PD and levodopa-induced complications, such as motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Timing of patient selection is crucial to obtain optimal benefits from DBS therapy, before PD complications become irreversible. The objective of this first part review is to examine the fundamental concepts of DBS for PD in clinical practice, discussing the historical aspects, patient selection, potential effects of DBS on motor and non-motor symptoms, and the practical management of patients after surgery.

Nas últimas três décadas, a estimulação cerebral profunda (ECP) se tornou um tratamento bem estabelecido para doença de Parkinson (DP) e outros transtornos do movimento. A eficácia a longo prazo na DP foi bem documentada para a melhora dos sintomas motores cardinais da DP e das complicações induzidas pelo uso do levodopa, como as flutuações motoras e as discinesias. O momento da seleção do paciente é crucial para se obter os benefícios ideais da ECP, antes que as complicações da DP se tornem irreversíveis. O objetivo desta primeira parte da revisão é examinar os conceitos fundamentais da ECP na prática clínica, discutindo os aspectos históricos, a seleção de pacientes, os potenciais efeitos da ECP nos sintomas motores e não motores da doença e o manejo prático dos pacientes após a cirurgia.

Fundamentals of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease in clinical practice: part 2.

The field of neuromodulation has evolved significantly over the past decade. Developments include novel indications and innovations of hardware, software, and stimulation techniques leading to an expansion in scope and role of these techniques as powerful therapeutic interventions. In this review, which is the second part of an effort to document and integrate the basic fundamentals and recent successful developments in the field, we will focus on classic paradigms for electrode placement as well as new exploratory targets, mechanisms of neuromodulation using this technique and new developments, including focused ultrasound driven ablative procedures.

O campo da neuromodulação evoluiu significativamente na última década. Esse progresso inclui novas indicações e inovações de hardware, software e técnicas de estimulação, levando a uma expansão das áreas clínicas cobertas e no papel dessas técnicas como intervenções terapêuticas eficazes. Nesta revisão, que é a segunda parte de um esforço para documentar e integrar os fundamentos básicos e os desenvolvimentos recentes e bem-sucedidos no campo, vamos nos concentrar em paradigmas clássicos para colocação de eletrodos, bem como em novos alvos exploratórios, mecanismos de neuromodulação usados por esta técnica e novos desenvolvimentos, incluindo procedimentos ablativos orientados por ultrassom focalizado.

Adverse Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Scoping Review.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an emerging therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although adverse effects have been reported in early-phase and a few randomized clinical trials, little is known about its overall safety profile, which has been assumed to be similar to that of DBS for movement disorders. The objective of this study was to pool existing safety data on DBS for TRD. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed was searched for English articles describing adverse outcomes after DBS for TRD. Studies were included if they reported at least 5 patients with a minimal follow-up of 6 months. After abstract (n = 607) and full-article review (n = 127), 28 articles reporting on 353 patients met criteria for final inclusion. Follow-up of the studies retrieved ranged from 12 to 96 months. Hemorrhages occurred in 0.8% of patients and infections in 10.2%. The rate of completed suicide was 2.5%. Development or worsening of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and mania occurred in 18.4%, 9.1%, and 5.1%, respectively. There were some differences between targets, but between-study heterogeneity precluded statistical comparisons. In conclusion, DBS for TRD is associated with surgical and psychiatric adverse events. Hemorrhage and infection occur at rates within an accepted range for other DBS applications. The risk of suicide after DBS for TRD is 2.5% but may not represent a significant deviation from the natural history of TRD. Finally, risks of worsening depression, anxiety, and the incidence of mania should be acknowledged when considering DBS for TRD.

Reduction of alpha-synuclein oligomers in preclinical models of Parkinson's disease by electrical stimulation in vitro and deep brain stimulation in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been widely used to manage debilitating neurological symptoms in movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite its well-established symptomatic benefits, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying DBS and its possible effect on the accumulation of pathological proteins in neurodegeneration remains limited. Accumulation and oligomerization of the protein alpha-synuclein (α-Syn) are implicated in the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra in PD, making α-Syn a potential therapeutic target for disease modification. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of high frequency electrical stimulation on α-Syn levels and oligomerization in cell and rodent models. METHODS: High frequency stimulation, mimicking DBS parameters used for PD, was combined with viral-mediated overexpression of α-Syn in cultured rat primary cortical neurons or in substantia nigra of rats. Bimolecular protein complementation with split fluorescent protein reporters was used to detect and quantify α-Syn oligomers. RESULTS: High frequency electrical stimulation reduced the expression of PD-associated mutant α-Syn and mitigated α-Syn oligomerization in cultured neurons. Furthermore, DBS in the substantia nigra, but not the subthalamic nucleus, decreased overall levels of α-Syn, including oligomer levels, in the substantia nigra. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results demonstrate that direct high frequency stimulation can reduce accumulation and pathological forms of α-Syn in cultured neurons in vitro and in substantia nigra in vivo. Thus, DBS therapy could have a role beyond symptomatic treatment, with potential disease-modifying properties that can be exploited to target pathological proteins in neurodegenerative diseases.

Fundamentals of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease in clinical practice: part 1 / Princípios da estimulação cerebral profunda na doença de Parkinson na prática clínica: parte 1

Abstract Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is recognized as an established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) and other movement disorders in the light of the developments seen over the past three decades. Long-term efficacy is established for PD with documented improvement in the cardinal motor symptoms of PD and levodopa-induced complications, such as motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Timing of patient selection is crucial to obtain optimal benefits from DBS therapy, before PD complications become irreversible. The objective of this first part review is to examine the fundamental concepts of DBS for PD in clinical practice, discussing the historical aspects, patient selection, potential effects of DBS on motor and non-motor symptoms, and the practical management of patients after surgery.

Resumo Nas últimas três décadas, a estimulação cerebral profunda (ECP) se tornou um tratamento bem estabelecido para doença de Parkinson (DP) e outros transtornos do movimento. A eficácia a longo prazo na DP foi bem documentada para a melhora dos sintomas motores cardinais da DP e das complicações induzidas pelo uso do levodopa, como as flutuações motoras e as discinesias. O momento da seleção do paciente é crucial para se obter os benefícios ideais da ECP, antes que as complicações da DP se tornem irreversíveis. O objetivo desta primeira parte da revisão é examinar os conceitos fundamentais da ECP na prática clínica, discutindo os aspectos históricos, a seleção de pacientes, os potenciais efeitos da ECP nos sintomas motores e não motores da doença e o manejo prático dos pacientes após a cirurgia.

Seasonal pattern and depression outcomes from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) may exhibit a seasonal pattern. The impact of a seasonal pattern in depressive symptoms on rTMS outcomes is unexplored. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with MDD receiving open-label high frequency rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Having a seasonal pattern was defined as scoring ≥ 12 on the Personal Inventory for Depression and Seasonal Affective Disorder (PIDS). Primary outcomes included improvement in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and remission. Secondary analyses included the use of the self-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) to assess for changes in atypical neurovegetative symptoms. Multiple linear regression, multiple logistic regression, and linear mixed effects analyses were performed. 46 % (58/127) of the sample had a seasonal pattern. Seasonal pattern did not significantly influence improvement in HAMD (PIDS < 12, 7.8, SD 5.9; PIDS ≥ 12, 10.4, SD 4.9 or remission (PIDS < 12, 30 %; PIDS ≥ 12, 34 %). There were equivalent degrees of improvement in atypical neurovegetative symptoms over time as assessed using the QIDS. Depression with seasonal pattern was found to respond to rTMS treatment similarly to depression without seasonal pattern, suggesting that this may be a viable treatment for this group.