Efficacy of SPR720 in murine models of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infection.

BACKGROUND: Non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasing worldwide, with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus as the predominant pathogens. Current treatments are poorly tolerated and modestly effective, highlighting the need for new treatments. SPR719, the active moiety of the benzimidazole prodrug SPR720, inhibits the ATPase subunits of DNA gyrase B, a target not exploited by current antibiotics, and therefore, no cross-resistance is expected with standard-of-care (SOC) agents. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vitro activity of SPR719 against MAC and M. abscessus clinical isolates, including those resistant to SOC agents, and in vivo efficacy of SPR720 in murine non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) pulmonary infection models. METHODS: NTM isolates were tested for susceptibility to SPR719. Chronic C3HeB/FeJ and severe combined immunodeficient murine models of pulmonary infection were used to assess efficacy of SPR720 against MAC and M. abscessus, respectively. RESULTS: SPR719 was active against MAC (MIC90, 2 mg/L) and M. abscessus (MIC90, 4 mg/L) clinical isolates. Efficacy of SPR720 was demonstrated against MAC pulmonary infection, both as a monotherapy and in combination with SOC agents. SPR720 monotherapy exhibited dose-dependent reduction in bacterial burden, with the largest reduction observed when combined with clarithromycin and ethambutol. Efficacy of SPR720 was also demonstrated against M. abscessus pulmonary infection where monotherapy exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in bacterial burden with further reductions detected when combined with SOC agents. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro activity of SPR720 against common NTM pathogens and efficacy in murine infections warrant the continued clinical evaluation of SPR720 as a new oral option for the treatment of NTM-PD.

A narrative review of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: microbiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management challenges.

INTRODUCTION: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are a diverse group of mycobacterial species that are ubiquitous in the environment. They are opportunistic pathogens that can cause a range of diseases, especially in individuals with underlying structural lung disease or compromised immune systems. AREAS COVERED: This paper provides an in-depth analysis of NTM infections, including microbiology, environmental sources and transmission pathways, risk factors for disease, epidemiology, clinical manifestations and diagnostic approaches, guideline-based treatment recommendations, drugs under development, and management challenges. EXPERT OPINION: Future approaches to the management of NTM pulmonary disease will require therapies that are well tolerated, can be taken for a shorter time period and perhaps less frequently, have few drug-drug interactions, and are active against the various strains of pathogens. As the numbers of infections increase, such therapies will be welcomed by clinicians and patients.

Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease and the potential role of SPR720.

INTRODUCTION: Nontuberculous mycobacteria infect patients who have structural lung disease or those who are immunocompromised. Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasing in prevalence. Treatment guidelines for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease involve a three-drug regimen with azithromycin, ethambutol, and rifampin, and those of Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MAB) pulmonary disease involve a combination of three or more antimicrobials including macrolides, amikacin, and a ß-lactam or imipenem. However, these regimens are poorly tolerated and generally ineffective. AREAS COVERED: SPR720 is a novel therapeutic agent that has demonstrated activity against a range of NTM species, including MAC and MAB. Encouraging in vitro and pre-clinical data demonstrate that SPR720 is active both alone and in combination with standard-of-care agents, with no evidence of cross-resistance to such agents. It is generally well tolerated with mainly gastrointestinal and headache adverse events of mild or moderate severity. EXPERT OPINION: Management of NTM-PD is challenging for many reasons including length of therapy, poor efficacy, drug intolerance, recurrence, and resistance development. The current antimicrobial management options for NTM-PD are limited in number and there exists a large unmet need for new treatments. SPR720 has encouraging data that warrant further study in the context of a multidrug regimen.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of SPR206 in subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment.

SPR206 is a novel polymyxin derivative with potent in vitro activity against susceptible and multidrug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter species. SPR206 is eliminated renally. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SPR206 were evaluated in healthy subjects with normal renal function (Cohort 1) and subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment (RI) (Cohorts 2-4) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) (Cohort 5). Subjects in Cohorts 1-4 received a 100-mg intravenous (IV) dose of SPR206. Subjects in Cohort 5 received a 100-mg IV dose within 2 h after HD on day 1 and 1 h before HD on day 5. Safety and PK analyses included 37 subjects. Mostly mild but no serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. Systemic exposure to SPR206 increased as renal function decreased, with mean area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last) values 39% to 239% greater in subjects with RI vs healthy subjects. Mean plasma clearance (CL) of SPR206 decreased with decreasing renal function (29% to 76% lower vs healthy subjects). In subjects with ESRD, AUC0-last decreased by 51%, and CL increased by 92% for dialyzed vs nondialyzed conditions. SPR206 was excreted in urine within 12 h in healthy subjects and subjects with mild RI (Cohort 2) but was prolonged in those with moderate and severe RI (Cohorts 3 and 4, respectively). In summary, SPR206 was generally safe and well tolerated, and the PK of SPR206 was well characterized in subjects with RI.

Impact of antibiotic pharmacokinetics in urine on recurrent bacteriuria following treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

The clinical relevance of bacteriuria following antibiotic treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in clinical trials remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of urine pharmacokinetics on the timing of recurrent bacteriuria in a recently completed trial that compared oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide to intravenous ertapenem. The urinary clearance and urine dwell time of ertapenem were prolonged relative to tebipenem and were associated with a temporal difference in the repopulation of bladder urine with bacteria following treatment, potentially confounding the assessment of efficacy.

Ceftobiprole activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens causing bone and joint infections in the United States from 2016 to 2020.

Bone and joint infections (BJIs) present significant treatment challenges. Ceftobiprole, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, is approved in many European and other countries for the treatment of adults with community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia, excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia. In this study, the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole and comparators was evaluated against clinical isolates collected from BJIs in the USA from 2016 to 2020. Gram-positive pathogens made up 70.6% of all BJI isolates and included S. aureus (47.4% of all isolates), ß-hemolytic streptococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Enterococcus faecalis. Ceftobiprole was highly active against S. aureus (MIC50/90 values, 0.5/1 mg/L; 99.6% susceptible using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing susceptibility breakpoint of ≤2 mg/L for the treatment of pneumonia patients) and exhibited potent activity against the other Gram-positive cocci and the predominant BJI Gram-negative groups. These results support the further evaluation of ceftobiprole for this potential indication.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Investigator-blinded Trial Comparing Ceftobiprole With a Standard-of-care Cephalosporin, With or Without Vancomycin, for the Treatment of Pneumonia in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: The advanced-generation, broad-spectrum, intravenous (IV) cephalosporin, ceftobiprole, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but its effects in pediatric patients have not been established. METHODS: In this multicenter, investigator-blinded, active-controlled, phase 3 study, patients 3 months to <18 years old with HAP or CAP requiring hospitalization were randomized (2:1) to ceftobiprole versus standard-of-care (SoC) IV cephalosporin treatments (ceftazidime or ceftriaxone), with or without vancomycin. After at least 3 days' IV treatment, patients demonstrating clinical improvement could be switched to an oral antibiotic, to complete a minimum of 7 days' treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 138 patients were randomized to ceftobiprole (n = 94) or a SoC cephalosporin (n = 44). Median time to oral switch was 6.0 days in the ceftobiprole group and 8.0 days in the SoC cephalosporin group. While on IV therapy, adverse events and treatment-related adverse events were reported by 20.2% and 8.5% of ceftobiprole-treated patients and 18.2% and 0% of SoC cephalosporin-treated patients. Early clinical response rates at day 4 in the intention-to-treat population were 95.7% and 93.2% (between-group difference, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval, -5.5% to 14.7%) in the ceftobiprole and comparator groups, and clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 90.4% and 97.7% (between-group difference, -7.3%; 95% confidence interval, -15.7% to 3.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftobiprole was well tolerated and, in this small phase 3 study, demonstrated similar efficacy to SoC cephalosporins in pediatric patients with HAP or CAP requiring hospitalization.

Ceftobiprole Compared With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial (TARGET).

BACKGROUND: The development of novel broad-spectrum antibiotics, with efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, has the potential to enhance treatment options for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation intravenous cephalosporin with broad in vitro activity against gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative pathogens. METHODS: TARGET was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 noninferiority study that compared ceftobiprole with vancomycin plus aztreonam. The Food and Drug Administration-defined primary efficacy endpoint was early clinical response 48-72 hours after treatment initiation in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the European Medicines Agency-defined primary endpoint was investigator-assessed clinical success at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Noninferiority was defined as the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference in success rates (ceftobiprole minus vancomycin/aztreonam) >-10%. Safety was assessed through adverse event and laboratory data collection. RESULTS: In total, 679 patients were randomized to ceftobiprole (n = 335) or vancomycin/aztreonam (n = 344). Early clinical success rates were 91.3% and 88.1% in the ceftobiprole and vancomycin/aztreonam groups, respectively, and noninferiority was demonstrated (adjusted difference: 3.3%; 95% CI: -1.2, 7.8). Investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit was similar between the 2 groups, and noninferiority was demonstrated for both the ITT (90.1% vs 89.0%) and clinically evaluable (97.9% vs 95.2%) populations. Both treatment groups displayed similar microbiological success and safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: TARGET demonstrated that ceftobiprole is noninferior to vancomycin/aztreonam in the treatment of ABSSSIs, in terms of early clinical response and investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03137173.

Ceftobiprole Activity against Bacteria from Skin and Skin Structure Infections in the United States from 2016 through 2018.

Ceftobiprole medocaril is an advanced-generation cephalosporin prodrug that has qualified infectious disease product status granted by the US FDA and is currently being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. In this study, the activity of ceftobiprole and comparators was evaluated against more than 7,300 clinical isolates collected in the United States from 2016 through 2018 from patients with skin and skin structure infections. The major species/pathogen groups were S. aureus (53%), Enterobacterales (23%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7%), beta-hemolytic streptococci (6%), Enterococcus spp. (4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (2%). Ceftobiprole was highly active against S. aureus (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/liter; 99.7% susceptible by EUCAST criteria; 42% methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). Ceftobiprole also exhibited potent activity against other Gram-positive cocci. The overall susceptibility of Enterobacterales to ceftobiprole was 84.8% (>99.0% susceptible for isolate subsets that exhibited a non-extended-spectrum ß-lactamase [ESBL] phenotype). A total of 74.4% of P. aeruginosa, 100% of beta-hemolytic streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, and 99.6% of Enterococcus faecalis isolates were inhibited by ceftobiprole at ≤4 mg/liter. As expected, ceftobiprole was largely inactive against Enterobacterales that contained ESBL genes and Enterococcus faecium Overall, ceftobiprole was highly active against most clinical isolates from the major Gram-positive and Gram-negative skin and skin structure pathogen groups collected at U.S. medical centers participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program during 2016 to 2018. The broad-spectrum activity of ceftobiprole, including potent activity against MRSA, supports its further evaluation for a potential ABSSSI indication.

Ceftobiprole activity when tested against contemporary bacteria causing bloodstream infections in the United States (2016-2017).

Ceftobiprole medocaril, the prodrug of ceftobiprole, is an advanced-generation cephalosporin that is approved in many European and non-European countries for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia) and community-acquired pneumonia and is currently being evaluated in a global phase 3 clinical trial of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. This study investigated the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole and comparators against a total of 5466 gram-positive and -negative isolates from bloodstream infections (BSIs) that were collected in the United States during 2016 and 2017 as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Ceftobiprole was highly active (isolates were >99% susceptible) against S. aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus), coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus faecalis, streptococci, and non-extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (non-ESBL) phenotype Enterobacteriaceae. As expected, lower activities were observed against Enterococcus faecium, ESBL-phenotype Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. These results support further clinical evaluation of ceftobiprole for the treatment of BSIs caused by susceptible organisms.

Ceftobiprole Activity against Gram-Positive and -Negative Pathogens Collected from the United States in 2006 and 2016.

Ceftobiprole is an advanced cephalosporin with potent activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria that has been approved in many European and non-European countries to treat community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia). This study reports on the activity of ceftobiprole against a large set of clinical isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in the United States in 2016 that caused serious infections, including pneumonia, bacteremia, and skin and skin structure infections. To assess any potential temporal changes in ceftobiprole activity, the 2016 results were compared to corresponding MIC data from a 2006 U.S. survey that included key target pathogens. Ceftobiprole exhibited potent activity against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, which were 99.3% susceptible), coagulase-negative staphylococci (100% susceptible), Enterococcus faecalis (100% susceptible), Streptococcus pneumoniae (99.7% susceptible), and other tested streptococci. Similarly, ceftobiprole was highly active against Enterobacteriaceae isolates that did not exhibit an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype, including Escherichia coli (99.8% susceptible) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (99.6% susceptible). A total of 99.6% of all Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates were inhibited at ≤1 mg/liter ceftobiprole, and 72.7% of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole. With the exception of decreased cephalosporin susceptibility among Enterobacteriaceae isolates, which correlates with an increased prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates, ceftobiprole had similar activities against the isolate sets collected in 2006 and 2016. Therefore, ceftobiprole remains highly active when tested in vitro against a large number of current Gram-positive or Gram-negative pathogens that cause serious infections.

Randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter study of gatifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate treatment of recurrent and nonresponsive otitis media in children.

BACKGROUND: Decreased susceptibility of pathogens to currently used agents for recurrent otitis media has provided the impetus for identifying new antimicrobial options. OBJECTIVE: To compare gatifloxacin with amoxicillin/clavulanate in children with recurrent or nonresponsive acute otitis media (AOM). METHODS: Included in this multicenter randomized trial were 413 patients, ranging in age from 6 months to 7 years, who had recurrent AOM (at least 3 episodes in the previous 6 months or 4 episodes in the previous 12 months) and/or had failed antibiotic therapy for AOM within 14 days of enrollment. Diagnosis required evidence of acute inflammation and otoscopic findings of middle ear effusion; baseline tympanocentesis was optional and encouraged. Children were randomly assigned (2:1) to 10 days of oral therapy with gatifloxacin suspension (10 mg/kg of body weight once daily) or amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension (45/6.4 mg/kg/d in 2 divided doses). RESULTS: : Clinical cure was obtained in 90.2% (222 of 246) of patients in the gatifloxacin group and 84.3% (102 of 121) of those in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (95% confidence interval, -1.9-12.9) 3-10 days after treatment ended. Gatifloxacin was associated with higher clinical cure rates than was amoxicillin/clavulanate in children younger than 2 years of age (92.0% versus 80.0%, respectively). Cure rates by pretreatment pathogen in the gatifloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate groups were 92.1% (35 of 38) versus 88.9% (16 of 18) for Streptococcus pneumoniae infections and 88.2% (30 of 34) versus 92.3% (12 of 13) for Haemophilus influenzae infections, respectively. Sustained clinical cures 3-4 weeks after treatment ended were obtained in 74.4% (183 of 246) of patients treated with gatifloxacin and 72.7% (88 of 121) of those treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate. Adverse events considered drug-related occurred with similar frequency in the 2 groups. Six patients (2.2%) in the gatifloxacin group and 2 patients (1.5%) in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group developed transient symptoms of mild or moderate arthralgia. CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative evaluation of fluoroquinolone therapy in children with AOM, gatifloxacin was similar in clinical efficacy to amoxicillin/clavulanate 45/6.4 mg/kg/d for treatment of recurrent/nonresponsive infections.

Randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, comparative study of gatifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in recurrent otitis media and acute otitis media treatment failure in children.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent otitis media and acute otitis media treatment failure are commonly encountered in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of gatifloxacin with amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of acute otitis media treatment failure and recurrent otitis media. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-four children 6 months-7 years with recurrent otitis media and/or acute otitis media failure were stratified according to age (younger than 2 years versus 2 years or older) and then randomly assigned to 10 days of treatment with gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg once daily or amoxicillin/clavulanate 90 mg/6.4 mg in 2 divided doses. Tympanocentesis was performed in 116 children with acute otitis media treatment failure and 52 with recurrent otitis media at study entry to validate the clinical diagnosis and provide microbiologic data. The primary outcome measure was clinical resolution of infection at the test-of-cure visit 3-10 days after completing treatment. RESULTS: Clinical resolution of acute otitis media was observed in 79.0% (49 of 62) of clinically evaluable children younger than 2 years and 90.3% (56 of 62) of those 2 years or older who were treated with gatifloxacin as compared with 77.6% (45 of 58) of children younger than 2 years and 79.7% (47 of 59) of children 2 years or older treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate. In patients with acute otitis media treatment failure, clinical response rates for children younger than 2 years and those 2 years or older were 87.5% (21 of 24) and 97.0% (32 of 33) with gatifloxacin versus 63.6% (14 of 22) and 83.9% (26 of 31) with amoxicillin/clavulanate. The corresponding clinical response rates in patients with recurrent otitis media were 79.2% (19 of 24) and 85.7% (18 of 21) with gatifloxacin and 90.5% (19 of 21) and 76.0% (19 of 25) with amoxicillin/clavulanate. Clinical success in those subjects having pretreatment middle ear fluid pathogens was similar for the 2 regimens [80.0% (24 of 30) gatifloxacin, 77.1% (27 of 35) amoxicillin/clavulanate]. Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains was not observed. Both drugs were generally well-tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common drug-related adverse event (10% gatifloxacin, 18% amoxicillin/clavulanate). No evidence of abnormal joint or gait findings was found during a 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Gatifloxacin once daily is at least as effective and well-tolerated as amoxicillin/clavulanate twice daily in children with acute otitis media treatment failure or recurrent otitis media. There was no evidence of arthrotoxicity or emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria in gatifloxacin-treated children.

Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of oral gatifloxacin for the treatment of recurrent/nonresponsive acute otitis media: an open label, noncomparative, double tympanocentesis study.

BACKGROUND: Gatifloxacin is an 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone with good activity against respiratory pathogens. OBJECTIVES: To document the bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of gatifloxacin in recurrent/nonresponsive acute otitis media (AOM). METHODS: One hundred sixty patients 6 to 48 months of age with recurrent/nonresponsive AOM received gatifloxacin suspension (10 mg/kg once daily for 10 days). Recurrent AOM was defined as > or =3 AOM episodes during the previous 6 months or > or =4 AOM episodes during the previous 12 months. Nonresponsive AOM was defined as AOM occurring < or =14 days after completing antibiotic treatment or not improving after > or =48 h of therapy. Middle ear fluid (MEF) obtained by tympanocentesis pretreatment (Day 1) and 3 to 5 days after initiation of treatment (Days 4 to 6) was cultured. Additional MEF cultures were obtained if clinical failure or recurrence of AOM occurred. Bacteriologic failure was defined by culture-positive MEF during treatment. Patients were followed until Days 22 to 28. Susceptibility was determined by broth microdilution. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight (80%) patients completed treatment, and 32 discontinued the study prematurely (adverse events, 17; lost to follow-up, 10; consent withdrawal, 3; and laboratory abnormalities, 2). From 89 patients (median age, 1 year; median number of prior AOM episodes, 4; range, 0 to 12), 121 pathogens were recovered: Haemophilus influenzae, 74 (61%); Streptococcus pneumoniae, 36 (30%); Moraxella catarrhalis, 9 (7%); and Streptococcus pyogenes, 2 (2%). The 36 S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to gatifloxacin (MIC50 0.25 microg/ml); 26 of 36 (72%) were penicillin-nonsusceptible (15 fully resistant). All 74 H. influenzae isolates were susceptible to gatifloxacin (MIC < or = 0.03 mg/ml). Fourteen of 74 (19%) and 9 of 9 (100%) H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis isolates, respectively, produced beta-lactamase. Bacteriologic eradication was achieved for 118 of 121 (98%) pathogens: 74 of 74 H. influenzae; 34 of 36 (94%) S. pneumoniae; 9 of 9 M. catarrhalis; and 1 of 2 S. pyogenes. Clinical improvement/cure at end of treatment was seen in 103 of 114 (90%) clinically evaluable patients. Clinical recurrence of AOM after completion of therapy occurred in 31 patients. Of the 27 recurrent AOM cases in which tympanocentesis was performed, there were 16 (59%) new infections, 4 (15%) culture-negative results and only 7 (26%) true bacteriologic relapses. Adverse events were recorded in 21 of 160 (13%) patients: vomiting, 16; diarrhea, 3; maculopapular rash, 2. No articular adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Gatifloxacin is efficacious and safe for the treatment of recurrent/nonresponsive AOM.

Comparison of once-daily extended-release ciprofloxacin and conventional twice-daily ciprofloxacin for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women.

BACKGROUND: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) is currently the first choice for empiric therapy of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) in women. In areas where resistance to TMP/SMX is known to be high, ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones are recommended as first-line choices for the empiric therapy of UTI. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety profile of once-daily extended-release ciprofloxacin 500 mg (referred to hereafter as ciprofloxacin QD) with those of conventional ciprofloxacin 250 mg BID, each administered orally for 3 days, in the treatment of uncomplicated UTI in women. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, Phase III trial, adult women with clinical signs and symptoms of acute uncomplicated UTI, pyuria, and a positive pretherapy urine culture (>/=10(5) colony-forming units/mL) received ciprofloxacin QD or ciprofloxacin BID. Bacteriologic and clinical outcomes were assessed at the test-of-cure visit (4-11 days after completion of therapy) and the late follow-up visit (25-50 days after completion of therapy). RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population consisted of 891 patients (444 ciprofloxacin QD, 447 ciprofloxacin BID); 422 patients were evaluable for efficacy (199 ciprofloxacin QD, 223 ciprofloxacin BID). At the test-of-cure visit, bacteriologic eradication was achieved in 94.5% (188/199) of the ciprofloxacin QD group and 93.7% (209/223) of the ciprofloxacin BID group (95% CI, -3.5 to 5.1). Clinical cure was achieved in 95.5% (189/198) of the ciprofloxacin QD group and 92.7% (204/220) of the ciprofloxacin BID group (95% CI, -1.6 to 7.1). Bacteriologic and clinical outcomes at the late follow-up visit were consistent with the test-of-cure findings. The rate of eradication of Escherichia coli, the most prevalent organism, was >97% in each treatment group. Rates of drug-related adverse events were similar with the once- and twice-daily ciprofloxacin regimens (10% and 9%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Extended-release ciprofloxacin 500 mg given once daily for 3 days was as effective and well tolerated as conventional ciprofloxacin 250 mg given twice daily for 3 days in the treatment of acute uncomplicated UTI in women.