RESUMEN
Purpose Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are common, particularly among the elderly due to low-energy trauma. Adequate rehabilitation is essential for functional recovery, whether through conservative or surgical treatment. Permissive weight bearing (PWB) is a relatively new rehabilitation concept, characterized by earlier mobilization of the affected limb/joint after trauma. Multiple studies demonstrated the value of PWB for the lower extremities, but this has not been translated to the upper extremity (i.e. PHF). Therefore, our aim was to investigate the current state and variability of rehabilitation of PHF and the role of implementing PWB principles in aftercare. Materials and methods An online survey, comprising 23 questions about the treatment of PHF, was distributed amongst an estimated 800 Dutch orthopaedic and trauma surgeons via the Dutch Orthopaedic and Dutch Trauma Society newsletter from May 2021 until July 2021. Results Among 88 respondents (n=69 orthopaedic, n=17 trauma surgeons, and n=2 other), most recommended early post-trauma mobilization (<6 weeks). Additionally, 53.4% (n=49) advised starting load bearing after six weeks for conservatively treated patients and 59.8% (n=52) for operative treatment. A wide variation of exercises used after immobilization was found in both groups. The usage of a sling after operative treatment was advised by 86% (n=74) of all 86 respondents. Conclusions The present study found limited consensus about PHF aftercare and the implementation of weight-bearing principles. The majority recommended early mobilization and advised the usage of a sling. A protocol capable of accommodating the diversity in aftercare (e.g. fracture type) is essential for maintaining structured rehabilitation, with PWB emerging as a promising example. More prospective studies are needed to form an evidence-based protocol focusing on the aftercare of PHF.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although corticosteroid injections are frequently used in practice to treat tendinopathies, there are many adverse effects. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 62-year-old woman received an aspiration and corticosteroid injection of a ganglion on the volar side of the left wrist. A few weeks later, she presented with severe pain and loss of function of the left wrist. On physical examination, here was a notable swelling with hematoma formation, along the course of the flexor carpi radialis. An MRI confirmed complete rupture of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon. She was treated non operatively with analgesics and a protective brace. During final check-up minimal loss of function was seen. CONCLUSION: Cautiousness and judicious restraint are imperative when considering corticosteroid infiltrations targeting a volar ganglion at the level of the FCR. Aspiration combined with corticosteroid infiltration is not recommended for patients exhibiting (subclinical) STT-/CMC-1 osteoarthritis, as it may cause FCR tendon ruptures.
