Circadian period is compensated for repressor protein turnover rates in single cells.

Most mammalian cells have molecular circadian clocks that generate widespread rhythms in transcript and protein abundance. While circadian clocks are robust to fluctuations in the cellular environment, little is known about the mechanisms by which the circadian period compensates for fluctuating metabolic states. Here, we exploit the heterogeneity of single cells both in circadian period and a metabolic parameter-protein stability-to study their interdependence without the need for genetic manipulation. We generated cells expressing key circadian proteins (CRYPTOCHROME1/2 (CRY1/2) and PERIOD1/2 (PER1/2)) as endogenous fusions with fluorescent proteins and simultaneously monitored circadian rhythms and degradation in thousands of single cells. We found that the circadian period compensates for fluctuations in the turnover rates of circadian repressor proteins and uncovered possible mechanisms using a mathematical model. In addition, the stabilities of the repressor proteins are circadian phase dependent and correlate with the circadian period in a phase-dependent manner, in contrast to the prevailing model.

Extracellular matrix substrates differentially influence enteric glial cell homeostasis and immune reactivity.

Introduction: Enteric glial cells are important players in the control of motility, intestinal barrier integrity and inflammation. During inflammation, they switch into a reactive phenotype enabling them to release inflammatory mediators, thereby shaping the inflammatory environment. While a plethora of well-established in vivo models exist, cell culture models necessary to decipher the mechanistic pathways of enteric glial reactivity are less well standardized. In particular, the composition of extracellular matrices (ECM) can massively affect the experimental outcome. Considering the growing number of studies involving primary enteric glial cells, a better understanding of their homeostatic and inflammatory in vitro culture conditions is needed. Methods: We examined the impact of different ECMs on enteric glial culture purity, network morphology and immune responsiveness. Therefore, we used immunofluorescence and brightfield microscopy, as well as 3' bulk mRNA sequencing. Additionally, we compared cultured cells with in vivo enteric glial transcriptomes isolated from Sox10iCreERT2Rpl22HA/+ mice. Results: We identified Matrigel and laminin as superior over other coatings, including poly-L-ornithine, different lysines, collagens, and fibronectin, gaining the highest enteric glial purity and most extended glial networks expressing connexin-43 hemichannels allowing intercellular communication. Transcriptional analysis revealed strong similarities between enteric glia on Matrigel and laminin with enrichment of gene sets supporting neuronal differentiation, while cells on poly-L-ornithine showed enrichment related to cell proliferation. Comparing cultured and in vivo enteric glial transcriptomes revealed a 50% overlap independent of the used coating substrates. Inflammatory activation of enteric glia by IL-1ß treatment showed distinct coating-dependent gene expression signatures, with an enrichment of genes related to myeloid and epithelial cell differentiation on Matrigel and laminin coatings, while poly-L-ornithine induced more gene sets related to lymphocyte differentiation. Discussion: Together, changes in morphology, differentiation and immune activation of primary enteric glial cells proved a strong effect of the ECM. We identified Matrigel and laminin as pre-eminent substrates for murine enteric glial cultures. These new insights will help to standardize and improve enteric glial culture quality and reproducibility between in vitro studies in the future, allowing a better comparison of their functional role in enteric neuroinflammation.