RESUMEN
Introduction The goal of total knee arthroplasty is to replace diseased cartilage and bone with an artificial implant to improve the patient's quality of life. The knee has historically been reconstructed to the patient's mechanical axis (MA). However, kinematically aligned techniques have been increasingly used. Kinematic alignment requires less soft-tissue resection and aligns the knee with what is anatomically natural to the patient, while there is concern that kinematically aligned knees will lead to earlier failure due to potential unequal weight distribution on the implant. The purpose of this study is to compare the parallelism from the floor of the joint-line cuts using kinematic and mechanical alignment and understand if the MA is a proper estimation of the tibial-ankle axis (TA). Methods A retrospective study was conducted by recruiting all high tibial osteotomy and distal femoral osteotomy recipients operated on by two surgeons in two MedStar Health hospitals from 01/2013 to 07/2020 with full-length films in preparation for restorative procedures. Baseline osteoarthritis was graded using the Kellgren-Lawrence classification system with all patients presenting as Grade 0. The TA and the joint-line orientations of the MA and kinematic axis (KA) were measured on 66 legs. The average distance from parallelism to the ground was compared between the MA and the KA and between the MA and the TA using a paired t-test. Results KA joint-line orientation (1.705° deviation) was more parallel to the floor in the bipedal stance phase than the MA (2.316° deviation, p=0.0156). The MA (2.316° deviation) was not a proper estimation of the TA (4.278° deviation, p=0.0001). Conclusion By utilizing the KA technique, the restoration of the natural joint line, as well as a joint that is more parallel to the floor in the stance phase compared to the MA, is achieved. The parallelism to the ground of the KA during the bipedal stance phase suggests an even load distribution across the knee. In addition, due to its similarity to the KA and anatomical significance in weight-bearing distribution, further investigation into the hip-to-calcaneal axis as an approximation of the joint line is warranted.
RESUMEN
Introduction When performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), surgeons may use either the mechanical alignment (MA) or the kinematic alignment (KA) to guide implant placement and joint balancing. By measuring preoperative and postoperative patellar height (PH), surgeons can predict knee stability after TKA. Improper PH is associated with knee instability which may complicate the postoperative course and lead to patient dissatisfaction or need for revision. The purpose of this study is to measure patellar height using the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI), Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), and Blackburne-Peel Index (BPI) preoperatively and postoperatively in patients who underwent TKA with either MA or KA to assess for changes in patellar height. Methods We performed a retrospective eight-year review of 256 patients who underwent TKA with either MA or KA by a single surgeon at a single hospital site. We obtained demographic data, including gender, age, and BMI, via the electronic health record. Furthermore, we calculated the ISI, CDI, and BPI using necessary parameters from preoperative and postoperative radiographs. We used these measurements to assess any statistically significant difference in postoperative PH. Results The MA cohort consisted of 104 patients with an average age of 63 years and an average BMI of 34.1 kg/m2. The KA cohort included 152 patients with an average age of 64 years and an average BMI of 34.9 kg/m2. For the MA population, the average postoperative score with ISI was 1.10 [1.05 to 1.16] (p < 0.001), with CDI was 1.05 [0.98 to 1.11] (p < 0.001), and with BPI was was 0.94 [0.89 to 0.99] (p < 0.001). While for the KA population, the average postoperative score with ISI was 1.03 [0.99 to 1.06] (p = 0.17), with CDI was 0.87 [0.82 to 0.91] (p = 0.15), and with BPI was 0.82 [0.78 to 0.86] (p = 0.34). Conclusion TKA with a KA has a statistically significant improvement in postoperative PH and better postoperative maintenance of preoperative PH. Improved PH may lead to increased patellofemoral stability and superior postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing TKA. Future studies should focus on whether differences in preoperative and postoperative PH measurements result in changes in clinical outcomes in patients with MA versus KA TKA.
