Prognostic analysis and treatment utilization of different treatment strategies in elderly esophageal cancer patients with distant metastases: a SEER database analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore which therapeutic strategy is more beneficial for elderly esophageal cancer (EC) patients with distant metastasis, the treatment utilization status and the screening of factors related to prognosis, so as to better guide the treatment of these patients. METHODS: Patients in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were divided into chemoradiotherapy (Group A), chemotherapy (Group B), radiotherapy (Group C), and no treatment (Group D) according to different treatment methods. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) and esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 7027 patients were included in this study, 5739 males (81.7%) and 1288 females (18.3%) with the median age was 70 (60-98). In the original cohort, the number of patients in the four groups was 2260 (Group A), 2087 (Group B), 945 (Group C) and 1735 (Group D), respectively. After PSM, there was no significant difference in mean OS (A vs B, 13.5 months VS 13.4 months, P = 0.511) and mean ECSS (A vs B, 15.6 vs 15.5 months, P = 0.374), while both OS (B vs C, 7 vs 3 months, P < 0.001) and ECSS (B vs C, 8 vs 3 months, P < 0.001) of chemotherapy alone were significantly better than those of radiotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis of patients older than 80 years showed that the median OS (A vs B, 7 vs 6 months) and median ECSS (A vs B, 8 vs 7 months) of Group A were significantly better than those of Group B (P < 0.05). In addition, all patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set with a ratio of 7:3. Based on the independent risk factors for OS, a nomogram model was constructed and validated. CONCLUSION: For elderly EC patients with distant metastasis, aggressive treatment was still necessary after a comprehensive assessment of the patient's physical condition, especially for patients over 80 years old, and chemoradiotherapy maybe still the first choice. In addition, a nomogram model was constructed to intuitively and accurately evaluate the prognosis of this population.

Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Iodine-125 Seed Implantation and Conventional Radiochemotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility, safety and efficacy of iodine-125 seed implantation in the treatment of dysphagia of advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced esophageal cancer who underwent EUS-guided iodine-125 seed implantation or conventional chemoradiotherapy in our hospital. The propensity score match was used to reduce the baseline differences. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients were enrolled, 17 patients received EUS-guided iodine 125 seed implantation (Group A), 31 patients received radiotherapy (Group B), 38 patients received chemotherapy (Group C) and 41 patients received chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy (Group D). At half month postoperatively, the dysphagia remission rate in Group A (100%) was better than that in Groups B (39.3%), C (20%), D (15.8%), respectively, in the original cohort (P < 0.01); At 1 month postoperatively, the dysphagia remission rate in Group A (86.7%) was better than that in Group B (57.1%) (P > 0.05), Group C (25.7%) (P < 0.05) and Group D (34.2%) (P < 0.05), respectively, in the original cohort. There was no statistically significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between Group A (16 months) and Group B (37 months) (P = 0.149), and between Group A (16months) and Group C (16 months) (P = 0.918) in the original cohort. The mean OS of Group D (54 months) was better than that of Group A (20 months) in the original cohort (P = 0.031). The incidences of grade ≥2 myelosuppression in Groups B, C, and D were 12.9%, 28.9%, and 43.9%, respectively; the incidence of grade ≥2 gastrointestinal adverse events in Groups B, C, and D were 12.9%, 15.8%, 12.2%, respectively. No serious adverse events were found in Group A. The radiation dose around the patient was reduced to a safe range after the distance from the implantation site was more than 1 m (4.2 ± 2.6 µSv/h) or with lead clothing (0.1 ± 0.07 µSv/h). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, iodine-125 seed implantation might improve dysphagia more quickly and safely, further clinical data is needed to verify whether it could effectively prolong the OS of patients.

Factors related to stent patency and early elimination of jaundice using bile duct stent combined with iodine-125 seed implantation in malignant obstructive jaundice.

Purpose: Biliary stents combined with percutaneous or endoscopic ultrasound-guided iodine-125 seed implantation into primary tumor have been confirmed to relieve malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ), and prolong patient's stent patency. The aim of the study was to evaluate meaningful clinical application indications and better guide the application of this technology. Material and methods: Patients with MOJ, who have received bile duct stenting combined with iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation from October, 2010 to April, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were adopted to indicate factors of stent patency in MOJ and influencing factors of jaundice reduction at one week after surgery. Results: A total of 90 patients were enrolled into the study, including 52 males (57.8%) and 38 females (42.2%), with a mean age of 68.66 ±12.53 years. The median stent patency was 8 months. No serious adverse events occurred during follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh score (HR = 2.221, 95% CI: 1.081-4.562), biliary infection (HR = 1.901, 95% CI: 1.084-3.335), and pre-operative jaundice duration (HR = 1.977, 95% CI: 1.106-3.533) were the independent risk factors for stent patency. Child-Pugh B/C (OR = 4.647, 95% CI: 1.080-19.982) and bile duct infection (OR = 3.583, 95% CI: 1.095-11.725) were the independent risk factors for jaundice reduction at one week after surgery. Conclusions: MOJ patients treated with biliary stents combined with 125I seed implantation, and patients with better pre-operative liver function and no biliary tract infection, present not only longer biliary stent patency, but also better early jaundice reduction.