Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(18): e15461, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31045821

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of deliberate hypotensive anesthesia on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) and compare the effects of propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and desflurane anesthesia on IOP and OPP. METHODS: A total of 50 patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the lateral decubitus position were randomized to receive desflurane or propofol anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was maintained in the range of 60-75 mm Hg during hypotensive anesthesia. IOP was measured using a handheld tonometer at 7 time points: before induction (T1, baseline); immediately after endotracheal intubation (T2); 10 minutes after position change to lateral decubitus (T3); 10, 30, and 50 minutes after the start of hypotensive anesthesia (T4-T6); and at the end of surgery (T7). RESULTS: MAP decreased about 35% to 38% during hypotensive anesthesia. Compared to baseline values, the IOP at T6 in dependent and non-dependent eyes decreased by 0.43 and 2.74 mm Hg, respectively in desflurane group; 3.61 and 6.05 mm Hg, respectively in the propofol group. IOP of both eyes in the propofol group was significantly lower than in the desflurane group from T2 to T7. OPP of both eyes in both groups was significantly lower than at baseline, except at T2 in the desflurane group. OPP of both eyes in the propofol group was significantly higher than that in the desflurane group at T5 and T6. CONCLUSIONS: Hypotensive anesthesia reduced IOP and OPP, but propofol TIVA maintained higher OPP than desflurane anesthesia. These findings suggest that propofol TIVA can help mitigate the decrease of OPP during hypotensive anesthesia.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Desflurano/administración & dosificación , Hipotensión Controlada/métodos , Presión Intraocular/efectos de los fármacos , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Presión Arterial/efectos de los fármacos , Artroscopía/métodos , Ojo/irrigación sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Hombro/cirugía , Tonometría Ocular , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(16): e0440, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29668608

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant perineural dexmedetomidine can be used to prolong the analgesic effect of interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB). We investigated the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine in ISB for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: One hundred patients scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopic surgery were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study. Ultrasound-guided ISB was performed before general anesthesia using 22 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% combined with 1, 1.5, or 2 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine (group D1, D2, and D3, respectively) or with normal saline as a control (group R, n = 25 per group). The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia (DOA), numeric pain rating scale (NRS), and consumption of additional analgesics during 36 h after ISB. Secondary outcome included durations of motor and sensory block (DOM and DOS), hemodynamic variables and sedation and dyspnea scores. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients completed the study. The DOS, DOM, and DOA were significantly longer in the dexmedetomidine groups than in group R. The DOA was significantly longer in group D3 than in groups D1 (P = .026) and D2 (P = .039). The DOA was 808.13 ±â€Š179.97, 1032.60 ±â€Š288.14, 1042.04 ±â€Š188.13, and 1223.96 ±â€Š238.06 min in groups R, D1, D2, and D3, respectively. The NRS score was significantly higher in group R than in the dexmedetomidine groups 12 h after ISB (P < .001) and significantly lower in group D3 than in the other groups 18 h after ISB (P = .02). The incidence of hypotension was higher in groups D2 and D3 than in group R during surgery (P = .008 and P = .011, respectively). There were no significant differences in consumption of rescue analgesics, sedation, and dyspnea scores between the study groups. CONCLUSION: Perineural dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg could be the optimal dose in ISB for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in that it provides an adequate DOA. However, this dose was associated with increased risk of hypotension.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Artroscopía/efectos adversos , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Dexmedetomidina/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Hombro/cirugía , Anciano , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Dexmedetomidina/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Hipotensión/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...