Development and implementation of a municipal outdoor play policy for children and youth in Nova Scotia, Canada: a community case study.

Background: Children and youth benefit from outdoor play; however, environments and policies to support outdoor play are often limited. The purpose of this paper is to describe a case study of the development of a municipal outdoor play policy in Nova Scotia, Canada. The outdoor play policy was developed by the Town of Truro with support from the UpLift Partnership, a School-Community-University Partnership in Nova Scotia, Canada. UpLift supports the health and well-being of school-aged children and youth using a Health Promoting Schools approach which identifies the important role of municipal government in creating healthy school communities. The UpLift Partnership and the municipality hosted online workshops for municipal staff, community leaders and partners that included content about the importance of outdoor play, barriers and facilitators to outdoor play, best practices for youth engagement, the policy development process, and how policy actions can support outdoor play. Workshop participants developed policy actions for their community of Truro, Nova Scotia to increase opportunities for outdoor play for children and youth. Following the workshops, a small team from the municipality and UpLift drafted an outdoor play policy and submitted it to Truro town council for approval. The outdoor play policy was adopted in Fall 2021 and has since informed recreation and municipal planning decisions. By presenting a case study of the development of this outdoor play policy, we hope other communities may be inspired to develop and adopt their own outdoor play policies to benefit children and youth in their communities.

Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary valve intervention after tetralogy of Fallot repair: A nationwide cohort study.

Objectives: To determine guideline adherence pertaining to pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) referral after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair. Methods: Children and adults with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging scans and at least moderate pulmonary regurgitation were prospectively enrolled in the Comprehensive Outcomes Registry Late After TOF Repair (CORRELATE). Individuals with previous PVR were excluded. Patients were classified according to presence (+) versus absence (-) of PVR and presence (+) versus absence (-) of contemporaneous guideline satisfaction. A validated score (specific activity scale [SAS]) classified adult symptom status. Results: In total, 498 participants (57% male, mean age 32 ± 14 years) were enrolled from 14 Canadian centers (2013-2020). Mean follow-up was 3.8 ± 1.8 years. Guideline criteria for PVR were satisfied for the majority (n = 422/498, 85%), although referral for PVR occurred only in a minority (n = 167/498, 34%). At PVR referral, most were asymptomatic (75% in SAS class 1). One participant (0.6%) received PVR without meeting criteria (PVR+/indication-). The remainder (n = 75/498, 15%) did not meet criteria for and did not receive PVR (PVR-/indication-). Abnormal cardiovascular imaging was the most commonly cited indication for PVR (n = 61/123, 50%). The SAS class and ratio of right to left end-diastolic volumes were independent predictors of PVR in a multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 3.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-5.8, P < .0001; hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 2.18-3.55, P < .0001). Conclusions: Although a majority of patients met guideline criteria for PVR, only a minority were referred for intervention. Abnormal cardiovascular imaging was the most common indication for referral. Further research will be necessary to establish the longer-term clinical impact of varying PVR referral strategies.

Process and experience of youth researchers within a Health Promoting Schools study in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) is an approach to research that engages youth across the research process. The peer researcher method is a technique used in YPAR where youth are trained in research and ethics to interview their peers. The purpose of this study was to: (i) describe the process of engaging youth as peer researchers in a Health Promoting Schools (HPS) and student engagement project and (ii) understand the peer researchers' perspectives of their experience throughout the project. Youth from across Nova Scotia, Canada in grades 7-10 (ages 12-16) were recruited as peer researchers in the Summer, 2022. The project included three stages: (i) peer researcher training, (ii) practicing, recruiting and conducting interviews and (iii) data interpretation workshop. To understand the peer researcher's experience, quantitative data were collected from an evaluation questionnaire. Outputs were produced using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were collected through a focus group and interviews and analyzed using inductive content analysis. A total of 11 youth were recruited and completed peer researcher training. Most youth provided positive feedback on the training with a satisfaction score of 8.7/10. Qualitative analysis indicated benefits to the peer researchers including opportunities to build interview and social skills and learn about other's perspectives. This study provides a detailed overview of how to use a peer researcher method in a YPAR project to involve youth in research related to HPS and student engagement. The research also highlights the benefits of engaging youth in YPAR. Future research will report on the findings from the peer interviews.