Aerobic interval training reduces inducible ventricular arrhythmias in diabetic mice after myocardial infarction.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI), and aggravates ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients. Although exercise training improves cardiac function in heart failure, it is still unclear how it benefits the diabetic heart after MI. To study the effects of aerobic interval training on cardiac function, susceptibility to inducible ventricular arrhythmias and cardiomyocyte calcium handling in DM mice after MI (DM-MI). Male type 2 DM mice (C57BLKS/J Lepr (db) /Lepr (db) ) underwent MI or sham surgery. One group of DM-MI mice was submitted to aerobic interval training running sessions during 6 weeks. Cardiac function and structure were assessed by echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. Ventricular arrhythmias were induced by high-frequency cardiac pacing in vivo. Protein expression was measured by Western blot. DM-MI mice displayed increased susceptibility for inducible ventricular arrhythmias and impaired diastolic function when compared to wild type-MI, which was associated with disruption of cardiomyocyte calcium handling and increased calcium leak from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. High-intensity exercise recovered cardiomyocyte function in vitro, reduced sarcoplasmic reticulum diastolic calcium leak and significantly reduced the incidence of inducible ventricular arrhythmias in vivo in DM-MI mice. Exercise training also normalized the expression profile of key proteins involved in cardiomyocyte calcium handling, suggesting a potential molecular mechanism for the benefits of exercise in DM-MI mice. High-intensity aerobic exercise training recovers cardiomyocyte function and reduces inducible ventricular arrhythmias in infarcted diabetic mice.

Both aerobic endurance and strength training programmes improve cardiovascular health in obese adults.

Regular exercise training is recognized as a powerful tool to improve work capacity, endothelial function and the cardiovascular risk profile in obesity, but it is unknown which of high-intensity aerobic exercise, moderate-intensity aerobic exercise or strength training is the optimal mode of exercise. In the present study, a total of 40 subjects were randomized to high-intensity interval aerobic training, continuous moderate-intensity aerobic training or maximal strength training programmes for 12 weeks, three times/week. The high-intensity group performed aerobic interval walking/running at 85-95% of maximal heart rate, whereas the moderate-intensity group exercised continuously at 60-70% of maximal heart rate; protocols were isocaloric. The strength training group performed 'high-intensity' leg press, abdominal and back strength training. Maximal oxygen uptake and endothelial function improved in all groups; the greatest improvement was observed after high-intensity training, and an equal improvement was observed after moderate-intensity aerobic training and strength training. High-intensity aerobic training and strength training were associated with increased PGC-1alpha (peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor gamma co-activator 1alpha) levels and improved Ca(2+) transport in the skeletal muscle, whereas only strength training improved antioxidant status. Both strength training and moderate-intensity aerobic training decreased oxidized LDL (low-density lipoprotein) levels. Only aerobic training decreased body weight and diastolic blood pressure. In conclusion, high-intensity aerobic interval training was better than moderate-intensity aerobic training in improving aerobic work capacity and endothelial function. An important contribution towards improved aerobic work capacity, endothelial function and cardiovascular health originates from strength training, which may serve as a substitute when whole-body aerobic exercise is contra-indicated or difficult to perform.