RESUMEN
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype, accounting for 15-20% of all lymphoma diagnoses. Although typically slow-growing and responsive to frontline therapies, advanced-stage FL remains incurable with current treatments and typically follows a chronic relapsing/remitting course with increasingly shorter responses to subsequent lines of therapy. Outcomes are highly variable; some patients experience prolonged first remissions that may approximate a 'functional cure'. By contrast, a significant minority of patients experience disease progression shortly after frontline treatment resulting in high rates of lymphoma-related mortality. Reflecting on the heterogeneous natural history of FL, clinical practice varies widely, particularly in controversial areas, including appropriate disease staging, selection of management strategies and duration of clinical follow-up. This position statement presents an evidence-based synthesis of the literature for application in Australasian practice.
RESUMEN
The natural history of limited-stage peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) remains poorly defined. We investigated outcomes and prognostic variables in patients registered in the T-Cell Project (TCP) (#NCT01142674) to develop a model to predict overall survival (OS) for the common nodal PTCL subtypes (PTCL-NOS, AITL, ALCL). The model was validated in an independent data set from Australian and Brazilian registries. 211 patients registered in the TCP between 2006-2018 were studied. The median age was 59 years (range 18-88) and median follow-up was 49 months. One hundred twenty-seven patients (78%) received anthracycline-based regimens, 5 patients (3%) radiotherapy alone (RT), 24 patients (15%) chemotherapy+RT. 5-year OS and PFS were 47% and 37%, respectively. Age >60 years, elevated LDH and low serum albumin were independent prognostic factors. The model identified 3 groups with low- (26%, score 0), intermediate- (41%, score 1), and high-risk (33%, score 2-3) with 5-year OS of 78% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 29-127), 46% (95% CI, 24-68), and 25% (95% CI, 20-30), respectively (P < 0.001) and 5-year PFS of 66% (95% CI, 33-99), 37% (95% CI, 9-65), and 17% (95% CI, 9-25), respectively (P < 0.001). The model demonstrated greater discriminatory power than established prognostic indices and an analogous distribution and outcomes in the 3 groups in the validation cohort of 103 patients. The SALENTO Model (Limited Stage Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Prognostic Model) is an objective, simple and robust prognostic tool. The high-risk group has poor outcomes, comparable to advanced stage disease, and should be considered for innovative first-line approaches.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células T Periférico , Humanos , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/terapia , Pronóstico , Australia/epidemiología , Linfocitos T/patología , AntraciclinasRESUMEN
Grade (G) 3B follicular lymphoma (FL) is a rare FL subtype which exists on a histological continuum between 'lowgrade' (Grade 1, 2 and 3A FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) appearing to share features with each. Clinical characteristics and outcomes are poorly understood due to lack of adequate representation in prospective trials and large-scale analyses. We analyzed 157 G3BFL cases from 18 international centers, and two comparator groups; G3AFL (n=302) and DLBCL (n=548). Composite histology with DLBCL or low-grade FL occurred in approximately half of the G3BFL cases. With a median of 5 years follow-up, the overall survival and progression-free survival of G3BFL patients was better than that of DLBCL patients (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively); however, G3BFL patients were younger (P<0.001) with better performance status (P<0.001), less extranodal disease (P<0.001) and more frequently had normal lactate dehydrogenase (P<0.001) at baseline. The overall and progression-free survival of patients with G3BFL and G3AFL were similar (P=0.83 and P=0.80, respectively). After frontline immunochemotherapy, 24% of G3BFL relapsed; relapse rates were 63% in the DLBCL cohort and 19% in the low-grade FL cohort. Eight percent of relapses occurred beyond 5 years. In this G3BFL cohort, the revised International Prognostic Index successfully delineated risk groups, but the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index did not. We conclude that patients with immunochemotherapy-treated G3BFL have similar survival outcomes to those with G3AFL, yet a favorable baseline profile and distinctly superior prognosis compared to patients with DLBCL.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma Folicular , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Humanos , Linfoma Folicular/diagnóstico , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Linfoma no Hodgkin/patología , Pronóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Accurate staging and response assessment are essential for prognosis and to guide treatment in patients with lymphoma. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/MRI versus FDG PET/CT in adult patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin and Non- Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: In this single centre study, 50 patients were prospectively recruited. FDG PET/MRI was performed after staging FDG PET/CT using a single injection of 18F-FDG. Patients were invited to complete same-day FDG PET/MRI with FDG PET/CT at interim and end of treatment response assessments. Performance was assessed using PET/CT as the reference standard for disease site identification, staging, response assessment with Deauville score and concordance in metabolic activity. RESULTS: Staging assessment showed perfect agreement (κ = 1.0, P = 0) between PET/MRI and PET/CT using Ann Arbor staging. There was excellent intermodality correlation with disease site identification at staging (κ = 0.976, P < 0.001) with FDG PET/MRI sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 94-98%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 99-100%). There was good correlation of disease site identification at interim assessment (κ = 0.819, P < 0.001) and excellent correlation at end-of-treatment assessment (κ = 1.0, P < 0.001). Intermodality agreement for Deauville scores was good at interim assessment (κ = 0.808, P < 0.001) and excellent at end-of-treatment assessment (κ = 1.0, P = 0). There was good-excellent concordance in SUV max and mean between modalities across timepoints. Minimum calculated radiation patient effective dose saving was 54% between the two modalities per scan. CONCLUSION: With high concordance in disease site identification, staging and response assessment, PET/MR is a potentially viable alternative to PET/CT in lymphoma that minimises radiation exposure.
Asunto(s)
Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Linfoma , Adulto , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Radiofármacos , Linfoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is typically treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). However, only 60% of patients are cured with R-CHOP. Polatuzumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD79b, which is ubiquitously expressed on the surface of malignant B cells. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, international phase 3 trial to evaluate a modified regimen of R-CHOP (pola-R-CHP), in which vincristine was replaced with polatuzumab vedotin, as compared with standard R-CHOP, in patients with previously untreated intermediate-risk or high-risk DLBCL. Patients 18 to 80 years of age were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive six cycles of either pola-R-CHP or R-CHOP, plus two cycles of rituximab alone. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 879 patients underwent randomization: 440 were assigned to the pola-R-CHP group and 439 to the R-CHOP group. After a median follow-up of 28.2 months, the percentage of patients surviving without progression was significantly higher in the pola-R-CHP group than in the R-CHOP group (76.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72.7 to 80.8] vs. 70.2% [95% CI, 65.8 to 74.6] at 2 years; stratified hazard ratio for progression, relapse, or death, 0.73 by Cox regression; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; P = 0.02). Overall survival at 2 years did not differ significantly between the groups (88.7% [95% CI, 85.7 to 91.6] in the pola-R-CHP group and 88.6% [95% CI, 85.6 to 91.6] in the R-CHOP group; hazard ratio for death, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.37; P = 0.75). The safety profile was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with previously untreated intermediate-risk or high-risk DLBCL, the risk of disease progression, relapse, or death was lower among those who received pola-R-CHP than among those who received R-CHOP. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; POLARIX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03274492.).
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Inmunoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Vincristina/efectos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) represent a heterogeneous disease group accounting for 10% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. PTCL patients have typically poorer outcomes compared with aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, such outcomes are heavily dependent on subtype. Although anthracycline-based regimens such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone remain the standard first-line treatment for most aggressive PTCL, there are important variations including incorporation of novel agents, use of radiotherapy and judicious consideration of stem cell transplantation. Relapsed or refractory disease represents a significant area of unmet need where chemotherapy intensification has limited efficacy and novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin and pralatrexate provide additional opportunities for attainment of remission and potential stem cell transplant. In the future, pre-therapy prognostic biomarkers including genomic characterisation, may aid in risk stratification and help guide initial patient management to improve survival. There is an urgent need to understand better the pathogenesis of PTCL to facilitate novel drug combinatorial approaches to improve survival. This position statement represents an evidence-based synthesis of the literature for application in Australian and New Zealand practice.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células T Periférico , Humanos , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/terapia , Vincristina/uso terapéutico , Brentuximab Vedotina , Prednisona , Consenso , Estudios de Seguimiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , BiomarcadoresRESUMEN
There are limited data on post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in the era of positron emission tomography (PET) and rituximab (R). Furthermore, there is limited data on the risk of graft rejection with modern practices in reduction in immunosuppression (RIS). We studied 91 patients with monomorphic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma PTLD at 11 Australian centers: median age 52 years, diagnosed between 2004 and 2017, median follow-up 4.7 years (range, 0.5-14.5 y). RIS occurred in 88% of patients. For patients initially treated with R-monotherapy, 45% achieved complete remission, rising to 71% with the addition of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone (R-CHOP) for those not in complete remission. For patients initially treated with R-CHOP, the complete remission rate was 76%. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between R-monotherapy and R-chemotherapy patients. There was no difference in OS for patients with systemic lymphoma (n = 68) versus central nervous system (CNS) involvement (n = 23) (3-y OS 72% versus 73%; P = 0.78). Treatment-related mortality was 7%. End of treatment PET was prognostic for patients with systemic lymphoma with longer OS in the PET negative group (3-y OS 91% versus 57%; P = 0.01). Graft rejection occurred in 9% (n = 4 biopsy-proven; n = 4 suspected) during the entire follow-up period with no cases of graft loss. RIS and R-based treatments are safe and effective with a low likelihood of graft rejection and high cure rate for patients achieving complete remission with CNS or systemic PTLD.
RESUMEN
Recent data suggest the use of radiotherapy alone (RT) in Early-Stage Follicular Lymphoma is declining. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments has not been performed. We constructed a partitioning model (15-year horizon) to compare RT, combined-modality therapy (CMT) and immunochemotherapy with rituximab maintenance (ICT + RM) from a PET-staged cohort from the Australian Lymphoma Alliance. Lifetime direct health care costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. AUD $75,000 was defined as the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP). The direct healthcare costs were: RT $12,791, CMT $29,391 and ICT + RM $42,644. Compared with RT, CMT demonstrated minimal improvement in QALYs (+0.01) and an ICER well above the WTP threshold ($1,535,488). Compared with RT, ICT + RM demonstrated an improvement in QALYs (+0.41) with an ICER of $73,319. Modeling a 25% cost reduction with a rituximab biosimilar led to further ICER reductions with ICT + RM ($52,476). ICT + RM is cost-effective in early-stage FL from the Australian taxpayer perspective.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma Folicular , Australia/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma Folicular/terapia , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Rituximab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) occurring following organ transplantation (post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder [PTLD]) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is typically treated with high-dose methotrexate-based regimens. Outcomes are dismal and clinical trials are lacking. It is almost always Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated. Two patients (CA1-2) presented with EBV-associated PCNSL after renal transplant. CA1 was on hemodialysis and had prior disseminated cryptococcus and pseudomonas bronchiectasis, precluding treatment with methotrexate. CA2 was refractory to methotrexate. Both were treated off-label with the first-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib for 12 months. Cerebrospinal fluid penetration at therapeutic levels was confirmed in CA1 despite hemodialysis. Both patients entered remission by 2 months. Sequencing confirmed absence of genetic aberrations in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I/II and antigen-presentation/processing genes, indicating retention of the ability to present EBV-antigens. Between Weeks 10 and 13, they received third-party EBV-specific T cells for consolidation with no adverse effects. They remain in remission ≥34 months since therapy began. The strength of these findings led to an ongoing phase I study (ACTRN12618001541291).
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Sistema Nervioso Central , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/tratamiento farmacológico , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Humanos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/etiología , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/etiología , Piperidinas , Linfocitos TRESUMEN
Australia and New Zealand have achieved excellent community control of COVID-19 infection. In light of the imminent COVID-19 vaccination roll out in both countries, representatives from the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand and infectious diseases specialists have collaborated on this consensus position statement regarding COVID-19 vaccination in patients with haematological disorders. It is our recommendation that patients with haematological malignancies, and some benign haematological disorders, should have expedited access to high-efficacy COVID-19 vaccines, given that these patients are at high risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 infection. Vaccination should not replace other public health measures in these patients, given that the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination, specifically in patients with haematological malignancies, is not known. Given the limited available data, prospective collection of safety and efficacy data of COVID-19 vaccination in this patient group is a priority.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hematología , Australia/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Consenso , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , VacunaciónRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic poses a unique challenge to the care of patients with haematological malignancies. Viral pneumonia is known to cause disproportionately severe disease in patients with cancer, and patients with lymphoma, myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia are likely to be at particular risk of severe disease related to COVID-19. This statement has been developed by consensus among authors from Australia and New Zealand. We aim to provide supportive guidance to clinicians making individual patient decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular during periods that access to healthcare resources may be limited. General recommendations include those to minimise patient exposure to COVID-19, including the use of telehealth, avoidance of non-essential visits and minimisation of time spent by patients in infusion suites and other clinical areas. This statement also provides recommendations where appropriate in assessing indications for therapy, reducing therapy-associated immunosuppression and reducing healthcare utilisation in patients with specific haematological malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specific decisions regarding therapy of haematological malignancies will need to be individualised, based on disease risk, risks of immunosuppression, rates of community transmission of COVID-19 and available local healthcare resources.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/fisiopatología , Linfoma/fisiopatología , Mieloma Múltiple/fisiopatología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Australia , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Quimioterapia , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/inmunología , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/terapia , Linfoma/inmunología , Linfoma/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Nueva Zelanda , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/virología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre/métodosRESUMEN
Relative survival (RS) in myeloma has improved in younger but not older patients (≥80 years) with treatment advances. Whether place of residence or socioeconomic status (SES) affect RS is unknown. We used the Queensland cancer registry to calculate the five-year RS of myeloma patients diagnosed between 1982 and 2014. This period was divided into three eras: (1) 1982-1995 chemotherapy alone; (2) 1996-2007 autologous stem cell transplantation; (3) 2008-2014 novel agents (proteasome inhibitors and IMIDs). 6025 patients were diagnosed from 1982 to 2014. RS improved across eras: (1) 30% vs. (2) 43% vs. (3) 53% (p < .001 (2) vs. (1); p < .001 (3) vs. (2)). RS improved across all age groups, including patients ≥80 years. Patients with disadvantaged SES (39% vs. affluent 46%; p < .001) and rural patients (40% vs. urban 45%; p < .001) had an inferior RS. RS has improved across all ages with treatment advances.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Queensland/epidemiología , Clase Social , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
Management practices in early-stage (I/II) follicular lymphoma (FL) are variable and include radiation (RT), systemic therapy, or combined modality therapy (CMT). There is a paucity of data regarding maintenance rituximab in this cohort. We conducted an international retrospective study of patients with newly diagnosed early-stage FL staged with positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography and bone marrow biopsy. Three hundred sixty-five patients (stage I, n = 221), median age 63 years, treated from 2005-2017 were included, with a median follow-up of 45 months. Management included watchful waiting (WW; n = 85) and active treatment (n = 280). The latter consisted of RT alone (n = 171) or systemic therapy (immunochemotherapy [n = 63] or CMT [n = 46]). Forty-nine systemically treated patients received maintenance rituximab; 72.7% of stage I patients received RT alone, compared to 42.6% with stage II (P < .001). Active therapies yielded comparable overall response rates (P = .87). RT alone and systemic therapy without maintenance rituximab yielded similar progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-2.34; P = .96). Maintenance rituximab improved PFS (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.095-0.64; P = .017). The incidence of transformation was lower with systemic therapy compared to RT or WW (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.070-0.61; P = .034). Overall survival was similar among all practices, including WW (P = .40). In the largest comparative assessment of management practices in the modern era, variable practices each resulted in similar excellent outcomes. Randomized studies are required to determine the optimal treatment in early-stage FL.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma Folicular/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Australia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon and typically aggressive form of lymphoma. Although often initially chemosensitive, relapse is common. Several induction and conditioning regimens are used in transplant-eligible patients, and the optimal approach remains unknown. We performed an international, retrospective study of transplant-eligible patients to assess impact of induction chemoimmunotherapy and conditioning regimens on clinical outcomes. We identified 228 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were similar among the induction groups except for some variation in age. The type of induction chemoimmunotherapy received did not influence overall response rates (ORRs) (0.43), progression-free survival (PFS) (P > .67), or overall survival (OS) (P > .35) on multivariate analysis (PFS and OS). Delivery of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was associated with favorable PFS and OS (0.01) on univariate analysis only; this benefit was not seen on multivariate analysis-PFS (0.36) and OS (0.21). Compared with busulfan and melphalan (BuMel), the use of the carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM)-conditioning regimen was associated with inferior PFS (HR = 2.0 [95% CI 1.1-3.6], 0.02) but not OS (HR = 1.1 [95% CI 0.5-2.3], 0.81) on univariate analysis only. Within the limits of a retrospective study and modest power for some comparisons, type of induction therapy did not influence ORR, PFS, or OS for transplant-eligible patients with MCL. International efforts are required to perform randomized clinical trials evaluating chemoimmunotherapy induction regimens.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Linfoma de Células del Manto/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carmustina/uso terapéutico , Citarabina/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Linfoma de Células del Manto/mortalidad , Masculino , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Fosfatasas de Especificidad Dual/genética , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/genética , Fosfatasas de la Proteína Quinasa Activada por Mitógenos/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico/metabolismo , Niño , Reordenamiento Génico , Humanos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/enzimología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
To improve complete remission (CR) rates by reducing toxicity and enhancing delivery, we created a modified hyper-CVAD/MA regimen (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone/methotrexate, cytarabine) by reducing the cytarabine dose (3 g/m2 to 2 g/m2) and number of cycles (eight to six). We conducted a phase II trial in the pre-rituximab era in the intermediate-high international prognostic index (IPI) (≥2) de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) (ACTRN12605000105640). CR rates were compared with reported IPI-stratified rates. Sixty-three patients (n = 26 PTCL; n = 37 DLBCL) were evaluated; median follow-up of 30 months. CR rates for PTCL and DLBCL patients were 46% and 49%, respectively, similar with reported CR rates with CHOP-like chemotherapy (p = .6). Of the patients, 51 (81%) experienced ≥1 unplanned hospital admission; only 41 (65%) completed six cycles. The cytarabine modifications did not prevent significant toxicity. Modified hyper-CVAD/MA resulted in similar outcomes to CHOP-like chemotherapy in aggressive lymphomas and was associated with significant toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Causas de Muerte , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Inducción de Remisión , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/efectos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare form of T-cell lymphoma that occurs after implantation of breast prostheses. We performed comprehensive next generation sequencing based genomic characterization of 11 cases of BIA-ALCL including sequence variant detection on 180 genes frequently mutated in haematological malignancy, genome-wide copy number assessment, structural variant detection involving the T-cell receptor loci and TRB deep-sequencing. We observed sequence variants leading to JAK/STAT activation in 10 out of 11 patients. We also observed germline TP53 mutations in two cases. In addition we detected a recurrent copy number loss involving RPL5 as well as copy number amplifications involving TNFRSF11A [RANK] (in 2 cases), MYC, P2RX7, TMEM119 and PDGFRA. In summary, our comprehensive genomic characterisation of 11 cases of BIA-ALCL has provided insight into potential pathobiological mechanisms (JAK/STAT, MYC and TP53) as well as identifying targets for future therapeutic intervention (TNFRSF11A, PDGFRA) in this rare entity.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relative survival of patients in Queensland with different lymphoma subtypes; to determine whether outcomes have improved with recent changes in treatment; to evaluate relative survival according to place of residence and socio-economic status. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based study; analysis of data from the Oncology Analysis System, an online reporting tool for cancer incidence and outcomes in Queensland. PARTICIPANTS: Patients over 15 years of age diagnosed with lymphoma in Queensland during 1993-2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative survival by lymphoma subtype; influence of place of residence and socio-economic status, age group, sex, year of diagnosis (in 5-year bands), and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme funding of rituximab for treating B-cell lymphomas on relative survival. RESULTS: 9509 people (56% men) were diagnosed with lymphoma during 1993-2012. Five-year relative survival improved significantly between 1993-1997 and 2008-2012 for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (47%; 95% CI, 42-51% v 64%; 95% CI, 61-67%) or follicular lymphoma (62%; 95% CI, 57-66% v 88%; 95% CI, 85-90%; each P < 0.001). Rituximab became available for treating these subtypes during 2003-2006. There was no change in relative survival for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (81%; 95% CI, 76-85% v 80%; 95% CI, 75-84%; P = 0.22). The only statistically significant difference according to place of residence or socio-economic status was inferior relative survival for rural residents with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28). CONCLUSION: Relative survival for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma improved significantly with the introduction of rituximab as first-line therapy in Australia.