A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials Comparing Radiation Therapy Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer.

The treatment landscape for localized and regional prostate cancer includes active surveillance, radiation therapy (RT), and radical prostatectomy (RP). Population-based studies comparing RP to radiation reveal conflicting results due to methodological flaws. This systematic review and pooled analysis of studies aim to compare cause-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity outcomes, comparing RP to RT in the management of prostate cancer. This systematic review search included the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries according to the PRISMA statement with the inception of each database up to June 24, 2023. Randomized phase 2 or 3 clinical trials that compared RP to RT in prostate cancer were included. The forest plot for the Odds ratio (OR) was plotted using the Mantel-Haenszel method, and the Z test was used to assess significance. A fixed effects model was used for meta-analysis. The search yielded seven completed randomized clinical trials and four ongoing trials. The majority of complete trials had low to intermediate-risk patient populations. OR for OS was 1.00 with 95% CI, 0.71-1.41 (P-value: 0.98), CSS OR was 0.99 with 95% CI, 0.45-2.18 (P-value 0.11), OR for DFS was 1.26 with 95% CI, 0.89-1.78 (P-value 0.19) when comparing RP to RT. The rate of distant metastatic disease was 2.3% in the RP versus 2.9% in the RT at 10 years. The rate of second malignant neoplasms was 4.5% in the RP compared to 4.2% in the RT arm at 10 years. RP caused more urinary symptoms, with a predominance of the need for urinary pads and a higher incidence of sexual dysfunction, and RT caused a higher incidence of bowel symptoms, such as blood in stools and fecal incontinence. This study provides evidence that the treatment-related outcomes are similar in patients with low to intermediate-risk prostate cancer when comparing RP to RT. Multidisciplinary treatment approaches and factoring patients' values and preferences should form the cornerstone of the ideal treatment option for each patient with localized prostate cancer. Patients with prostate cancer have an equal chance of being cancer-free and alive at 10 years with either RP or RT. In terms of side effects, RP causes more urine leakage and loss of erections, whereas RT tends to cause more bowel side effects, such as blood in stools and fecal leakage.

Evaluating outcomes and toxicities for a newly implemented MRI-based brachytherapy program for cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We report an updated analysis of the outcomes and toxicities of MRI-based brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer from a U.S. academic center. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients treated with MRI-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer. EBRT was standardly 45 Gy in 25 fractions with weekly cisplatin. MRI was performed with the brachytherapy applicator in situ. Dose specification was most commonly 7 Gy for 4 fractions with optimization aim of D90 HR-CTV EQD2 of 85-95 Gyα/ß=10 Gy in 2 implants each delivering 2 fractions. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included with median follow up of 24.5 months (IQR 11.9-39.8). Stage IIIA-IVB accounted for 31.6% of cases. Dosimetry results include median GTV D98 of 101.0 Gy (IQR 93.3-118.8) and HR-CTV D90 of 89 Gy (IQR 86.1-90.6). Median D2cc bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel doses were 82.1 Gy (IQR 75.9-88.0), 65.9 Gy (IQR 59.6-71.2), 65.1 Gy (IQR 57.7-69.6), and 55 Gy (IQR 48.9-60.9). Chronic grade 3+ toxicities were seen in the bladder (8.2%), rectosigmoid (4.1%), and vagina (1.0%). Three-year LC, PFS, and OS were estimated to be 84%, 61.7%, and 76.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI-based brachytherapy demonstrates excellent local control and acceptable rates of high-grade morbidity. These results are possible in our population with relatively large volume primary tumors and extensive local disease.

Prevalence of trauma history and symptoms in patients who have received vaginal brachytherapy as part of their endometrial cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) is an essential component of curative intent treatment for many patients with endometrial cancer. The prevalence of trauma history in this population is unknown and important to understand considering VBT requires patients to have an instrument vaginally inserted while in the vulnerable lithotomy position. We aim to identify patients treated with intracavitary VBT and collect survey data to assess trauma endpoints. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with endometrial cancer who underwent intracavitary VBT at our institution between 01/2017 and 08/2022. Patients were mailed and/or electronically mailed a survey that included demographics, psychosocial background, and validated trauma surveys to be filled out as they relate to their trauma experiences prior to VBT and again considering any trauma symptomatology related to VBT. Electronic medical record review was performed. Descriptive statistics as well as multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: 206 patients met inclusion criteria, 66 (32.1%) of whom returned the survey and were included for analysis. Thirty-two percent of patients self-reported a personal history of any prior mental health diagnosis. Eighty-eight percent of patients screened positive for a history of trauma exposure, 23% endorsed symptoms of PTSD related to their VBT experience, and 5% screened positive for a likely PTSD diagnosis from VBT. CONCLUSION: A majority of included patients had a history of trauma exposure prior to VBT. In a subset of patients, VBT re-induced trauma and was considered to be an independent traumatic event. This study highlights the importance of practicing trauma informed care, particularly in this patient population.

Bombarding Oligoprogression: Oncologic Outcomes After Radiation to Patients With Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on Maintenance Systemic Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) to oligoprogressive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 23 patients with metastatic NSCLC on maintenance systemic therapy, developed oligoprogression (1 to 5 sites), and all oligoprogressive sites amenable to and treated with RT. The primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and median time to start next-line therapy (MTT). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank testing were performed using R-Studio software. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 31.3 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 17.86 to 45.4). The median event-free survival for the entire cohort was 8.3 months (IQR: 2.7 to 12). Patients with no prior radiation had longer median event-free survival of 11.9 months (IQR: 8.4 to 18.2) compared with patients with a history of prior radiation at 4.1 months (IQR: 2.7 to 12; P = 0.041). The local control rate for the treated lesions was 97.5%. At 12 months follow-up, 6 (43%) of 14 living patients maintained systemic therapy without initiating next-line therapy. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 8.4 months (IQR: 4.1 to 17.5). Patients who did not receive prior radiation had longer median PFS of 11.9 months (IQR: 8.4 to 18.2) compared with patients who received prior radiation 6.2 months (IQR: 2.7 to 8.5; P = 0.018). Two patients (9%) had grade 3 chronic toxicity related to RT and were medically managed. CONCLUSION: We identified that in patients with oligoprogressive metastatic NSCLC, targeted RT to all progressive sites yielded high LC and favorable rates of PFS and MTT.