Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer ; 120(1): 77-85, 2014 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24108668

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preclinical and clinical studies suggest mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors may have metabolic and antiangiogenic effects, and synergize with epidermal growth factor pathway inhibitors. Therefore, a phase 1/pharmacodynamic trial of everolimus with cetuximab was performed. METHODS: A total of 29 patients were randomized to a run-in of oral everolimus (30, 50, or 70 mg) or cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading, 250 mg/m(2) maintenance) weekly, followed by the combination in this dose-escalation study. Primary endpoints were phase 2 dose and toxicity characterization. [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was performed as a pharmacodynamic marker of mTOR inhibition, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) was performed as an indicator of tumor perfusion changes, at 3 time points. RESULTS: Everolimus and cetuximab were tolerable at full doses, with an expected toxicity profile. Dose-limiting toxicities in the everolimus 70 mg group included grade 3 skin toxicity in 2 patients, and mucositis in 1 patient. Of 16 patients evaluable for response, 5 had stable disease lasting 4 to 19 months. Mean change in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) for those treated initially with everolimus was -24% (2% to -54%), and with cetuximab was -5% (-23 to 36%). The K(trans) measured by DCE-MRI did not decrease, regardless of run-in drug. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus and cetuximab can be safely administered at standard doses, and are associated with prolonged disease control. The recommended phase 2 dose of oral weekly everolimus is 70 mg in combination with standard cetuximab. Imaging studies reveal that metabolic inhibition by everolimus alone and in combination with cetuximab predominates over changes in tumor perfusion in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Cetuximab , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Everolimus , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Cintigrafía , Radiofármacos , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/metabolismo
2.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 71(6): 1485-91, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23532207

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Platinum compounds or bevacizumab, in combination with gemcitabine, achieved good response rates in early studies in advanced pancreatic cancer. This prompted an evaluation of an aggressive approach to allow better local control and resectability in locally advanced disease. METHODS: We piloted a combination of gemcitabine/oxaliplatin/bevacizumab Q2w for four cycles, followed by oxaliplatin and bevacizumab added to infusional 5-FU and radiotherapy, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated, of whom 17 completed the protocol-specified treatment. Median age was 60 years. Fifteen had unresectable, and four had borderline resectable disease. Toxicity of chemotherapy was moderate: grade III neutropenia (5) and grade I/II nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and neuropathy. During chemoradiation, major grade III toxicities were nausea and vomiting (3 each). One patient had intractable pain early on, necessitating treatment cessation. Response rate for 18 evaluable patients was 11 % (by RECIST); five patients (4 inoperable, 1 borderline, 26 %) went on to have surgery. One-year overall survival was 58 % and progression-free survival was 37 %. CONCLUSIONS: This combination, associated with higher response rates in metastatic disease, had a lower than expected response rate in primary tumors. Although tolerable, our approach failed to affect clinical outcomes meaningfully.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Proyectos Piloto , Gemcitabina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...