RESUMEN
Understanding participants' preferences for the return of individual research results (IRR) in genomic research may allow for the implementation of more beneficial result disclosure methods. We tested four preference-setting models through cognitive interviews of parents to explore how parents conceptualize the process of setting preferences and which disease characteristics they believe to be most important when deciding what results to receive on their child. Severity and preventability of a condition were highly influential in decision making and certain groups of research results were anticipated by participants to have negative psychological effects. These findings informed the development of an educational tool and preference-setting model that can be scaled for use in the return of IRR from large biobank studies.
Asunto(s)
Bancos de Muestras Biológicas , Toma de Decisiones , Revelación , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Genómica , Consentimiento Informado , Padres , Adulto , Ansiedad , Niño , Comprensión , Formación de Concepto , Revelación/ética , Ética en Investigación , Femenino , Genoma , Genómica/ética , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Consentimiento Informado/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Psicológicos , Padres/psicología , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Little is known about parental attitudes toward return of individual research results (IRRs) in pediatric genomic research. The aim of this study was to understand the views of the parents who enrolled their children in a genomic repository in which IRRs will be returned. METHODS: We conducted focus groups with parents of children with developmental disorders enrolled in the Gene Partnership (GP), a genomic research repository that offers to return IRRs, to learn about their understanding of the GP, motivations for enrolling their children, and expectations regarding the return of IRRs. RESULTS: Parents hoped to receive IRRs that would help them better understand their children's condition(s). They understood that this outcome was unlikely, but hoped that their children's participation in the GP would contribute to scientific knowledge. Most parents wanted to receive all IRRs about their child, even for diseases that were severe and untreatable, citing reasons of personal utility. Parents preferred electronic delivery of the results and wanted to designate their preferences regarding what information they would receive. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for researchers to understand participant expectations in enrolling in a research repository that offers to disclose children's IRRs in order to effectively communicate the implications to parents during the consenting process.
