Paucity of Online Information About Gender-Affirming Surgery Fellowships in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing demand for gender-affirming surgery (GAS), there are few formal GAS fellowships in the United States. Paucity of online information about GAS fellowships may discourage potential applicants and decrease the visibility of the field. Thus, it is important to analyze the existing online information about GAS fellowships to improve fellow recruitment and patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To identify the number of GAS fellowship websites (GASFWs) and evaluate their robustness. Second, to report the social media presence of GAS fellowships. METHODS: To identify GASFWs, existing databases sponsored by plastic surgery associations and Google query were used between April and May 2023. Thirty-five independent variables based on previously published data were evaluated for presence in a bivariate fashion on GASFWs. Accounts on popular social media websites were also identified by Google query. Website and social media analysis were also done for GAS fellowships that were offered by departments/specialties other than plastic surgery. RESULTS: In total, only 6 GASFWs associated with plastic surgery departments were identified and analyzed. Eight nonplastic surgery GASFWs were included for analysis. Overall, both categories of GASFWs were not robust; key information such as previous fellow listing and selection criteria was often missing. Furthermore, important topics specifically related to GAS such as community engagement and programmatic building are often not found on GASFWs either. In addition, none of the fellowships had any independent Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure patient safety and quality outcomes, it is important to promote GAS by recruiting more applicants for specialized training beyond residency. With increased Internet use, improving GASFWs and social media presence as well as considering the use of a centralized database or match system can foster the growth of the field.

Flipping Tradition on Its Head: A Single-Institution Study on United States Medical Licensing Examination Step Order.

Given the recent change in Step 1 grading, medical students are faced with decisions surrounding the optimal Step examination order and timing. There is a current lack of guidance outside commonly used United States Medical Licensing Examination study blogs. The aim of this study was to characterize current practices in Step examination order and understand the factors influencing student examination preference. To gather data, we used a 24-item survey and electronically distributed it through three separate email requests to medical students. Participants included medical students (MS1-4) attending a single institution, interested in a surgical residency. In total, 56 students responded to the survey (response rate of 20%). Most students (63.6%) opted to take Step 2 before Step 1. Justifications included the perceived importance of Step 2 for residency applications (33.3%), the change to pass/fail grading (27.0%), the relevance of Step 2 after rotations (27.0%), and a desire to obtain a Step 2 score earlier (7.9%). Step examination order did not lead to differences in Step 2 score (P = 0.459), time used to prepare for Step 1 (P = 0.396), or time used to prepare for Step 2 (P = 0.078). Due to the perceived importance of Step 2, most medical students at our institution who are interested in pursuing a surgical residency are reversing the traditional Step examination order. As this may represent a national trend, additional work needs to be done to provide guidance to medical students and identify the optimal step examination testing strategy.

Evaluating skin colour diversity in the validation of scar assessment tools.

Across scar studies, there is a lack of dark-skinned individuals, who have a predisposition for keloid formation, altered pigmentation and poorer quality of life (QOL). There is a need for patients of colour to be included in scar scale development and validation. In this study, we evaluate the racial diversity of patients included in the validation of scar assessment scales. A systematic review was conducted for articles reporting on the validation of a scar assessment tool. Racial, ethnic and Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) data were extracted. Fifteen scar scale validation studies were included. Nine of the studies did not mention FST, race or ethnicity of the patients. Two of the studies that reported FST or race information only included White patients or included no FST V/VI patients: mapping assessment of scars (MAPS) and University of North Carolina '4P'. Only four studies included non-White patients or dark-skinned patients in the validation of their scar scale: the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), acne QOL and SCAR-Q scales. The patients included in the modified VSS validation were 7% and 13% FST V/VI, 14% African in the modified POSAS and 4.5% FST V/VI in the SCAR-Q. We highlight the severe lack of diversity in scar scale validation, with only 4 out of 15 studies including dark-skinned patients. Given the susceptibility of darker-skinned individuals to have poorer scarring outcomes, it is critical to include patients of colour in the very assessment tools that determine their scar prognosis. Inclusion of patients of colour in scar scale development will improve scar assessment and clinical decision-making.

Fruit and Vegetable Preferences and Practices May Hinder Participation in Community-Supported Agriculture Among Low-Income Rural Families.

OBJECTIVE: Describe fruit and vegetable (FV) preferences and other factors that may influence participation in community-supported agriculture (CSA). DESIGN: In-depth, semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Eight rural/micropolitan communities in 4 US states. PARTICIPANTS: There were 41 caregivers and 20 children (8-12 years of age) from low-income, English-speaking households. PHENOMENA OF INTEREST: Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding FVs; perceived barriers to CSA participation. ANALYSIS: Transcribed verbatim and iteratively coded. RESULTS: Caregivers and children believed FVs were important to health, yet FVs were not featured in dinners or snacks and consumption was challenged by limited preferences and neophobia. Few caregivers and children knew about the seasonality of FV. Most caregivers were unfamiliar with CSA and had concerns about CSA cost, accessibility, produce quality, and selection. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These qualitative data support improvements in: 1) CSA distribution practices to offer flexible payment and pick-up options, more fruits, and self-selection of FV; 2) public awareness of produce seasonality and the CSA distribution model as necessary precursors to participation, and lower cost for low-income families who highlighted this barrier; and 3) capacity to prepare FV by enhancing skills and providing time-saving kitchen tools. Approaches to aligning CSA practices with the needs and preferences of low-income families warrant further research.