Cholangiocarcinoma.

Management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma relies on a thorough understanding of the tumor's location and proximity to critical vasculobiliary structures. Mid-common bile duct tumors may require hemihepatectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy based on the status of the intraoperative frozen section. Distal common bile tumors are treated with pancreatoduodenectomy. When appropriate, volumetric assessment of the remnant liver should be performed to identify cases requiring preoperative liver augmentation strategies. A similar strategy should be employed for perihilar tumors, which require a right trisegmentectomy with bilioenteric reconstruction to achieve a negative margin. Adjuvant systemic therapy is recommended and increasing usage of neoadjuvant treatment is being incorporated into borderline resectable or regionally advanced cases.

What's Behind it all: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Retrogastric Pancreatic Necrosis Management.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of laparoscopic transgastric necrosectomy (LTN) and direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) in the management of retrogastric walled-off necrosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical and endoscopic transgastric approaches are used to manage retrogastric pancreatic necrosis. Studies comparing these treatment modalities are lacking but would influence contemporary practice patterns. METHODS: LTN or DEN treated patients at Stanford University Hospital between 2011 and 2023 were identified. Cohort data included demographics, core pancreatitis care benchmarks, and clinical outcomes (total debridement time, new-onset endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency) as well as re-intervention, 30-day readmission, complication, and mortality rates. Long-term follow-up was also compared between intervention arms. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the interaction between admission APACHE-II score and intervention on length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: 106 patients (62% LTN, 38% DEN) were identified. Demographic and core pancreatitis benchmark data were similar between cohorts. 30-day readmission, complication, and mortality rates for surgical and endoscopic approaches were also similar: 23% vs. 25% (P = 0.98), 42% vs. 40% (P = 0.97), and 3% vs. 3% (P > 0.99). Median LTN total debridement time (minutes) was 131 vs. 134 for DEN, however, complete debridement was achieved with only 1 LTN compared to 3 DENs (P<0.01). While not statistically significant, LOS and unplanned intervention rates were less for LTN (8 vs. 10 days, P = 0.41 and 6% vs. 15%, P = 0.24). Multivariable analysis revealed a significant interaction between APACHE-II scores and LOS for LTN compared to DEN, which translated into a length of stay reduction for higher APACHE-II scoring patients (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: LTN is a safe and efficient treatment modality for walled-off necrosis, and compared to DEN, can reduce the LOS in high APACHE-II score patients. While additional comparative research between the two intervention types is needed, this study supports a role for a surgical approach in the management of retrogastric pancreatic necrosis.

Revascularization techniques for complete portomesenteric venous occlusion in patients undergoing pancreatic resection.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic pathologies causing portomesenteric occlusion complicate extirpative pancreatic resection due to portomesenteric hypertension and collateral venous drainage. METHODS: Patients with portomesenteric occlusion undergoing pancreatectomy were identified between 2007 and 2020 at Stanford University Hospital. Demographic and clinical data, technique and perioperative factors, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Of twenty-seven (27) patients undergoing venous revascularization during pancreatectomy, most (15) were for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Occlusions occurred mostly at the portosplenic confluence (15). Median occlusion length was 4.0 cm [3.1-5.8]. Regarding revascularization strategy, mesocaval shunting was used in 11 patients, in-line venous revascularization with internal jugular conduit in three patients, traditional venous resection and reconstruction in 9 patients, and thrombectomy in two patients. Median cohort operative time and estimated blood loss were 522 min [433-638] and 1000 mL [700-2500], respectively. Median length of stay was 10 days [8-14.5] with overall readmission rate of 37%. Significant complications occurred in 44% of patients despite only one (4%) perioperative mortality. DISCUSSION: Despite the technical complexity for managing portomesenteric occlusions, early revascularization strategies including mesocaval shunting or in-line venous revascularization are feasible and facilitate a safe pancreatic resection for surgically fit patients.

Two-Port Minimally Invasive Nephro-Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Debridement for Pancreatic Necrosis.

Walled-off necrosis (WON) occurs in approximately 20% of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Infection occurs in approximately 30% of necrosis patients, and despite advances in management, infected necrosis still confers a high mortality between 30 and 40%. While sterile necrosis requires drainage only for cases of symptom relief or "persistent unwellness," prompt intervention is critical for infected necrosis. Several management strategies exist depending on the location and anatomy of the necrosum. In particular, retroperitoneal collections away from the stomach are typically managed with a step-up approach that begins with percutaneous drain placement. While a minority of patients skirt further intervention, the majority require formal debridement at some point via the existing drain tract. These debridement techniques include video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) through a flank incision or minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic (MIRP) necrosectomy under continuous irrigation with a nephroscope. While effective, both debridement strategies have drawbacks: for VARD, the flank incision is prone to infections and hernia while MIRP debridements are tedious and often require repeat operative trips. To overcome these pitfalls, we describe a novel two-trocar minimally invasive hybrid nephro-laparoscopic retroperitoneal debridement technique for an efficient retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy.

Common hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an analysis of actual survival.

BACKGROUND: The common hepatic artery lymph node (CHALN) represents a second-echelon node for tumors in the head of the pancreas. Although early studies suggested survival was comparable between the CHALN and remote metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), whether the lymph node is associated with adverse survival remains equivocal. Here, we examined a prospective cohort of patients calculating actual survival to better understand implications of this specific lymph node metastasis. METHODS: We studied 215 patients with pancreatic head PDAC, who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies at a single institution between 2010 and 2017, wherein the CHALNs were excised. We performed actual and actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses, with subsequent univariate and multivariate analyses in node-positive patients. RESULTS: Of this cohort, 7.3% of patients had involvement of the CHALN, and all of them had metastatic spread to first-echelon nodes. Actual median survival of patients with no lymph node involvement was 49 months. In patients with any nodal involvement, the survival was no different when comparing the lymph node positive and negative (13 and 20 months, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses likewise attached no significance to the lymph node metastasis, while demonstrating worse survival with positive margin status and poorly differentiated histology. Our DFS analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in actual survival in node-positive patients regardless of the CHALN involvement and recommended against its assessment in prognosticating survival or guiding surgical treatment.

"Evolving Trends in Pancreatic Cystic Tumors: A 3-Decade Single-Center Experience With 1290 Resections".

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe our institutional experience with resected cystic tumors of the pancreas with emphasis on changes in clinical presentation and accuracy of preoperative diagnosis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Incidental discovery of pancreatic cystic lesions has increased and has led to a rise in pancreatic resections. It is important to analyze surgical outcomes from these procedures, and the prevalence of malignancy, pre-malignancy and resections for purely benign lesions, some of which may be unintended. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective database spanning 3 decades. Presence of symptoms, incidental discovery, diagnostic studies, type of surgery, postoperative outcomes, and concordance between presumptive diagnosis and final histopathology were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 1290 patients were identified, 62% female with mean age of 60 years. Fifty-seven percent of tumors were incidentally discovered. Ninety-day operative mortality was 0.9% and major morbidity 14.4%. There were 23 different diagnosis, but IPMN, MCN, and serous cystadenoma comprised 80% of cases. Concordance between preoperative and final histopathological diagnosis increased by decade from 45%, to 68%, and is presently 80%, rising in parallel with the use of endoscopic ultrasound, cytology, and molecular analysis. The addition of molecular analysis improved accuracy to 91%. Of misdiagnosed cases, half were purely benign and taken to surgery with the presumption of malignancy or premalignancy. The majority of these were serous cystadenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Indications and diagnostic work-up of cystic tumors of the pancreas have changed over time. Surgical resection can be performed with very low mortality and acceptable morbidity and diagnostic accuracy is presently 80%. About 10% of patients are still undergoing surgery for purely benign lesions that were presumed to be malignant or premalignant. Further refinements in diagnostic tests are required to improve accuracy.

Prediction of R Status in Resections for Pancreatic Cancer Using Simplified Radiological Criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Predicting R status before surgery for pancreatic cancer (PDAC) patients with upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Negative surgical margins (R0) are a key predictor of long-term outcomes in PDAC. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatic resection with curative intent for PDAC were identified. Using the CT scans from the time of diagnosis, the 2019 NCCN borderline resectability criteria were compared to novel criteria: presence of any alteration of the superior mesenteric-portal vein (SMPV) and perivascular stranding of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Accuracy of predicting R status was evaluated for both criteria. Patient baseline characteristics, surgical, histopathological parameters, and long-term overall survival (OS) after resection were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 593 patients undergoing pancreatic resections for PDAC between 2010 and 2018 were identified. Three hundred and twenty-five (54.8%) patients underwent upfront surgery, whereas 268 (45.2%) received neoadjuvant therapy. In upfront resected patients, positive SMA stranding was associated with 56% margin positive resection rates, whereas positive SMA stranding and SMPV alterations together showed a margin positive resection rate of 75%. In contrast to these criteria, the 2019 NCCN borderline criteria failed to predict margin status. In patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, only perivascular SMA stranding remained a predictor of margin positive resection, leading to a rate of 33% R+ resections. Perivascular SMA stranding was related to higher clinical T stage (P = 0.003) and clinical N stage (P = 0.043) as well as perineural invasion (P = 0.022). SMA stranding was associated with worse survival in both patients undergoing upfront surgery (36 vs 22 months, P = 0.002) and neoadjuvant therapy (47 vs 34 months, P = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: The novel criteria were accurate predictors of R status in PDAC patients undergoing upfront resection. After neoadjuvant treatment, likelihood of positive resection margins is approximately halved, and only perivascular SMA stranding remained a predictive factor.

Concepts and Outcomes of Perioperative Therapy in Stage IA-III Pancreatic Cancer-A Cross-Validation of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers (GCRG/ADT).

(1) Background: The aim of this study is to assess perioperative therapy in stage IA-III pancreatic cancer cross-validating the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers-Network for Care, Quality, and Research in Oncology, Berlin (GCRG/ADT) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). (2) Methods: Patients with clinical stage IA-III PDAC undergoing surgery alone (OP), neoadjuvant therapy (TX) + surgery (neo + OP), surgery+adjuvantTX (OP + adj) and neoadjuvantTX + surgery + adjuvantTX (neo + OP + adj) were identified. Baseline characteristics, histopathological parameters, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. (3) Results: 1392 patients from the GCRG/ADT and 29,081 patients from the NCDB were included. Patient selection and strategies of perioperative therapy remained consistent across the registries for stage IA-III pancreatic cancer. Combined neo + OP + adj was associated with prolonged OS as compared to neo + OP alone (17.8 m vs. 21.3 m, p = 0.012) across all stages in the GCRG/ADT registry. Similarly, OS with neo + OP + adj was improved as compared to neo + OP in the NCDB registry (26.4 m vs. 35.4 m, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The cross-validation study demonstrated similar concepts and patient selection criteria of perioperative therapy across clinical stages of PDAC. Neoadjuvant therapy combined with adjuvant therapy is associated with improved overall survival as compared to either therapy alone.

A Combination of Biochemical and Pathological Parameters Improves Prediction of Postresection Survival After Preoperative Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: The PANAMA-score.

OBJECTIVE: To build a prognostic score for patients with primary chemotherapy undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer based on pathological parameters and preoperative Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels. BACKGROUND: Prognostic stratification after primary chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer is challenging and prediction models, such as the AJCC staging system, lack validation in the setting of preoperative chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with primary chemotherapy resected at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed. Tumor characteristics independently associated with overall survival were identified and weighted by Cox-proportional regression. The pancreatic neoadjuvant Massachusetts-score (PANAMA-score) was computed from these variables and its performance assessed by Harrel concordance index and area under the receiving characteristics curves analysis. Comparisons were made with the AJCC staging system and external validation was performed in an independent cohort with primary chemotherapy from Heidelberg, Germany. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients constituted the training cohort. The multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size, number of positive lymph-nodes, R-status, and high CA19-9 to be independently associated with overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis according to low, intermediate, and high PANAMA-score showed good discriminatory power of the new metrics (P < 0.001). The median overall survival for the three risk-groups was 45, 27, and 12 months, respectively. External validation in 258 patients confirmed the prognostic ability of the score and demonstrated better accuracy compared with the AJCC staging system. CONCLUSION: The proposed PANAMA-score, based on independent predictors of postresection survival, including pathologic variables and CA19-9, not only provides better discrimination compared to the AJCC staging system, but also identifies patients at high-risk for early death.

Achalasia and obesity: patient outcomes and impressions following laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication.

PURPOSE: The optimal management of achalasia in obese patients is unclear. For those who have undergone Heller myotomy and fundoplication, the long-term outcomes and their impressions following surgery are largely unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication (LHMDF) for achalasia was performed. From this cohort, Class 2 and 3 obese (BMI > 35 kg/m2) patients were identified for short- and long-term outcome analysis. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2015, 252 patients underwent LHMDF for achalasia, and 17 (7%) patients had BMI > 35 kg/m2. Pre-operative Eckardt scores varied from 2 to 9, and at short-term (2-4 week) follow-up, scores were 0 or 1. Ten (58%) patients had available long-term (2-144 months) follow-up data. Eckardt scores at this time ranged from 0 to 6. Symptom recurrence was worse for patients with BMI > 40 kg/m2 compared to patients with BMI < 40 kg/m2. BMI was largely unchanged at long-term follow-up regardless of pre-intervention BMI. Most patients were satisfied with surgery but would have considered a combined LHMDF and weight-loss procedure had it been offered. CONCLUSION: LHMDF for achalasia in obese patients is safe and effective in the short term. At long-term follow-up, many patients had symptom recurrence and experienced minimal weight loss. Discussing weight-loss surgery at the time LHMDF may be appropriate to ensure long-term achalasia symptom relief.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (BR/LA PDAC) in the Era of Modern Neoadjuvant Treatment: Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To define short-term and long-term outcomes of IORT for the management of BR/LA PDAC in the era of modern neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). BACKGROUND: In the era of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, many patients with borderline resectable/locally advanced (BR/LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) become candidates for surgical exploration with curative intent. IORT may be used to consolidate treatment for successfully resected patients with close or positive margins or administered in unresectable patients without distant metastases. METHODS: A retrospective review of 158 patients who received IORT in the setting of biopsy-proven BR/LA PDAC following NAT between 2008 and 2017 was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of FOLFIRINOX treated patients. RESULTS: Most patients (83%) received FOLFIRINOX, and 95% underwent consolidative chemoradiation therapy (50.4-58.8 Gy). Among FOLFIRINOX-treated patients, 86 underwent combined surgical resection with IORT (10 Gy) while 46 received IORT alone (15-20 Gy). The median PFS and OS were 21.5 and 46.7 months for patients who underwent resection with IORT and 14.7 and 23 months in the IORT alone group. Local progression occurred in 12.7% of patients after resection with IORT, and in 15% of patients who received IORT alone. Major complications occurred in 13% of patients following resection, and 5% of patients after IORT alone, including one death. CONCLUSION: IORT combined with surgical resection appears to be associated with improved survival and minimal morbidity in patients with positive or close margins. IORT is also associated with improved survival in patients with unresectable, non-metastatic disease.

To resect or not to resect: a review of pancreatic cyst disease management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With recent advances in radiographic testing, there have been increases in the incidental identification of pancreatic cysts. Determining management, specifically, which cysts can be watched versus intervened upon has significant impact on at the patient-physician level as well as globally on resource allocation and healthcare expenditures. This review focuses on the three main guidelines (Fukuoka guidelines, European consensus, and American Gastroenterological Association recommendations) for management of pancreatic cystic disease after incidental identification. RECENT FINDINGS: There are iterant revisions to each set of recommendations every few years as new data is published on the subject. This review encompasses the most up-to-date recommendations for management while also providing a framework for conceptualizing work-up for varying types of pancreatic cystic disease before and after incidental identification. SUMMARY: Pancreatic cystic disease should be approached in thoughtful clinical manner, and each cyst should be evaluated in the context of patient's health and healthcare goals. All cysts, however, should be considered malignant until proven otherwise. Applications of different diagnostic modalities like MRI and EUS with FNA can better characterize cystic lesions and assess malignant potential. Resection should always be considered in cysts with concerning features. If deferred, surveillance should be continued indefinitely. Early termination of surveillance risks future malignant progression.