Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
EClinicalMedicine ; 52: 101584, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35942273

RESUMEN

Background: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is increasing, but increasing longevity among persons with diagnosed diabetes may be is associated with more extensive and diverse types of morbidity. The extent and breadth of morbidity and how this varies across sub-groups is unclear and could have important clinical and public health implications. We aimed to estimate comorbidity profiles in people with T2DM and variations across sub-groups and over time. Methods: We identified approximately 224,000 people with T2DM in the Discover-NOW dataset, a real-world primary care database from 2000 to 2020 covering 2.5 million people across North-West London, England, linked to hospital records. We generated a mixed prevalence and incidence study population through repeated annual cross sections, and included a broad set of 35 comorbidities covering traditional T2DM conditions, emerging T2DM conditions and other common conditions.We estimated annual age-standardised prevalence of comorbidities, over the course of the disease in people with T2DM and several sub-groups. Findings: Multimorbidity (two or more chronic conditions) is common in people with T2DM and increasing, but the comorbidity profiles of people with T2DM vary substantially. Nearly 30% of T2DM patients had three or more comorbidities at diagnosis, increasing to 60% of patients ten years later. Two of the five commonest comorbidities at diagnosis were traditional T2DM conditions (hypertension (37%) and ischaemic heart disease (10%)) the other three were not (depression (15%), back pain (25%) and osteoarthritis (11%)). The prevalence of each increased during the course of the disease, with more than one in three patients having back pain and one in four having depression ten years post diagnosis.People with five or more comorbidities at diagnosis had higher prevalence of each of the 35 comorbidities. Hypertension (73%) was the commonest comorbidity at diagnosis in this group; followed by back pain (69%), depression (67%), asthma (45%) and osteoarthritis (36%). People with obesity at diagnosis had substantially different comorbidity profiles to those without, and the five commonest comorbidities were 50% more common in this group. Interpretation: Preventative and clinical interventions alongside care pathways for people with T2DM should transition to reflect the diverse set of causes driving persistent morbidity. This would benefit both patients and healthcare systems alike. Funding: The study was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

2.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 9(4): 468-472, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30755396

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Primary care has a central role in palliative and end of life care: 45.6% of deaths in England and Wales occur under the care of primary care teams at home or in care homes. The Community Care Pathways at the End of Life (CAPE) study investigated primary care provided for patients in the final 6 months of life. This paper highlights the opportunities and challenges associated with primary palliative care research in the UK, describing the methodological, ethical, logistical and gatekeeping challenges encountered in the CAPE study and how these were addressed. THE STUDY METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach, quantitative data were extracted from the general practitioner (GP) and district nurse (DN) records of 400 recently deceased patients in 20 GP practices in the East of England. Focus groups were conducted with some GPs and DNs, and individual interviews held with bereaved carers and other GPs and DNs. THE CHALLENGES ADDRESSED: Considerable difficulties were encountered with ethical permissions, with GP, DN and bereaved carer recruitment and both quantitative and qualitative data collection. These were overcome with flexibility of approach, perseverance of the research team and strong user group support. This enabled completion of the study which generated a unique primary palliative care data set.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos/tendencias , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias , Investigación , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Inglaterra , Médicos Generales , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Casas de Salud , Cuidado Terminal , Gales
3.
PLoS One ; 8(4): e61475, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23613857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the number of individuals lacking the mental capacity to participate in decisions about their own healthcare is increasing. Due to the ageing global population and advancing medical treatments, there are now many more people living longer with neurological disorders, such as dementia, acquired brain injuries, and intellectual disabilities. Many of these individuals have feeding difficulties and may require artificial nutrition. However, little is known about the decision-making process; the evidence base is uncertain and often ethically complex. Using the exemplar of artificial nutrition, the objective of this review is to examine how treatment decisions are made when patients are at risk of lacking capacity. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We undertook a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines to determine who was involved in decisions, and what factors were considered. We searched PubMed, AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and OpenSigle for quantitative and qualitative studies (1990-2011). Citation, reference, hand searches and expert consultation were also undertaken. Data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently and in duplicate. We utilised Thomas and Harden's 'Thematic Synthesis' for analysis. Sixty-six studies met inclusion criteria, comprising data from 40 countries and 34,649 patients, carers and clinicians. Six themes emerged: clinical indications were similar across countries but were insufficient alone for determining outcomes; quality of life was the main decision-making factor but its meaning varied; prolonging life was the second most cited factor; patient's wishes were influential but not determinative; families had some influence but were infrequently involved in final recommendations; clinicians often felt conflicted about their roles. CONCLUSIONS: When individuals lack mental capacity, decisions must be made on their behalf. Dynamic interactive factors, such as protecting right to life, not unnecessarily prolonging suffering, and individual preferences, need to be addressed and balanced. These findings provide an outline to aid clinical practice and develop decision-making guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Estado Nutricional
4.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 46(3): 345-54, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23195390

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: General practitioners (GPs) and community nurses (CNs) have a central role in palliative care. With health policy focusing more and more on enabling patients to die at home, primary health care professionals are increasingly responsible for symptom management of patients near the end of life. OBJECTIVES: 1) To investigate GPs' and CNs' training and knowledge in palliative care and 2) to identify the characteristics of GPs and CNs with lower levels of palliative care knowledge. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to all GPs and CNs in two areas of the U.K. A panel of doctors and nurses with palliative care expertise rated the response categories with regard to correctness and questions with regard to importance for their professional group. These weightings were combined and applied to answers to assess knowledge levels. RESULTS: Response rates were 54% and 35% for GPs and CNs, respectively. Respondents reported receiving training in most areas of palliative care throughout their careers, with the exceptions of syringe driver use and bereavement care. High levels of knowledge concerning pain management and syringe driver use were found, with no significant differences in the overall knowledge between the professions. Some important gaps were identified for future educational focus. Regression analyses did not identify characteristics that explained the variation in knowledge scores. CONCLUSION: Both groups had a high level of knowledge concerning key issues in pain management and syringe driver use that should equip them well for their central role in palliative care. Recommendations for the focus of future education sessions are made.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Enfermeros de Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/epidemiología , Dolor/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud/etnología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/enfermería , Manejo del Dolor/enfermería , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...