532-nm potassium titanyl-phosphate laser versus 595-nm pulsed dye laser for port-wine birthmarks: A prospective, randomized, split-side study.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed dye lasers (PDL) are currently the first-line treatment of port-wine birthmarks (PWB). Due to high maintenance costs and instable technology, alternative methods are needed. OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes of a variable-sequenced, long-pulsed 532-nm potassium titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser and PDL on treating PWB. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, split-side study. Patients were treated with a KTP laser and PDL with 1 to 5 sessions at intervals of 6-8 weeks. A follow-up visit was scheduled 6 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was evaluated through colorimetric analysis, area reduction measurements and clinical evaluations by two blinded investigators based on photo documentation. Subjects provided rating of pain intensity during treatment, post-treatment reactions and satisfaction. Safety was measured by adverse events. Maintenance issues of the laser systems were documented. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients (mean age 42.1 years) were enrolled. 63% were female. Patients received 2.4 (SD 1.4; 1-5) treatment sessions. Colorimetric analysis indicated a comparable clearance effect in PWB of both KTP laser and PDL. Independent investigators rated clinical appearance to be significantly improved compared to baseline. No significant difference was observed between both laser systems. Regarding post-treatment reactions, the KTP laser caused less swelling, purpura and crusts. 96% would recommend both treatment modalities. Patients were satisfied with both laser systems. During the study, PDL systems malfunctioned for 6.6 months in total. For the KTP laser, we did not observe any system failures. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the KTP laser of the latest generation with large-spot sizes, subpulse technology and cryogen cooling has a comparable efficacy to the PDL in treating PWB. In addition, KTP laser is associated with greater tolerability, fewer technical failures and lower repair costs. Further prospective studies are required to determine the true effectiveness of the KTP laser in PWB treatment. This study was preregistered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05771298).

Rosacea treatment with 532 nm KTP versus 595 nm pulsed dye laser-A prospective, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed-dye lasers (PDL) are one of the standard therapies for rosacea, but alternatives are needed. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of the variable-sequenced, large-spot 532 nm KTP laser to the 595 nm PDL in treating rosacea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, controlled, evaluator-blinded study. Patients were treated with either a KTP or PDL with 1-3 sessions at intervals of 6-8 weeks. A follow-up visit was scheduled on Week 6 post-treatment. Clinical outcome was assessed by computer-assisted analysis and by patients and two blinded dermatologists. Pain intensity during treatment and adverse events were documented. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (mean age 51 years) were allocated in a 2:1 ratio to either the KTP or PDL. Erythema in both treatment arms decreased significantly (p < 0.01). Clinical evaluation revealed high improvement. Mean pain intensity was significantly lower with the KTP (2.5/10) than with the PDL (4.1/10). Both lasers showed a good safety profile. Relevant purpura was only seen in the PDL group. CONCLUSIONS: Both the variable-sequenced, large-spot KTP and the PDL demonstrated comparable efficacy in treatment of rosacea. Regarding safety, the KTP exhibited fewer post-treatment reactions. The KTP might serve as a potential alternative to PDL in the treatment of rosacea.