Neuromyelitis optica: Clinical course and potential prognostic indicators.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune neurological disorder associated with antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4). NMOSD has been thought to follow a progressive disease course, with step-wise accumulation of disability over time, even in patients undergoing immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapy. The influence of factors such as AQP4 seropositivity, AQP4 serum titer levels, and administration of plasmapheresis on NMOSD prognosis is, as yet, unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 53 persons with NMOSD at Duke University Hospital-collecting data on longitudinal disease course, imaging, demographics, and serum AQP4 titers (measured using the ELISA or FACS method). Most patients in our cohort were treated with high-dose corticosteroids and, following diagnosis, received maintenance immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapies. Longitudinal data on EDSS scores were used to calculate the slope of disability over time for each participant. We additionally investigated the correlation between initial AQP4 seropositivity, initial AQP4 serum titer levels, and treatment with plasmapheresis on disability progression for each participant. RESULTS: Contrary to current views on NMOSD disease course, the majority of our participants showed either no change (31.9%) or improvement (27.1%) in disability over time. Our results additionally revealed no significant association between clinical prognosis and initial AQP4 seropositivity (p = 0.830), initial AQP4 serum titer levels (p = 0.338), or administration of plasmapheresis (p = 0.1149). CONCLUSIONS: Our study presents a contemporary view of the clinical course of NMOSD and shows a more favorable view of its disease course than prior studies (performed before high-efficacy disease modifying therapies became widely-used for this patient population). Most patients in this study received treatment with high-dose corticosteroids following NMOSD flares, as well as a variety of maintenance immunosuppressive therapies. The results of this study cannot shed light on the disease course of untreated NMOSD. Our findings additionally challenge the theory that AQP4 seropositivity or serum titer levels at time of diagnosis may be used to effectively predict NMOSD prognosis. While we were unable to find evidence supporting a favorable effect of plasmapheresis administration on disease outcomes, further research is needed to determine the role plasmapheresis ought to play in the treatment of NMOSD.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease: Presentation and outcomes of adults at a single center.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is a chronic demyelinating disorder that has been increasingly recognized since the serum antibody became commercially available in 2017. The most common clinical presentation is optic neuritis, and first line acute treatment is intravenous (IV) steroids. However, there are many questions that remain unanswered. For clinicians and patients, the primary question is whether relapses will occur and whether to treat with chronic therapy. METHODS: This retrospective chart review examined characteristics of thirty-three known adult MOGAD cases at a single institute. Data was collected on patient demographics, clinical presentation, objective diagnosis with MRI and serum antibody levels, acute and chronic treatment and disease outcomes. RESULTS: Our MOGAD cases revealed a slight female to male predominance of 1.5:1. No racial groups were affected disproportionately, and age of symptom onset spanned a large range with a median of 40 years. The most common clinical and radiologic presentation was optic neuritis followed by transverse myelitis and brainstem symptoms/lesions. IV methylprednisolone was used in the vast majority of cases for acute treatment. 83.3% of our patients were treated with chronic therapy at some point during their disease course. Therapies include rituximab, IVIG, ocrelizumab, mycophenolate mofetil and ofatumumab. The majority of our patients were treated with rituximab and we did not see a significant benefit of yearly relapse reduction for rituximab versus other therapies. Our cohort had a higher-than- expected percentage of cases with relapsing disease (56.3%) compared to monophasic (43.8%). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our study confirms prior data regarding the demographics, clinical presentation and radiologic presentation of MOGAD. There is no consensus on whether maintenance therapy should be started for MOGAD cases with a single clinical event. Our cohort showed a higher relapse rate than has been reported previously and all known relapses occurred within one year of diagnosis. More data is necessary to confirm risk of relapse in the years following diagnosis. In addition, further data on biomarkers are needed to predict the disease course could help guide management.

The clinical presentation and treatment of MOG antibody disease at a single academic center: A case series.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical presentation of MOG antibody disease (MOG-AD) in a series of patients at a single academic center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with MOG antibodies. RESULTS: We review the clinical presentation of 11 patients with MOG antibodies. In patients seen at Duke University Health System with MOG antibodies, the most common presentation was optic neuritis. Rituximab was the most used treatment for long-term management. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series highlights the common presentation of MOG antibody disease (MOG-AD) at a single academic medical center.