Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 31(3): 589-598, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27072988

RESUMEN

This prospective single-center observational study compared impedance cardiography [electrical velocimetry (EV)] with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE, based on trans-aortic flow) and analyzed the influence of physiological shunts, such as patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) or patent foramen ovale (PFO), on measurement accuracy. Two hundred and ninety-one triplicate simultaneous paired left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) measurements by EV (LVSVEV) and TTE (LVSVTTE) in 99 spontaneously breathing neonates (mean weight 3270 g; range 1227-4600 g) were included. For the whole cohort, the mean absolute LVSVEV was 5.5 mL, mean LVSVTTE was 4.9 mL, resulting in an absolute Bland-Altman bias of -0.7 mL (limits of agreement LOA -3.0 to 1.7 mL), relative bias -12.8 %; mean percentage error MPE 44.9 %; true precision TPEV 33.4 % (n = 99 aggregated data points). In neonates without shunts (n = 32): mean LVSVEV 5.0 mL, mean LVSVTTE 4.6 mL, Bland-Altman bias -0.4 mL (LOA -2.8 to 2.0 mL), relative bias -8.2 %; MPE 50.7 %; TPEV 40.9 %. In neonates with shunts (PDA and/or PFO; n = 67): mean LVSVEV 5.8 mL, mean LVSVTTE 5.0 mL, bias -0.8 mL (LOA -3.1 to 1.5 mL), relative bias -14.8 %, MPE 41.9 %, TPEV 29.3 %. Accuracy was affected by PDA and/or PFO, with a significant increase in the relative difference in LVSVEV versus LVSVTTE: Subjects without shunts -2.9 % (n = 91), PFO alone -9.6 % (n = 125), PDA alone -14.0 % (n = 12), and PDA and PFO -18.5 % (n = 63). Physiological shunts (PDA and/or PFO) in neonates affect measurement accuracy and cause overestimation of LVSVEV compared with LVSVTTE.


Asunto(s)
Cardiografía de Impedancia/métodos , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/diagnóstico , Foramen Oval Permeable/diagnóstico , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/complicaciones , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/fisiopatología , Femenino , Foramen Oval Permeable/complicaciones , Foramen Oval Permeable/fisiopatología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Reología/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología
2.
Crit Care ; 18(6): 603, 2014 Nov 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25407329

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Electrical velocimetry (EV) is a type of impedance cardiography, and is a non-invasive and continuously applicable method of cardiac output monitoring. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is non-invasive but discontinuous. METHODS: We compared EV with TTE in pediatric intensive care patients in a prospective single-center observational study. Simultaneous, coupled, left ventricular stroke volume measurements were performed by EV using an Aesculon® monitor and TTE (either via trans-aortic valve flow velocity time integral [EVVTI], or via M-mode [EVMM]). H0: bias was less than 10% and the mean percentage error (MPE) was less than 30% in Bland-Altman analysis between EV and TTE. If appropriate, data were logarithmically transformed prior to Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients (age: 2 days to 17 years; weight: 0.8 to 86 kg) were analyzed. Patients were divided into subgroups: organ transplantation (OTX, n = 28), sepsis or organ failure (SEPSIS, n = 16), neurological patients (NEURO, n = 9), and preterm infants (PREM, n = 26); Bias/MPE for EVVTI was 7.81%/26.16%. In the EVVTI subgroup analysis for OTX, NEURO, and SEPSIS, bias and MPE were within the limits of H0, whereas the PREM subgroup had a bias/MPE of 39.00%/46.27%. Bias/MPE for EVMM was 8.07%/37.26% where the OTX and NEURO subgroups were within the range of H0, but the PREM and SEPSIS subgroups were outside the range. Mechanical ventilation, non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure ventilation, body weight, and secondary abdominal closure were factors that significantly affected comparison of the methods. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that EV is comparable with aortic flow-based TTE for pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Reología/métodos , Adolescente , Cardiografía de Impedancia/métodos , Cardiografía de Impedancia/normas , Niño , Preescolar , Ecocardiografía/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/normas , Masculino , Monitoreo Fisiológico/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Reología/normas , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología
3.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 24(4): 393-9, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24354795

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim was to investigate whether cerebral transcutaneous near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) or two-site NIRS is a suitable monitoring tool to detect or confirm a cerebral circulatory arrest in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. METHODS: Prospective single-center pediatric observational study. Simultaneous NIRS measurements over forehead (cNIRS, crS02) and kidney (rNIRS, rrSO2), at the same time, the cardiac output were determined by transthoracic echocardiography. Area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver-operating curve (ROC) was analyzed for NIRS regarding cerebral circulatory arrest. RESULTS: There were two groups of patients (weight 2.1-73 kg): Group A: patients with intact cerebral perfusion (n = 36). Group B: patients with cerebral circulatory arrest (n = 8) proven by Doppler ultrasound scan or perfusion scintigraphy. There was no difference in cardiac output between the groups. PICU mortality for Group A was 3/36 (8.3%), for Group B 8/8, (100%). Mean cNIRS values were significantly higher with 68.92 (SEM = 2.54, SD = 15.25) in Group A compared with 34.63 (SEM = 5.36, SD = 15.15) in Group B (P < 0.001). ROC analysis for cNIRS detecting cerebral circulatory arrest was significant (AUC 0.948, 95% confidence interval 0.876-1.000, SE = 0.037, P < 0.001). Discrimination was optimal at 46 for cNIRS, at 36.5 for the difference rNIRS-cNIRS and at 0.5646 for the quotient cNIRS/rNIRS. The probability of a cerebral circulatory arrest was 77.8% (cNIRS) and 87.5% (combinations of cNIRS and rNIRS) at these cutoffs. CONCLUSIONS: cNIRS did detect cerebral circulatory arrest with high sensitivity. Specificity was, however, not high enough to confirm a cerebral circulatory arrest.


Asunto(s)
Química Encefálica/fisiología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/fisiopatología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Perfusión , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Ultrasonografía Doppler Transcraneal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...