Early Outcomes of Heart Transplantation Using Donation After Circulatory Death Donors in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Limited donor availability and evolution in procurement techniques have renewed interest in heart transplantation (HT) with donation after circulatory death (DCD). The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of HT using DCD in the United States. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify adult HT recipients from 2019 to 2021. Recipients were stratified between DCD and donation after brain death. Propensity-score matching was performed. Cox proportional hazards was used to identify independent predictors of 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate 1-year survival. RESULTS: Of 7496 HTs, 229 DCD and 7267 donation after brain death recipients were analyzed. The frequency of DCD HT increased from 0.2% of all HT in 2019 to 6.4% in 2021 (P<0.001), and the number of centers performing DCD HT increased from 3 of 120 centers to 20 of 121 centers (P<0.001). DCD donors were more likely to be younger, male, and White. After propensity matching, 1-year survival was 92.5% for DCD versus 90.3% for donation after brain death (hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.44-1.43]; P=0.44). Among DCD HTs, increasing recipient age and waitlist time predicted 1-year mortality on univariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of DCD HT in the United States are increasing. This practice appears safe and feasible as mortality outcomes are comparable to donation after brain death. Although this study represents early adopting centers, outcomes of the experience for DCD HT in the United States is consistent with existing international data and encourages broader utilization of this practice.

Outcomes in Patients With LVADs Undergoing Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have shown better outcomes for simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (sHKT) than for isolated orthotopic heart transplant (iOHT) in recipients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, outcomes in patients supported by durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have not been well studied. METHODS: Patients with durable LVADs and stage 3 or higher CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) undergoing iOHT or sHKT between 2008 and 2020 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with associated log-rank test was conducted to compare post-transplant survival rates. Multivariable modeling was used to identify risk-adjusted predictors of 1 year post-transplant mortality. RESULTS: We identified 4375 patients; 366 underwent sHKT, and 4009 underwent iOHT. The frequency of sHKT increased during the study period. The 1-year post-transplant survival rate was worse in patients after sHKT than in patients after iOHT (80.3% vs 88.3%; P < 0.001) and persisted up to 5 years post-transplant (P = 0.001). sHKT recipients were more likely to require dialysis after transplantation and had longer hospital lengths of stay (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that sHKT remained an independent risk factor for mortality at 1 year (OR 1.58; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: sHKT is becoming more common in patients with durable LVADs. Compared with iOHT, patients with sHKTs have worse short- and long-term survival rates and are more likely to require post-transplant dialysis.

Prolonged Ischemia Times for Heart Transplantation: Impact of the 2018 Allocation Change.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing implemented a change in heart allocation policy resulting in increased organ ischemia times in early analyses. This study evaluated the effect of ischemia time on 1-year mortality in the context of allocation policy changes implemented in 2006 and 2018. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify adults undergoing heart transplantation from 2000 to 2020. Patients were stratified by the allocation policy era in which they received a transplant (2000-June 2006, July 2006-October 2018, October 2018-2020) and by ischemia time, defined as normal (≤4 hours) and prolonged (>4 hours). One-year survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression was used to determine risk-adjusted hazards for ischemia time on 1-year mortality. RESULTS: There were 40 052 patients included for analysis. Ischemia times were normal in 32 585 (81.36%) and prolonged in 7467 (18.64%) patients. The proportion of transplantations with prolonged ischemia times increased with each subsequent policy era. After the 2018 policy change, 1-year survival was 90.92% with normal ischemia times vs 87.52% with prolonged ischemia times (P < .001). Ischemia time independently predicted 1-year mortality in each era with a hazard ratio of 1.20 per hour (P = .004) in the current era. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged ischemia times occur in a minority of cases but are increasing in frequency. The independent risk of prolonged ischemia time on 1-year mortality persists despite advances in storage technology and should remain a consideration in donor-recipient matching.

Impact of donor age on survival after heart transplantation: an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding the influence of donor age on outcomes after heart transplantation. We sought to determine if advanced donor age is associated with differences in survival after heart transplantation and how this compares to waitlist survival. METHODS: All adult heart transplants from 2000 to 2012 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Donors were stratified into four age groups: 18-39 (reference group), 40-49, 50-54, and 55 and above. Propensity scoring was used to compare status IA waitlist patients who did not undergo transplantation with IA recipients who received hearts from advanced age donors. The primary outcome of interest was recipient survival and this was analyzed with multivariate Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 22,960 adult heart transplant recipients were identified. Recipients of hearts from all three older donor groups had significantly increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.187-1.426, all p < 0.001) compared to recipients from donors age 18 to 39. Additionally, propensity-matched status IA patients managed medically without transplantation had significantly worse adjusted survival than status IA recipients who received hearts from older donors age ≥55 (HR, 1.362, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to donors aged 18-39, age 40 and above is associated with worse adjusted recipient survival in heart transplantation. This survival difference becomes more pronounced as age increases to above 55. However, the survival rate among status IA patients who receive hearts from advanced age donors (≥55) is significantly better compared to similar status IA patients who are managed without transplantation.

Coronary revascularization in lung transplant recipients with concomitant coronary artery disease.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is not uncommon among lung transplant candidates. Several small, single-center series have suggested that short-term outcomes are acceptable in selected patients who undergo coronary revascularization prior to, or concomitant with, lung transplantation. Our objective was to evaluate perioperative and intermediate-term outcomes in this patient population at our institution. We performed a retrospective, observational cohort analysis of 898 lung transplant recipients between 1997 and 2010. Pediatric, multivisceral, lobar or repeat transplantations were excluded, resulting in 791 patients for comparative analysis, of which 49 (median age 62, 79.6% bilateral transplant) underwent concurrent coronary artery bypass and 38 (median age 64, 63.2% bilateral transplant) received preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Perioperative mortality, overall unadjusted survival and adjusted hazard ratio for cumulative risk of death were similar among both revascularization groups as well as controls. The rate of postoperative major adverse cardiac events was also similar among groups; however, concurrent coronary artery bypass was associated with longer postoperative length of stay, more time in the intensive care unit and more postoperative days requiring ventilator support. These results suggest that patients with CAD need not be excluded from lung transplantation. Preferential consideration should be given to preoperative PCI when feasible.