Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
2.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 23(5): 689-706, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35854102

RESUMEN

Primary cutaneous lymphomas are a rare group of diseases, with an estimated incidence of 0.5-1 case per 100,000 people per year. Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (pCBCLs) represent 25-30% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas. There are three main subtypes of pCBCL: primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma, primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma, and primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type. Cutaneous B-cell lymphomas have a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, which makes diagnostic and therapeutic strategies challenging. To date, treatment recommendations for cutaneous B-cell lymphomas have been largely based on small retrospective studies and institutional experience. Recently, the pharmacotherapeutic landscape has expanded to include drugs that may modify the underlying disease pathology of pCBCLs, representing new therapeutic modalities for this rare group of diseases. Novel therapies used for other systemic B-cell lymphomas show promise for the treatment of pCBCLs and are being increasingly considered. These new therapies are divided into five main groups: monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, small-molecule inhibitors, bispecific T-cell engaging, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell. In this review, we discuss the clinical, histopathological, molecular, and cytogenetic features of the most common pCBCL subtypes with a focus on current and innovative therapeutic developments in their management. These emerging treatment strategies for B-cell lymphomas and cutaneous B-cell lymphomas may represent novel first-line options for the management of these rare diseases.


Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Linfoma de Células B/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B/patología , Linfoma de Células B/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia
3.
South Med J ; 114(12): 789-796, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34853856

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Reports of medical student mentorship prevalence range between 26% and 77%. This broad range likely reflects the tendencies of studies to focus on specific populations of medical students. There is little consensus about the characteristics of mentoring relationships among medical students. The primary goal of this study was to determine the reported prevalence of mentorship among medical students in the United States. The secondary goals were to assess the desired qualities of and barriers to successful mentoring from a medical student perspective. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was administered via Qualtrics to all medical students at participating accredited medical schools from July 2018 to March 2019. The questionnaire contained a subsection of questions that assessed the existence of mentoring, facilitators, and barriers in finding a mentor, and the desired qualities of a successful mentor. RESULTS: With a 94% completion rate, 369 (69%) of 532 medical students reported having a mentor. Adjusted analysis showed that fourth-year medical students were significantly more likely to have a mentor compared with first-year (odds ratio [OR] 2.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-4.73, P = 0.001), second-year (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.14-3.76, P = 0.016), and third-year medical students (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.2-3.90, P = 0.011). Compassion (64%) was the most commonly reported quality in a successful mentoring relationship. Lack of time from mentor (75%) was the most commonly reported barrier. CONCLUSIONS: This study may serve as a guide to fostering more supportive mentoring relationships. Each mentoring relationship should be tailored to the needs of the mentee, however.


Asunto(s)
Tutoría/normas , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tutoría/ética , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
6.
J Cutan Pathol ; 48(4): 567-571, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885480

RESUMEN

Patients with primary immunodeficiency are at increased risk for malignancy, especially hematologic neoplasms. This paper reports a unique case of a 47-year-old man with X-linked agammaglobulinemia who presented with progressive asymptomatic violaceous papules and plaques on his face, hands, and trunk for 1 year. Skin biopsies revealed deep, nodular infiltrates of histiocytes and CD8-positive lymphocytes, with a CD4:CD8 ratio of 1:10. Laboratory studies showed cytopenias. Flow cytometry in the skin, blood, and bone marrow (BM) showed a CD3+/CD8+/CD57+ large granular lymphocyte population. BM biopsy showed 30% involvement with these atypical T-cells. T-cell gene rearrangement studies of skin, blood, and BM revealed identical T-cell clones. He was diagnosed with T-large granular lymphocyte leukemia (T-LGLL) with an associated CD8+ cutaneous lymphoproliferation. Skin involvement was suspected to represent infiltration by T-LGLL. However, co-existence of two lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs), T-LGLL and CD8+ granulomatous LPD, remains a possibility. In general, cutaneous infiltrates associated with LGLL are rare and poorly understood. It has been suggested that they are markers of poor prognosis. Our case report describes skin, blood, and BM findings in an immunosuppressed patient with T-LGLL in detail. These findings have not yet been reported and their significance requires further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia/genética , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/patología , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/genética , Leucemia Linfocítica Granular Grande/genética , Leucemia Linfocítica Granular Grande/patología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Agammaglobulinemia/complicaciones , Agammaglobulinemia/diagnóstico , Agammaglobulinemia/patología , Biopsia , Médula Ósea/patología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Quimioterapia Combinada , Reordenamiento Génico de Linfocito T , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/complicaciones , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/patología , Histiocitos/patología , Humanos , Imiquimod/administración & dosificación , Imiquimod/uso terapéutico , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Leucemia Linfocítica Granular Grande/complicaciones , Leucemia Linfocítica Granular Grande/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piel/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Community Health ; 45(5): 910-915, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32189211

RESUMEN

Lower vaccination rates in uninsured adults may be related to prohibitive costs of and limited access to vaccines. To compare Tdap and pneumococcal vaccination rates of a student-run free clinic to national averages. A retrospective chart review of 236 adult patients from 05/2017 to 06/2019 was conducted. Vaccine eligibility was determined according to CDC guidelines at the time of the patient visit and according vaccination history by review of medical records. Percent up-to-date was determined by dividing the number of up-to-date individuals by the total number of patients eligible for the vaccine. BRIDGE Healthcare Clinic vaccination rates were near or surpassed national averages. The percent of up-to-date individuals was 63.1% for Tdap, 90% for pneumococcal vaccines in adults 65 or older, and 86.5% for pneumococcal vaccines in high-risk adults 18-64 years. This compares with 2017 national averages of 63.4%, 69%, and 24.5%, respectively (Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Vaccination coverage among adults in the United States, National Health Interview Survey. Retrieved February 8, 2018 from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-managers/coverage/adultvaxview/pubs-resources/NHIS-2017.html#pneumo , 2017). Of the 197 vaccines provided during the course of this study, 184 were provided by the BRIDGE Healthcare Clinic. In conclusion, with the appropriate funding and stewardship, student-run free clinics play a resourceful role in increasing access to preventative health care for uninsured patients.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes no Asegurados , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas Neumococicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudiantes , Estados Unidos
9.
J Community Health ; 45(1): 128-132, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31420789

RESUMEN

Women who lack health insurance have much lower rates of cervical cancer screening and higher rates of cervical cancer than insured women. The current screening rate for insured patients is 86.9%, while the rate for uninsured women is 68.2%. Student-run free clinics may help increase the rates of cervical cancer screening in uninsured women. As screening rates in this setting are uncertain, this study was performed to determine rates of cervical cancer screening at a student-run free clinic, and therefore determine its effectiveness in increasing screening rates in uninsured women. A retrospective chart review was conducted among female patients ages 21-64 at a student-run free clinic to determine how many patients were up-to-date with cervical cancer screening per American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines. A total of 239 women were included in the retrospective chart review. At their most recent visit, 87.9% of clinic patients were up-to-date on cervical cancer screening. This screening rate is higher than both the reported uninsured (68.2%) and insured (86.9%) national screening rates in the United States. Although there are multiple barriers that prevent uninsured patients from undergoing cervical cancer screenings, screening rates at our student-run free clinic are higher than national screening rates. This higher screening rate can be attributed to a standardized screening system, access to resources including Pap tests provided by community partners, and the clinic's ability to longitudinally follow patients. However, there remain areas for improvement, such as reducing no-show rates and ensuring that staff screen for cervical cancer at each visit.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes/normas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes no Asegurados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Adulto Joven
11.
J Community Health ; 45(3): 501-505, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31667647

RESUMEN

Mammography rates among the uninsured are less than half of those among insured patients as reported by American Cancer Society (Breast cancer facts & figures 2017-2018, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, 2017). This may stem from high costs of and limited access to a usual place for health care, which may portend delayed breast cancer diagnoses and poorer outcomes among uninsured women. Student-run free clinics provide opportunities for uninsured patients to establish a medical home, thereby increasing access to preventative health care. The purpose of this study is to determine the rates of breast cancer screening at a student-run free clinic and compare them to national averages. A retrospective chart review was conducted using patients of BRIDGE Healthcare Clinic who were women ages 40-75 years between January 2012 and March 2018. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, date of mammogram, and screening results. A total of 194 women 40 years or older were included in the review. Overall, of the 157 women who were 45 years or older at their most recent visit, 75.5% were up-to-date according to guidelines set forth by the American Cancer Society. These values are well above the reported national rates in insured and uninsured women (21%, 53%, respectively) as reported by American Cancer Society (Breast cancer facts & figures 2017-2018, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, 2017). Of the patients who obtained screening mammograms, 84.5% utilized BRIDGE Healthcare Clinic's program. Volunteer providers are often the sole source of health care for a substantial portion of uninsured patients, who may have unmet preventative health needs. As such, the findings of this study suggest that student-run free clinics play an important role in increasing uninsured patients' access to mammograms. The breast cancer screening program described herein may serve as an example for implementation by other student-run free clinics.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Pacientes no Asegurados , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes , Adulto , Anciano , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudiantes , Estados Unidos
12.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 37(1): 124-129, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31691347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe adverse drug reaction including integumentary and internal organs. An extensive literature review of DRESS in the pediatric population has not been performed. METHODS: A literature search was performed to find reports of pediatric DRESS published between 1997 and March 2019. If not already included, each case was scored based on RegiSCAR criteria. Only "probable" or "definite" cases of DRESS were included in the analysis, totaling 130 cases. RESULTS: In the pediatric population, the average age of diagnosis for DRESS was 8.7 years old. The most common causative drugs include antiepileptics (50%) and antibiotics (30.8%). Time from drug exposure to DRESS presentation averaged 23.8 days. Common clinical symptoms include rash (99.2%) (typically morbilliform (89.2%)), fever (96.2%), eosinophilia (90%), and lymphadenopathy (74.6%). Human herpesvirus-6 reactivation was observed in 16.1% of cases. The most commonly affected internal organ was the liver (80%), followed by the spleen (21.5%) and kidney (15.4%). Management strategies involved, either alone or in combination, included corticosteroids (intravenous 60.8% and oral 41.5%), intravenous immunoglobulins (12.3%), plasmapheresis (2.3%), and ganciclovir (1.5%). Long-term sequelae occurred in 10.8% of patients, most commonly hypothyroidism (3.8%), liver failure (3.1%), and diabetes (2.3%). The mortality rate was 5.4%. CONCLUSION: This literature review highlights the presentation and course of pediatric DRESS. Morbilliform eruption, fever, and eosinophilia appear to be clinical hallmarks of pediatric DRESS. Common causative agents, specifically carbamazepine, are comparable to the adult population. Furthermore, the mortality rate from DRESS is significant and is similar between pediatric and adult patients.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Niño , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Cureus ; 10(7): e2909, 2018 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30186714

RESUMEN

The molecular characterization of solid tumor malignancies with respect to tumorgenesis, risk stratification, and prognostication of chemotherapeutic side effects is multi-faceted. Characterizing these mechanisms requires a detailed understanding of cytogenetics and pharmacology. In addition to the standard palliative care interventions that address issues such as fatigue, neuropathy, performance status, depression, nutrition, cachexia, anxiety, and medical ethics, we must also delve into individual chemotherapy side effects. Comprehending these symptoms is more complex with the advent of broader targeted therapies. With the advent and initiation of Foundation Medicine (FMI) testing, we have been able to tailor regimens to the individual genetics of the patient. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a bioinformatic analysis used in order to create a targeted effort to understand the complex genetics of a vast array of malignancies. Through the process known as high-throughput sequencing we, as clinicians, can obtain more real-time genetic data and incorporate the information into our reasoning process. The process involves a broad manner in which deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence data is obtained including genome sequencing and resequencing, protein-DNA or proteinomics, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-sequencing, ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing, and epigenomic analysis. High-throughput sequencing techniques including single molecule real-time sequencing, ion semiconductor sequencing, pyrose sequencing, sequencing by synthesis, sequencing by ligation, nanopore sequencing, and chain termination (otherwise known as Sanger sequencing) have expanded the realm of NGS and clinicians options.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA