The lack of retropatellar resurfacing at index surgery is significantly associated with failure in patients following patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty: a multi-center study of more than 260 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up following contemporary patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty (PFIA) and to identify potential risk factors for failure in a multi-center study. METHODS: All patients who underwent implantation of PFIA between 09/2009 and 11/2016 at 11 specialized orthopedic referral centers were enrolled in the study and were evaluated retrospectively at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Tegner Scale, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and subjective patient satisfaction. Pre- and perioperative risk factors were compared among failures and non-failures to determine potential risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients (85% follow-up rate) could be enrolled. The mean age at the time of index surgery was 49 ± 12 years with a mean postoperative follow-up of 45 ± 18 months. The overall failure rate was 11% (28 patients), of which 18% (5 patients) were patients with patella resurfacing at index surgery and 82% (23 patients) were patients without initial patella resurfacing. At final follow-up, 93% of the patients who did not fail were satisfied with the procedure with a mean transformed WOMAC Score of 84.5 ± 14.5 points, a mean KOOS Score of 73.3 ± 17.1 points, a mean Tegner Score of 3.4 ± 1.4 points and a mean VAS pain of 2.4 ± 2.0 points. An increased BMI was significantly correlated with a worse postoperative outcome. Concomitant procedures addressing patellofemoral instability or malalignment, the lack of patellofemoral resurfacing at the index surgery and a high BMI were significantly correlated with failure in our patient cohort. CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty shows high patient satisfaction with good functional outcomes at short-term follow-up and thus can be considered a viable treatment option in young patients suffering from isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Patellar resurfacing at index surgery is recommended to decrease the risk of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Mini-arthrotomy for lateral discoid menisci in children.

BACKGROUND: Long-term results after partial, extended, or complete resection of lateral discoid meniscus in children revealed knee arthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the operative approach, arthrotomy or arthroscopy, has an impact on the outcome and the development of arthritis. METHODS: A retrospective comparison of 2 well matching groups totaling 40 children with symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus (48 knees, mean age 8.9 years, 13 male and 27 female patients). Meniscus resection was performed via mini-arthrotomy in group 1 (n=17 patients, 20 knees) and arthroscopically in group 2 (n=23 patients, 28 knees). RESULTS: In the follow-up (mean 57 months in group 1, 62 months in group 2), functional results indicated a trend to better results in the International Knee Documentation Committee score (P=0.12) and in the Lysholm score for group 1 (P=0.13) but not in the Ikeuchi score (P=0.48). The comparison of the radiographic arthritis grading in the follow-up showed no significant arthritis in either group (P=0.22). The overall complication rate was similar in both groups (2/20, 10% in group 1; 3/28, 12% in group 2). CONCLUSIONS: Most likely because of the appropriate visualization of the children's joint and the easier instrumentation, the mini-arthrotomy led to slightly superior results compared with those after arthroscopic resection regarding functional outcome and 5 years after surgery. We can recommend the mini-arthrotomy for the resection of lateral discoid meniscus particularly in young children with narrow joint spaces and for surgeons that are not familiar with arthroscopies of small joints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (therapeutic study, case series with control group).

Intra- and retroperitoneal irrigation liquid after arthroscopy of the hip joint.

The case of intra- and retroperitoneal irrigation solution after hip arthroscopy of a 15-year-old girl is presented. She underwent hip arthroscopy for intra-articular adhesiolysis after previous surgical dislocation of the hip for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy was performed in the lateral decubitus position without traction to debride the peripheral joint compartment. The irrigation pressure was set at 40 mm Hg. There were no intraoperative complications. By the end of surgery, the anesthesiologist reported a drop in the patient's body temperature from 36.3 degrees to 34.5 degrees C. Postoperatively, she complained about abdominal swelling and discomfort. Abdominal sonography revealed approximately 2 to 3 L of intra- and retroperitoneal liquid, which was considered to be irrigation fluid. The irrigation fluid was absorbed within 16 hours without further treatment. The only possible way the irrigation fluid could have flown was a retroperitoneal course along the iliopsoas muscle and the iliac vessels with intraperitoneal perforation along their course. We observed at arthroscopies that irrigation pressure incidentally can rise to 140 mm Hg when leaking of fluid through the portals occurs. Intra-abdominal fluid is a potentially devastating complication. A sudden drop of body temperature has to raise suspicion for intra-abdominal leaking of irrigation fluid.