Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Liver Transplantation: A 10-year Study on 685 Liver Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is not widely used for postoperative pain management in liver transplantation due to hepatic coagulopathy-related increased risk of inducing an epidural hematoma. However, an increasing number of patients are transplanted for other indications than the end-stage liver disease and without coagulopathy allowing insertion of an epidural catheter. METHODS: This study is a retrospective observational single-center study of all adult patients undergoing first-time liver transplantation at Oslo University Hospital between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. Data regarding patient characteristics were obtained from the Nordic liver transplant registry, medical records, and pain registration forms. Patients without coagulopathy (international normalized ratio <1.5 and platelets >100 × 109/L) were eligible for TEA. RESULTS: Out of 685 first-time liver transplantations in a 10-year period, 327 received TEA, and 358 did not. The median Model of End-stage Liver Disease score was lower in the TEA group than in the non-TEA-group (9 versus 17, P < 0.001), and fewer patients were hospitalized preoperatively (16 versus 127, P < 0.001). The median international normalized ratio (1.1 versus 1.6, P < 0.001) and platelet count (190 versus 78, P < 0.001) were different between the TEA and non-TEA groups. There were no serious complications related to insertion or removal of the TEA catheters. Patients in the TEA group had less pain with a mean numeric rating scale at postoperative days 0-5 of 1.4 versus 1.8 (P = 0.008). Nearly 50% of the patients were prescribed opioids when discharged from hospital (non-TEA 154 versus TEA 158, P = 0.23), and there was no difference after 1 year (P = 0.718). CONCLUSIONS: Our report revealed very good pain control with both TEA and the non-TEA modality. TEA was without any serious complications like epidural hematoma or infection/abscess in selected liver transplant recipients without severe coagulopathy. Opioid prescription at hospital discharge and by 1-year follow-up did not differ between the groups.

Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Open Liver Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial to investigate if intravenous, multimodal, patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) could be noninferior to multimodal thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in patients undergoing open liver surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The increasing use of minimally invasive techniques and fast track protocols have questioned the position of epidural analgesia as the optimal method of pain management after abdominal surgery. METHODS: Patients operated with open liver resection between February 2012 and February 2016 were randomly assigned to receive either IV-PCA enhanced with ketorolac/diclofenac (IV-PCA, n = 66) or TEA (n = 77) within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Noninferiority would be declared if the mean pain score on the numeric rating scale (NRS) for postoperative days (PODs) 0 to 5 in the IV-PCA group was no worse than the mean pain score in the TEA group by a margin of <1 point on an 11-point scale (0-10). RESULTS: The primary endpoint, mean NRS pain score was 1.7 in the IV-PCA group and 1.6 in the TEA group, establishing noninferiority. Pain scores were lower in the TEA group on PODs 0 and 1, but higher or equal on PODs 2 and 5. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients in the IV-PCA group (74 vs 104 h, P < 0.001). The total opioid consumption during the first 3 days was significantly lower in the IV-PCA group. CONCLUSIONS: IV-PCA was noninferior to TEA for the treatment of postoperative pain in patients undergoing open liver resection.

A patient with solid gynecologic cancer causing lactic acidosis, severe hypercalcemia, and hypoglycemia.

Though rare in cervical cancer patients, paraneoplastic syndrome usually presents with several endocrine and hormonal symptoms. Knowledge of the pathophysiology that underlies these abnormalities is beneficial to diagnosis and treatment. An interdisciplinary approach and test analysis prior to initiating specific treatment is recommended, though prognosis appears poor in advanced cases.

Validation of a Holographic Display for Quantification of Mitral Annular Dynamics by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography with multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) is used clinically to quantify the mitral annulus. MPR images are, however, presented on a two-dimensional screen, calling into question their accuracy. An alternative to MPR is an autostereoscopic holographic display that enables in-depth visualization of 3D echocardiographic data without the need for special glasses. The aim of this study was to validate an autostereoscopic display using sonomicrometry as a gold standard. METHODS: In 11 anesthetized open-chest pigs, sonomicrometric crystals were placed along the mitral annulus and near the left ventricular apex. High-fidelity catheters measured left atrial and ventricular pressures. Adjustments of pre- and afterload were done by constriction of the inferior vena cava and the ascending aorta, respectively. Three-dimensional epicardial echocardiography was obtained from an apical view and converted to the autostereoscopic display. A 3D virtual semitransparent annular surface (VSAS) was generated to measure commissure width (CW), septal-lateral length, area of the mitral annular surface, nonplanarity angle, and the annular height-to-commissure width ratio in mid-systole and late diastole. RESULTS: Mitral annular measurements from the 3D VSAS derived from the 3D echocardiographic images and autostereoscopic display correlated well with sonomicrometry over a range of loading conditions: CW length (r = 0.98, P < .00001), septal-lateral length (r = 0.98, P < .00001), annular surface area (r = 0.93, P < .001), nonplanarity angle (r = 0.87, P < .001), and annular height-to-commissure width ratio (r = 0.85, P < .01). The 3D VSAS showed better agreement with the sonomicrometric measurements compared with MPR. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral annular measurements using 3D VSAS correlate well with sonomicrometry over a range of loading conditions and may represent a powerful tool for noninvasive quantification of mitral annular dynamics.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To perform the first randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic and open liver resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic liver resection is increasingly used for the surgical treatment of liver tumors. However, high-level evidence to conclude that laparoscopic liver resection is superior to open liver resection is lacking. METHODS: Explanatory, assessor-blinded, single center, randomized superiority trial recruiting patients from Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway from February 2012 to January 2016. A total of 280 patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic (n = 133) or open (n = 147) parenchyma-sparing liver resection. The primary outcome was postoperative complications within 30 days (Accordion grade 2 or higher). Secondary outcomes included cost-effectiveness, postoperative hospital stay, blood loss, operation time, and resection margins. RESULTS: The postoperative complication rate was 19% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 31% in the open-surgery group (12 percentage points difference [95% confidence interval 1.67-21.8; P = 0.021]). The postoperative hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic surgery (53 vs 96 hours, P < 0.001), whereas there were no differences in blood loss, operation time, and resection margins. Mortality at 90 days did not differ significantly from the laparoscopic group (0 patients) to the open group (1 patient). In a 4-month perspective, the costs were equal, whereas patients in the laparoscopic-surgery group gained 0.011 quality-adjusted life years compared to patients in the open-surgery group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing parenchyma-sparing liver resection for colorectal metastases, laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly less postoperative complications compared to open surgery. Laparoscopic resection was cost-effective compared to open resection with a 67% probability. The rate of free resection margins was the same in both groups. Our results support the continued implementation of laparoscopic liver resection.

Continuous molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment in 69 patients listed for liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is used to purify blood from albumin-bound toxins in patients with liver failure. However, the application of MARS has not demonstrated improved survival in randomized clinical trials and the clinical utility has not been finally established. In our department, the use of MARS is now restricted to the most critically ill patients with acute or acute on chronic liver failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 2005, we have treated 69 patients (30 males/39 females with median age of 49 years ranging from 1 months to 70 years) listed for liver transplantation (LT) with MARS. Median model of end-stage liver disease score in patients older than 12 years of age (n = 56) was 33 (interquartile range 26-39). The flow rate was 35-40 mL/kg/h and treatment kits were changed every 8-12 h. The patients were treated for a median of 27 h (range 1-144 h). RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (81%) were transplanted. Nine died before they could be transplanted, and four patients recovered without transplantation. Forty-six (82%) of the transplanted patients were alive 30 days after transplantation. Ammonium decreased modestly from a median of 148 to 124 µM (p = 0.03) during MARS treatment. We detected worsening of coagulopathy with significant decreases in platelet count and fibrinogen concentrations, and increase in International Normalized Ratio. Phosphate and magnesium decreased significantly during MARS treatment. CONCLUSION: Continuous MARS therapy may bridge liver failure patients to LT under close observation and treatment of coagulopathy and electrolyte disturbances.

Liver transplantation for nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the potential for long-term overall survival (OS) after liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). BACKGROUND: Patients with nonresectable CLMs have poor prognosis, and few survive beyond 5 years. CLMs are currently considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation, although liver transplantation for primary and some secondary liver malignancies shows excellent outcome in selected patients. Before 1995, several liver transplantations for CLMs were performed, but outcome was poor (5-year survival rate: 18%) and liver transplantation for CLMs was abandoned. Since then, the survival rate after liver transplantation in general has improved by almost 30%. On the basis of this, a 5-year survival rate of about 50% after liver transplantation for CLMs could be anticipated. METHODS: In a prospective pilot study, liver transplantation for nonresectable CLMs was performed (n = 21). Main inclusion criteria were liver-only CLMs, excised primary tumors, and at least 6 weeks of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimates of the OS rate at 1, 3, and 5 years were 95%, 68%, and 60%, respectively. Metastatic recurrence of disease was common (mainly pulmonary). However, a significant proportion of the recurrences were accessible for surgery, and at follow-up (after median of 27 months; range, 8-60), 33% had no evidence of disease. Hepatic tumor load before liver transplantation, time from primary surgery to liver transplantation, and progressive disease on chemotherapy were identified as significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: OS exceeds by far reported outcome for chemotherapy, which is the only treatment option available for this patient group. Furthermore, OS is comparable with liver resection for resectable CLMs and survival after repeat liver transplantation for nonmalignant diseases. Selection strategies based on prognostic factors may further improve the outcome (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01311453).